Sugar Daddy Sites

[AmgPhilly63]

Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:

Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.

Registered Address:

Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.

I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.

The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.

Thats nice. Well I got news for you. It is ABSOLUTELY the same people behind it. I created an account on there and within 10 minutes my cc account was banned. I immediately filed fraud chargebacks with my card and stuck it to them.

[HollywoodGuy]

Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.

Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.

Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:

References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."

Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.

Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.

They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.

I have adjusted my intro letter. Now there is no mention of anything that could be construed as ppm or any other "arrangement". But I do allude to having fun in a way that no one can misconstrue as anything other than hitting the FC. If they respond I go straight to txt. No problems the last few months I been doing it this way.

[FarFarAway]

I just noted the motto that comes up when you log on now.

You know what you want, find it on seeking.

Of course, read literally this is mild, but this is the game they play, to tease what it is without being overt.

And the policing is so random and selective, it is admittedly very very frustrating. However, women seem to like it and know it best, so that is why we go there.

[FarFarAway]

They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.

Uncertain about the accuracy of this. Both seeking and what'syourprice are from the same parent, W8 tech. The information I was able to find from the CC site is:

Registered in England & Wales No. 12081037.

Registered Address:

Cuddle Comfort Ltd, International House, 12 Constance Street, London, E16 2 DQ, United Kingdom.

I was on WYP for a while, I was having an easier time paying for my membership w / prepaid debit card. Their sites use the same payment processor. However, that hasn't generally proved to be the case, and I'd say paying the membership is a crapshoot.

The site itself says to pay using Google pay on the Android version of the phone app.

[Admin2]

They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.

It's all about CC processing. Banks prohibit sites that talk about prostitution from having merchant accounts. Since Fosta/Sesta passed its worse. Seeking/Cuddle Comfort do that so they can keep processing payments. They know exactly what is going on on their sites as do their banks but because they pull a Louis Renault (obscure film reference) whenever they catch somebody "Prostitution on our dating site, we are SHOCKED I tell you, SHOCKED."

It's as simple as that.

A2

[StevenWalker]

Good pooce.

[AmgPhilly63]

Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.

Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.

Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:

References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."

Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.

Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.

They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.

They are scumbags. Same company behind cuddlecomfort which is the biggest conflict of interest ever. 90% of the profiles on there are fake. I suggest you hit them with fraud chargebacks, that's what I did. Fuck them.

[FarFarAway]

Just got a slap on the wrist on seeking, totally unfair, but whatever.

Just thought everyone should be aware of the very restrictive terms of service. If you don't follow these, you are at risk.

Seeking strictly prohibits any form of compensated companionship, including references to or arrangements involving companionship, dating, or intimacy in exchange for money, gifts, financial support, mentorship, or other valuable benefits. This includes, but is not limited to:

References to "sugar dating," including terms like "sugar daddies," "sugar mamas," or "sugar babies."

Mentions of "PPM," "allowance," or specific monetary amounts in relation to companionship or relationships.

Offers or requests for paid dates, financial arrangements, or transactional intimacy.

They do also say that they don't police what people do off the site, but I fell victim of sending a screenshot of texts.

[CoolGuy818]

Hi Gents. Anyone met with this one on Sugardaddymeet? Goes under Cheekymiss. She comes off a bit pushy. Sent number within first few emails and a bit pushy to meet. Lives in Burbank and giving pro vibes.

She is or at least was on seeking too. Same deal, condoms for everything. I talked her down in how much and went to see her. Pics are old and she's gained a lot of weight since.

[Lexx1]

I want to "thumbs up" this comment with an LOL! .

You got to taste the rainbow man! LOL Today is the last day of my sub on sugardaddymeet. And I have to say it's a worthy competitor to seeking and hella cheap at 50/ month. I have hooked up with two Latina girls, White girl and a Black girl. Have another Black girl ready to fuck. And finally a cute young Japanese girl that I'm about to close the deal on. Ages between 19 and 24. Reasonable ppms between 200 to 400. Plus a bunch of other ongoing conversations.

I'm stopping the sub because I want to see if SDM allows established conversations to continue after. One thing I hated about Seeking is once you stopped your sub. You couldn't keep an established conversation going. That is stupid as fuck and now at 150 a month even dumber and a lower value. Keeps the riff raff out?! LOL Don't give a fuck if someone thinks I'm riff raff. I put importance on the value something gives me in return.

SDM giving me 4 honeys to fuck in a month's time is a great return in value.

You Grey Poupon dudes. Keep wasting your money on seeking.

[FarFarAway]

Congrats. I just met up w / 'Christy' - (IK her real name too).

She's been singing the song w / me that she needs 1 K per meet, which seemed counter to your experience. We M&G after some significant hassle, she is in LA and took Uber (uber-expensive).

She stuck to her guns. She did mention she was a little submissive, likes getting spanked, but betrayed nothing like you experienced. I LFKed her, but that's it. She's still nice.

I'd just say, she fucked you for sport, so more power to you. The fact I am an old bald guy could have something to do with it.

I've had a pretty specific roster for a while. A live in who I've been with sometime. Spiritually / yogi spinner who's German / Jewish / Italian.

As well as this Polish older woman who just has me under her spell. Thankfully she enjoys the company more then what I want to provide financially, as well as another 19 white girl from Newport and lastly my bit of Latin spice. From Argentina born and raised.

While I will say this girl doesn't seem as new to the site as the what her profile will suggest. I will say that she was eager to please. Met up for some drinks at a hotel in South OC that has a nice bar as well as good food. Talked for 2/3 hours and then decided to enjoy the rest of the evening upstairs. She was extremely submissive, eager to please and could not get enough. Put 2 or 3 loads inside her that night and she asked to stay, which I agreed to. Only for her to wake me up and begging for me to go again in the morning.

Won't say what I had to provide but it was next to nothing and she's already reaching out to tell me she's sore but thinking of me and wants to meet again.

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...2-fb2f1c0b5312

[SecondLove]

Don't report women on seeking, it comes to no good.

Totally agree! The last thing I want from Seeking admin is attention. I keep profile pics & text and I take a pic of all onsite messages I get and send. I also keep a full log of offsite texts I get up to a successful meet & greet with her. Hard drive storage is cheap. Begging Seeking admin for reinstatement is a PITA, unless you have a full record of evidence at hand.

Plus, in my experience, reporting bad actors, scammers, cat fishers and others rarely (perhaps never) results in that user getting punished.

[Grail47]

Don't be afraid of the dark side padawan. LOL Chocolate pussy is great pussy too. I have all the skittles flavors in my collection. LOL.

I want to "thumbs up" this comment with an LOL! .

[Lexx1]

Imma try and give her a shot. Not into the chocolate variety too much ill admit but a young skinny submissive play thing is hard to say no to. I hit her up on seeking and dry convo though.

Don't be afraid of the dark side padawan. LOL Chocolate pussy is great pussy too. I have all the skittles flavors in my collection. LOL.

[Ghost323]

Hey everyone Dave here, new SLN girl in Lakewood, her name is Nisha and she is 21. She can be submissive at times and is open minded. For example, she is not into anal but is willing to try, and she is not into girls but is willing to consider a 3 sum, would also consider MFM. She loves having her neck and behind her ear kissed, and being fingered. Not into rough sex as far as choking and slapping, but likes to be pounded. She likes giving head, just can't deep-throat, but is ok for CIM. OK for BBFS, but doesn't allow CIP. Low-Mid range PPM.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Babygirlnisha/

Imma try and give her a shot. Not into the chocolate variety too much ill admit but a young skinny submissive play thing is hard to say no to. I hit her up on seeking and dry convo though.