Escort Reports

**BobXX99** · 02-19-26 09:01

Originally Posted by Ejent [View Original Post]

Sorry forgot to include.

160 qv.

200 hh.

Thanks! She looks amazing and in my part of town, might need to check her out. Is she GFE at all?

**JoeHh** · 02-19-26 02:40

Originally Posted by Ejent [View Original Post]

Sorry forgot to include.

160 qv.

200 hh.

How to tackle the video verification? All the burner apps only allows voice calls.

**Ejent** · 02-18-26 20:48

Originally Posted by Ejent [View Original Post]

Fellas this is another really good one worth visiting. Not much English. Is in a mobile home north of bearss. Kind of a nice quiet community to be honest. Used to run track when she was in school, so she's thin, strong, muscular. Her photos do not do her justice. She's hot. Reminds me of Sabrina the Venezuelan and Kayla the thin black chick.

Except she'll suck the finish off that rubber and let you pound her good.

Fully covered play. Daty / FIV was allowed. Not a big clock watcher. Ran her through 4 positions twice. She was awesome.

Tell her EJ sent you.

https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/8134143547

Sorry forgot to include.

160 qv.

200 hh.

**TailNReds8888** · 02-18-26 20:17

Great thorough response here! To piggyback off of what he is saying keep this in mind if you mess around with just one low volume girl, it is not only how many dicks has been in her that day or that week but it's the total dicks that have been in her, then whoever those dicks slept with is also part of the equation. So you can imagine one low volume woman could certainly have thousands of partners under her belt and then passing it to you. Also to be clear washing or cleaning your privates or their privates does not stop STDs and worse. The only safeguard is condoms and basically crossing your fingers. Be safe and good luck out there.

Originally Posted by FeedEmNutz [View Original Post]

Nice input.

Goes back to my original point regarding measuring "volume".

Wish I could set up a poll (I'll look into it).

VOLUME: I don't rationally see how low volume is even a consideration when rationale math suggests at the low end any regular provider is going to see a minimum of a triple digit number of different dicks in a given 365 day period. There will be different rules for different guys who play by different rules with different gals. There is additionally a likelihood she sees more of some than others which adds to any risk calculation.

SAFETY: Defined how? "Always" plays safe? Is the "always" or only for FS or are BBBJs allowed (you can't catch anything from a BJ right)? Is "always" for new clients, or are exceptions made for guys they "know"? Does she become better friends with new clients where new not talked about rules are established? Stealth? How honest are these gals? How many girls do you know that post this and provide you with that? Are you unique? I'll help you: No.

I've found a girl I saw for years who swore up and down unprovoked that she only swallowed my cum. A random google search of her LC alter-ego resulted in an online video production with over 500 k views of her lips balls deep surrounding some dude's cock as he ejaculated down her throat for nearly 30 seconds. It wasn't me.

Be real with yourself is all I'm saying. If a "safe" girl who averages half a dick a day makes you feel better than a high volume provider who averages 4, whatever makes you feel good.

**BubbaBlaze** · 02-18-26 12:28

Originally Posted by Tantra6969 [View Original Post]

Curious to know those of you that roll the dice on presumably low volume ladies have gotten or know of someone that got an STD?

I was stupid a few times and went bare. But I was worried about STI / Ds that I got tested and luckily was negative. I agree with many comments here that it is foolish to believe when a provider says she is low volume and only allows you for bare services. It is not worth the risk.

**Simms156** · 02-18-26 10:14

Originally Posted by SmittyQbert [View Original Post]

Didn't say it was.

I'm just saying if the comment about a "low volume" is safer, then a low volume that doesn't do protection at all can't be safer than a high volume who does use protection.

I agree with you on that. High volume protected vs. Low volume unprotected is a no brainer. But maybe I missed something. If that wasn't what you were implying, then how is washing up with soap and water afterwards related to the topic of volume and protection?

**Andry** · 02-17-26 23:43

Even even with a simple BBBJ you can get a nice surprise and a doc visit. Sometimes it happens to me that I want to be safer, but my little head says let's melt it in her mouth. I've only gone BBFS once, I wasn't expecting it, She just took a sit on top and rode it until cip, I got scare, but luckily I'm clean. Also happened to me got a surprise even with cover on while drilling the backdoor to a different SP. I reported here a few years ago. So even with cover You're not 100% Safe.

Originally Posted by BubbaBlaze [View Original Post]

It is obvious that the more number of bare sticks that enter the hole, the higher the risk of diseases. IMHO it does depend on a lot of other factors. Does the provider present a clean picture of herself and her place? Does she have other habits? Does she take care of herself? Does she have a regular job outside of this line of work?

In my experience, I have seen girls who are ONLY doing this work and are usually seeing 4-5 clients a day at least. I never dare to risk anything bare with them. On the other hand, I have also seen providers who come across like a girl / woman next door. They have a regular job, go the gym and maintain a healthy look, do not partake in any drugs, dress nicely, talk intelligently and are in this business for either fun or some extra cash. Very rarely these women allow BBFS. But over a period of time, they may trust you more and relax on the rules. I have gone bare with a few of these but the fear lingers some where. My big head tells me not to risk at all but the small one some times takes over.

**Ejent** · 02-17-26 22:23

Fellas this is another really good one worth visiting. Not much English. Is in a mobile home north of bearss. Kind of a nice quiet community to be honest. Used to run track when she was in school, so she's thin, strong, muscular. Her photos do not do her justice. She's hot. Reminds me of Sabrina the Venezuelan and Kayla the thin black chick.

Except she'll suck the finish off that rubber and let you pound her good.

Fully covered play. Daty / FIV was allowed. Not a big clock watcher. Ran her through 4 positions twice. She was awesome.

Tell her EJ sent you.

https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/8134143547

**OlderGuy69** · 02-17-26 21:58

A sweet, petite young lady, very accommodating and laid-back.

BBBJ was incredible, pussy was clean and tight.

She was a real joy to be with will definitely see her again.

I saw her by the airport. A+ hotel. Great body and boobs. In my dream, I saw 312 stars and.

Looked across the harbor at 708 fish. It looked like 3493 rental cars were parked there.

Have a good time! She is reviewed in the Orlando area.

Tell her OG saw her.

**Moose813** · 02-17-26 20:40

Originally Posted by StpaMonger [View Original Post]

Unless I'm missing something there's no contact info. Or else I'd ruin a p stars b-hole for that qv rate.

I was eyeing her for a while a few months back when she did have her contact info up but looks like she took it down and hasnt been back since. And same, her work is pretty good, might try and snag a session with kristy kremes.

**FeedEmNutz** · 02-17-26 19:09

Originally Posted by SmittyQbert [View Original Post]

Didn't say it was.

I'm just saying if the comment about a "low volume" is safer, then a low volume that doesn't do protection at all can't be safer than a high volume who does use protection.

Man I've said a bunch on this topic already but my bottom line for all the reasons I've previously stated is volume is a myth that can't be debunked without some serious creeper status moves. What I will take for a fact is that just because a girl says it, doesn't make it true. If you are playing with a provider, you are assuming a significantly elevated level of risk in comparison to "civilians" let's call them. Debate over whether or not a girl who did 125 dicks last year vs one that did 3 k is more or less risky is like a billionaire examining his bank account: it doesn't fuckin matter. The reality is we don't know what these girl do with whom or how often regardless of what they say. What we do know is that mongers and providers alike are involved in a game that carries some risk. Find your tolerance and execute appropriately.

**StpaMonger** · 02-17-26 18:05

Unless I'm missing something there's no contact info. Or else I'd ruin a p stars b-hole for that qv rate.

Originally Posted by Moose813 [View Original Post]

Has anyone seen her? https://tryst.link/escort/pornstar-jada-coxxx trying to cross off a few P-stars off my bucket list.

**StpaMonger** · 02-17-26 17:54

Third time the charm? They are both fully aware I took this photo and consented to it being up.

**JahStoney** · 02-17-26 17:52

Originally Posted by FeedEmNutz [View Original Post]

I've found a girl I saw for years who swore up and down unprovoked that she only swallowed my cum. A random google search of her LC alter-ego resulted in an online video production with over 500 k views of her lips balls deep surrounding some dude's cock as he ejaculated down her throat for nearly 30 seconds. It wasn't me.

She still around? I've been looking for a girl with that particular skillset. Thanks in advance. Preciate it!