Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 1,741 to 1,755 of 51187
-
10-13-25 02:02 #49447Senior Member

Posts: 36Just saw her today. GND pretty, cutesy personality, has a pretty good vibe and gets along well. Tall, nice B cup but feels nice in the hand. She wants to please so she is willing to do what you want within boundaries. It was like being with a GF.
Originally Posted by Heizenberg
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 22:17 #49446Senior Member

Posts: 2305For jgirls, MH Lily No3 is back with a couple days extension, she is high looks, good service, maximum vibe. Not to be confused with MH Lili from a few weeks ago. Saki J's last day is very soon and so is Akari J. Akari J is comparable to a pre-MILF service queen with both looks and service. There is quite a wide variety of types among jgirls now. More will come.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7410650 Saki J
That would be untrue too. You are talking with people who actually saw Peach 10 or 12 months ago and know about her price increases. There were many posts about it too at the time. Anyone can find them with a search, try Douwoo.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
You may have forgotten, but you asked for intel on Peach late February. That was less than 8 months ago. So you should know that you don't know, unless you somehow forgot that you didn't see Peach.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...40#post7209240
You've also repeatedly tried to correct me about girls that I saw whom you obviously did not, always with wrong info. Several people confirmed a bb special rate, and you suggested it was wrong and asked me to confirm I really paid X amount for sex. Another time, you made three posts in a row asking to confirm Jenny was really in OC when any normal person could just book her. These are not normal questions a customer would ask. You ask about a lot of girls but don't see them, and you copy other people's intel (often wrong) as your own.
I want people to be aware of all that, since there is no rule on this site about repeatedly posting wrong intel (it could happen by accident). And yes, you should clarify each of your claims if you really aren't sure they are true. It's a lot.
-
10-12-25 21:40 #49445Senior Member

Posts: 123Clarification Peach Pricing
Should clarify, by "always" I should have said "for at least the past 12 months". That is all.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 20:55 #49444Senior Member

Posts: 555Baby Moon back in ktown
Adam let me know baby moon is back so I schedule a morning session with her tomorrow!!
She started today but my normal times lot is already taken so Monday it is.
Anyone here saw her today? How's the service? How does she look?
Also booker Adam said she is here on a short visit so that's that.
TIa.
-
10-12-25 19:36 #49443Senior Member

Posts: 2305You keep posting wrong information on girls, and I want to show you how to fix that. Peach was always cheaper in LA under other names and that info was even discussed here:
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
You weren't even around this far back, Peach predates you, and you know that. This was one of your first posts ever:
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
So what I would do is phrase it as a question "Hasn't Peach always been the same price?" On to Saki J:
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
This is also wrong. People are seeing Saki J in LA, she is obviously there. This is a mistake we've all made, but I hope it speaks for itself that there are re-used ads and old ads you have to ignore. Very often in my experience.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
Both these examples from you are today. I've seen you argue with someone that a girl wasn't good looking, then later notice you didn't see the girl and posted other obviously wrong information. This may have happened several times, since your intel often made no sense. I often wondered if you even saw any girls ever, because some things you've said not only sounded impossible but you would know they were untrue if you actually saw the girl. It had to be made up. If you were merely repeating what someone said, then I encourage you to make up your own mind about girls. Use reports as hints but consider them unconfirmed until you see a girl.
It's not just you. I have had multiple people argue with me that a girl is GFE only when her ad says she is BB, the booker says she is BB, and I repeatedly BB'd her.
About this question from long ago:
I want people to think for themselves. The bookers were wrong, probably because they have a lot of girls to keep track of and simply don't know her price history at all. But the fact that Haven was bb special was posted by many reviewers before you asked your question. If anyone wants to believe a booker over multiple reviewers who saw a girl, be my guest. I don't actually want to help or correct such people. They are hopeless.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
Of course, there is no way to confirm blonde Haven since she is not blonde this year. There is a profound lesson here on who is a reliable source of intel.
I've even had people argue that a girl must have gotten an MM boob implant because her stats say D cup, when I spent a whole hour with the girl confirming that they are definitely B cup if even B.
So this falls under law 3 of kgirl reviews:
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Law 3 - Only someone who has seen a girl can provide true intel.
Bookers do their best by tracking customer feedback, but customer feedback is not always accurate and everyone has their taste. The result is 60% to 80% accuracy, which is not good enough for me except as a last resort. What I do is I only follow reviewers who have accurately described girls I've seen.
A result of Law 3 is even if a reviewer is reliable, I can only take what they saw as reliable to some extent (let's say 80% probably true). For example if they a girl is beautiful (A-Tier), I usually agree or can at least see her appeal. Worst case, I think she is S-Tier or B-Tier sometimes. To me, being off by only 1 tier is actually agreement. With unknown or less reliable reviewers, two to four good samples of their opinions tend to show a clear pattern. You can also say that's about 80% accurate if they agree on something. When even the good and bad reviews agree on something the accuracy shoots up much higher.
However, most reviewers are varying levels of reliable, so by default I can only take them to be 60% true. Sometimes they just make an honest mistake and confuse one girl's name with another. We've all done it.
Lastly, there is a maximum accuracy limit to intel, even for a girl you saw with your own two eyes. Since girls can and do change their appearance over time.
-
10-12-25 19:13 #49442Senior Member

Posts: 99Green / Barbie / Peach
You are correct. Her base donation has crept up for the past two years. She even had 400 listed for about a week before dropping to 360, then raised it to the current 380.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 18:40 #49441Senior Member

Posts: 121New to kgirls
I usually to AMPs, but looking to try a kgirl in a couple weeks in LA. What is the best / easiest agency to get screened on? I don't have the usual p411 or references.
Also I am looking for something early am (8 am or earlier). What are my options?
-
10-12-25 14:57 #49440Senior Member

Posts: 2560I'm not an expert on her, but I feel like I've seen less for Peach. Not recently obvi, but likely under her other brands. Likely mentioned in the HYA thread.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 14:33 #49439Senior Member

Posts: 767I personally only see 350 all-in or 320 GFE kgirls now.
Originally Posted by DefCooked
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 13:59 #49438Senior Member

Posts: 123Peach has always been 320/380.
Originally Posted by DefCooked
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 13:57 #49437Senior Member

Posts: 101Am I geeking or?
https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-ziana
https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-peach
Or are these examples of a slow price increase?
I'm not trying to sound like a brokey but shit all around is getting pricier. Not just pussy. How often do these increases happen?
-
10-12-25 13:51 #49436Senior Member

Posts: 101A small K girl with a big head is crazy. Looking at the price I'm going to make an assumption she's a MILF. How would you rank her among the cock queens running around like Jiyoung, Maya, Lucky etc. ?
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-25 13:32 #49435Senior Member

Posts: 2176Kbliss Sunday lineup.
Yami Maya Kona playa vista. Prema mw. Lucy Kiwi ktown.
-
10-12-25 12:41 #49434Senior Member

Posts: 185So have any of you high rollers taken advantage of this agency's offer for 5 girls? I don't have that kind of cash unfortunately. I need to live vicariously through you on this one. LOL.
https://www.hotno1kgirl.com/post/sunny-ari-double
-
10-12-25 02:39 #49433Senior Member

Posts: 1484Ella
Just saw Ella again and I forgot how playful she is, those tits are TO DIE FOR, no lie.
Originally Posted by TJ2617
[View Original Post]
We did all the position I can think off and damn she got real creamy with all the white juice squeezing out.
Also, she does have some jiggly ass and very nice to grab.
It's really weird for one thing, when you walk in, you see a tiny short girl with a big head for a second and once you are in the room and start fucking, her face and head somehow got smaller?
I think it's the illusion when the door open, all you see is her head, LOL but once you started to take in her body and them giant tits, her face / head is not big at all anymore.
Just a funny though.







Reply With Quote




