Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

**TJGeek** · 10-25-25 07:20

Saw her for the 3rd time and still hot!

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-vitalina/

Pictures are her or 99% accurate.

We hug, chat, and she goes for the CBJ while I am still standing. Then we get comfortable in bed and give mutual oral pleasure. I focus on her with DATY and FIV until she convulses. CFS in a few positions and I explode. We cuddle then round two of the same. A wonderful unrushed hour with a sweet Eastern Euro girl. In town about 1 week. Hopefully will return.

**Desparado** · 10-24-25 10:33

Originally Posted by Riina [View Original Post]

She's working today. I'l have to see what it's about.

Do you think the pics were real and recent?

**Spame** · 10-23-25 17:45

Originally Posted by MichiBob [View Original Post]

Anyone know what's going on with this agency. They haven't posted a schedule this week. They have not posted on x since Sept 12. Prior to this week they were pretty reliable posting schedule on their website and daily updates on x as to who was available.

Anyone know what happened to Olivia?

**Berserker06** · 10-23-25 16:59

Originally Posted by TimJacks25 [View Original Post]

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

https://chicagocovergirls.live/

**Riina** · 10-23-25 15:45

Originally Posted by Riina [View Original Post]

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-juliia/

This looks pretty good, right age and weight.

She's working today. I'l have to see what it's about.

**Member #7206** · 10-23-25 15:10

Originally Posted by TimJacks25 [View Original Post]

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

They just switched their domain. It had been listed on their old site for the last month or two. It's chicagocovergirls. Live now.

**TimJacks25** · 10-23-25 13:30

Originally Posted by ClearlyFakeUse [View Original Post]

Anybody going to the Halloween Party that's posted on CCG's website? I just reached out to the booker to get more information but he said it's sold out. I'm curious to know what it's all about, costs, etc. If anyone can provide a description of what the party's all about, I'd appreciate it!

Like AC's who went down for a bit, I'm having trouble browsing CCG's site. You or anyone having this issue? Many of our frequent sites have been terrible to browse thru lately.

**Member #7206** · 10-22-25 16:04

Anybody going to the Halloween Party that's posted on CCG's website? I just reached out to the booker to get more information but he said it's sold out. I'm curious to know what it's all about, costs, etc. If anyone can provide a description of what the party's all about, I'd appreciate it!

**Rpark52** · 10-22-25 14:53

Originally Posted by JasonWi [View Original Post]

I largely agree with this. One way around it is, if you're a member, click on the name of the reviewer, and you can see whether they give out a wide variety of scores. If they rave about everyone, it's tough to trust. If there are some 5's and 6's given by a reviewer to another girl, then I'm more apt to trust a review with a 9 from that review-writer. Same goes for this site too tbh. While not numbered reviews, if one of y'all has posted a mix of duds, good times, and atf, I'm more apt to buy the story. Not a perfect system, no doubt, but better than nothing.

Yep. If there's someone I'm thinking of seeing, I'll look at other reviews by their reviewers and see if they've seen anyone else I have already seen. Then I'll compare our reviews/scores to see if their tastes are similar, then I'm more likely to trust their review. If they give someone a 9/9 for someone I've given a 6/6, it doesn't necessarily mean they're fake but it does mean we're probably looking for different things.

Both of these things make it sound like a lot of homework or research, but usually I'm just spending a couple minutes here and there if I'm seeing someone new.

**JasonWi** · 10-22-25 12:34

Originally Posted by Rpark52 [View Original Post]

Fake reviews at the other place have become a real problem lately, IMO. There was always a risk of exaggeration or poetic license, and I've always assumed the self bragging was bullshit from the start (she came 5 times!) But now, there's a very obvious influx of either google translated reviews (always easy to spot) or ones that are pure fantasy, maybe even ChatGPT generated. People are always pretty bad at guesses ages (myself included), so I've always already mentally adjusted most of the descriptions. Once you get 4 or 5 reviews that are pretty consistent in terms of description or activities, excluding the obvious bullshit ones, then I feel like I've gotten a good idea of what to expect.

I largely agree with this. One way around it is, if you're a member, click on the name of the reviewer, and you can see whether they give out a wide variety of scores. If they rave about everyone, it's tough to trust. If there are some 5's and 6's given by a reviewer to another girl, then I'm more apt to trust a review with a 9 from that review-writer. Same goes for this site too tbh. While not numbered reviews, if one of y'all has posted a mix of duds, good times, and atf, I'm more apt to buy the story. Not a perfect system, no doubt, but better than nothing.

**Rpark52** · 10-22-25 12:15

Originally Posted by Deadpool12 [View Original Post]

Got it. Thanks for the tip. Why wouldn't you recommend her? Looks? Service? Both?

Mainly looks, but we also didn't connect. Mostly a personal preference, but wouldn't recommend her over anyone else there that I've seen.

**Deadpool12** · 10-21-25 23:21

Originally Posted by Rpark52 [View Original Post]

On my opinion, no. Especially since her indy rate is more than it was at AC. YMMV, of course, and at least one other poster here liked her.

Got it. Thanks for the tip. Why wouldn't you recommend her? Looks? Service? Both?

**Rpark52** · 10-21-25 15:54

Originally Posted by Deadpool12 [View Original Post]

Was she worth seeing in your opinion? I was planning to book based on her reviews on the other site but now I'm not sure.

On my opinion, no. Especially since her indy rate is more than it was at AC. YMMV, of course, and at least one other poster here liked her.

**Riina** · 10-20-25 22:59

https://classyladiesofchicago.com/product/new-juliia/

This looks pretty good, right age and weight.

**Deadpool12** · 10-20-25 14:30

Originally Posted by Rpark52 [View Original Post]

Fair enough, and hopefully I didn't come across as too much of a dick. Unsolicited advice though, if it sounds too good to be true, it's because it is. Ads, reviews, whatever. In this case, both reviews were very similarly written, with equally flowery poetic bullshit (same kinda true a couple of her reviews under her AC name, which she's now gone from, BTW). In my case, I had seen her, so I also knew most of the descriptions were fake (I. E. She's completely flat, so no heaving bosoms, etc).

Fake reviews at the other place have become a real problem lately, IMO. There was always a risk of exaggeration or poetic license, and I've always assumed the self bragging was bullshit from the start (she came 5 times!) But now, there's a very obvious influx of either google translated reviews (always easy to spot) or ones that are pure fantasy, maybe even ChatGPT generated. People are always pretty bad at guesses ages (myself included), so I've always already mentally adjusted most of the descriptions. Once you get 4 or 5 reviews that are pretty consistent in terms of description or activities, excluding the obvious bullshit ones, then I feel like I've gotten a good idea of what to expect.

Was she worth seeing in your opinion? I was planning to book based on her reviews on the other site but now I'm not sure.