NoVA SugarBabies

[Mross86]

Wants to start slowly and online first, open to more later on.

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...f-362933645222

[Mross86]

When I first got into this some years ago, I (I guess naively) thought it was going to be more like the traditional sugar dating (and started because that style appealed to me). My first few were actually like that. Now I'll run a search on here, or think I've got a low volume one. Only to have someone be like "hey, anyone seen X?" and a bunch of you say you have LOL.

As someone already said before, we are all "eskimo brothers" LOL.

[TomFordModel]

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-bafa634330cc

Anyone hitting this? I saw her on tinder so she lives on the md side.

[Senbonzakura]

I'll tell you one thing though, back in 2016, when I started dipping into the Sugar dating, both Seeking Arrangements and Secret Benefits (I didn't use SDM back then) were completely different and more in line with traditional sugar dating. Now, some might disagree, but we are just a niche area under the large prostitution umbrella with very blurry lines that separate us as a unique area.

When I first got into this some years ago, I (I guess naively) thought it was going to be more like the traditional sugar dating (and started because that style appealed to me). My first few were actually like that. Now I'll run a search on here, or think I've got a low volume one. Only to have someone be like "hey, anyone seen X?" and a bunch of you say you have LOL.

[Mross86]

That is basically correct. You need to first buy a package of "credits. " E. G. , $150 for 500 credits (= $0. 30 a credit). You then offer a date to those you chose, and name a price for the date, e. G. , $200. If the girl accepts, then you can (1) text her (and get charged "credits" based on the amount you offered for the date. E. g. , a $300 date offer you will be charged 60 credits to message her, a $50 date offer and you will be charged 10 credits to message her), or (2) not next her (and you are charged nothing). Thus, you MUST become very selective about who you message.

There are a lot of "rinsers" or "M&G girls" on the site,. Girls who go on a date every night, collect their cash, and then disappear. I just watch the site for a few days and they are easy to pick out because they are always on. But there are several GND types who would like the sugar lifestyle, but don't want to commit to anyone until they have met them. They are RARE, but I have met several over the years, a couple of which lasted a couple of years. I am selective as well, and don't mind paying for a few dates to find the right fit because I want something longer term. Others disagree with this strategy, but that is how I have found the lower-volume SBs.

Seeking has a MUCH higher volume of hot girls (maybe 50 x more). But it also has a lot higher volume of pros and catfish and rinsers as well. The last thing I will say is that the "credits" do not expire. Once I find a good SB, I get off the site, and when I return months / years later, the credits are still there.

Got it. In your case I think WYP will work very well. I was exactly like you few years ago when I had 3 SBs over the span of 5 years, all long term relationships. That's a rarity these days and sort of a dying breed I think. The sites I'm currently using (Seeking, SB and SDM) are filled with Pros and even the genuine SBs there are very high volume. No knock on them though, as most of us here are also more contained with short term flings or transactional encounters and honestly I get bored with some of these girls pretty quick (and I think most of our brothers here are same way). In most cases, beyond the good looks and the sex, there is literally nothing else that would keep the interest going with most of these chicks, so once those things wear off, and they always do, you are ready to move on to the next one.

I'll tell you one thing though, back in 2016, when I started dipping into the Sugar dating, both Seeking Arrangements and Secret Benefits (I didn't use SDM back then) were completely different and more in line with traditional sugar dating. Now, some might disagree, but we are just a niche area under the large prostitution umbrella with very blurry lines that separate us as a unique area.

[AdcFellow]

Thanks, the way I understood it before was you get a date (pretty much pay for bit upfront) and then figure out the specifics and most of the chicks want it to be a dinner out. From there, you can try to get to the next stage. So to me it seemed like paid M&G. Another dude in the past told me that, he's been using it for so long and can see the signs if the girl is interested in hooking up and only bids on those and he's upfront (e. G. The date is in a hotel and the agreed price is the price etc.). I do see pros and cons with it. One of these days might give it a try.

That is basically correct. You need to first buy a package of "credits. " E. G. , $150 for 500 credits (= $0. 30 a credit). You then offer a date to those you chose, and name a price for the date, e. G. , $200. If the girl accepts, then you can (1) text her (and get charged "credits" based on the amount you offered for the date. E. g. , a $300 date offer you will be charged 60 credits to message her, a $50 date offer and you will be charged 10 credits to message her), or (2) not next her (and you are charged nothing). Thus, you MUST become very selective about who you message.

There are a lot of "rinsers" or "M&G girls" on the site,. Girls who go on a date every night, collect their cash, and then disappear. I just watch the site for a few days and they are easy to pick out because they are always on. But there are several GND types who would like the sugar lifestyle, but don't want to commit to anyone until they have met them. They are RARE, but I have met several over the years, a couple of which lasted a couple of years. I am selective as well, and don't mind paying for a few dates to find the right fit because I want something longer term. Others disagree with this strategy, but that is how I have found the lower-volume SBs.

Seeking has a MUCH higher volume of hot girls (maybe 50 x more). But it also has a lot higher volume of pros and catfish and rinsers as well. The last thing I will say is that the "credits" do not expire. Once I find a good SB, I get off the site, and when I return months / years later, the credits are still there.

[TonySop]

Anyone sampled this one? Sounds very high maintenance. I didn't see any recent reviews on the forum.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...7-8033b0d50196

[Starwood1982]

I'm trying to DM you. Can you clear your box?

Cleared, go ahead.

[Mross86]

Actually, it seems like she's still active. Saw her profile on SB and it's showing as being online. She magically age reversed there to 24. Also I don't think she still with that guy as usually in the past he would have reacted immediately and given the fact people are still talking about it, I'm assuming there has been no reaction from his end. To your point, he probably eventually figured out that he was dating a cum dumpster and jumped ship. Anyhow, she's not really worthy of any extra attention anyhow so I'll drop this now.

I'm trying to DM you. Can you clear your box?

[Sammajamma]

Yeah, don't think she's worth 800, but if she's firm on that ask, that means someone is likely already paying it.

As a side note, I didn't bother negotiating any further so not sure if she would be willing to settle somewhere between 400 and 800.

[Mross86]

Mixed results. There are a very limited number of new people on the site, but the odds of getting a date (if you find someone you are interested in) is higher. Actually hooking up takes a lot more work.

Thanks, the way I understood it before was you get a date (pretty much pay for bit upfront) and then figure out the specifics and most of the chicks want it to be a dinner out. From there, you can try to get to the next stage. So to me it seemed like paid M&G. Another dude in the past told me that, he's been using it for so long and can see the signs if the girl is interested in hooking up and only bids on those and he's upfront (e. G. The date is in a hotel and the agreed price is the price etc.). I do see pros and cons with it. One of these days might give it a try.

[Mross86]

Spoke to her for couple of weeks in August. DTF but big gap between ask and offer. I offered 400 ppm and she was looking for 800. Others came up in the 400-t00 range at the time so I just dropped her.

Yeah, don't think she's worth 800, but if she's firm on that ask, that means someone is likely already paying it.

[TomFordModel]

No, she responded she's worth at least double that amount, and offering a discount already. I respectfully disagreed and moved on. If someone's willing to pay 800 she's DTF but in my opinion, 500 is a ceiling for her.

She's crazy. Chunky AF the only thing she has going for her is she's white and blonde. In south Florida. People would be offering her 300. She should take whatever in DC because we have the highest concentration of simps overpaying.

[AdcFellow]

Not on my end, but out of curiosity how has your experience been on WYP? That's probably one of the very few sites I'm not using. Primarily because I've heard dudes constantly complaining that most of the chicks on it are just looking for free dinners and a handout and they bail right after and block you or ghost you.

Mixed results. There are a very limited number of new people on the site, but the odds of getting a date (if you find someone you are interested in) is higher. Actually hooking up takes a lot more work.

[Flipper69]

Did she accept the counter offer?

No, she responded she's worth at least double that amount, and offering a discount already. I respectfully disagreed and moved on. If someone's willing to pay 800 she's DTF but in my opinion, 500 is a ceiling for her.