Rubrankings.com
Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts

Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls in OC

+ Add Report
Page 7 of 242 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 57 107 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 3617
Because You Want The Best
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #3527
    Quote Originally Posted by Osori84  [View Original Post]
    Price drops should come from the Bosses or Bookers, the girls at the incall do all the work / heavy lifting!
    I've started being a bit more honest lately. The girls are being told that it's slow right now because of World Cup. I laugh every time I hear this. Maybe the logic here is that guys are losing money on World Cup wagering? I don't think 20% of OC is traveling to World Cup venues across America.

    There was a girl that started a couple weeks ago that was charging 360+100. (she's gone now) she was nice and had great service but a bit older and looks was about a 6. 5 to me. I told her straight up she would be much busier if she did bb special or reduce to 320. She said something about boss setting rate and how all the other costs have gone up etc etc. It's probably true but at almost $500/ hr I need to have an amazing session with a girl in her 20's who I have to double take to make sure she's not a K-pop star. Ok maybe not that good but you get the point.

    If the new norm is going to be $500/ hr for average looking women in their mid to late 30's, there's not going to be much traffic and there certainly isn't going to be many / any repeats.

  2. #3526

    Just the way I see it, IMO

    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    That's fair. Moving on.

    A lot of the 4. 4/4. 5 have told me it's slow. I tell them economy is not so good but what I really want to say is they need to drop their pricing. I'm too chicken shit to tell them. Who wants to be the man. LOL.
    Price drops should come from the Bosses or Bookers, the girls at the incall do all the work / heavy lifting!

  3. #3525

    I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    She enjoyed a day at the pool for the 4th holiday. We see each other doing the walk of shame, we're no lookers despite them telling us we're handsome or we look like a prince. Give the girl a break. There's other legitimate stuff to critic her but not a tan from a day in the sun. LOL.
    Yea, everyone has their preferences but to point that out. From my perspective, she was light skin to me. I think that goes the same with those who said J Saki was tan. Both light skin and beautiful, along with their great body, youth, personality and service. What's their to complain.

  4. #3524

    +1 Agree Runa = Young CYA

    Quote Originally Posted by JackShackHuntr  [View Original Post]
    New J-girl Baby Runa landed in OC. I say run to see B. Runa! Full PLEASER coming soon but here's the gist of it:

    Young, CYA+ GND, early twenties (20-23). Claims 21; booker says real age 21. Believable. Incredible physiquevery lean with subtle ab definition, especially in missionary with legs back. Skinny to Skinny+ build, enough ass to give two handfuls, natural A to small B cups. HYA+ Service, a lot of eye contact during BBBJ. LFK over DFK.

    Baby Runa = Baby Airi / Miyu, not the same person but equivalent in performance and looks.

    Baby Runa

    https://gangnamsecrets.com/profile/jp-baby-runa

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-runa

    https://kbeautygirls.com/baby-runa

    https://get9irl.com/RunaJ
    I agree with Jack. She was on the east coast with good reviews too.

  5. #3523

    He said what?

    Quote Originally Posted by Goku17  [View Original Post]
    I understand OP point of view though, in alot of the white skin asian countries being dark skin is considered unattractive because they will look like the jungle asians. I personally don't like dark skin or tan asians myself. So his comment was helpful for me.
    My man said "Jungle" Asians lmfao. That's hilarious. Dont think I've seen a tan/darker skinned girls from my experience with the Korgs, they all seemed be pretty fair skinned. For me its mainly the attitude, I can power through some fugly hoes. But not ones with shitty attitudes.

  6. #3522

    Gatesmashers OC Edition

    New J-girl Baby Runa landed in OC. I say run to see B. Runa! Full PLEASER coming soon but here's the gist of it:

    Young, CYA+ GND, early twenties (20-23). Claims 21; booker says real age 21. Believable. Incredible physique—very lean with subtle ab definition, especially in missionary with legs back. Skinny to Skinny+ build, enough ass to give two handfuls, natural A to small B cups. HYA+ Service, a lot of eye contact during BBBJ. LFK over DFK.

    Baby Runa = Baby Airi / Miyu, not the same person but equivalent in performance and looks.

    Baby Runa

    https://gangnamsecrets.com/profile/jp-baby-runa

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-runa

    https://kbeautygirls.com/baby-runa

    https://get9irl.com/RunaJ

  7. #3521
    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    That's fair. Moving on.

    A lot of the 4. 4/4. 5 have told me it's slow. I tell them economy is not so good but what I really want to say is they need to drop their pricing. I'm too chicken shit to tell them. Who wants to be the man. LOL.
    Yes, it's a lot of things that is nobody's fault. People want to cut back, focus on world cup, or just enjoy a summer break. More important there are too many girls in every city and every country. It is even slower in Japan and most of Asia.

    320-370 HR is about what I'd expect to pay if I like a girl and have a good time. I can understand upcharge if she's hot, but I'll also pick a 50 upcharge girl over a 100 if there's an equal choice.

    400 is a Longshot Option
    What happens when a girl is 400 and up, is I'll only see her 3 ways: 1) She is S-Tier or some high combo of Looks and Service like A Looks A Service. 2) My main girl cancels and she's the best backup 3) I've seen all the better and cheaper girls, so I'm curious and I already know I'll see her just one time.

    For 95% of girls, their only hope is #2 and #3 which is a stretch. I'll pick a "good for backup" girl one every 25 visits it feels like. And those girls outnumber ATFs, so they are splitting that tiny exception very thin. Most of the time a girl cancels, my backup is another ATF! It is by pure luck if my other ATFs are busy or I've repeated them so much I need a break. Then I see the 400 girl and I have fun but I can't repeat or tell my friends to see her.

    "good for backup" + expensive is a dead end combo. There are other guys who "just want new" who are okay with backup level girls. But many of them will skip over higher priced girls too. That sums it up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Download X  [View Original Post]
    It is hard to break it to the older girls that they need to match or beat these rates. If things were hard last week, they are going to harder this and next week with more cheap and beautiful girls coming in. Every city has the same problem - too many girls. Every city. A small price drop would help, but you can't really persuade girls to. Instead, what you can do is simply pick the better priced girls. The result speaks for itself.

    People are learning over time that a higher price doesn't mean hotter or younger. Some girls are just priced more and nobody knows why. There is nothing we can do other than not see them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Download X  [View Original Post]
    Some of us actually had a decent time. But no way would we repeat or even tell our friends to see MILFs unless they are cheaper than HYA. Whereas if a girl is young or hot, I can understand an upcharge or a +20 like Danbi or Subin. You take one look at Subin and it makes sense. But why are other girls charging more than her, we can't figure it out. It's why I only point out 5-10 girls for each city when OC has 60 and LA has 80 choices. Dead silence on the rest, someone else will have to speak up for them if they think they're worth it.
    I've never said a girl can't charge 400 or more. I'm just saying it is going to be very hard unless she is very hot or young. Contrasting 320 hr versus 400 hr leads to an OR rec (> 50% appeal) becoming an AND rec (<10% appeal):
    Quote Originally Posted by Download X  [View Original Post]
    There are many girls who I had fun seeing and other people had fun seeing, but we can't even recommend them to others due to their pricing. They are borderline backup girls when your girl cancels. Sometimes, the best I could do is say if you like A and B and C you should see her. Which is a very narrow appeal. There were other top HYA where I could say if you liked X or Y or Z you can see them. That's way more people for an OR than for an AND. Higher pricing turns OR recs into AND recs.
    Ms Angel is 320 hr and is for anyone who wants a young girl with a beautiful face OR a natural civvie girl who has a nice personality OR someone who likes a slightly thick body like the photo guide OR someone who wants a cute GFE only girl and doesn't want to pay a lot. If she went to 400 HR, you would see an AND description instead of OR in my matchmaking rec.

    I could say Lizza was for Spinner Hunters OR HYA Hunters OR guys who are into a DTF, submissive, cute young girl. This would make Lizza > 50% appeal (i.e. a randomly selected person could see her and probably like her). She has broad appeal and is popular. Full Service Hunters didn't like her, and in fact in 2024 many reviewers didn't like her. Only HYA Hunters did. I didn't even know the other perspective until the contrast in reviews showed up. Warning the right guys and inviting other guys naturally happens if you describe a girl well. It means the guys who show up after warnings tend to be a good match and have a higher success rate. People save money and the people who show up tend to repeat.

    Lizza was an outlier at > 50% appeal. There are girls with < 10% appeal. Those girls' best bet is to price lower in the 300s range. Their best strat is for some guys to like and repeat them long-term.

  8. #3520
    Quote Originally Posted by Goku17  [View Original Post]
    Well, we only see the girl for an hour, so if a girl is dark naturally or dark from a sun tan, she is dark skinned during our booking and that is what matters.
    That's fair. Moving on.

    A lot of the 4. 4/4. 5 have told me it's slow. I tell them economy is not so good but what I really want to say is they need to drop their pricing. I'm too chicken shit to tell them. Who wants to be the man. LOL.

  9. #3519
    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    I'm all for accurate description. My peeve are natural tits that are clearly MM. Calling her dark when she has a dark tone is fine. But calling her dark when she's got a tanned from a day at the pool. A tan that you can clearly tell is temporary because you can see her white bikini lines. Isn't calling her dark against what you want? An accurate description? How are you all missing that point just for the sake of debating. LOL.
    Well, we only see the girl for an hour, so if a girl is dark naturally or dark from a sun tan, she is dark skinned during our booking and that is what matters.

  10. #3518
    Quote Originally Posted by ResilientJohn  [View Original Post]
    As long as it's physical attributes / features, I think calling it out is fair game and legitimate. All of us has differing preferences. Big / Small tits, Bush or no, light skin or dark skin, and a plethora of other traits that I'm not going to bother listing. I appreciate the fact that some people here include stuff like that.

    And no, most of us aren't lookers (probably) but we're shelling out money for lookers so info regarding how the girl looks in all aspects should be disclosed if OP is willing to share it. That distinction is important regardless of how crass, shallow, and superficial it sounds.
    I'm all for accurate description. My peeve are natural tits that are clearly MM. Calling her dark when she has a dark tone is fine. But calling her dark when she's got a tanned from a day at the pool. A tan that you can clearly tell is temporary because you can see her white bikini lines. Isn't calling her dark against what you want? An accurate description? How are you all missing that point just for the sake of debating. LOL.

  11. #3517

    Yeah, I agree about descriptions,

    Quote Originally Posted by ResilientJohn  [View Original Post]
    As long as it's physical attributes / features, I think calling it out is fair game and legitimate. All of us has differing preferences. Big / Small tits, Bush or no, light skin or dark skin, and a plethora of other traits that I'm not going to bother listing. I appreciate the fact that some people here include stuff like that.

    And no, most of us aren't lookers (probably) but we're shelling out money for lookers so info regarding how the girl looks in all aspects should be disclosed if OP is willing to share it. That distinction is important regardless of how crass, shallow, and superficial it sounds.
    But no need for anyone to be mean about it, like calling her a jungle Asian!

    I've also run across guys using Jap in a description, don't know if they are racist or just abbreviating.

  12. #3516
    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    She enjoyed a day at the pool for the 4th holiday. We see each other doing the walk of shame, we're no lookers despite them telling us we're handsome or we look like a prince. Give the girl a break. There's other legitimate stuff to critic her but not a tan from a day in the sun. LOL.
    As long as it's physical attributes / features, I think calling it out is fair game and legitimate. All of us has differing preferences. Big / Small tits, Bush or no, light skin or dark skin, and a plethora of other traits that I'm not going to bother listing. I appreciate the fact that some people here include stuff like that.

    And no, most of us aren't lookers (probably) but we're shelling out money for lookers so info regarding how the girl looks in all aspects should be disclosed if OP is willing to share it. That distinction is important regardless of how crass, shallow, and superficial it sounds.

  13. #3515
    Quote Originally Posted by Goku17  [View Original Post]
    I understand OP point of view though, in alot of the white skin asian countries being dark skin is considered unattractive because they will look like the jungle asians. I personally don't like dark skin or tan asians myself. So his comment was helpful for me.
    Okay if you don't like a certain skin tone. Jungle asians? Come on man. You shouldn't be using that term for SEA.

    It's all of Asia that doesn't want a dark skin tone. It has nothing to do with looking SEA. It's a culture value rooted from history where if you were dark, it meant you were uneducated, worked in the sun, probably a farmer, in other words, poor.

  14. #3514
    Quote Originally Posted by SoloAdventure  [View Original Post]
    She enjoyed a day at the pool for the 4th holiday. We see each other doing the walk of shame, we're no lookers despite them telling us we're handsome or we look like a prince. Give the girl a break. There's other legitimate stuff to critic her but not a tan from a day in the sun. LOL.
    I understand OP point of view though, in alot of the white skin asian countries being dark skin is considered unattractive because they will look like the jungle asians. I personally don't like dark skin or tan asians myself. So his comment was helpful for me.

  15. #3513
    Quote Originally Posted by LemonPepper  [View Original Post]
    Now that I've seen Rayne, I can see your rankings pretty much mirror how I would put them minus Karla except ass / thighs. I actually prefer Danbi over Sansa and Rayne in that cat which makes me think I need to pay Karla a visit haha.
    Super fair. I picked Sansa because she had the perkiest. Rayne is wider and firm and Danbi is bigger because she's the bigger one of the three. It's really a toss up in that category. Then there's Karla. LOL.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Meet Sugar Babies
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts

Protected by Copyscape