Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 541 to 555 of 6030
-
08-31-25 22:40 #5490Senior Member

Posts: 180Sophia – Get9
Sophia – Get9.
Profile says 5'0, 96 lbs, 32 D natural, and that's accurate. She's very petite, under 100 lbs, but with a surprisingly full and perky natural bust. In person she looks better than her photos. Prettier face and a tight spinner frame.
Session was strong across the board. She's high-energy, affectionate, with BBBJ that's wet and unrushed. She's comfortable switching gears from sweet to intense when the mood builds.
Attitude is what makes her stand out. Warm, accommodating, and genuinely seems to enjoy the session. English is limited, but body language and vibe fill the gaps.
Summary: Petite natural with real curves, strong energy, and a dependable girlfriend vibe. On the repeat list.
-
08-31-25 20:34 #5489Senior Member

Posts: 579I tend to agree with you. My first visit was a long while back and I would give it a 6. 5 overall. The BJ was a bit lackluster and she didn't allow me to DATY or DATO. I'm always on the hunt for a "Phoebe" type session.
Originally Posted by Caker49
[View Original Post]
-
08-31-25 14:19 #5488Regular Member

Posts: 11Thank you gentlemen for the info but now I'm wondering which one is her real body? Is TA Bona / get9 Boa thin or thicc?
Originally Posted by Ggininder
[View Original Post]
-
08-31-25 07:08 #5487Senior Member

Posts: 68Allie
I don't know what the fuss is about her. Disappointed.
Pics: not her.
Since she's well reviewed already I'll skip the deets.
Sure, she had nice natural tits but apparently was sensitive so didn't even get to suck on them. Didn't allow DATY. Her body proportions are pretty average, legs same length as torso. Not toned. Face wise, very average. Her BBBJ was sad, was like a cat licking and no suction. Anyway, did one round, was hoping for a second but she seemed disinterested and I wasn't feeling it either. Pretty lousy experience IMO. Wouldn't repeat.
-
08-30-25 21:11 #5486Senior Member

Posts: 178TA Bona pics match Get9 Boa pics tho.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
I saw Boa K page was in OC and it was just Boa without K.
-
08-30-25 21:08 #5485Senior Member

Posts: 2311That's exactly my point, it confused you just now too. Read again carefully, OP never mentioned Boa and neither did I. OP was talking about TA Bona. TA Bona is Get9 Boa but not Get9 Boa K.
Originally Posted by Ggininder
[View Original Post]
And that is just one example of how confusing it always is. I won't explain it all, it is a very bad idea and caused chaos in SD. No one ended up seeing well-reviewed girls because no one had any idea who they were! I still don't.
Originally Posted by MrTacoo
[View Original Post]
Even when people hinted that girl A was girl B was girl C and that girl A's review meant girl C was good, people were reluctant to see girl C since they couldn't be sure. I wouldn't either.
I ended up about 60% sure about girl B and C, because it hinged on if no reviewer made a mistake in a series of different posts. There were scattered posts about three girls who turned out to actually be the same girl. This kind of breaks my workflow of just gathering different reviews and comparing them, giving more weight to reviewers I knew well. Now I have to instead trust everyone 100% to even get one bit of intel. I don't want to do that, so I ignore those girls and so did many others.
Yes I already know that perfectly well. That's not the problem.
Originally Posted by Ggininder
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 20:44 #5484Senior Member

Posts: 178Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out.
I think the one has been reviewed is a different provider.
This Boa appeared after the review was posted.
https://get9irl.com/Boa
I believed the Boa has beed reviewed is this Boa who's moving to LA.
https://get9irl.com/BoaK
-
08-30-25 19:27 #5483Senior Member

Posts: 477Love Q
I saw her {420/ hr) with bb option (+150) and enjoyed myself. She is a pretty HYA, bubbly, dfk, and wants to have a good time. English is passable. She is new to the American K-girl routine and that is part of what made it appealing. I will repeat, but need to save up my nickels so I can indulge in the bb option. She has a real tight box.
Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 19:25 #5482Senior Member

Posts: 723The word on the street is that she went back home to Korea, possibly returning sometime in the winter so we'll just have to see.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 19:08 #5481Senior Member

Posts: 43Loveq is pricey so one and done. Good body at least. Not a fan of price especially upcharge its too high for what offered.
Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89
[View Original Post]
Hami a good option she's older but looks great and good service. If I got to pay upcharge I rather pay 100 with cip.
-
08-30-25 18:25 #5480Senior Member

Posts: 123Katie K
Does anyone know where Katie K went after leaving CAKD? Back to home?
-
08-30-25 16:35 #5479Regular Member

Posts: 11Bona
What was her name previously if you mind me asking? I can just look for her reviews around here. Thank you.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 15:45 #5478Senior Member

Posts: 93She's quite pricey. I'm hoping someone TOFTT and posts a review to gauge whether the upcharge is worth it.
Originally Posted by NomadPush
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 14:28 #5477Senior Member

Posts: 579Maybe I'm a bit slow. Which Joanna are we talking about? Got an ad link?
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 14:19 #5476Senior Member

Posts: 2311Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out.
Originally Posted by MrTacoo
[View Original Post]
Thanks for this info, screening may have changed in recent times. I hope people screened with CAKD OC or BG reach out to FA to get screened. Happy customers stick with korgs and reuse the bookers who helped them. CAKD OC is a very important korg to screen with, they host a fair share of hot girls. CAKD SD is the same way, I even spelled it out limiting the list to just SD:
Originally Posted by Chuminh
[View Original Post]
But it's not like every girl is hot, it's just a higher percentage. Every korg has their advantage. FA and BLUE are known for being the cheapest, and they host the very first (and thereby hottest) girl on that list. I "only like Asians" but consider Isabella better looking than every single S-Tier kgirl I've seen so far. Agencies like SKP (which most bookers book for) focus on bb special. So there is an advantage for every korg.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Akari-J will be back, she is a high service jgirl who is a bit mature (pre-MILF) and fun.
I don't usually post about a girl unless I have clear intel on her. I know about Akari J from others who saw her too. It lines up closely with what Tccolim wrote and other clues I've seen, so it's why I left my notes and included his review. Akari J has both looks and service, but is more a priority for service hunters. Anyone might enjoy her though.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
One tip I have is that HYA hunters tend to review HYA in a way that makes sense to other HYA hunters, and service hunters do the same for other service hunters. It's why if a service hunter says a girl is high service, it's close a sure thing that she is. But when even a service hunter says a girl is exceptionally good looking and is won over, it also tends to be true since they rarely say anything. This is what I mean about reading reviews with a critical eye and also looking at a reviewer's past reviews to understand their standards. Some reviewers have lower standards and that's okay - they have every right to like who they like. But you just have to be aware of that and know they might like different girls than you. For various reasons, I only follow some reviewers.
About looks. It is always a bit funny to see people argue what order the S-Tier and A-Tier girls should be ranked in, when we're basically all agreeing that they are all hot. It is fun to rank them still, but there is a huge gap between A-Tier and C or D girls who are the most common. It is really rare for someone to put a C or D tier next to an A tier in "looks only", so clearly despite varying tastes we all share common basic standards. C and D tier girls may be fun and worth seeing for their other specialties sometimes. For example, there are many B or C tier girls I will see because they have perfect tits or perfect ass, and I just focus my eyes on that the whole time. Or butterfaces with a golden pussy, where keeping her in doggy it turns into perfection. We make the most of things, and we all want some variety sometimes too.
There is a high proportion of new girls lately. Mapmakers will be needed to sort them out. But there are also some returning girls, whom you can search for reviews on them from months back.
Terra starts Monday, and there are reviews of her from SD. For a long time I would quote reviews to help people research a girl. Then I switched to dropping a bunch of links to help people read and research, to make people more independent. Now, I will just tell you to search SD for her name. This is the 3-level progression of training so you won't need help from anyone in the future. My hope is people think for themselves and practice good research and decision making. It's the only way.
Oh right, now I will copy my tip on Allie. Earlier this year, I pointed out to SD she would leave someday when SD stopped repeating her, and of course she did. OC is under the same rule btw.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
It is up to you. Some day we will not have her in OC either.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Peach is also another good option. I would suggest hh with her. I made the same specific suggestion on a few other kgirls too. It is the best way to have a good time imo.
I really hate ad photos, but they are also necessary in order to match the correct girl in case another girl comes along with the exact same name. Agencies reuse names a lot. Attached is the ad photo for Terra. I would not rely on ad photos for expectations, however.
It is my sincere hope people find the girls they like, be happy, and avoid multiple shipwrecks. Only way.









Reply With Quote



