Agency Discussion and Reviews

[SilverFox1117]

I am not surprised by any of this. Especially, with the industry. I can validate the CA girls are younger and it less expensive. They are everywhere out there and my buddy goes all the time. We share about TN to CA.

People are always playing silly games on forums.

I warned them. A2 always says to report crap, so I did. Both were reported, and both accounts were taken care of and have been labeled as "shill" accounts.

I'm sure they will make new accounts or get an account transferred to them, so be mindful of any accounts posting praise of both agencies for awhile.

Thank you, A2!

[Stim69]

I am not surprised by any of this. Especially, with the industry. I can validate the CA girls are younger and it less expensive. They are everywhere out there and my buddy goes all the time. We share about TN to CA.

People are always playing silly games on forums.

This is just too ridiculous. I merely posted a mild comment about SSG, and I got inexplicably attacked? The only thing I can think of is that SSG's emergence has threatened CCG's turf. Last night, I went through a bunch of old records and found that CCG has a ton of burner accounts and a pile of fake reviews.

Let me put it this way: since 2019, I've been moving frequently for work. In 2019, I lived in Dallas, and people in Texas don't use this platformthey use ECCIE World. In 2021, I moved to Seattle, where I wasn't familiar with this platform either because we mostly used TNA. By the end of 2022, I moved to DC, and that's when I learned about this platform. I tried registering back then using my email, but I never received the activation email. It wasn't until a few months ago, after moving to Nashville, that SSG's booker asked me to provide some feedback. I had to go on Reddit to find a solution, contact the admin, and finally activate my account.

I've met plenty of Korean girls on both the East and West Coasts, and I can say bluntly: there are almost no Korean girls under 30 on the East Coast. The younger ones are mostly in California. If you're looking for girls under 30, you're better off with Japanese girls. CCG's burner accounts actually described Pika Chu as a "late 20's" girlWTF?.

[SilverFox1117]

I've been away from the hobby the majority of this year due to health problems but hope to be back soon. Anyways, props to you for catching on to this. After reading his posts it does seem so carry a strong bias towards CCG. I've only visited CCG and FUNUDF (only saw yuhee there) and never had issues with either of them other than having trouble entering the building. It seems that his posts do try to discourage people from visiting other agencies (like in one posts he says he is "happy to have more variety in Nashville" but then throws a low blow by saying that CCG has had great providers (implying there's no need for another agency). It does sound like shilling to me.

They essentially serve as tech / customer support. They announce new websites, state the website is down for maintenance, provide start and end dates for providers, and declare that the girls are regularly tested for STDs.

It's hard to notice when you just see their post pop up randomly in a thread, but it's quite obvious when you look at their post history.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7357058

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7338324

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7260905

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7159735

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6719752

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6709008

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6698469

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6919379

[GSlinger007]

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7120820

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7141216

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7117570

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7109884

Did you get blacklisted by ccg? Its obvious from your past report.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...iews&p=7143150#post7143150.

[SilverFox1117]

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...820&viewfull=1#post7120820.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...216&viewfull=1#post7141216.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...570&viewfull=1#post7117570.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...884&viewfull=1#post7109884.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7120820

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7141216

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7117570

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7109884

[AceCreamer]

This is just too ridiculous. I merely posted a mild comment about SSG, and I got inexplicably attacked? The only thing I can think of is that SSG's emergence has threatened CCG's turf. Last night, I went through a bunch of old records and found that CCG has a ton of burner accounts and a pile of fake reviews.

Let me put it this way: since 2019, I've been moving frequently for work. In 2019, I lived in Dallas, and people in Texas don't use this platform—they use ECCIE World. In 2021, I moved to Seattle, where I wasn't familiar with this platform either because we mostly used TNA. By the end of 2022, I moved to DC, and that's when I learned about this platform. I tried registering back then using my email, but I never received the activation email. It wasn't until a few months ago, after moving to Nashville, that SSG's booker asked me to provide some feedback. I had to go on Reddit to find a solution, contact the admin, and finally activate my account.

I've met plenty of Korean girls on both the East and West Coasts, and I can say bluntly: there are almost no Korean girls under 30 on the East Coast. The younger ones are mostly in California. If you're looking for girls under 30, you're better off with Japanese girls. CCG's burner accounts actually described Pika Chu as a "late 20's" girl—WTF? Do they dare let Pika Chu show her ID, or maybe turn the room's lights up a bit brighter? Also, Chu getting people to post fake reviews has already been exposed by the big shot Download X in California. You can still find posts about Korean girls faking reviews on the North VA forum. I originally thought this forum was a place to share authentic information, but it seems it's been completely infiltrated.

[Ayasaki]

Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?

Probably so, again just like you probably are. None of the real members have been aggressive towards either agency. Nobody cares, they just want a good session. Nobody on my list has ever said anything negative about CCG. Either they went themselves, said nothing, or admit they can't go.

Post count doesn't give legitimacy either. For example, this user was called out and ceased posting (not banned that I can see) by the admin. Over 100 posts. Mostly CCG related, but some were not.

FunUDF had shills, SSG has shills. But I have no doubt that CCG had / has shills that slipped through because they were in first. My point being, feel free to report them if you like. I leave such assessments to the admin to deal with. I'm not particularly interested in reporting any minor nuisance. But the thread temperature had almost returned to normal since you went off to create your safe space and I ceased posting my longest descriptions in here (posted to escorts instead because no one cares over there and I've seen other agency folks cross post as well).

This "conflict" that isn't an actual conflict, is better dealt with by reviewing more here. CCG has at least 3 times as many people who will visit them. There should at least be twice as many reviews. It should not be possible for one person to out review the other organization. And by trying to semi abandon the thread, you've got me in the awkward position of getting PMs asking about CCG vs SSG (examples attached). But you can see that I maintain a neutral stance despite my irritation with it. There is very little reason to cross lines. Those who enjoy CCG should stay there. Those looking for something different, or don't have a choice in the matter, come to SSG. If SSG packs up, CCG won't get a single extra dollar from that group.

I already gave you the freebie. I'm on break with SSG, so there is no review I can counter. If, instead of this nonsense, 5 CCG members posted anything about Hu, Pika-Chu, or Maya, there would be 5 reviews with nothing in between. I don't actually care if you are or aren't legit. I can't tell you what to do nor can I tell AceCreamer, but I have told you what I've noticed if you keep trying to drag things down. And my only ask of you is that you stick to reviewing your girls. And leave the rest for the admin.

[CGLover]

You are both probably burner accounts.

The majority of your post history (like 99%) is around CCG. In addition, you mysteriously had start and end dates to providers before they were up on the site.

You even said they get tested for STDs every two weeks. Amazingly, your first post was about CCG offering BBFS!

You also attacked FUND immediately using the same tactic.

This is SO MYSTERIOUS! I have no idea what this could possibly be (insert sarcasm). If you post here again with your stupidity, I will report you. Also, I will not discriminate; I will report both accounts: the SSG shill and CCG shill..

I've been away from the hobby the majority of this year due to health problems but hope to be back soon. Anyways, props to you for catching on to this. After reading his posts it does seem so carry a strong bias towards CCG. I've only visited CCG and FUNUDF (only saw yuhee there) and never had issues with either of them other than having trouble entering the building. It seems that his posts do try to discourage people from visiting other agencies (like in one posts he says he is "happy to have more variety in Nashville" but then throws a low blow by saying that CCG has had great providers (implying there's no need for another agency). It does sound like shilling to me.

[SilverFox1117]

Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?

You are both probably burner accounts.

The majority of your post history (like 99%) is around CCG. In addition, you mysteriously had start and end dates to providers before they were up on the site.

You even said they get tested for STDs every two weeks. Amazingly, your first post was about CCG offering BBFS!

You also attacked FUND immediately using the same tactic.

This is SO MYSTERIOUS! I have no idea what this could possibly be (insert sarcasm). If you post here again with your stupidity, I will report you. Also, I will not discriminate; I will report both accounts: the SSG shill and CCG shill.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...820&viewfull=1#post7120820.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...216&viewfull=1#post7141216.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...570&viewfull=1#post7117570.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...884&viewfull=1#post7109884.

[GSlinger007]

I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, LongLee. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with Karen and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed FunUDF, and CCG right below your post at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.

* In second place, we have Suede15. Member since 2020. Started out in California. While not an early adopter, he's got more CCG reviews than anyone else who crossed the fence. Tbh I thought this was going to be a setup because I know someone else who always asked about a rival agency and never went. But surprise surprise, he did.

* In third place, we have Hl123. He only has a single SSG review, so shouldn't really be placed this high, but you know what he also has? A visit with CCG Baby Moon so yet another one who has actually seen both sides. Does not appear to have FunUDF credit so loses to LongLee.

All of the top 3 are people who had experience with CCG. Unfortunately, all of the ones below don't have verifiable CCG experience. So for your standards, their words may mean nothing. But to others, it does.

* In fourth place, we have DeltaGuy73. He fell off the map but he was key in establishing initial presence with Yaya and Viki. And unlike some people, his history goes back 5 years before either agency was present, so his experience counts more than even mine. He also may have ushered in the current notice of Nashville L3 AMP establishments.

* In fifth place, we have SilverFox1117. Member since 2021. Various comments over escort threads at those times. Even tried to ask about CCG at one point. One of the semi early adopters for SSG with reviews on the OG Chinese girls.

* In sixth place, we have MaskRider2000. Nothing super notable but history going back to 2023. Still prior to the first CCG comment BTW. Nothing I'd see as abnormal behavior in their post history.

* In seventh place, we have Vol16. Member since 2004. Minimal Nashville history but it is explained pretty clearly why he was here. Should not be questioned.

* In eighth place, we have BenTeddyBear. Broke a two year silence of nothing in public to chime in for SSG. A little weird sure, but he's got post history going back to 2016 and it was a year between his first and second post, so it isn't out of character.

* Rounding out last place, we have LatinLvr90. He has a mere 5 posts. But considering his first post was in 2019, unless you are saying he was a plant that waited 6 years to prop up SSG, he's also a valid member. He did mention a visit to CCG but it isn't in his public post history, that's why he is granted a rank out of the top four.

So you've got 10 users, with a variety of history either crossing agencies, massage parlors, escorts, or just being really old accounts. None of whom have sought any fault with any agency that has passed through (well DeltaGuy73 did it a little bit but he's done more than enough to make up for that). None of these users can be seen pushing any individual agenda. And many of the reviews contain some sort of criticism, so no one treats it as an infallible agency. However, overall, the trend is positive. But somehow you seem to like to invalidate all their experiences just to push the point that doesn't matter.

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw.

Zero reason to mudsling on either side. Just out review the other. I'll even give you a freebie, one might say I'm on break with SSG for now. If we ignore the 502 commentary, this thread could have had 3 CCG reviews since my last SSG review. 2 from LeonardoDaRizy and one from BoneEm69. But instead, we have 1 review from LeonardoDaRizy, tech support, and mudslinging. I could have ignored your point, but I thought it helpful to everyone to highlight community contributions.

Its funny how you validated all the members but not acecreamer so is it safe to say that its a burner account?

[Stim69]

Well said Ayasaki!

I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, LongLee. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with Karen and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed FunUDF, and CCG right below your post at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.

[Ayasaki]

Still waiting for real feedback for ssg from reputable member so I can make my first appt with ssg but so far I don't see any.

I'm going to withhold what I have to say about what your first ever post on USASexGuide is this time. I would just like to remind you yet again that your posts are just as public and because of that you could never be trusted to review SSG anyway.

Instead, it would be great if you would not ignore the other verifiable members who have contributed. But for the gallery, I'll even highlight them for everyone (skipping catpaw). Rankings are mostly for humor.

* In first place, we have Mr. Agency Nashville, LongLee. He's got two SSG reviews under his belt with Karen and Viki. At a mere 33 posts, and less than 1 year old, why give him the top spot? Because he also reviewed FunUDF, and CCG right below your post at that time. So if you say he is not real then where was that energy back then? He's the one and only user with no suspicious connections because he reviewed all of them.

* In second place, we have Suede15. Member since 2020. Started out in California. While not an early adopter, he's got more CCG reviews than anyone else who crossed the fence. Tbh I thought this was going to be a setup because I know someone else who always asked about a rival agency and never went. But surprise surprise, he did.

* In third place, we have Hl123. He only has a single SSG review, so shouldn't really be placed this high, but you know what he also has? A visit with CCG Baby Moon so yet another one who has actually seen both sides. Does not appear to have FunUDF credit so loses to LongLee.

All of the top 3 are people who had experience with CCG. Unfortunately, all of the ones below don't have verifiable CCG experience. So for your standards, their words may mean nothing. But to others, it does.

* In fourth place, we have DeltaGuy73. He fell off the map but he was key in establishing initial presence with Yaya and Viki. And unlike some people, his history goes back 5 years before either agency was present, so his experience counts more than even mine. He also may have ushered in the current notice of Nashville L3 AMP establishments.

* In fifth place, we have SilverFox1117. Member since 2021. Various comments over escort threads at those times. Even tried to ask about CCG at one point. One of the semi early adopters for SSG with reviews on the OG Chinese girls.

* In sixth place, we have MaskRider2000. Nothing super notable but history going back to 2023. Still prior to the first CCG comment BTW. Nothing I'd see as abnormal behavior in their post history.

* In seventh place, we have Vol16. Member since 2004. Minimal Nashville history but it is explained pretty clearly why he was here. Should not be questioned.

* In eighth place, we have BenTeddyBear. Broke a two year silence of nothing in public to chime in for SSG. A little weird sure, but he's got post history going back to 2016 and it was a year between his first and second post, so it isn't out of character.

* Rounding out last place, we have LatinLvr90. He has a mere 5 posts. But considering his first post was in 2019, unless you are saying he was a plant that waited 6 years to prop up SSG, he's also a valid member. He did mention a visit to CCG but it isn't in his public post history, that's why he is granted a rank out of the top four.

So you've got 10 users, with a variety of history either crossing agencies, massage parlors, escorts, or just being really old accounts. None of whom have sought any fault with any agency that has passed through (well DeltaGuy73 did it a little bit but he's done more than enough to make up for that). None of these users can be seen pushing any individual agenda. And many of the reviews contain some sort of criticism, so no one treats it as an infallible agency. However, overall, the trend is positive. But somehow you seem to like to invalidate all their experiences just to push the point that doesn't matter.

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw.

Zero reason to mudsling on either side. Just out review the other. I'll even give you a freebie, one might say I'm on break with SSG for now. If we ignore the 502 commentary, this thread could have had 3 CCG reviews since my last SSG review. 2 from LeonardoDaRizy and one from BoneEm69. But instead, we have 1 review from LeonardoDaRizy, tech support, and mudslinging. I could have ignored your point, but I thought it helpful to everyone to highlight community contributions.

[AceCreamer]

Still waiting for real feedback for ssg from reputable member so I can make my first appt with ssg but so far I don't see any.

Bro, if you want me to spill more, I'll tell you: Pika-Chu, previously known as Chu, started working in California. Last year, she began visiting DMV, Boston and NYC. She used to be a girl with a 100+ or 200+ TER reviews account, but she got exposed for having fake reviews written for her. So she removed her previous TER account and created a new and changed her name to Pika-Chu. Do you need me to dig up all this info for you myself? I saw Chu last year in Tysons Corner, VA, and I have the booking text messages to prove it. I don't know why you guys at CCG are promoting her as being in her 20's.

Also, you've never even been to SSG, but you keep saying the reviews I wrote about SSG girls are fake. Why? The only thing that makes sense is that you're a burner account for CCG.

[GSlinger007]

I had some free time today and was torn between seeing Chu or Hana, but I ultimately chose Hana. Compared to an older service queen, I preferred younger, prettier girls.

Hana did not disappoint. Her photos were real but used Japanese studio filters. She looked pretty without makeup. Very petite and thin, her breasts appeared large on her tiny frame. She greeted me with a hug and a kiss, we settled the donation, and went for a quick shower. While waiting for the water to warm up, I stood behind her with my dick between her legs, pumping back and forth while grabbing her breasts. She eventually cleaned my dick, we dried off, and headed back to the room. We both got on the bed, I started making out with her, and then she sucked on my nipples. She went down and gave me a great BBBJ, slow and sensual, with occasional moaning and eye contact. She lubed us both up and climbed on top of me, slowly sliding my dick inside her. I was probably too big for her in that position because she moved very slowly. I suggested we switch to missionary; she grabbed a pillow to place under her, and I slowly entered her tight pussy while making out with her. She handled my dick much better in missionary, with no resistance. Her pussy felt amazing, and I had to slow down to control myself because I could have finished quickly. After slowing it down, I enjoyed a slow and sensual session for about ten minutes, eventually speeding up to finish inside her.

Afterward, we made small talk. She was on tour and planned to leave on September 3rd for other states. I definitely recommend seeing her if you can.

Still waiting for real feedback for ssg from reputable member so I can make my first appt with ssg but so far I don't see any.

[Ayasaki]

Thank you for the explanation. I read this after some googling of "usasexguide 502 error" but didn't an explanation as to why. This clears it up nicely for me.

Well after that comment I learned of a more reliable solution for Chromium related browsers in this thread. But the same core issue isn't resolved, if the answer is on usasexguide but the person who needs that answer can't reach this website, then that's going to kill off activity. But it is what it is.

Regardless, those who can review are still free to do so if they'd like to bring things back on track.