Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

[Lukkylou]

Do you think the pics were real and recent?

Met this little doll for a hhr. Slim with small tits, but a fantastic backside. Just like her pics. Face wasn't the prettiest but she was cute, youthful and tight all over. I walked into the room to a bitchy attitude. I initially interpreted it as a playful bratty demeanor, but she was definitely bitchy and annoying. Whatever. Below average CBJ, and she struggled in mish with her legs on my shoulders. I couldn't get in too deep. Flipped her around to doggie for a fantastic view. She continued being bitchy so I started going all in. She started struggling a bit but I could tell she was enjoying it by how she was squealing and how hard she was clenching the pillows haha. But the bitchiness continued. It's like she really regretted getting railed for cash. Whatever. I slammed her in doggie from all angles until I emptied out one of the biggest loads I've shot in a long time. Made my eyes cross honestly. For that alone it was worth it, but I won't be repeating unless that attitude changes.

[Manomissio]

Do they have a new website URL? I don't even know how to apply to get verified because I can't even find them now.

https://www.dancestudioac.net/verify

[DivingDeep70]

Has anyone who was locked out of the old AC due to screening been able to get in with the new "Dance Studio AC"? I did not get through screening for reasons I was never told. But I was hoping maybe old records were erased and we'd get another shot. Something like this must have happened way back when they went from Models Club Elite to AC. Because I was a regular at MCE and then locked out when I had to re-screen.

Do they have a new website URL? I don't even know how to apply to get verified because I can't even find them now.

[TJGeek]

New Euro-Asian girl, had to meet her.

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-sheri-2/

Tall and thin, close to pictures. Had a wild ride with her. Should have done the full hour instead of HHR to really experience her, but will next time. YMMV but worth a visit if she returns /.

[TJGeek]

Saw her a few years ago and had fun so why not see her again?

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/pr...-alla-is-back/

She has some curves now so the picture is not representative, and a few large tattoos which she had before.

Overall a high energy session with CBJ, DATY, DFK, and CFS in a few positions, then more CBJ in round two (did the full hour). Offered BBJ for extra 100 but I did not need it.

[TJGeek]

Saw her for the 3rd time and still hot!

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-vitalina/

Pictures are her or 99% accurate.

We hug, chat, and she goes for the CBJ while I am still standing. Then we get comfortable in bed and give mutual oral pleasure. I focus on her with DATY and FIV until she convulses. CFS in a few positions and I explode. We cuddle then round two of the same. A wonderful unrushed hour with a sweet Eastern Euro girl. In town about 1 week. Hopefully will return.

[Desparado]

She's working today. I'l have to see what it's about.

Do you think the pics were real and recent?

[Spame]

Anyone know what's going on with this agency. They haven't posted a schedule this week. They have not posted on x since Sept 12. Prior to this week they were pretty reliable posting schedule on their website and daily updates on x as to who was available.

Anyone know what happened to Olivia?

[Berserker06]

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

https://chicagocovergirls.live/

[Riina]

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-juliia/

This looks pretty good, right age and weight.

She's working today. I'l have to see what it's about.

[ClearlyFakeUse]

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

They just switched their domain. It had been listed on their old site for the last month or two. It's chicagocovergirls. Live now.

[TimJacks25]

Anybody going to the Halloween Party that's posted on CCG's website? I just reached out to the booker to get more information but he said it's sold out. I'm curious to know what it's all about, costs, etc. If anyone can provide a description of what the party's all about, I'd appreciate it!

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

[ClearlyFakeUse]

Anybody going to the Halloween Party that's posted on CCG's website? I just reached out to the booker to get more information but he said it's sold out. I'm curious to know what it's all about, costs, etc. If anyone can provide a description of what the party's all about, I'd appreciate it!

[Rpark52]

I largely agree with this. One way around it is, if you're a member, click on the name of the reviewer, and you can see whether they give out a wide variety of scores. If they rave about everyone, it's tough to trust. If there are some 5's and 6's given by a reviewer to another girl, then I'm more apt to trust a review with a 9 from that review-writer. Same goes for this site too tbh. While not numbered reviews, if one of y'all has posted a mix of duds, good times, and atf, I'm more apt to buy the story. Not a perfect system, no doubt, but better than nothing.

Yep. If there's someone I'm thinking of seeing, I'll look at other reviews by their reviewers and see if they've seen anyone else I have already seen. Then I'll compare our reviews/scores to see if their tastes are similar, then I'm more likely to trust their review. If they give someone a 9/9 for someone I've given a 6/6, it doesn't necessarily mean they're fake but it does mean we're probably looking for different things.

Both of these things make it sound like a lot of homework or research, but usually I'm just spending a couple minutes here and there if I'm seeing someone new.

[JasonWi]

Fake reviews at the other place have become a real problem lately, IMO. There was always a risk of exaggeration or poetic license, and I've always assumed the self bragging was bullshit from the start (she came 5 times!) But now, there's a very obvious influx of either google translated reviews (always easy to spot) or ones that are pure fantasy, maybe even ChatGPT generated. People are always pretty bad at guesses ages (myself included), so I've always already mentally adjusted most of the descriptions. Once you get 4 or 5 reviews that are pretty consistent in terms of description or activities, excluding the obvious bullshit ones, then I feel like I've gotten a good idea of what to expect.

I largely agree with this. One way around it is, if you're a member, click on the name of the reviewer, and you can see whether they give out a wide variety of scores. If they rave about everyone, it's tough to trust. If there are some 5's and 6's given by a reviewer to another girl, then I'm more apt to trust a review with a 9 from that review-writer. Same goes for this site too tbh. While not numbered reviews, if one of y'all has posted a mix of duds, good times, and atf, I'm more apt to buy the story. Not a perfect system, no doubt, but better than nothing.