Sugar Daddy Sites

**Vevor12-shill** · 09-22-26 06:08

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

Word. Hopefully he doesn't get broken if the money ever runs out. If it does. That will be the true test.

Naw, he is good for a bit, his 30 bitcoin isn't going anywhere or so I am told. Mf invested in that back in 2016. Even bc is down from their magic 6 digits a few years back, he is still very much well off to support his "g / f".

**Vevor12-shill** · 09-22-26 06:06

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

My man. I've been in this game for a long damn time. And not just the sugaring game like some of you cats here. The argument is not from my end. It's from the sugarbabies end.

Technically when any woman accepts cash for a sexual act. Even if just one time. That's technically prostitution in the laws eyes. You take that information as you will. But that's clear cut. Sugarbabies just don't usually want to admit to that. And that's fine. I don't really care as long as I get into those panties. I play along.

I'm here just to keep some of you youngins with a mindful eye. And some of you older dudes, than me, that can be suckered too. I'm in my early 50's. But I've seen a lot of shit, enough for a few lifetimes.

Everyone is so hung up on labels and names, you are 100% right on that money thing my friend. Sugerbabes and even OF special times are the same, just prostitution with extra steps toss in. As long it is with 2 consenting adults, who gives a crap what label it is, at the end of the day it is either going to cost me few benji from my clip or I am out of a PS5 for a good time. I played the sugarbabes games to dib my toes in, I don't know maybe the girl I got was too needy, it gave me a bad taste for it. When I don't have to travel as much I might consider going back for more young 20 year old that is not asian.

**Vevor12-shill** · 09-22-26 05:59

Originally Posted by Floraly808 [View Original Post]

They are just escorts with a different category tag is what this is, with some spice toss in.

At the end of the day, these sexy babes are sitting on an ATM, and when they need money, they just get us to swipe our dicks in and money comes out LOL.

**Nother Monger** · 09-21-26 21:32

Originally Posted by Vevor12 [View Original Post]

100% with that, but I tried to tell a friend of mine that's paying 3 g a month to this sugar babies and think she is his real girlfriend, and the money is just him supporting his girl for "not working" and do nothing much else but go dates with him.

Real GF's don't take money just to chill or go out to eat. GF's might expect / hope that their BF will pay for a meal / buy them shit, but it's not transactional like sugaring.

Speaking of which, recently met up with a girl (https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-6fda59048938) for some coffee. She seemed to be OK but then right at the end she hit me up with a "I need to go run some errands and make myself pretty" BS and then asked if I can help out with that. Say what? When I was talking to her before we met, there was no mention of $ for a meet and greet. It's one thing to say that you want $$ upfront for a meet and greet, but to pull that shit all of a sudden? I don't carry a lot of cash so whatever.

**Lexx1** · 09-21-26 20:15

Originally Posted by Vevor12 [View Original Post]

100% with that, but I tried to tell a friend of mine that's paying 3 g a month to this sugar babies and think she is his real girlfriend, and the money is just him supporting his girl for "not working" and do nothing much else but go dates with him.

Word. Hopefully he doesn't get broken if the money ever runs out. If it does. That will be the true test.

**Lexx1** · 09-21-26 20:12

Originally Posted by Vevor12 [View Original Post]

Sugar babes are good to have if you just want local talent, sometimes, but rarely, sometimes they do go exclusive status with you. That argument is like arguing escorts are not prostitutes because the word came with too much negative and prostitutes are refers to street walkers in escort's eyes LOL.

My man. I've been in this game for a long damn time. And not just the sugaring game like some of you cats here. The argument is not from my end. It's from the sugarbabies end.

Technically when any woman accepts cash for a sexual act. Even if just one time. That's technically prostitution in the laws eyes. You take that information as you will. But that's clear cut. Sugarbabies just don't usually want to admit to that. And that's fine. I don't really care as long as I get into those panties. I play along.

I'm here just to keep some of you youngins with a mindful eye. And some of you older dudes, than me, that can be suckered too. I'm in my early 50's. But I've seen a lot of shit, enough for a few lifetimes.

**Vevor12-shill** · 09-21-26 19:44

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

Exactly Grail. These girls aren't REAL girlfriends. You are PAYING them for their time. While we do pay always, in other ways, while trying to find true love. You don't pay for it directly like you do with sugarbabies or non-pros..

100% with that, but I tried to tell a friend of mine that's paying 3 g a month to this sugar babies and think she is his real girlfriend, and the money is just him supporting his girl for "not working" and do nothing much else but go dates with him.

**Vevor12-shill** · 09-21-26 19:41

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

Best to keep that to yourself though. Most sugarbabies / non-pros do not see themselves as escorts / ho's. If you ever tell them that. Be ready to get smacked or lose that girl or a lecture from them. LOL.

Sugar babes are good to have if you just want local talent, sometimes, but rarely, sometimes they do go exclusive status with you. That argument is like arguing escorts are not prostitutes because the word came with too much negative and prostitutes are refers to street walkers in escort's eyes LOL.

**Lexx1** · 09-21-26 19:17

Originally Posted by Floraly808 [View Original Post]

They are just escorts with a different category tag is what this is, with some spice toss in.

Best to keep that to yourself though. Most sugarbabies / non-pros do not see themselves as escorts / ho's. If you ever tell them that. Be ready to get smacked or lose that girl or a lecture from them. LOL.

**Floraly808** · 09-21-26 18:42

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

Exactly Grail. These girls aren't REAL girlfriends. You are PAYING them for their time. While we do pay always, in other ways, while trying to find true love. You don't pay for it directly like you do with sugarbabies or non-pros.

There was a member on here that had a good analogy on this with dinner at a restaurant. The dinner and table I think represented the girl. And the sugardaddy was the patron. You are only there for a short time for dinner at that table. But that table can obviously have many patrons. You aren't the only one. You aren't the only one with a reservation at that table.

They are just escorts with a different category tag is what this is, with some spice toss in.

**HiImJeff** · 09-21-26 16:30

Originally Posted by Godre737 [View Original Post]

Good on you. FWIW, it could be that she blocked you and so you only think she deleted her profile. I have an SB that I see regularly, and I thought she deleted her account also, but I have a backup free account on seeking that I use for different searches, and I saw her profile was still live and active LOL. Go figure.

So it might be worth it to have someone check her account for you.

Yeah I get that, but I watched her delete it LOL. Apparently she really hates using seeking, if we want to believe her LOL.

**Lexx1** · 09-21-26 15:26

Originally Posted by Grail47 [View Original Post]

Yeah, but if she wants to see another SD, that's her autonomous choice, no need to covertly stalk her profile. I mean, it's pretty much assumed that any given SD is usually seeing at least a few SB's, so why not allow the same for the SB's, unless exclusivity is specifically agreed upon.

Exactly Grail. These girls aren't REAL girlfriends. You are PAYING them for their time. While we do pay always, in other ways, while trying to find true love. You don't pay for it directly like you do with sugarbabies or non-pros.

There was a member on here that had a good analogy on this with dinner at a restaurant. The dinner and table I think represented the girl. And the sugardaddy was the patron. You are only there for a short time for dinner at that table. But that table can obviously have many patrons. You aren't the only one. You aren't the only one with a reservation at that table.

**Grail47** · 09-21-26 14:58

Originally Posted by Godre737 [View Original Post]

Good on you. FWIW, it could be that she blocked you and so you only think she deleted her profile. I have an SB that I see regularly, and I thought she deleted her account also, but I have a backup free account on seeking that I use for different searches, and I saw her profile was still live and active LOL. Go figure.

So it might be worth it to have someone check her account for you.

Yeah, but if she wants to see another SD, that's her autonomous choice, no need to covertly stalk her profile. I mean, it's pretty much assumed that any given SD is usually seeing at least a few SB's, so why not allow the same for the SB's, unless exclusivity is specifically agreed upon.

**Godre737** · 09-21-26 14:53

Good on you. FWIW, it could be that she blocked you and so you only think she deleted her profile. I have an SB that I see regularly, and I thought she deleted her account also, but I have a backup free account on seeking that I use for different searches, and I saw her profile was still live and active LOL. Go figure.

So it might be worth it to have someone check her account for you.

Originally Posted by HiImJeff [View Original Post]

My new SB says I'm the only one she's seeing and maybe I'm stupid or nave but I believe her. She deleted her seeking account and this girl is literally online playing videogames with me right now.

It's been discussed on here recently that a lot of dudes on seeking do not know how to talk to women without being assholes or creeps. Apparently she's only seen one other guy from seeking and it was negative enough for her to give up on it. I won purely out of not being creepy and being nice to her LOL.

**SugarLifeNow** · 09-20-26 10:53

Hey everyone, new fun SLN girl in Irvine, her name is Stella and she is 21. A bit hard to get info from her, but she says she is open to anything including anal. Her favorite position is doggie and she likes giving head, deep-throat is not a problem. She also likes girls and would be interested in 3 sums, both MFF and MFM. She wants condoms for everything, but will do BBFS for a bigger allowance. Looking for a low to mid range PPM allowance.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/stellaa_

Join Team SLN and get a free membership. PM me for details.

Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites

Thread Tools

SugarLifeNow

Posting Limitations