Visited with Arden from LTLV when the my #1 choice was not available. Not much English, MM C's, website pics are reasonably close. Not the most enthusiastic K-girl (however it was late in day so perhaps fatigue). Not a repeat for me with so many choices available. Overall perhaps a 6/10.
Has anyone tried the Pepsi / Amy duo? Pepsi messaged me yesterday to let me know that there is a new duo available with her. I had to let her know that I'm out of town for some travels, but that if the duo is still available in January when I'm back in town, that I'd give it a try. Has anyone tried the Pepsi / Amy duo yet? I'd imagine that it's at least solid, since Pepsi is involved, but maybe it is a great duo if Amy is good. I haven't seen Amy yet, so I can't speak to her service. If anyone does see Amy or tries the duo, please report back. We'd appreciate that.
Has anyone seen VAC Bubble? Is her description as being 22 accurate?
Yes, she used to go by Jennie and her body lacks the tightness of someone in their 20s. With that said, I'd still repeat with her since the action was good and the meatiness didn't detract from the overall experience.
Unfortunately, you cannot solve the naming problem this way for Socal kgirls. For example, most girls are multi-booker so I didn't see them at any agency in that sense. It's a foreign concept to LV. You must look at ad photos to differentiate girls. More importantly, girls change agency. When listing the agency would help, I list them. Most of the time it won't. The names are always in the context of Socal, and there is no ambiguity to a Socal regular. I'm not going to redo everything for LV.
In Japan, S has long been used in school to represent a grade above A. You can consider S = Super. If you got all A's at school, your GPA is 4.0. But there is such a thing as a GPA of 5.0 (ex. AP classes). S means exactly what 5.0 means in school. You see it used a lot in video games, which is where I adopted it from. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_Japan
I rank girls from 1st place to 180th place in looks. Then, I assign S-Rank to the top 4%, A-Rank to the next 12%, and so on. The rough distribution of rankings is:
4% S-Tier, 12% A-Tier, 20% B-Tier, 25% C-Tier, 20% D-Tier, 15% E-Tier, 4% F-Tier
It is bell curved. When I set the standards (I consider certain girls to mark the borderlines), the grading is set. These grades are only useful to "Looks First" HYA Hunters. Service Hunters who are used to seeing kgirl MILFs tend to hate HYA for low service. Don't even bother, they'll be disappointed.
Girls tend to be either for Looks, or for Service. When I see a high service MILF, my eyes are closed and it feels amazing getting worshipped. MILFs win when my eyes are closed, HYA win when my eyes are open. Easiest way to explain it.
Thank you for the clarification and I am glad to learn that S is for "super" vs "shitty". Happy holidays.
I'm unable to find what that means. Can anyone point me to the code dictionary.
Essentially there's a ranking above A that's needed.
Let's say A rank are girls you cannot go wrong with. Whether that's by looks or service. Eventually with luck that bucket will be full of girls. At that point you need a tier above which is S-tier.
Let's say A-tier is like the all-star team. S-tier is the hall of famers.
Any chance that your future rankings can include which agency you saw them at? So many of them repeat names. Thanks for the rankings either way.
Unfortunately, you cannot solve the naming problem this way for Socal kgirls. For example, most girls are multi-booker so I didn't see them at any agency in that sense. It's a foreign concept to LV. You must look at ad photos to differentiate girls. More importantly, girls change agency. When listing the agency would help, I list them. Most of the time it won't. The names are always in the context of Socal, and there is no ambiguity to a Socal regular. I'm not going to redo everything for LV.
I'm unable to find what that means. Can anyone point me to the code dictionary.
In Japan, S has long been used in school to represent a grade above A. You can consider S = Super. If you got all A's at school, your GPA is 4.0. But there is such a thing as a GPA of 5.0 (ex. AP classes). S means exactly what 5.0 means in school. You see it used a lot in video games, which is where I adopted it from. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_grading_in_Japan
I rank girls from 1st place to 180th place in looks. Then, I assign S-Rank to the top 4%, A-Rank to the next 12%, and so on. The rough distribution of rankings is:
4% S-Tier, 12% A-Tier, 20% B-Tier, 25% C-Tier, 20% D-Tier, 15% E-Tier, 4% F-Tier
It is bell curved. When I set the standards (I consider certain girls to mark the borderlines), the grading is set. These grades are only useful to "Looks First" HYA Hunters. Service Hunters who are used to seeing kgirl MILFs tend to hate HYA for low service. Don't even bother, they'll be disappointed.
Girls tend to be either for Looks, or for Service. When I see a high service MILF, my eyes are closed and it feels amazing getting worshipped. MILFs win when my eyes are closed, HYA win when my eyes are open. Easiest way to explain it.
Yes, this sums her up very well so I'm quoting all of it for emphasis (I generally quote the parts I agree with). One of a kind. She improves a lot on repeats if you vibe. It's a big if, so you could say it is ymmv service. Once you see a few S-Tier girls on my rankings, you'll understand why I rated the other girls A-Tier. A-Tier is beautiful, but there is a step above that. https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/sho...=1#post7460555 "Looks Only" Rankings
In the rankings list, LV guys might recognize SBC Angel aka VAC Angel, Baby Peach, Baby Arin, Baby Hami, Sammy. In that order. Baby Arin and Baby Hami are low A-Tier, which is still beautiful and high tier. Note for LV there is an agency which is strictly banned from mention, so follow that rule. Don't even mention girls that worked there in any context of the LV agency.
Yes, if anyone wants they can search OC for her reviews. You'll find a description of her like this:
Baby Peach - HYA. High looks and service. Cute face like a doll, baby face, 20s, about 5'4", C or D MMs, wide hips and ass, beautiful black hair with curls, smells good, very good looking overall. Professional kgirl vibe, good skills and service. Lots of tongue play. 380 rate with limited schedule. Ad photos give a decent idea of her body type.
Peach is A+ Looks, A Service. This is from a HYA Hunter's perspective. For a Service Hunter (guy who sees MILF service queens), it's mixed feedback since she is not a service queen. Just a young girl with good skills who enjoys sex if you have good manners. I consistently get good service from HYA because I make them feel safe and comfortable and vibe well with them. But guys who are disrespectful or rough actually get bad service from HYA. If it's bad enough you'll be blocked or banned. I don't know LV's standards but that's how it works in Socal.
I try to describe my ATFs like Angel and Peach accurately without hype because I truly believe there is no girl every guy likes. You have to match make based on her specs, looking at her pros and cons. For example, a random thing like tattoos or small tits can be a huge dealbreaker to a specific guy. I don't hype my ATFs because hype simply makes guys with high expectations see them, guys who are hard to please and end up disappointed if a girl is hyped. They won't like the girl, and the girl won't like him. By the same token, all you need to do to gauge if my intel is useful or not is to look up my past reviews for girls you recognize and judge if they were accurate or not:
Attached is a sample of some ATFs in a reference spreadsheet I made. I don't spend much time grading mid girls or duds, so the spreadsheet only has a few that were very memorably bad. The list is mostly top 25% girls instead. The attachment is just a short sample.
Any chance that your future rankings can include which agency you saw them at? So many of them repeat names. Thanks for the rankings either way.
Yes, this sums her up very well so I'm quoting all of it for emphasis (I generally quote the parts I agree with). One of a kind. She improves a lot on repeats if you vibe. It's a big if, so you could say it is ymmv service. Once you see a few S-Tier girls on my rankings, you'll understand why I rated the other girls A-Tier. A-Tier is beautiful, but there is a step above that. https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/sho...=1#post7460555 "Looks Only" Rankings
In the rankings list, LV guys might recognize SBC Angel aka VAC Angel, Baby Peach, Baby Arin, Baby Hami, Sammy. In that order. Baby Arin and Baby Hami are low A-Tier, which is still beautiful and high tier. Note for LV there is an agency which is strictly banned from mention, so follow that rule. Don't even mention girls that worked there in any context of the LV agency.
Yes, if anyone wants they can search OC for her reviews. You'll find a description of her like this:
Baby Peach - HYA. High looks and service. Cute face like a doll, baby face, 20s, about 5'4", C or D MMs, wide hips and ass, beautiful black hair with curls, smells good, very good looking overall. Professional kgirl vibe, good skills and service. Lots of tongue play. 380 rate with limited schedule. Ad photos give a decent idea of her body type.
Peach is A+ Looks, A Service. This is from a HYA Hunter's perspective. For a Service Hunter (guy who sees MILF service queens), it's mixed feedback since she is not a service queen. Just a young girl with good skills who enjoys sex if you have good manners. I consistently get good service from HYA because I make them feel safe and comfortable and vibe well with them. But guys who are disrespectful or rough actually get bad service from HYA. If it's bad enough you'll be blocked or banned. I don't know LV's standards but that's how it works in Socal.
I try to describe my ATFs like Angel and Peach accurately without hype because I truly believe there is no girl every guy likes. You have to match make based on her specs, looking at her pros and cons. For example, a random thing like tattoos or small tits can be a huge dealbreaker to a specific guy. I don't hype my ATFs because hype simply makes guys with high expectations see them, guys who are hard to please and end up disappointed if a girl is hyped. They won't like the girl, and the girl won't like him. By the same token, all you need to do to gauge if my intel is useful or not is to look up my past reviews for girls you recognize and judge if they were accurate or not:
Attached is a sample of some ATFs in a reference spreadsheet I made. I don't spend much time grading mid girls or duds, so the spreadsheet only has a few that were very memorably bad. The list is mostly top 25% girls instead. The attachment is just a short sample.
I'm unable to find what that means. Can anyone point me to the code dictionary.
I saw Angel twice during her stay in LV. Can confirm she is S-tier. The hottest girl I've seen in this hobby thus far, closest thing to banging a K-pop idol. Below is my review after seeing her the first time.
To be clear, she is $600 GFE, $800 BBFS, $100 MSOG for incall.
This is not cheap. So beware.
As I enter the apartment this beautiful Korean idol opens the door. She is shy at first. I greet her in Korean she gets excited thinking I can speak Korean, but I had to temper her expectations. She leads me to the room and sits on the bed and starts asking me questions. Now to many people (especially at this price point) it may come across as time wasting. But I think she genuinely is curious, nervous, and feeling out her clients at this point. So I highly recommend you go with the flow if this is the approach you get.
I answer her questions and ask her a few myself. I tell her she's gorgeous, and she says she isn't. I then ask to do mouthwash (she didn't offer shower or mouthwash, but I came clean and dressed to impress so YMMV) because I just had coffee, she points to the bathroom. I come back and we talk some more, while I sit next to her running my hands up her legs. She playfully suggest we do rock paper scissors to decide who undresses first.
Once the clothes are off she gets on her knees for a BBBJ. While this isn't the best, the visuals alone will send you over the top. The room is well lit, she has nothing to hide. The walls are all covered in mirrors. I take the time to burn this image into my brain. She does give good suction and technique, but she isn't the best. She does start doing some DT (I'm average size at best) so I grab her head and do some light FF. I shove her head down til she gags, I make sure to check in she was ok with it as well.
After this I take time to worship her body, suck her nipples, LFK at first. I asked if she was hesitant to DFK, she said no. So the tongue action started then. I put her on her back, spend some time on her pussy then enter her in mish. Spent time in mish, and multiple positions. She would make suggestions in positions, she seemed she was into it. She does this cute thing where she partially covers her face when she starts feeling it. Feels totally natural, GFE vibes. I'm just loving it. Her moans are perfect, scripted or not. I go through multiple positions for about 20-30 min just enjoying my dick being in this idol. Though I know I am going to struggle to finish as this was probably my 3rd monger this week. Being older I am pushing it. I feel like she came a couple times as her pussy just got crazy wet and I could feel her body shudder.
As I couldn't climax she asks if it was her, I said no and explained its just apart of getting older. She laughs and I tell her I still had a great time. I will definitely see her in LA if she's available next time I'm there, she said I should and then said "I want your cum inside me next time. " I laughed, I can't disappoint her now.
She will be in Vegas one last time in January during CES week. She said she was barely getting any work here the first time in Vegas. She is worth the extra dime if you are looking for a good trophy fuck. Treat her well.
Yes, this sums her up very well so I'm quoting all of it for emphasis (I generally quote the parts I agree with). One of a kind. She improves a lot on repeats if you vibe. It's a big if, so you could say it is ymmv service. Once you see a few S-Tier girls on my rankings, you'll understand why I rated the other girls A-Tier. A-Tier is beautiful, but there is a step above that. https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/sho...=1#post7460555 "Looks Only" Rankings
In the rankings list, LV guys might recognize SBC Angel aka VAC Angel, Baby Peach, Baby Arin, Baby Hami, Sammy. In that order. Baby Arin and Baby Hami are low A-Tier, which is still beautiful and high tier. Note for LV there is an agency which is strictly banned from mention, so follow that rule. Don't even mention girls that worked there in any context of the LV agency.
Fantastic time with baby Peach great body with MM upgrades and gives great service plenty of dfk and BBBJ, great attitude willing to please. Will continue to repeat.
Yes, if anyone wants they can search OC for her reviews. You'll find a description of her like this:
Baby Peach - HYA. High looks and service. Cute face like a doll, baby face, 20s, about 5'4", C or D MMs, wide hips and ass, beautiful black hair with curls, smells good, very good looking overall. Professional kgirl vibe, good skills and service. Lots of tongue play. 380 rate with limited schedule. Ad photos give a decent idea of her body type.
Peach is A+ Looks, A Service. This is from a HYA Hunter's perspective. For a Service Hunter (guy who sees MILF service queens), it's mixed feedback since she is not a service queen. Just a young girl with good skills who enjoys sex if you have good manners. I consistently get good service from HYA because I make them feel safe and comfortable and vibe well with them. But guys who are disrespectful or rough actually get bad service from HYA. If it's bad enough you'll be blocked or banned. I don't know LV's standards but that's how it works in Socal.
I try to describe my ATFs like Angel and Peach accurately without hype because I truly believe there is no girl every guy likes. You have to match make based on her specs, looking at her pros and cons. For example, a random thing like tattoos or small tits can be a huge dealbreaker to a specific guy. I don't hype my ATFs because hype simply makes guys with high expectations see them, guys who are hard to please and end up disappointed if a girl is hyped. They won't like the girl, and the girl won't like him. By the same token, all you need to do to gauge if my intel is useful or not is to look up my past reviews for girls you recognize and judge if they were accurate or not:
I've said before that I review girls because I feel sorry for other guys. So really, once I post accurate intel I don't actually care if you believe me or not.
Attached is a sample of some ATFs in a reference spreadsheet I made. I don't spend much time grading mid girls or duds, so the spreadsheet only has a few that were very memorably bad. The list is mostly top 25% girls instead. The attachment is just a short sample.
Originally Posted by Luvluv99
[View Original Post]
Reply With Quote
