Sugar Daddy Sites

[Grail47]

You may be the first person on this thread to join that site. Please post all the details as it progress's.

Hilarious! From reading this thread, I would have thought others here had also joined. Well, I guess we'll see if I have any luck!

[FarFarAway]

You may be the first person on this thread to join that site. Please post all the details as it progress's.

Well, I had a 60-day membership comped to me. The main issue is that there is not a lot of flow on there. Every time you log on, you see the same profiles. I can't tell what order they are presented in, possibly proximity to the location you list on your profile. There are some that seem like they are actual real people, and others that are pretty questionable. Like on a lot of sites, you aren't sure, you can message a profile, often you don't get a response. The interpretation of that is varied. There were a few tipoffs to possible fake profiles. They used very similar values for the income level they were seeking.

I tried to use the site to search POTs in places I plan to travel. I did make contact w / one girl who is real in the southeast, and even have her phone #, but haven't been in her area to test her out.

The guy, Dave, who runs the site sometimes posts profiles on here. One was in my area, and I've been in touch w / her. She is certainly authentic, other people have posted about seeing her from other sites in the past. However, she wasn't the easiest person to message with and set something up. But, she's attractive and seems ready to play. So I think if he posts a profile, it is likely to be a real person.

At this time, I don't see it as competitive to seeking for sure. I am using What's Your Price a fair amount lately, I think it is better than SLN.

[HollywoodGuy]

Not only have I finally joined up here as a member, but I also created a profile on SugarLife! I haven't upgraded yet on the latter, so there isn't much I can do there, but I do plan to pay for at least one month and find out how my interactions will turn out. I'm in the DTLA area so maybe there will be some members who are nearby.

You may be the first person on this thread to join that site. Please post all the details as it progress's.

[SeanTime53]

Still working to crack this nut.

Anyone used privacy dot com virtual cards to pay for seeking, with good experience or bad?

Open to DM also if you prefer.

privacy.com blocks seeking in my experience.

[Murrican]

Still working to crack this nut.

Anyone used privacy dot com virtual cards to pay for seeking, with good experience or bad?

Open to DM also if you prefer.

[Lexx1]

We're texting this weekend, she sends a pic of the flowers w / fawning texts. Lots of other good convo too, but seriously, women are suckers for this stuff.

The ladies usually appreciate flowers and they don't always have to be extravagant. A single rose works as well. It's the gesture that counts. Seems though the younger generation has lost the art of properly courting a woman as a gentleman.

[FarFarAway]

If you want a SB to continue to see you, at your favorable price point, you need to treat her right. I am just getting into a sugar relationship w / a 30's MILF, and we had the sex of a lifetime at our first FC. After she complained about the sugar. I had lunch w / her the other day, dropped $50 plus added in some 'gas money'. But I also had stopped at a grocery and gotten her a bouquet - $8.

We're texting this weekend, she sends a pic of the flowers w / fawning texts. Lots of other good convo too, but seriously, women are suckers for this stuff.

[SugarLifeNow]

Hey everyone, Dave here, new SLN chocolate girl in Los Angeles, her name is Candy and she is 35. Nice big rack and an amazing ass. A bit hard to get some information out of her, but she is very submissive and likes to be led and controlled. Loves giving and receiving head the most, especially receiving. Loves every position, but especially doggy. Unable to get any other details, no word on BBFS as well. Wants a public meet first, but then is ok to go straight to a room. PPM started out pretty high, but seemed like she could be talked down to reality.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/CandyGurl/

[FarFarAway]

There is a perennial problem for those w / wardens about how to pay for seeking. This is not a proven solution, but one worth trying. I have a profile on What's Your Price. It is a sister to seeking and they use the same payment processor. I just bought credits on there using the card pictured here. I bought it in a CVS store. MasterCard gift card. I did go online first to check it had its balance and added a PIN. I added nothing else, there were no other options. On the WYP site, I put in fake info (the same as always, my 'sugar' identity) for all of the address, etc. It went right through. This would be worthwhile trying on seeking. Please report success.

[Grail47]

Hey everyone, Dave here, new SLN girl in Woodland Hills, her name is Nina and she is 27. She sounds like a pro, but willing to do it all, even anal. Wants a condom for sex, but not for head, and loves 69. Open to 3 sums MFF, and has a friend that will play if she is in town. No fingering, but ok with rough sex, and wants daddy to cum on her tits. High PPM but seemed like she can be talked down some.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Ninaxdiamond/

Not only have I finally joined up here as a member, but I also created a profile on SugarLife! I haven't upgraded yet on the latter, so there isn't much I can do there, but I do plan to pay for at least one month and find out how my interactions will turn out. I'm in the DTLA area so maybe there will be some members who are nearby.

[UnknownSD]

I'd like the evidence for some of that. How in the world could the site police offline communication? I presume you mean people messaging not on the site, say by email or text. I have never had mods message me other than via an official email.

Let me change it to "They probably have. ". It is what I suspect. Not a concrete fact yet. Just be cautious in your messages.

[SecondLove]

I do not think there is any evidence to support this theory about offline AI / moderators. I violate the Seeking TOS within 5 messages to all of the girls I've messaged, never had a problem.

I am very careful in DMs on the site, that is certainly moderated.

The only possible exposure you have from offline messages is IF the SB reports you and sends screen shots of your messages. Even then, Seeking will not be likely to take any action as a screenshot is not really proof of anything. They can be faked, and even if "real" there is no conclusive proof that a message came from a registered Seeking user, or that it was sent TO a registered user. Still, I am always careful in offsite comms to wait until she actually uses prohibited words or phrases first. Which doesn't take very long.

And, no, in using Seeking for over 12 years, I've never heard of a Seeking staff member pretending to be a SB offsite for any reason. There may be LE doing that, bit not staff.

[RanManCan]

Plus the site is not what it use to be anymore. On their homepage, it says "Sugar dating and all forms of transactional relationships are strictly prohibited. " If you mention anything transactional on or offline, you're account is flagged and banned immediately. They use AI content filtering and moderators texting you offline. If the person you're chatting with offline is not very responsive and can't meet up or unwilling to meet then you're probably chatting with a moderator.

I do not think there is any evidence to support this theory about offline AI / moderators. I violate the Seeking TOS within 5 messages to all of the girls I've messaged, never had a problem.

I am very careful in DMs on the site, that is certainly moderated.

[FarFarAway]

Plus the site is not what it use to be anymore. On their homepage, it says "Sugar dating and all forms of transactional relationships are strictly prohibited. " If you mention anything transactional on or offline, you're account is flagged and banned immediately. They use AI content filtering and moderators texting you offline. If the person you're chatting with offline is not very responsive and can't meet up or unwilling to meet then you're probably chatting with a moderator.

I'd like the evidence for some of that. How in the world could the site police offline communication? I presume you mean people messaging not on the site, say by email or text. I have never had mods message me other than via an official email.

[UnknownSD]

Damn. This is going to knock off a lot of married guys.

Plus the site is not what it use to be anymore. On their homepage, it says "Sugar dating and all forms of transactional relationships are strictly prohibited. " If you mention anything transactional on or offline, you're account is flagged and banned immediately. They use AI content filtering and moderators texting you offline. If the person you're chatting with offline is not very responsive and can't meet up or unwilling to meet then you're probably chatting with a moderator.