Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 16 to 30 of 10780
-
01-16-26 17:24 #10765Regular Member

Posts: 47I can concur with Lexx, in that I have had good experiences with several SB's on SDM amongst those who never reply or stop replying. Granted, I'm only maintaining arrangements with three SB's right now and so I'm not on Lexx's level. Yet! It definitely can be kinda addicting to search, find and connect with new SB's, just to find out who is interested and has follow though. I had a M&G with someone new this week and she said I was the first guy who actually followed through on meeting up in person, this being after she joined the site 5 months ago. So yeah, the SD's can be just as flaky and inconsistent as any SB!
Originally Posted by Lexx1
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-26 16:32 #10764Senior Member

Posts: 53What's your salary lex? Being able to support 9-10 SBs.
Originally Posted by Lexx1
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-26 12:52 #10763Senior Member

Posts: 896You must not be reading my posts about SDM man. Because there's so many of Seeking's dick riders on this thread. Lmao The one site for sugar that truly does suck is Secret Benefits. Don't waste your money on any "credits" based payment system like theirs. It has sister sites like sugardaddy.com. Stay away.
Originally Posted by Pulgotass
[View Original Post]
SDM is a legit sugar site. But it's not perfect. Seeking is not perfect either. It should be at the stupid expensive sub its priced at. But nope! I've had good success on SDM. You just have to get a hang of how their flame matches work and how their search system works. I lapsed my sub on SDM a second time and will start again by end of month. That's around when new babies come along and other girls there start replying more. Because the first of the month is around the corner and they need rent money and other fun shit.
Plus I have enough new girls on my roster now that I really don't need to be adding anymore. LOL But it can get addicting hunting new young pussy. I currently have two Asian girls, three Latinas, two White girls, one Black girl, one mixed girl and close to sealing deal with a new mixed girl. New mixed girl flame matched with me and wants to fuck soon. I'm digging her because she's got a cute nerdy look and wears glasses. I have a kink for girls that wear glasses. I love facializing them and nutting on their glasses. LOL And then making them lick / eat my nut off their glasses. Fuckin hot seeing them do that and all on video. So I'm doing very well with the site.
And average girls asking for GPS amounts are on any sugar site. Seeking is the worst offender for that. Because it's the most well known site for sugar. Well at least it was a sugar site. Now it's a pseudo "luxury dating" site. lol
This thread is called Sugar Daddy "Sites" not Seeking. Good worthy competitors should be encouraged not discouraged. And any proper sugar site will have its flaws. No one site is perfect.
-
01-16-26 10:54 #10762Senior Member

Posts: 622SDM is Seeking's leftover girls or girls that couldn't find any SDs on Seeking. Also, a majority of SDM's profile are either fake, outdated / inactive, or located in the middle of no where. And the few that are real, I already seen them on Seeking. I came across some profiles with hot pics then I look at their age and it's 40+. The photo and their age don't match. Some are located in a small town in CA and when you look on Google Maps it's in the middle of no where. Also, last activity date / time is inaccurate on SDM because they don't want to show how many inactive / outdated profiles is on their site. That's the reason why you're not getting any responses.
Originally Posted by Pulgotass
[View Original Post]
-
01-15-26 23:47 #10761Regular Member

Posts: 7Hoeflation
I gave up on seeking and gave SDM a try, and what a shit show it's been. Barely any responses and and the ones that do take forever to reply, so just like seeking.
What gets me the most is the out of control pricing one and a half bands for the most average looking gals, and I just had another ask for and a half. Anyone else have similar experiences lately?
-
01-14-26 22:49 #10760Senior Member

Posts: 5591Very true. But I just came back from a 3 day biz trip to L. A. Found a girl on seeking to let me stay at her place all 3 nites. Spent maybe $$$ on her while I was there. Not a lot happened but she did ask me to come back.
Originally Posted by AceMcNasty
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-26 12:58 #10759Senior Member

Posts: 227Sent me her contact info and I'll let you know!
Originally Posted by AceMcNasty
[View Original Post]
-
01-13-26 10:59 #10758Senior Member

Posts: 3224Wins and losses on seeking
It is always a challenge to find a prepaid card that works on seeking. I just got a month's membership using this card. I can't tell you what the packaging was, I got it long ago.
I have used lots pics for my seeking profile of the same guy (I know / knew of professionally (he's deceased)) who looks like me. I tried to take a real pic of me and use Microsoft's copilot to modify it so facial rec software would not match it to me IRL. I put it on my seeking profile, they spiked it because of "misrepresentation".
-
01-12-26 23:49 #10757Senior Member

Posts: 99Math Nerd
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...6-1edcee8baf8c
Anybody have experiences with her? Any info would help. TIA.
-
01-12-26 21:42 #10756Senior Member

Posts: 896Definitely weird. Maybe they are actually raising the prices to that soon. The screenshots I posted were recent screenshots. But I had seen those prices months ago in early to mid 2025. Not the beginning of 2026 like their blog update says they were going to go in effect. Or maybe they're picking at random who's sugardaddy ass they want to tax more. LOL But for me anything over a 100 for a sub is silly to pay. Especially for a site that's not technically a sugar arrangement site anymore.
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]
Why would I pay more for a pompous, pass me the Grey Poupon, snobby site. When I can find the same type of girls on an affordable site like SDM and the girls themselves be more affordable. Pussy shouldn't be 500 and up even for the "hot" ones. Unless you're maybe getting quite a few hours or overnight with that girl. AND she's a true GFE experience in bed. Meaning no rubbers for anything, kissing, swallowing, CIP and maybe anal play which usually automatically ends with CIA. Taking video and pics is icing on the cake. Which I get with most of my girls with no extra money offered in the arrangement.
-
01-09-26 15:44 #10755Senior Member

Posts: 1204Woooosh!
Since you stopped sugaring and became domesticated, you ain't as sharp no more dude. You lost your edge. My post flew over your head like them BlackHawk choppers above some Narco Dictator's house in S. America LOL.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
So which picture convinced you my self-proclaimed low body count baby is in fact, a high volume nasty professional hoe?
Originally Posted by BerolLoz
[View Original Post]
Let me guess. The FIVE guys? Ha ha ha.
-
01-09-26 15:30 #10754Senior Member

Posts: 548HAHA! This is awesome. Had a bad week so that is just what a need to see. Thank YOU!
Originally Posted by AceMcNasty
[View Original Post]
-
01-09-26 12:40 #10753Senior Member

Posts: 622That's how much my friend paid. He send me a screenshot. I checked the prices on the website. I'm guessing he is the only one that paid that price. Weird.
Originally Posted by Lexx1
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-26 20:28 #10752Senior Member

Posts: 5591Haha. LOL. I thought you only dated AA. But if the price is right go for it.
Originally Posted by AceMcNasty
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-26 20:25 #10751Senior Member

Posts: 5591Here is mine. been a member since 2012 but had a different profile.. and was on SD4M and CL before that
Originally Posted by Lexx1
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote





