Seeking Arrangements

**TheCondor7** · 05-26-26 00:17

There's a user on their who keeps trying to exchange messages via telegram. Their username is broke1111. They have had multiple profiles on seeking with different pictures. Never met them but something seems really fishy so just wanted to pass that warning to others to keep an eye out.

**Emv La** · 05-25-26 18:25

Originally Posted by Bran2025 [View Original Post]

It did happen years ago -- I was using SA over 10 years ago -- but yes a fair bit less. I've never been on SA without some percentage of SB's seeking some compensation for a first, platonic, date.

The women on there in 2026 are using Seeking to monitize their lives a little differently than they were 10+ years ago. That shift can show up as "entitlement" but I would submit is just a different mindset as to what they will do for money. Think about it -- if millions of men will pay for pics on OF, why wouldn't a man pay for a REAL LIFE coffee or drink date? To these girls, the paid platonic date is an extension of paid pics. To us mongers the platonic date is each party's "investment" in seeking out a sugar relationship. It's just two entirely different mindsets in 2026. I get it.

Been on there for years and never paid for a platonic date my friend. I've paid for dinners or events as I would any real life date but not just for their presence. Like another monger said, if they agree to what I want for in PPM or allowance then they'll get their monetary value. The problem are men who pay for OF or platonic dates and high rates for fugly women.

**Bran2025** · 05-25-26 16:36

Originally Posted by Corrado58 [View Original Post]

I found this on SA years ago, and thought it was a huge turn off, worse and different than deposits, that I don't agree to or with, but could find a rationale. But this is a relatively new mind set, one that screams "I don't have to audition or meet you half way, ever. " Didn't happen years ago. Time is money, but this is a non-starter for me. Entitlement!

It did happen years ago -- I was using SA over 10 years ago -- but yes a fair bit less. I've never been on SA without some percentage of SB's seeking some compensation for a first, platonic, date.

The women on there in 2026 are using Seeking to monitize their lives a little differently than they were 10+ years ago. That shift can show up as "entitlement" but I would submit is just a different mindset as to what they will do for money. Think about it -- if millions of men will pay for pics on OF, why wouldn't a man pay for a REAL LIFE coffee or drink date? To these girls, the paid platonic date is an extension of paid pics. To us mongers the platonic date is each party's "investment" in seeking out a sugar relationship. It's just two entirely different mindsets in 2026. I get it.

**Corrado58** · 05-25-26 15:42

Originally Posted by HankChinanski [View Original Post]

This was recently discussed but basically when one idiot pays the price of a 9 to a 5 or 6 that becomes the new firm price for these women. I've recently just been asking women what their usual allowance is or ppm is before I throw my number out there to gauge if it's worth it or not, there's also now been a hard push on paying for first time platonic meets. I recently met a hot goth off sb and thought it went well until she expected to be paid for our first meet which we agreed to at first meet in a public setting for safety then I had hit her with I would give it if she met my requirements that go into a ppm and let's just say she wouldn't budge on any form of intimacy although I felt like if I had thrown a higher number than our agreed price she would've slobbed my knob in my car before she had to make her train back to Gloucester.

I found this on SA years ago, and thought it was a huge turn off, worse and different than deposits, that I don't agree to or with, but could find a rationale. But this is a relatively new mind set, one that screams "I don't have to audition or meet you half way, ever. " Didn't happen years ago. Time is money, but this is a non-starter for me. Entitlement!

**Bran2025** · 05-25-26 11:50

Originally Posted by HankChinanski [View Original Post]

This was recently discussed but basically when one idiot pays the price of a 9 to a 5 or 6 that becomes the new firm price for these women. I've recently just been asking women what their usual allowance is or ppm is before I throw my number out there to gauge if it's worth it or not, there's also now been a hard push on paying for first time platonic meets. I recently met a hot goth off sb and thought it went well until she expected to be paid for our first meet which we agreed to at first meet in a public setting for safety then I had hit her with I would give it if she met my requirements that go into a ppm and let's just say she wouldn't budge on any form of intimacy although I felt like if I had thrown a higher number than our agreed price she would've slobbed my knob in my car before she had to make her train back to Gloucester.

Asking what their "usual allowance" is does invite a somewhat fictitious higher-than-usual number. I just (well back when I was active) give them my number and if it works it works. If they'd actually take 5 and you offer 5, you're likely to have a deal. If you ask them and they say 8, there is a decent chance that your 5 counter-offer will be met with an emotional response or a counter offer etc. Just give your number.

**HipHoprulez02** · 05-25-26 07:54

Originally Posted by HankChinanski [View Original Post]

This was recently discussed but basically when one idiot pays the price of a 9 to a 5 or 6 that becomes the new firm price for these women. I've recently just been asking women what their usual allowance is or ppm is before I throw my number out there to gauge if it's worth it or not, there's also now been a hard push on paying for first time platonic meets. I recently met a hot goth off sb and thought it went well until she expected to be paid for our first meet which we agreed to at first meet in a public setting for safety then I had hit her with I would give it if she met my requirements that go into a ppm and let's just say she wouldn't budge on any form of intimacy although I felt like if I had thrown a higher number than our agreed price she would've slobbed my knob in my car before she had to make her train back to Gloucester.

Exactly!! I was talking to one who wanted 5 for dinner, alone with nothing else for a first meet! Like come on now! I have switched over to your tactic as of late. It seems like more of these 5 or 6's are getting top dollar and they arent worth it. Had one woman who is the size of two women trying to get me to pay to take her out to dinner, and I don't even get down with someone built like a boxcar.

-HH02.

**HankChinanski** · 05-25-26 06:10

Originally Posted by HipHoprulez02 [View Original Post]

Its not even the price increase, its the lack of quality for the prices they throw around is my main issue. Like, there are a bunch of 6. 5's who think they are 9. 5 and taxing us at that rate. While the 9. 5 is still charging the same. However outside of the Northeast those same 6. 5's know their lane and arent tryin to overcharge because of the bums on their social media telling them how beautiful they are when its not true.

-HH02.

This was recently discussed but basically when one idiot pays the price of a 9 to a 5 or 6 that becomes the new firm price for these women. I've recently just been asking women what their usual allowance is or ppm is before I throw my number out there to gauge if it's worth it or not, there's also now been a hard push on paying for first time platonic meets. I recently met a hot goth off sb and thought it went well until she expected to be paid for our first meet which we agreed to at first meet in a public setting for safety then I had hit her with I would give it if she met my requirements that go into a ppm and let's just say she wouldn't budge on any form of intimacy although I felt like if I had thrown a higher number than our agreed price she would've slobbed my knob in my car before she had to make her train back to Gloucester.

**HipHoprulez02** · 05-24-26 18:07

Originally Posted by EmvLa [View Original Post]

Of living too affects the prices these girls want / need. My last 2 SB wanted more for what we already had going and didn't feel like obliging so just been using BIE. I hate the hr or two restriction but gotten a few numbers to hopefully work outside them though they are a great agency nonetheless. I'd recommend most to take a break from SA if they can't afford the price increase for now.

Its not even the price increase, its the lack of quality for the prices they throw around is my main issue. Like, there are a bunch of 6. 5's who think they are 9. 5 and taxing us at that rate. While the 9. 5 is still charging the same. However outside of the Northeast those same 6. 5's know their lane and arent tryin to overcharge because of the bums on their social media telling them how beautiful they are when its not true.

-HH02.

**DarkClouds** · 05-24-26 16:12

She went by Anika. Told me she was going to leave SA and start a dog walking business. I don't see any recent activity on social media.

Originally Posted by KcirtaPanner2 [View Original Post]

I know she's been talked about on here before but can't find it. Anyone seen lately?

**Bran2025** · 05-24-26 14:56

Originally Posted by MajorJohnson [View Original Post]

I get the same message when clicking a link here. Just hit re=load after you get that message. Profile for Karizma comes up. Or open it in a new window.

TY! Never knew that worked.

I agree she kinda looks familiar (and more like 49 not 39) but I can't place her.

**MajorJohnson** · 05-24-26 13:31

Originally Posted by Bran2025 [View Original Post]

I'm seeing "Profile Not Available" so either she's gone or I blocked, which now a days is rare.

I get the same message when clicking a link here. Just hit re=load after you get that message. Profile for Karizma comes up. Or open it in a new window.

**AcknowledgeMe** · 05-24-26 12:59

Originally Posted by Bran2025 [View Original Post]

I'm seeing "Profile Not Available" so either she's gone or I blocked, which now a days is rare.

Profiles still there just clicked it.

**Bran2025** · 05-24-26 11:53

No it was private photos I opened up to them on Seeking.

No metadata with those photos.

But reverse search engines for facial recognition work very well. After the fact I tried it out on my Seeking pics (which were never posted anywhere else) and sure enough it linked me to my LinkedIn profile and another public photo or 2.

You will not avoid facial-reverse-search I'd any way other than not having ANY photos of yourself online anywhere I'm afraid.

Originally Posted by FriendlyKing [View Original Post]

Did you share the photo through regular text messaging? If so, it's still possible in some cases for metadata to remain, depending on the phone and messaging system used.

Photos can contain EXIF metadata such as GPS coordinates, timestamp, and phone model if location services were enabled when the picture was taken. Some texting methods strip that data automatically, but not all of them do consistently.

Personally, before I share any photo, I explicitly modify or remove the location metadata first, just to avoid situations like this.

**Bran2025** · 05-24-26 11:50

I'm seeing "Profile Not Available" so either she's gone or I blocked, which now a days is rare.

Originally Posted by AcknowledgeMe [View Original Post]

Anyone know or have talked to her. She messaged me and her pics look so familiar it's like I seen them somewhere and can't remember where.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...e-a356807a4740