Korean Agency BB

**PumpNDump** · 08-10-26 08:49

BookerM. New meat Tatianna, Baby Kylie, Baby Ellie. Baby Cupid and Rozy back on menu in mw.

Rokm. Ch /.

**IkeBuny** · 08-09-26 12:02

I don't know Vulcan, my experience with Areum was great. She does talk a lot, but that was pretty cute. She didn't try to cockblock at all, maybe you are more well-endowed than me LOL.

Had a great time, and she was all over me making sure I was pleased, and very energetic. She's fit and young spinner and a welcome change among the old Latinas and real aunties charging nearly 400 in PV these days.

Overall I had a great time and I am going to repeat.

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

Clearly SD's standard of service queen vs LA's are different. Should have waited for your review here.

MM not that great on a medium B, not even C. Body is normal, not wow like many raving reviews.

It was a lot of unnecessary talking, cock blocking (closing up her leg when I go deep), fast changing position (right when I felt something she stop) and gets tired fast.

She is the only girl this year so far that I couldn't cum due to all the turn offs.

Anyway, should have waited for more insight from L. A, took one for the team.

**Vulcan1009** · 08-09-26 02:37

Originally Posted by JackHolly [View Original Post]

I agree about the different standards. I saw Ella, Areum, and Hannah, separately, a couple months ago, and at the time, those seemed to be the top reviewed K-girls in SD. I didn't have a bad time with any of them, but for me, personally, they were all just ok. I've clicked with most of the K-girls I've seen over the years (mostly in LA, OC, Vegas, and Honolulu), and I didn't click with any of them. Could've just been me not clicking with them. That said, there was nothing wrong with them at all in terms of looks or service (or pricing. The 340-380 price point is awesome), and I don't think anyone would have a bad time with them.

I think the different standards are kind of like how the one sushi restaurant in some town in the middle of nowhere in a flyover state might get rave reviews, but wouldn't hold a candle to a sushi place in a major city. At least when I was seeing the three girls down in SD a couple months ago, there were only like 4-8 K-girls in SD, compared to the 100+ in LA and OC. But over the past few months, we've seen a huge push by all the bookers big and small (CGLA, LGP, RokM, Get9, etc.) in to San Diego, so I'm guessing we'll see a huge influx of K-girls in San Diego over the next year or so. As long as the pricing doesn't go up (or comes down! That'll be good for everyone.

There are multiple factors why girls don't go to SD, 1st, their rate is lower, 2nd low density of population, 3rd too many cheap Latina easy to come by, 4th too many retiree are on budget, 5th too close to TJ, 6th not much to do when they are off a week for their period. Yes they tour around but L. A still get the most opportunity and but most competitive on looks, skills and highest price vs SF and SD. Somehow we are more expensive than both other city in CA.

**CumSquat** · 08-07-26 23:25

Originally Posted by TfssdBoy [View Original Post]

I was just fascinated with someone new. She was the kind of woman I was looking for, decent MM.

Lets you CIP, fairly decent session, nice body and she provides good service. I had decent shower with good amount.

Of BBBJ and BT, fun in the bedroom and just overall good from start to CIP. Would see her again.

Can we get more deets on age / looks / physique?

**SsStuntCock** · 08-07-26 19:46

Originally Posted by Kaamper [View Original Post]

I'm noticing two upcoming KGirls (B. Vox and B. Rina) that are advertising $420 BBFS as "Special". While $420 is on the lower end of standard upcharge rates, the true "special" girls are less than $400 for BBFSCIP. It seems to me this is less of a special rate and more like trying to normalize higher prices. If we call prices in a normal range "special" then "normal" becomes a higher price. I haven't seen either one of them, but I'll pass on these two.

I like where your heads at. I've never been a fan of normalizing upcharges and above-market rates. That being said, I think the "special" label merely means they're upcharging less than a hundo for bb.

**PumpNDump** · 08-07-26 11:21

Kbliss Friday fun.

Maya Sharon Keily playa vista. Yami Enjin Emery wilshire Angel K. Kona Seoah in oc.

**Heisenberg69** · 08-07-26 09:21

I was intrigued with Becca's menu so I made the appointment. Pictures are her except they are photoshopped to make her seem flawless. She instant kissed and walked me in. We showered and there was some preview. Then onto the bed and I bent her over and she knew and started lubing me and her. Went real slow for greek. Took some time to get it in and for her to adjust. Man she was tight, felt like it was choking jr. Surprising she was game for a few different positions. Blew deep inside and rested. She cleaned me up and round 2 started. Went through mutltiple positions but I just could not finish. Time was up and so I showered and left. She was a good time, lots of dfk and tries hard to please. On my way out I can hear her roomate getting pummeled by one of you dudes.

**TfssdBoy** · 08-06-26 22:43

I was just fascinated with someone new. She was the kind of woman I was looking for, decent MM.

Lets you CIP, fairly decent session, nice body and she provides good service. I had decent shower with good amount.

Of BBBJ and BT, fun in the bedroom and just overall good from start to CIP. Would see her again.

**CreamFire** · 08-06-26 21:11

Anyone seen Emma? Seems to have good reviews from Tee E are.

https://bookergray.com/la/Emma12/?sca=WLA

**JackHolly** · 08-06-26 15:54

She's listed at CGLA, RokM, etc. (interestingly, listed as 360 for one hour and 320 for half hour at CGLA but is listed at 350 for one hour and 300 for half hour at RokM).

As usual, I assume her photos are fake / edited, but if they're even somewhat close to reality, I'd be interesting in seeing her. I couldn't find any reviews on TER for her, and with the three-letter name, I couldn't do a search here.

**JackHolly** · 08-06-26 15:34

I agree about the different standards. I saw Ella, Areum, and Hannah, separately, a couple months ago, and at the time, those seemed to be the top reviewed K-girls in SD. I didn't have a bad time with any of them, but for me, personally, they were all just ok. I've clicked with most of the K-girls I've seen over the years (mostly in LA, OC, Vegas, and Honolulu), and I didn't click with any of them. Could've just been me not clicking with them. That said, there was nothing wrong with them at all in terms of looks or service (or pricing. The 340-380 price point is awesome), and I don't think anyone would have a bad time with them.

I think the different standards are kind of like how the one sushi restaurant in some town in the middle of nowhere in a flyover state might get rave reviews, but wouldn't hold a candle to a sushi place in a major city. At least when I was seeing the three girls down in SD a couple months ago, there were only like 4-8 K-girls in SD, compared to the 100+ in LA and OC. But over the past few months, we've seen a huge push by all the bookers big and small (CGLA, LGP, RokM, Get9, etc.) in to San Diego, so I'm guessing we'll see a huge influx of K-girls in San Diego over the next year or so. As long as the pricing doesn't go up (or comes down! That'll be good for everyone.

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

Anyone from L. A seen Areum yet? X's reference seem raving, not sure if she did have a big tits but seems ass to waist ratio is great.

Service over look but seem bang-able? I don't know guys, who saw her?

FYI, I think the SD raving reviews are different standards vs. LA, seem like L.A have higher standards.

Thanks!!

**CumSquat** · 08-06-26 15:25

Originally Posted by PumpNDump [View Original Post]

BookerM. New Hannah and Leah.

Rokm. Ch.

With B. Winter gone, how do the other non-upcharge new girls like Hannah et al. Stack up?

**Kaamper** · 08-06-26 15:11

I'm noticing two upcoming KGirls (B. Vox and B. Rina) that are advertising $420 BBFS as "Special". While $420 is on the lower end of standard upcharge rates, the true "special" girls are less than $400 for BBFSCIP. It seems to me this is less of a special rate and more like trying to normalize higher prices. If we call prices in a normal range "special" then "normal" becomes a higher price. I haven't seen either one of them, but I'll pass on these two.

**NotHobbyPro** · 08-06-26 11:59

After seeing some negative comments on Areum, I got curious if Ariana is any better? Old reviews seemed positive but if anyone saw her recently, did she keep the good qualities?