Thread: Rants, Raves, and Stupid Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Bullshit
+
Add Report
Results 1 to 15 of 1961
-
Yesterday 18:07 #1961Senior Member

Posts: 566The Asian agencies do the same thing. You'll frequently see a 'new girl' advertised and it turns out to be one of the ones that's come into town before. They do this for several reasons, first they understand that girls with too many reviews (even if they're all good ones) tend to be regarded as high volume (and thus have less value), additionally, they'll sometimes quote different price levels (to see if they can get more). They'll test out the effectiveness of certain photos or phrases on one ad or the other (A / B Split Testing), and they'll also have a backup identity should one of their stage names catches a bad review (which can be devastating for a high end provider's business). If their reputation falls apart under one name, they can go all in on the other. I believe the smarter girls are doing this, vs what the other ones do, throwing away an old name and contact info when they catch bad reviews and then completely start over with a new name. We certainly know some providers mentioned here that have had 6-7 different profile names over the course of years. Having a developed backup lets them avoid skipping a beat in their earnings.
Originally Posted by Tawayem
[View Original Post]
-
Yesterday 11:59 #1960Regular Member

Posts: 10Same
Deff same. Saw within two weeks. She advertises like that as her adds speak to two different clientele. She doesn't limit herself by one.
Originally Posted by Tawayem
[View Original Post]
-
Yesterday 11:36 #1959Senior Member

Posts: 149My experience
I have seen "both" of them and they are the same girl. No idea why she does it that way, but it must be working for her. You can actually see a fairly unique bracelet in both profiles that is hers. I've attached the pictures from the different ads and you can see for yourself.
Originally Posted by Tawayem
[View Original Post]
-
01-27-26 18:19 #1958Senior Member

Posts: 268You're free to think that, but they're different people. Even when they were with BKS, they were advertised as different people by the agency. Why would the agency go through that trouble if it was just one person?
Originally Posted by MrBJohnson
[View Original Post]
Even now, they have different TER profiles, different tryst profiles, different email addresses, phone numbers, and one has a P411, while the other does not.
If you look at their tryst activity too, both are active frequently. One was active today, the other yesterday.
It makes 0 sense for one person to maintain two completely separate profiles, with separate physical descriptions BTW. Marcelle lists herself as 5' with green eyes, while Michelle Lavigne lists herself as 5'1" with brown eyes.
If you can explain logically all of these discrepancies, sure, I'll concede it's one person. But it's not. The fact that the agency they both were with together listed them as separate providers is the biggest evidence that they're separate.
I'm not interested in this becoming an argument, so believe what you want.
-
12-08-25 22:49 #1957Senior Member

Posts: 225More info, please?
What were her rates? Anything bare? GFE / PSE?
Originally Posted by NiteLifed69
[View Original Post]
-
12-05-25 11:53 #1956Senior Member

Posts: 49Thank you
This is a great review of your experiences. Since some of these ladies aren't on CC or other anymore, do you think any would mind you sharing contact information?
Originally Posted by NiteLifed69
[View Original Post]
-
12-04-25 16:12 #1955Senior Member

Posts: 66Seeking and Cuddle Comfort Reflections
I like this thread so I will post my reflections here.
During the government shutdown, I was trying to avoid spending any money. I had paused sugaring and cuddle comfort sessions but still some of the sugar babies and CC professionals reached out. I told them about my situation and I was taking a pause for right now and a couple of them ended up blocking me from texting and block me on SA and CC but not all where like t hat.
I had one SB said we could skip the room and just have a date in her SUV. I was surprised when one pro from CC, She is strictly platonic cuddler at least for me, provided me with a free 90 minute cuddle session! She said I have been a good client, and she was confident that once the shutdown ended, we'd be able to pick up our sessions again.
A lot of this reminds of Season 1 of The GirlFriend Experience About not backing down on rates, I have not seen the other seasons but I liked Riley Keough, who's Elvis Presley Granddaughter, in season 1. She plays an upscale escort.
Recap from Vulture.com and they even referenced Tits and SASS article on never Running Specials.
There is a scene where she is with a regular client who When Christine presses him, he reveals he's not quite as wealthy as he's led her to believe. Regular sessions have been stressing his finances (even apparently causing him to take out loans), but the thought of ending the relationship is too much for him to bear. Christine suggests they see each other less, Kevin asks her to lower her rate, and she offers to figure out an arrangement that'll offer some sort of happy medium. Later in the episode, the two regroup: After giving it some thought, Christine's decided she has to cut Kevin loose. "I just can't make exceptions," she says as he pleads with her to reconsider.
https://titsandsass.com/if-i-cant-se...ning-specials/
To go with this, I have posted about Kaydee before. Like one of the comments " She was good before she wasn't".
I started going over her to see her when she had that apartment in Wilson, she had that big puppy dog crate in the apartment and then even when she was out in Statonsburg. She asked me to send her 25 dollars and she did, she invited me over and didn't take any payment that was a great time, she was an acrobat that day but of course she started blowing my phone up afterwards. Statonsburg was when I stopped seeing her, the broken window and the rundown place out in the boondocks. You could tell this was not going to end well for anyone involved. Her and her buddy was not worth the 100 dollar dream.
Unto Cuddle Comfort down through the years on CC, I have seen 30 cuddlers, I have posted some of them in the Raleigh CC thread, Only 3 have been platonic for me. YMMV.
One of the three that was platonic for me was GypsyCuddler, She had another name LuvsHugs or something but she was strictly platonic with me but then I see from other threads.
She had a menu. She's banned on CC. I saw a post where she is on Cuddle Companions.
Going back to that Vulture article in reference to CC, the three pros. I am talking pros I really enjoyed and also all 3 at one time or another where / still on Seeking.
1. Pinkbabybunny. Her menu was too expensive but almost everything was on the able. I just couldn't pay that every time. She's has deleted her CC account.
2. Nerdie Birdy. Always a great time, she's seems semi-pro now, great conversation, awesome massages, incredible FS she has so much energy but she is pricey with a full menu.
3. Sweet and Strong. She is really the one I would compare to the character in GFE. I knew when she located to the District she would do great. Silicon Hills, Silicon Valley, Seaport District these are locations she would do great because she's a comic book geek and Techie, You can hangout in a comic book store with her and she wouldn't be bored, She looks so sexy reading the books. I may have to request for her to dress as a librarian next time I am in The District. Exceptional conversation, she doesn't match Nerdie's energy in the bedroom, I think few can, if Nerdie is into you she puts her back into and you're going to have a great time:0 but where Strong stands out is she is more intimate and sensual but like all of that I have mentioned the menu is / was nice but expensive.
I am not even going to say.
I should change my screenname to Kevin Yung based off the character from the Girlfriend Experience. I am not a Whale or MrSponsor when it comes to sugaring or having a session with someone from CC.
I couldn't see paying that much even if I had Elon Musk money.
Again YMMV!
That's my two cents. Nanu Nanu, and may your arrangements be plentiful!
-
12-03-25 19:51 #1954Regular Member

Posts: 10Right On
Yes brother, I'm aware. I'm not tall I'm regular guy, not even that big LOL, but thing is I've done it before when market was less saturated I jumped on ball fast but gambled that away and lost a few good girls. But that's in the past now and I'm basically just looking for random advice or research. You are right for the most part but you also have to remember, porn is art, sex is art form, yes it's easier if you know what market and demographic you are getting into bc that's preset, but that doesn't mean every line has been set. Markets and futures change. Too build something is easy if you have good people to work with, I'm looking for that mainly brother, but I appreciate that reality of and gravity of your response. Very valid. (sorry again for missing this one earlier).
Originally Posted by Tawayem
[View Original Post]
-
11-20-25 03:08 #1953Senior Member

Posts: 71Very much agreed!
Would likely decrease unlawful trafficking, legitimize the space so that law abiding citizens could choose to partake in the industry on the provider and client side, and increase safety for all those involved from a health standpoint. Providers get fair pay and clients likely get far safer and better service. Make PreP easily accessible for all parties to further improve health safety.
Originally Posted by MmceStep
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-25 23:22 #1952Regular Member

Posts: 84Many good viewpoints have been expressed on ICE and immigration. I'm for law enforcement because the law applies to both citizens and non-citizens. Law abiding citizens and non-citizens creates a safe environment for all. Having sanctuary cities who decide what laws the want to follow is dangerous. Having district attorneys who are social activists is dangerous. Having serial criminals not incarcerated is dangerous. Having LE engage in racial profiling is dangerous.
The Biden administration was wrong for having an open border. People were not vetted. Unaccompanied children are missing. People crossing the border during COVID were not quarantined and they did not receive the vaccination. A lot of wrongs here that put citizens at risk. The Trump administration is wrong for being heavy handed when conducting illegal alien sweeps. Congress and past administrations were wrong to not address legal and illegal immigration.
I'm keeping this brief because this can get deep quickly but politics is to blame. When politics is allowed to operate above the law and above the will of the people then we see the negative results that divides and creates more problems.
-
11-19-25 22:31 #1951Senior Member

Posts: 566I could not agree with you more. Electing Democrats is the only way to end these draconian laws in NC and TX, and potentially decriminalize it completely (Harris for instance has said she'd like to decriminalize prostitution between consenting adults, with neither side being charged). The GOP has radically changed over the past 12 years, with the bulk of their policy platform attempting to legislate their morality onto the rest of us. As an attorney, you might be surprised to learn that I think we would be far more free with less laws on the books.
Originally Posted by PleasureSeeker
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-25 22:13 #1950Regular Member

Posts: 84Your rant is fair! I've only been active for a short time and I've also noticed that just a few who do follow-up when information has been given.
Originally Posted by CaryMike
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-25 18:04 #1949Senior Member

Posts: 182I mean here is my take. It's not true that we don't enforce immigration laws. If someone is found to be here illegally, they get deported. That has always been the case. The difference is that you usually only get caught if you committed a crime and are found out in some other way. Now, we are more aggressively searching out people here illegally who often have committed no additional crimes.
Originally Posted by CuriousVaMan
[View Original Post]
But, I should point out two things. One, simply overstaying a visa is actually not a "crime", it's a civil penalty. Crossing the border is a crime but only a misdemeanor leading to deportation.
ICE has drawn a number of resources away from other crime-fighting areas such as anti-trafficking and other types of true criminal investigations. Is it worth it? No, I don't think so. Let's focus on the really dangerous people and, if they happen to be here illegally, deal with them at that point. Many of the rest are simply here working and taking jobs that no one else really wants (and getting no additional benefits to do so).
Similarly, what other "crimes" are we sending people in with masked goons to capture them proactively?
-
11-19-25 12:51 #1948Senior Member

Posts: 459I too am moderate, however, I want the immigration laws of our nation enforced. ICE is simply enforcing existing law. Don't like the existing law? Change the law.
Regrettably, the immigration laws in this country have not been enforced for at least 30 years. For those in other countries whose lives are in danger, the UN has agreed upon the protocol for asserting an asylum claim. Under these protocols, the asylee is to claim asylum status in a neighboring country. For example, the referenced former Brazilian policeman should have claimed political asylum in Argentina for example, not the US. Truth be told, there aren't many political asylees. Most of them come to the US for work, which I fully understand. That said, I want my fellow Americans to have opportunity as well, the opportunity to work those shit jobs which incent one to acquire the skills to get a better job. It's difficult to do when those lower skill jobs are occupied by illegal aliens.
As for the constituency of ICE officers with chips on the shoulders, I don't know. I suspect many ICE officers are former military who the US government trained to use force.
.
Originally Posted by JohnD89
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-25 12:14 #1947Senior Member

Posts: 1644Press?
BTW Step: Ever consider going to the press with what you know or heard from the inside? Honestly, what you're saying their talking about internally is national news and would be important to le the press know, even possibly anonymously. That's some corrupt, Nazi shit.
Originally Posted by MmceStep
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote






