Korean Agency BB

[Heizenberg]

Adam let me know baby moon is back so I schedule a morning session with her tomorrow!!

She started today but my normal times lot is already taken so Monday it is.

Anyone here saw her today? How's the service? How does she look?

Also booker Adam said she is here on a short visit so that's that.

TIa.

[Download X]

Peach has always been 320/380.

You keep posting wrong information on girls, and I want to show you how to fix that. Peach was always cheaper in LA under other names and that info was even discussed here:

I am writing to thank you this time about your earlier warning of Barbie's rebrand. I believe in our last correspondence you wrote and I quote "Douwoo = Barbie / Baby Peach / Baby Green". Your timely caution is greatly appreciated as is your wise counsel as always. I would not want to pay 400 just to unintentionally repeat a girl that I already saw at a much lower rate of 350

Baby Peach / Baby Green / Barbie / Douwoo

You weren't even around this far back, Peach predates you, and you know that. This was one of your first posts ever:

https://kbeautygirls.com/baby-peach
https://get9irl.com/BabyPeach
Totally different pics, which one is more accurate?
I've read the reviews and get an idea of DD enhanced, 5'4-5'5. What's the age at?

So what I would do is phrase it as a question "Hasn't Peach always been the same price?" On to Saki J:

Interesting. Saki J is listed on a Canadian booker and I was planning on seeing.

This is also wrong. People are seeing Saki J in LA, she is obviously there. This is a mistake we've all made, but I hope it speaks for itself that there are re-used ads and old ads you have to ignore. Very often in my experience.

Both these examples from you are today. I've seen you argue with someone that a girl wasn't good looking, then later notice you didn't see the girl and posted other obviously wrong information. This may have happened several times, since your intel often made no sense. I often wondered if you even saw any girls ever, because some things you've said not only sounded impossible but you would know they were untrue if you actually saw the girl. It had to be made up. If you were merely repeating what someone said, then I encourage you to make up your own mind about girls. Use reports as hints but consider them unconfirmed until you see a girl.

It's not just you. I have had multiple people argue with me that a girl is GFE only when her ad says she is BB, the booker says she is BB, and I repeatedly BB'd her.

About this question from long ago:

Hey Download X, CGLA and TA are saying that Haven was never bb special and never had a $340 rate, can you confirm if it's the blonde Haven?

I want people to think for themselves. The bookers were wrong, probably because they have a lot of girls to keep track of and simply don't know her price history at all. But the fact that Haven was bb special was posted by many reviewers before you asked your question. If anyone wants to believe a booker over multiple reviewers who saw a girl, be my guest. I don't actually want to help or correct such people. They are hopeless.

Of course, there is no way to confirm blonde Haven since she is not blonde this year. There is a profound lesson here on who is a reliable source of intel.

I've even had people argue that a girl must have gotten an MM boob implant because her stats say D cup, when I spent a whole hour with the girl confirming that they are definitely B cup if even B.

I have seen Leslie K's breasts and the booker has not. Think.

So this falls under law 3 of kgirl reviews:

Law 3 - Only someone who has seen a girl can provide true intel.

Bookers do their best by tracking customer feedback, but customer feedback is not always accurate and everyone has their taste. The result is 60% to 80% accuracy, which is not good enough for me except as a last resort. What I do is I only follow reviewers who have accurately described girls I've seen.

A result of Law 3 is even if a reviewer is reliable, I can only take what they saw as reliable to some extent (let's say 80% probably true). For example if they a girl is beautiful (A-Tier), I usually agree or can at least see her appeal. Worst case, I think she is S-Tier or B-Tier sometimes. To me, being off by only 1 tier is actually agreement. With unknown or less reliable reviewers, two to four good samples of their opinions tend to show a clear pattern. You can also say that's about 80% accurate if they agree on something. When even the good and bad reviews agree on something the accuracy shoots up much higher.

However, most reviewers are varying levels of reliable, so by default I can only take them to be 60% true. Sometimes they just make an honest mistake and confuse one girl's name with another. We've all done it.

Lastly, there is a maximum accuracy limit to intel, even for a girl you saw with your own two eyes. Since girls can and do change their appearance over time.

[ID2468]

I'm not an expert on her, but I feel like I've seen less for Peach. Not recently obvi, but likely under her other brands. Likely mentioned in the HYA thread.

You are correct. Her base donation has crept up for the past two years. She even had 400 listed for about a week before dropping to 360, then raised it to the current 380.

[SlickZero]

I usually to AMPs, but looking to try a kgirl in a couple weeks in LA. What is the best / easiest agency to get screened on? I don't have the usual p411 or references.

Also I am looking for something early am (8 am or earlier). What are my options?

[SsStuntCock]

Peach has always been 320/380.

I'm not an expert on her, but I feel like I've seen less for Peach. Not recently obvi, but likely under her other brands. Likely mentioned in the HYA thread.

[HiKeke]

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-ziana

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-peach

Or are these examples of a slow price increase?

I'm not trying to sound like a brokey but shit all around is getting pricier. Not just pussy. How often do these increases happen?

I personally only see 350 all-in or 320 GFE kgirls now.

[Gooner3]

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-ziana

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-peach

Or are these examples of a slow price increase?

I'm not trying to sound like a brokey but shit all around is getting pricier. Not just pussy. How often do these increases happen?

Peach has always been 320/380.

[DefCooked]

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-ziana

https://www.rokm.ch/product-page/baby-peach

Or are these examples of a slow price increase?

I'm not trying to sound like a brokey but shit all around is getting pricier. Not just pussy. How often do these increases happen?

[DefCooked]

Just saw Ella again and I forgot how playful she is, those tits are TO DIE FOR, no lie.

We did all the position I can think off and damn she got real creamy with all the white juice squeezing out.

Also, she does have some jiggly ass and very nice to grab.

It's really weird for one thing, when you walk in, you see a tiny short girl with a big head for a second and once you are in the room and start fucking, her face and head somehow got smaller?

I think it's the illusion when the door open, all you see is her head, LOL but once you started to take in her body and them giant tits, her face / head is not big at all anymore.

Just a funny though.

A small K girl with a big head is crazy. Looking at the price I'm going to make an assumption she's a MILF. How would you rank her among the cock queens running around like Jiyoung, Maya, Lucky etc. ?

[PumpNDump]

Kbliss Sunday lineup.

Yami Maya Kona playa vista. Prema mw. Lucy Kiwi ktown.

[Paul Sgv]

So have any of you high rollers taken advantage of this agency's offer for 5 girls? I don't have that kind of cash unfortunately. I need to live vicariously through you on this one. LOL.

https://www.hotno1kgirl.com/post/sunny-ari-double

[Vulcan1009]

Thanks, I saw Vanilla and hoped her tits would be a little bigger. I hope Ella's are bigger.

Just saw Ella again and I forgot how playful she is, those tits are TO DIE FOR, no lie.

We did all the position I can think off and damn she got real creamy with all the white juice squeezing out.

Also, she does have some jiggly ass and very nice to grab.

It's really weird for one thing, when you walk in, you see a tiny short girl with a big head for a second and once you are in the room and start fucking, her face and head somehow got smaller?

I think it's the illusion when the door open, all you see is her head, LOL but once you started to take in her body and them giant tits, her face / head is not big at all anymore.

Just a funny though.

[TJ2617]

YES. She does, I like them better then Vanilla's but yet, both of them are my ATF at the moment, so have them both, LOL.

Thanks, I saw Vanilla and hoped her tits would be a little bigger. I hope Ella's are bigger.

[HiKeke]

No, this Allie mostly worked SD and OC. I meta reviewed her in May:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7296634 Allie Meta review

Allie has a balance of looks and service. So most don't say either HYA or service queen she is in-between both. I consider her high looks and high service, most guys liked her style of service. There is a range of opinions on looks, I liked her a lot while others considered her a good backup. A few guys (maybe 20%) consider her DDG - I consider her borderline DDG. Similar idea to Baby Hami, who is also borderline DDG to me (maybe 20% of guys will say full DDG). Allie does resemble some of the better HK actresses so it's up to taste and preference.

Her body reminded me a lot of Erica due to overall proportions with generous tits. But her tits are large soft naturals which I prefer anyways. Petite but not short enough to be spinner. She has a very pleasing and genuine attitude which sets her apart from others for me.

How is her bbbh? DT and face fuck allowed?

[KGirlSavant]

My problem isn't that Angel wasn't feeling it and didn't seem all that interested in servicing me. I get it, she's human, and I don't to force a girl to do something she doesn't want to do. My problem is that she wasn't willing to give me back any of the $800 I paid at the beginning of the session. It's pretty simple. If you don't do the job you're hired for, then you shouldn't get paid. And if she's not comfortable or not willing to service a client, she should let the client know AT THE DOOR. By inviting the client inside the room, the client automatically incurs a house fee equal to anywhere from a quarter to half of the total session price, even if the client receives zero service from the girl. That's where it feels scammy. Why should a client have to pay anything for services not rendered?

800 for some punani that doesn't want to work is crazy.