Find Your New Baby
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts

Thread: Seeking Arrangements

+ Add Report
Page 12 of 729 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 62 112 512 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 10933
This blog is moderated by Psalyer
  1. #10768

    Veritifcation

    Quote Originally Posted by IOnDaStreet  [View Original Post]
    Considering returning to it, I think I may take the advice on unlocking photos, but hate that some have only locked photos to begin with (almost wonder if they get a commision off unlocking).

    Also don't use credits for any of the answering questions etc.
    I also refused to engage with girls who weren't verified. Not only does it give you some peace of mind that they are probably legit, but it also shows you most of them without making / hair done so you get a better idea of their appearance vs the filtered pictures.

  2. #10767
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaBear11  [View Original Post]
    Yeah the money sucks either way, and you have to be careful how you spend it.

    Never spend it on read receipts.

    Never spend it to unlock photos.

    Never spend it to boost messages.

    And I typically only unlocked messages to start chatting with girls who didn't have shit in their profile about being spoiled, traveling or shopping. Those girls are looking for the traditional sugar daddys to just spoil them with money and trips. You'll find enough of the girls phrase things a certain way on their profiles that you can tell they are looking for PPM and they understand that involves sex. I've had decent luck, but nothing earth shattering.
    Considering returning to it, I think I may take the advice on unlocking photos, but hate that some have only locked photos to begin with (almost wonder if they get a commision off unlocking).

    Also don't use credits for any of the answering questions etc.

  3. #10766

    Sb

    Quote Originally Posted by EmvLa  [View Original Post]
    Made an account on Secret Benefits and definitely not impressed. Especially for those who complain about how much a girl wants the credit system definitely isn't worth it in regards to ROI. LOL I thought I was getting access to these girls photos when they "granted me access" but was still being charged. SA IMO Is better for ROI. I will say the verification video is nice. Definitely helped in not messaging some seeing how fugly they were or stupid sounding. Paid for the higher tier in credits but once it's done I'll just be on Seeking.
    Yeah the money sucks either way, and you have to be careful how you spend it.

    Never spend it on read receipts.

    Never spend it to unlock photos.

    Never spend it to boost messages.

    And I typically only unlocked messages to start chatting with girls who didn't have shit in their profile about being spoiled, traveling or shopping. Those girls are looking for the traditional sugar daddys to just spoil them with money and trips. You'll find enough of the girls phrase things a certain way on their profiles that you can tell they are looking for PPM and they understand that involves sex. I've had decent luck, but nothing earth shattering.

  4. #10765

    Finally

    Quote Originally Posted by SunsetStrip77  [View Original Post]
    It's very easy to use up your credits on SB if you're not careful. I had many women contact me, only to open their message and see "Hi there! With no further contact. It's really kind of a joke.
    Made an account on Secret Benefits and definitely not impressed. Especially for those who complain about how much a girl wants the credit system definitely isn't worth it in regards to ROI. LOL I thought I was getting access to these girls photos when they "granted me access" but was still being charged. SA IMO Is better for ROI. I will say the verification video is nice. Definitely helped in not messaging some seeing how fugly they were or stupid sounding. Paid for the higher tier in credits but once it's done I'll just be on Seeking.

  5. #10764

    Not true

    Quote Originally Posted by ItsNev  [View Original Post]
    SA was made by a rich man for rich men. It seems ridiculous to the middle class, but it's not intended for the middle class.
    That's how it was marketed, but it's a business. They don't care as long as they make money. The site has progressively worsened over many years. Your comment is laughable.

  6. #10763

    Thanks for the infor

    Quote Originally Posted by TrustTwoDeal  [View Original Post]
    Thought I would share some info -.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/d...5-50139e98c6db

    Location says Cambridge but she is really in Leominster? Wanted $$ for trip to Boston to meet? WTF? Told her to change her location.

    She does not host.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-b4fb15df3bf9

    Pro working out of Boston area. Moves around. Not always the person in pics.

    She hosts.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...9-651b182eb1c7

    Very nice lady. Just moved back to Boston- met her. Overall 5 out of 10.

    Does not host.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/4...a-4191eac744bb

    Nice enough. Hard to pin down a meeting. Out of Waltham- 5 out of 10.

    She hosts out of her biz.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/4...d-c2e05746fb4d

    Semi pro fro NH. Great communication- wants $1,500.

    For 2 hours. Sends pics and very accommodating 7 out of 10.

    She does not host in Boston area.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...5-e53e9e318134

    Meet her. Very attractive. However - you will never touch her. She is looking for Prince Charming.

    And requires a lot of $$$ - no wonder she is single.

    She does not host.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/8...7-b9b5392293f3

    Pro. She posts on LC, nice enough. She doesn't host. Multiple reports in here.

    6 out of 10.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/3...4-07fdab19363e

    This one is crazy. Can't seem to pin her down. I believe she meets a lot of folks outside of Boston.

    She does not host. Communication at times is a little crazed.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/3...f-9c7ae694f23b

    She is a pro. Full menu. Hosts - great communication- gilf- I like her - 7 out of 10.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/c...4-f7280973af41

    Very nice lady. Out of RI, met her. Couldn't agree on price tag wants $600 - she is looking for.

    LT. Very nice. I don not pull the trigger due to distance.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/3...6-f37fc74b7e63

    She is a DOM. Pro - she likes pegging. Not my thing at all FYI. Very good communication.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-8daa939828cc

    As reported before. Has demons. Met, doesn't host - 4 out of 10.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/f...1-539d1d419245

    Posts on LC, pro. Hosts - 5 out of 10 - won't.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/4...8-3d8e598f141d

    Nice lady. Hosts - but at times seems a bit out of it. When talking with her she says she is not meds.

    For mental health - 6 out of 10.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...f-732302e37adf

    Communicates well in the beginning of reaching out. Does not host. But after agreeing to.

    Terms. She goes silent?

    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...8-10fdf8bcbf0e

    Crazy town. Stay away. Texts from rehab.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/8...1-6e6d98cc4c9a

    Stay away. Crazed - demons. Texts from rehab. Wants low amount but needs a place to live.

    I feel very bad for her.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/2...b-ea8eb12d42ea

    Bio say Boston but she is really in Worcester- requires $$ for travel. Have not met and she does not host.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/d...e-b697367821db

    Wants $$ for pics and vids. Strange yet interesting- met once in a car, nice and pics make her look better.

    Doesn't host. And eventually asks for $$ due to hard times.

    FYI. It seems those that host are more like a pro. And most seems to be financially strapped for cash.

    FYI.
    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...5-8daa939828cc

    As reported before. Has demons. Met, doesn't host - 4 out of 10.

    I almost pull the trigger on this one. Lucky to read this today. Thanks.

  7. #10762

    Block

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkPowers  [View Original Post]
    She no showed three times. The best advice we can give you is to block her and move on.
    I'm not looking for an advice. Looking to share stories about experience on SD. Since it's been boring here. I've moved on already. She text me here and there to get me going and send me nude photos.

  8. #10761

    This

    Quote Originally Posted by ItsNev  [View Original Post]
    SA was made by a rich man for rich men. It seems ridiculous to the middle class, but it's not intended for the middle class.
    Exactly! A lot of you guys aren't willing to dish up the 150/200+ dinner dates or hotels or event but want a gorgeous girl for the price of a street walker and it be bare. LOL The price is the price, either buy or window shop. No amount of bitching on here will change that.

  9. #10760
    Quote Originally Posted by NewEngland  [View Original Post]
    I agree Sb has been better S A seems full of frauds.
    It's very easy to use up your credits on SB if you're not careful. I had many women contact me, only to open their message and see "Hi there! With no further contact. It's really kind of a joke.

  10. #10759
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsNev  [View Original Post]
    SA was made by a rich man for rich men. It seems ridiculous to the middle class, but it's not intended for the middle class.
    If your subscription lapses, they'll offer you $30 off. Still not worth it.

  11. #10758

    Don't forget

    SA was made by a rich man for rich men. It seems ridiculous to the middle class, but it's not intended for the middle class.

    Quote Originally Posted by AstroAndy  [View Original Post]
    SA also wants $150/ month now. Completely insane. Apparently embracing the healthcare model: higher prices and less service.

  12. #10757

    Sa

    Quote Originally Posted by NewEngland  [View Original Post]
    I agree Sb has been better S A seems full of frauds.
    SA also wants $150/ month now. Completely insane. Apparently embracing the healthcare model: higher prices and less service.

  13. #10756
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaBear11  [View Original Post]
    I've been off seeking for months now and won't go back. SB has been decent.
    I agree Sb has been better S A seems full of frauds.

  14. #10755
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCondor7  [View Original Post]
    They seem to excessively ban men and give no explanation. I have never been explicit yet they have banned me in the past and give no explanation even when requested. Yet there will be women who actively scam there or break rules and stay on forever. It's such a strangely run site.
    I've been off seeking for months now and won't go back. SB has been decent.

  15. #10754

    Seeking Rules

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCondor7  [View Original Post]
    They seem to excessively ban men and give no explanation. I have never been explicit yet they have banned me in the past and give no explanation even when requested. Yet there will be women who actively scam there or break rules and stay on forever. It's such a strangely run site.
    I've been off the site for a year but have the itch to get back on, however I will not post a face selfie. I've always been able to use discreet photos. Is there a way to get around this? Maybe I am better off not getting back on. I too have been banned for little things but usually after review was let back.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts

Protected by Copyscape