Thai org and Thai agency girls

[TnaStylez]

SC has a promotion for 1 more week at 180 hh, 260 hr. The girl is Ida, no idea about her. I'm only pointing out the price. Hopefully others can chime in on what she's like.
https://www.humaniplex.com/network/SweetCandies/

Great work as usual! They have a second HX account in Pasadena as well, lucky_88.

[Download X]

SC has a promotion for 1 more week at 180 hh, 260 hr. The girl is Ida, no idea about her. I'm only pointing out the price. Hopefully others can chime in on what she's like.
https://www.humaniplex.com/network/SweetCandies/

SweetCandies hosts mostly Thai girls in SGV. I've seen some Laos, Viet, and half-Chinese girls through them too. Looks and service vary just like with korgs. They fill in a niche in-between AMPs and korgs where the price is cheaper like AMPs but you get a private incall in the korg fashion. Most Thai girls are freestyle service. More like a real girlfriend than typical service queen worship, though a few Thai girls did it too. The service style is different, not necessarily better or worse, so it was good for variety. I used to go all the time.

I'm not sure if every girl is priced the same, but it was typically 200 hh, 240 45, 300 hr.

They have very occasionally had HYA and MILFs, but it's not often. In my experience, HYAs used HYA ads and MILFs used MILF ads. There is PS and fake placeholder ads, but sometimes they will post real selfies mixed in which were more accurate. Occasionally it was no filter or low filter and recent, but I don't expect it often. On HX what I would do is just notice when they updated their ads. No face selfies tended to be the most accurate, especially backside shots.

Lastly, HX is the best way to screen imo. They will network rate you back, but with some Thai orgs I have had to remind them 2-3 times but they eventually did. For example, they are not always available to log in and do it but told me to remind them later and they did. Within korgs, some bookers will do this too but there are bookers who do not rate back anymore. Just FYI.

[Download X]

Currently in OC Khaleesi is posting pictures of Nina who was recently up in Pasadena. Normally, the Thai orgs are great at posting real pictures. But lately, I am skeptical because these look too good to be true. Did anyone happen to see Nina when she was up here?

Yes, this one looks like a generic ad photo.

Here is the other Nina ad you asked about and my reply:
https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/att...7&d=1767001843 Nina ad selfie

Note there is filter on the face. It's possible the body is real and the face gives you an idea of her face type but doesn't "tell you the level" (I. E. Tier / hot or not). I haven't seen her, so that is just a guess from past experience. It isn't enough consolation, but at least thai orgs are cheap at 200 hh and the girls tend to have good attitude and service. But my dilemma is as long as a korg or corg has an ATF in town, I don't have the time to toftt.

So it is a kind of standoff where either a) Someone toftt or b) They add new ads again. There are some thai girls like Maya aka Megan who worked long tour, so eventually guys gather good intel.

Over in the Las Vegas / OC / LA forums for Korean agency BBFS, there is a poster who always says he gets selfies of the girls after seeing them and posts them here. I've talked to a couple of providers who said that the photo the guy uses are the photos they gave to the booker and / or owner. I don't like the shilling aspect of that, but if it's a real selfie (the selfies always have the phone obscuring the face in a mirror), then at least the more accurate representation of their body is appreciated.

Yes, it looks like Bighose does this for mainly LTLV, occasionally GNS or FKS. Since I know so little about it, I only have a general impression and not all the facts. If your distinction is correct (he claims to get selfies but is just passing booker selfies) that's sad. But, I don't actually know that and haven't examined it carefully. If I were him, I would be completely upfront what I was doing. I have nothing against supplying accurate selfies itself, just the transparency. That said, he may be saying that for legal reasons. The same way someone East Coast says his review was "just a dream". I wouldn't do it that way myself, but I get it. In this hobby, people have to do that so you read between the lines.

I've thought about it a while and have mixed feelings. One reason I review girls at all is it's the only way to fight against lying ads. I don't even look at ad photos or specs, the only thing I'll believe is the price and upcharge options. If bookers themselves supplied reasonably accurate selfies, I'd be all for it. It would solve the original problem. You could put this as a thought experiment - if bookers put photos and descriptions of girls that were as accurate as any normal reviewer could write about a girl, would you use that intel? I sure would! The reason I don't use booker info is because it's wrong, not because it's from the booker.

That's a separate issue of course from shilling. If someone is upfront about what they're doing and their biases, all good. If they say "I'm a booker and I'm going to be posting accurate selfies from now on", and I see that they're truthful - I'm all for it. It is distasteful if someone pretends to be a customer but is doing that (I do believe Bighose is a real customer, though). Although I'm pretty cynical and choose to look at the half glass full if they're giving honest info. It would still be way better than some actual reviewers who post poor quality or even wrong info. That sucks too, people underrate how important accuracy of intel is over who is supplying it. I'd stop reviewing if one day booker sites had more accurate photos and words than me. Right? Never gonna happen though.

I have tried grading the selfies that Bighose posts, but it's just not often he posts one of a girl I know well. None of them so far were inaccurate, but I don't have enough examples. He does make rosters, same problem. Everything he posted was accurate, and it looks like he does see the girls. So, he is at least more helpful and good than the gatekeepers.

There is divine punishment for gatekeeping. OC routinely cucks LA when they gatekeep HYA leading to the HYA working OC only. And OC is overrun with HYA because MILF hunters don't review enough. And so on..

[KingsFoil]

Currently in OC Khaleesi is posting pictures of Nina who was recently up in Pasadena. Normally, the Thai orgs are great at posting real pictures. But lately, I am skeptical because these look too good to be true. Did anyone happen to see Nina when she was up here?

[JackHolly]

Over in the Las Vegas / OC / LA forums for Korean agency BBFS, there is a poster who always says he gets selfies of the girls after seeing them and posts them here. I've talked to a couple of providers who said that the photo the guy uses are the photos they gave to the booker and / or owner. I don't like the shilling aspect of that, but if it's a real selfie (the selfies always have the phone obscuring the face in a mirror), then at least the more accurate representation of their body is appreciated.

I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.

[Download X]

Part 2. I will attach ad photos from SweetCandies two years ago. Be warned these are all HYA ads for actual HYA, I would not expect them often. But they represent the kind of ads my ATFs were using at SweetCandies. There was a brand new girl, SC Chichi. They posted placeholder ads showing a HYA - see the first 3 images for Chichi's original ads. The remarkable thing was when they had HYA ads, it was a HYA. Or rather, when it was a MILF they made sure to use MILF ads. I'm okay with the girl not looking the same as the ad as long as it is in the ballpark so to speak, and I had used SC enough to know that they sometimes hosted HYA. So I was hopeful after my SC Emily experiences, and each time I dove in on an HYA ad it was an actual HYA. It was quite a surprise, and maybe too good to be last. But, Thai orgs have a much better average than korgs on ads so there is that.

Once Chichi started, they added new ads more and more, and they were recognizably her with low filter. Some of her outdoors, some smartphone photos taken of her in the apartment. You could instantly recognize it was the apartment and that it was taken very recently, and having already seen Chichi I could see it was an unfiltered shot. If there was some filter or PS, I couldn't tell, so the important point is they were accurate. 4th photo is 1 cropped example. There were many others.

5th and 6th photos are 2 later ads they used when Chichi toured again. I think there is light PS making her look slimmer and smoothing out the face. It is very light. She had a great figure imo and didn't need it, so it took a long examination to identify the PS. Not bad, she actually looked about the same level as her ads just slightly different. In the 6th picture attached, she has full make up on. I repeated her many times and did see her look pretty much like that, but usually she didn't. It's another factor in ad photos and the same point I made about Jenny K.

I saw Chichi and Jenny K match their ad photos even down to the make up look, but most visits they did not have that make up. That is the big caveat even when the ad matches - it won't stay that way. It is simply too hard to maintain full make up and do appointments, the make up wears off and causes problems. But glamour shots will show it. It's a case where the ad is not representative, but not wrong either (it is not some filter). It's why in-apartment selfies are superior, because usually it's taken when she is "ready" and more representative. They are also way more recent. When I saw HX independents, girls would post hundreds of selfies, and they varied over time. The more recent photos were sometimes as close as you can get with natural day-by-day variation only. I used to write HX guides and this was one way to pick your girl.

Last two photos are SC Emily from 2 years ago. I repeated her many times over a long time and her weight did go up and down. Sometimes she was very skinny. I feel like there could be PS in the selfie but it is not far off if there is. Meaning the important point is it's representative. Note the big hands, that's not filtering but what happens when you stand close to a mirror and take a selfie (if you try it yourself, your hand easily gets bigger than your head). Those were her nails, her jewelry, her outfit, her hairstyle, the apartment. Chefs kiss. The last photo is another one, it has light PS but was representative. She had an unreal exotic look to her face, it is a one of a kind face. She was mixed Thai and Chinese. So to the extent there is PS, it's as close as you can hope for and the ad captures her well.

I think I got very lucky with these and other girls I saw at SweetCandies. I reported when ads were accurate and so did others, and I never got a dud. I consider that a combo of intel and luck, it is just a matter of time when my luck changes. I did see plenty of placeholder ads and ads with more PS, but it wasn't korg level. MILFs got MILF ads, which was what mattered to me. Many Thai women are thick and full bodied. It's not my thing, but glad that ads usually showed that too. Especially backside shots with no face, people generally reported them as accurate with low or no filter.

I would not expect true HYA at thai orgs often. S99 Lyla was borderline HYA in October in SD, she was a solid girl but like with korgs it's maybe 10% to 20% HYA depending on your standard. She was short tour so never rotated to LA.

There are some girls who use completely fake ads. If the girl is the same level as the ad then I call it a placeholder ad, I assume for privacy. Keep an eye out for new updated ads that are selfies or in-apartment, they tend to be decent. But lately, people are pointing out there are ads looking too much better than the girl, so the only solution is intel.

[Download X]

I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.

Yes, it's true. If you follow the agency ad photos, you'll see they cycle through various photos for some veteran girls. SC Maya for example has about 20 different photos. Usually, ass photos without face and in-apartment selfies tend to be the most accurate. No face photos are sometimes unfiltered (as far as I can tell). Even korgs occasionally do that, though it is rare.

When a girl has weird face PS, it does make her look worse. It's for privacy. More often, it is the usual PS to improve her age / looks.

FA Sammy for example has no face photos that are exactly her - but face photos are heavily PS'd. Her body actually looks better than her no face photos, you can't see how well toned and good her complexion is from a zoomed out full shot photo.

Some girls like KDC Jenny K vary their looks both over time and even day to day as far as make up. So my first visit to Jenny K, she looked 95% like her ad photo including the exact outfit in her ad and same make up style. It was extremely close. But my second visit, she had different make up. Her weight went up and down, not by a lot, but enough to not match the ad closely. So even with a realistic and accurate ad, it drifts over time and even day by day. I have seen some girls occasionally with no make up, obviously it makes a difference. So even an unfiltered ad cannot exactly match a girl consistently, but what we hope for is it gives an accurate idea of the girl to help you pick the right girl.

SC Maya and Guitar are examples of girls with realistic ads. It gives you the right idea even when there is some PS. So it gives a starting point for people to talk about the girl, especially if she has changed since the photos were taken. USAG has a photo attachment limit, so I will first include Maya's ad photos current and past.

[Skizzard]

Admittedly, I still haven't seen any of these Thai girls because I just can't find the time for the commute. However, I have noticed that the pics have been going down hill. What I mean by that is that they are slowly but surely moving from authentic, representative pics, to glammed up, touched up, or even flat out fake pics. Look at Pinky's new pics, for example. She was one of the girls I was most interested in meeting (and I still am). However, her new pics look so touched up it's hard to tell if it's even her. Anna's pics (Khaleesi) look flat out fake and that is what I will assume until confirmed otherwise.

I wish there was some way to make these agencies understand that having real and accurate pics is a major asset, and on top of the better pricing, it puts them at a huge advantage over the K agencies. I, for one, have completely abandoned the K agencies, first and foremost because the fake pics and rebranding make every session a crapshoot. When you add the crazy prices on top of that, it is just not worth the risk. The Thai agencies should stay where they started and build our trust through real and accurate pics. I hope they read this.

I've noticed this trend too, and I completely agree with you. Selfies or the mirror shots are the best photos providers can use. I assume we all want to get what we see. Glam photos raise too many questions about authenticity. Pinky's old photos were amazing, her new ones (that's still her) don't make her look as good, but she was still cute with a slight tummy (service was good but not great, no DFK). Regardless, the new photo trend makes me pause whereas before I wouldn't hesitate.

[FiatVoluptas]

Admittedly, I still haven't seen any of these Thai girls because I just can't find the time for the commute. However, I have noticed that the pics have been going down hill. What I mean by that is that they are slowly but surely moving from authentic, representative pics, to glammed up, touched up, or even flat out fake pics. Look at Pinky's new pics, for example. She was one of the girls I was most interested in meeting (and I still am). However, her new pics look so touched up it's hard to tell if it's even her. Anna's pics (Khaleesi) look flat out fake and that is what I will assume until confirmed otherwise.

I wish there was some way to make these agencies understand that having real and accurate pics is a major asset, and on top of the better pricing, it puts them at a huge advantage over the K agencies. I, for one, have completely abandoned the K agencies, first and foremost because the fake pics and rebranding make every session a crapshoot. When you add the crazy prices on top of that, it is just not worth the risk. The Thai agencies should stay where they started and build our trust through real and accurate pics. I hope they read this.

[Skizzard]

That's a pity, she was fun. Would like to know where she is as well.

I have no idea. She hasn't popped up anywhere as of yet.

[MyFinalHeav3]

Forgot to add, she's left Pasadena already.

That's a pity, she was fun. Would like to know where she is as well.

[TJ2617]

Forgot to add, she's left Pasadena already.

No, I wanted to see her. Where is she now?

[Skizzard]

Are the face pics accurate, representative?

Forgot to add, she's left Pasadena already.

[Skizzard]

Are the face pics accurate, representative?

Mmmm, kind of? The photos online look filtered and her face looked filtered in person too, she wasn't ugly but she had the silicone lips and tons of make up, she looks ready for a photo shoot so DFK or LFK were off the table. Probably takes her a while to get all that ready, but her body was great.

[TnaStylez]

I can save you all the trouble. I saw Daisy (new face pics on HX). She's got a tight petite body with big fake tits. Some kind of surgical tape on the underboob, so she might've just gotten them done. Face is ok with big balloon lips, her face looks photoshopped in real life, it was weird haha. But I guess you could say she was attractive in that way. Service was mediocre, but will say she's got a nice little ass on her and she was thin but she struggles with size. I was looking for her body type after having my fill of seeing soft bodies for a while so she fit the bill. She got the job done but I won't be repeating.

Are the face pics accurate, representative?