Thread: Cuddlers
+
Add Report
Results 91 to 105 of 245
-
09-25-25 17:02 #155Senior Member

Posts: 78Cracking the code.
Well. No. I saw her under her Cuddle Comfort profile, which (a) was $125 / Hour at the time, and (b) did not require a 2-Hour minimum. I don't do deposits and what-not unless absolutely mandatory, and it sure as hell wasn't in this case. The extras came at no-charge for me, but I was fortunate to catch her early in her "cuddling" journey. She would have definitely up-charged me had I encountered her with some experience under her belt, and just before I stopped seeing her, she did start making strong hints about "tipping her. " Haha, nope. Thanks for the pussy, babe.
Originally Posted by Original703
[View Original Post]
You'd think so, wouldn't you? If anything, it actually works the *other* direction: Girls with lower rates are more apt to offer extras. They do this because they want to keep the "base experience" affordable, so they can upcharge for the extras without it breaking the bank for the guy.
Originally Posted by Original703
[View Original Post]
Here's a perfect example: https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/raven88 I think we can agree that she's easily in the top quartile for attractiveness amongst PNW cuddlers, and based on that alone, *should* be charging more like $150/ H. But she charges much less. Why? Because that's just the admission fee for the platonic-only stuff. Get on the phone with her prior to the appointment (which she requires) and she'll flat-out tell you the extras she offers right from the jump. If you'll forgive the analogy: She's making bank from the huge mark-ups on the alcohol sales from the bar, not the tiny margins on the lunch special that she advertised on the display board out front.
So, the girls with the higher rates. What are *they* doing? More often than not, they are leveraging the fact that they are more attractive than the competition and charging a premium for being in their divine presence. Here's an extreme example: https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/cuddleangeltt At $230/ H, one might be led to conclude that she will jerk you off with one hand while doing your taxes with the other. And maybe she will! YMMV, right? But doubtful. Extremely doubtful. The message here is very frequently "I'm hot, so I can charge more. " Full stop. It's not much different than the message from all the "former models" on Tryst that supposedly have two doctorates and speak eight languages. "Oh, I'm so exclusive! Pay me more! Pay me for my image!
How to improve your odds, then? Half of this is getting really, really good at reading profiles. It's never just "one thing" that is a giveaway; it's a combo platter of small things. Price point, type of photos, whether or not she hosts, length of bio, word choice in bio, what she says (and doesn't say) in the bit with her stats, and so on. I'm not going to write a novel on this (this shit is long enough already), but what I will tell you that this is less about looking for clues that she is inviting Sexy Fun Times, and more about observing the lack of elements that intentionally discourage those inquiries.
To wit: If a girl absolutely does not want that kind of action, she will cite the forum rules and make severe warnings about visiting such indecorous behavior upon her exalted person. Yeah, probably stay away from those, unless you're an idiot like me and relish the challenge. But, if you just see a passing "Oh, platonic only please!" note in her bio, there is a good chance she's just doing that to cover her ass with forum admin. Many of them will keep completely silent on the subject, and the rare few will be ever-so-slightly suggestive (Sammy has a line that reads "Looking forward to new acquaintances and intimate connections. " Well, yahoo.)
Once you've opened dialogue with your target, the other half of this is having excellent "soft skills. " Be charming, be funny, listen to her, get to know her, yada-yada-yada. I mean, sure, some of them will make it lay-down easy for you and just text you their fucking menu. Order your value combo of choice. But there are a lot of these women -- mainly the attractive ones, if I'm honest -- that are the epitome of YMMV and will wait to see how they feel about you in person before deciding whether to open the doors to the holy temple. That's where the soft skills come in. If you can make her feel special, and somehow make yourself feel "different than the others" to her, your batting average will skyrocket. After all, they are girls on a cuddle forum. They are deliberately electing to get as intimate as you can while clothed, with a complete stranger, and get paid for it. They aren't stupid. They know what's up and a lot of them are into it. But you have to show them "respect" first -- let them know that you wouldn't ever dream that they are anything other than the innocent angels that they are.
Then you fuck them and it's glorious. The whole time they are all "Oh golly, I never do this!" and you're all "Wow, I know, I feel so special!" You're lying, she's lying. It's fucking awesome.
Jesus Chris, this was a long post. Sorry if I put anyone to sleep.
-
09-25-25 15:48 #154Senior Member

Posts: 320Does price correlate with menu?
Dang. 350 for a 2-hr cuddle. And the extras were ala carte?
I've tried to crack the code: which cuddlers are more likely to provide a sexy cuddle instead of a platonic cuddle? Profile pics have helped a bit, this thread has helped a LOT, and I've assumed that hourly rates are a possible indicator of extras. In your experience, does a higher hourly rate correspond with extras?
Thanks.
Originally Posted by BoredTooEasily
[View Original Post]
-
09-24-25 18:41 #153Senior Member

Posts: 78I can't speak to the frequency of her Seattle visits anymore, but I do know that it happens. She lists Seattle as a secondary city on her Cuddle Comfort profile, and she also exists as "raygun857" on Cuddle Companions with Seattle being her primary city. I imagine she probably comes up this way when she thinks she can profitably "tour" with new requests and the smattering of regulars that she has managed to retain.
Originally Posted by GameMaker007
[View Original Post]
All that to say: I recommend you just tell her that you'd be happy to see her when she is coming up next, and wait it out. She'll do it eventually. She typically gets an AirBnB when she does, so there wouldn't be any need to host. But also, don't hold your breath. One of the reasons I dropped her is because scheduling was like pulling teeth. She's pretty good in bed and I'd rail her when she was in town and convenient for me, but that is the extent of the effort I'd put into that girl.
-
09-24-25 18:22 #152Senior Member

Posts: 77Haven't been successful with her. She wanted me to pay for train ride from portland and also host which seems contrary to posts here.
Originally Posted by BuckNaked123
[View Original Post]
-
09-23-25 17:20 #151Senior Member

Posts: 78I'm pleased to share the information. I hope it continues to inspire some conversation and keep this thread alive. It's an interesting pursuit, this Cuddling Game. I'm wired a bit differently when it comes to all this: I need some sort of psychological challenge, or it just isn't quite as much fun.
-
09-23-25 15:47 #150Senior Member

Posts: 304Thanks BoredTooEasily for all this great intel, I have seen several of these ladies and had some very similar experiences.
LittleBear. Seen her a few times. Cute and very sweet girl. She has gained a few pounds since her photos were taken. She wears fairly seductive looking clothes, shorts with no panties. But I never pushed boundaries with her as I liked her too much as a person. She talked about the guys who try for more and I valued her opinion too much to be one of those guys. Great cuddler though.
SitaRosee. Seen her once. She was cute, loves her marijuana as it was like a Cheech and Chong movie when I walked in the door. She cute and was wearing a sexy nightie, cuddled well, but I never got a green light. I won't see her again.
Indicaprinc3 ss. Saw this one once. She is fairly cute, a little bigger than the pictures. She is a fun girl who also loves her marijuana. After going at it for quite sometime, she passed out when we took a break. Like really snoring. I waited it out for awhile and woke her up to finish. She is cool, great attitude but I only saw her once.
Sammy478. I saw this one and she is hotter than her pictures. Incredible body, pretty cool attitude until it comes time to talk money. She up-charges at least for me. But was a good fuck and finished with a load deep inside her. She is a flake though and was in a cheap hotel on Aurora when I saw her. I won't see her again.
Originally Posted by BoredTooEasily
[View Original Post]
-
09-23-25 15:42 #149Senior Member

Posts: 78Jack in the Box!
That's funny as hell. (I'm laughing with you, not at you.) Unlucky with that one. I agree that, prima facie, she seems like she'd be down for a good time.
Originally Posted by BuckNaked123
[View Original Post]
Or a cheeseburger. One of the two.
Cuddle Companions is hard work, what with the mandatory deposit before you can exchange numbers. There's certainly no incentive for the girl to ghost post-deposit, since it is the website that gets it, not her. I've actually had pretty good luck there (3-for-4), but the girls that fit my criteria are so few in number that it took years to get to that specific count.
Off-topic, I have my own white whale that pops up on STG every so often. I've tried to see her six times. She has ghosted me in the parking lot of her hotel six times. I don't know why I keep pursuing her, other than (a) I'm really into her specific look, and (b) it's a personal challenge and I want to plant my flag.
All that to say, I totally get making exception-after-exception for someone you just really fucking want to fuck.
-
09-23-25 15:19 #148Senior Member

Posts: 304MandyMoon
I tried seeing MandyMoon at least four times over a few years and she is an incredible flake. I broke all the rules because I thought she was hot and she talked a big game. She sent me sexy photos, one was a dildo in her ass that totally turned me on and I had to see her. I sent her money a few times for the pictures, I even rented a hotel room as she promised she was on her way. As I am sitting in the room, she texted she needed gas money to get there. I had to send it as I was so invested already. After I sent it, I wait and wait and I wait. I text her asking where she was and if she was close, she texted back and said "Jack in the Box" and that was it. The gall of that had me laughing but fuck, I was out $130 in hotel plus the $20 for gas. All in, I wasted over $200 on her and got nothing but headaches.
https://cuddlecompanions.org/cuddler/mandymoon/
-
09-22-25 21:13
Senior Member
-
09-22-25 19:21 #147Senior Member

Posts: 78Rest easy. I was the one that did it.
I am happy to clear your conscience, my friend, and I'll do it right out here in the open.
Originally Posted by Efurufe
[View Original Post]
I guarantee that you didn't get her banned -- because I did.
I won't get into the full details of my interactions with her and the "why" of it all. Suffice it to say that I found her to be an haughty hypocrite, so when she jumped on Tryst, I didn't hesitate to out her to the forum admin as a net consequence for her unwarranted discourtesy toward me. The ban hammer was swift and merciless, and I chuckled with satisfaction when I saw the post come up here less than 24 hours later to confirm the same.
I don't care how these women make their money. I really don't. Live and let live. Except the rude. They get what is coming to them.
-
09-22-25 18:43 #146Senior Member

Posts: 489Pissed off cuddler
Yeah, MurderDeath tracked me down on fet and thanked me for getting her banned and losing half her income (BTW, she's still active on the other cuddle site and the other various links I shared). I would have been open to talk to her about it, but she seemed pretty upset so I ended up blocking her.
Originally Posted by BoredTooEasily
[View Original Post]
Part of me feels bad for her, but on the other hand, it was pretty easy to connect the dots. I don't think it was my fault. It's not like I reached out to a cuddle site and got her banned. I just posted some of her links here. I also didn't talk about any personal experience with her (which I didn't have since I never reached out to her and we never met).
-
09-22-25 15:21 #145Senior Member

Posts: 78Haha -- yeah, I thought the same thing! I'm pretty sure she knows what she is doing, hence the Admiral Ackbar impression from yours truly.
Originally Posted by Efurufe
[View Original Post]
That said, and to be fair, I've clicked in some way with every cuddler I've seen. Except her. The vibe was just "off" for some reason. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that someone is banging her on the regular -- I think all of them have at least one favorite that gets Ye Olde Special Treatment. And that's what we all want, right? There is no better pussy than "Exception-To-The-Rule Pussy."
Anyway, happy to make a meaningful contribution. I'm mildly surprised my phone hasn't blown up with some pissed-off cuddler quite yet. I was unflinchingly specific with the nature of my encounters.
-
09-22-25 13:34 #144Senior Member

Posts: 489Thank you for this!
I really appreciate all the intel you shared here. Such a great summary of so many cuddlers. Especially RoraSnuggles. She's been on my radar for such a long time but I haven't had the opportunity to drive that far for an expensive cuddle, and now I'm glad I never did. Though part of me still thinks "maybe I would be the one to break through. " hahaha.
Originally Posted by BoredTooEasily
[View Original Post]
-
09-19-25 01:53 #143Senior Member

Posts: 43She no longer offers FS. But she does bdsm.
Originally Posted by Efurufe
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-25 11:28 #142Senior Member

Posts: 78Negative. Her profile screams "Platonic Only" to me, so I never engaged. I do believe that there is no such thing as a "0% Probability" with any of these girls -- given the right situation, given the right guy, etc, etc, -- but that one has several red flags that tell me it's a long shot.
Originally Posted by MartinWa90
[View Original Post]
Also, as a matter of OPSEC, I never see a girl that requires a photo (I don't have one on my bio, either). I've been able to talk my way around that requirement in the past, but my experience is that if a photo is required, it is a strong (but not perfect) indicator that play-time is not on the table.
-
09-18-25 01:20 #141Regular Member

Posts: 23Have you seen m3 rmaids? I've only gotten platonic over 3 sessions. Great cuddles but 0 hint at more. She seems too wholesome.
Originally Posted by BoredTooEasily
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote









