Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 391 to 405 of 5873
-
08-30-25 19:27 #5483Senior Member

Posts: 477Love Q
I saw her {420/ hr) with bb option (+150) and enjoyed myself. She is a pretty HYA, bubbly, dfk, and wants to have a good time. English is passable. She is new to the American K-girl routine and that is part of what made it appealing. I will repeat, but need to save up my nickels so I can indulge in the bb option. She has a real tight box.
Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 19:25 #5482Senior Member

Posts: 710The word on the street is that she went back home to Korea, possibly returning sometime in the winter so we'll just have to see.
Originally Posted by Gooner3
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 19:08 #5481Senior Member

Posts: 43Loveq is pricey so one and done. Good body at least. Not a fan of price especially upcharge its too high for what offered.
Originally Posted by Mrworldwide89
[View Original Post]
Hami a good option she's older but looks great and good service. If I got to pay upcharge I rather pay 100 with cip.
-
08-30-25 18:25 #5480Senior Member

Posts: 115Katie K
Does anyone know where Katie K went after leaving CAKD? Back to home?
-
08-30-25 16:35 #5479Regular Member

Posts: 11Bona
What was her name previously if you mind me asking? I can just look for her reviews around here. Thank you.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 15:45 #5478Senior Member

Posts: 85She's quite pricey. I'm hoping someone TOFTT and posts a review to gauge whether the upcharge is worth it.
Originally Posted by NomadPush
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 14:28 #5477Senior Member

Posts: 551Maybe I'm a bit slow. Which Joanna are we talking about? Got an ad link?
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
08-30-25 14:19 #5476Senior Member

Posts: 2163Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out.
Originally Posted by MrTacoo
[View Original Post]
Thanks for this info, screening may have changed in recent times. I hope people screened with CAKD OC or BG reach out to FA to get screened. Happy customers stick with korgs and reuse the bookers who helped them. CAKD OC is a very important korg to screen with, they host a fair share of hot girls. CAKD SD is the same way, I even spelled it out limiting the list to just SD:
Originally Posted by Chuminh
[View Original Post]
But it's not like every girl is hot, it's just a higher percentage. Every korg has their advantage. FA and BLUE are known for being the cheapest, and they host the very first (and thereby hottest) girl on that list. I "only like Asians" but consider Isabella better looking than every single S-Tier kgirl I've seen so far. Agencies like SKP (which most bookers book for) focus on bb special. So there is an advantage for every korg.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Akari-J will be back, she is a high service jgirl who is a bit mature (pre-MILF) and fun.
I don't usually post about a girl unless I have clear intel on her. I know about Akari J from others who saw her too. It lines up closely with what Tccolim wrote and other clues I've seen, so it's why I left my notes and included his review. Akari J has both looks and service, but is more a priority for service hunters. Anyone might enjoy her though.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
One tip I have is that HYA hunters tend to review HYA in a way that makes sense to other HYA hunters, and service hunters do the same for other service hunters. It's why if a service hunter says a girl is high service, it's close a sure thing that she is. But when even a service hunter says a girl is exceptionally good looking and is won over, it also tends to be true since they rarely say anything. This is what I mean about reading reviews with a critical eye and also looking at a reviewer's past reviews to understand their standards. Some reviewers have lower standards and that's okay - they have every right to like who they like. But you just have to be aware of that and know they might like different girls than you. For various reasons, I only follow some reviewers.
About looks. It is always a bit funny to see people argue what order the S-Tier and A-Tier girls should be ranked in, when we're basically all agreeing that they are all hot. It is fun to rank them still, but there is a huge gap between A-Tier and C or D girls who are the most common. It is really rare for someone to put a C or D tier next to an A tier in "looks only", so clearly despite varying tastes we all share common basic standards. C and D tier girls may be fun and worth seeing for their other specialties sometimes. For example, there are many B or C tier girls I will see because they have perfect tits or perfect ass, and I just focus my eyes on that the whole time. Or butterfaces with a golden pussy, where keeping her in doggy it turns into perfection. We make the most of things, and we all want some variety sometimes too.
There is a high proportion of new girls lately. Mapmakers will be needed to sort them out. But there are also some returning girls, whom you can search for reviews on them from months back.
Terra starts Monday, and there are reviews of her from SD. For a long time I would quote reviews to help people research a girl. Then I switched to dropping a bunch of links to help people read and research, to make people more independent. Now, I will just tell you to search SD for her name. This is the 3-level progression of training so you won't need help from anyone in the future. My hope is people think for themselves and practice good research and decision making. It's the only way.
Oh right, now I will copy my tip on Allie. Earlier this year, I pointed out to SD she would leave someday when SD stopped repeating her, and of course she did. OC is under the same rule btw.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
It is up to you. Some day we will not have her in OC either.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Peach is also another good option. I would suggest hh with her. I made the same specific suggestion on a few other kgirls too. It is the best way to have a good time imo.
I really hate ad photos, but they are also necessary in order to match the correct girl in case another girl comes along with the exact same name. Agencies reuse names a lot. Attached is the ad photo for Terra. I would not rely on ad photos for expectations, however.
It is my sincere hope people find the girls they like, be happy, and avoid multiple shipwrecks. Only way.
-
08-29-25 23:45 #5475Regular Member

Posts: 11Bona
Does anyone got a review on Bona? She lookin mad thicc. https://topangels.ch/topangel/bona2/
-
08-29-25 20:12 #5474Senior Member

Posts: 85Tried to book today. Booker went silent on me when I ask about availability, she must be booked out.
Originally Posted by DashingD
[View Original Post]
-
08-29-25 17:30 #5473Senior Member

Posts: 157Love Q CAKDoll
New high price upcharge bunny.
Potential Katie K replacement?
If anyone toftt, appreciate the info back here. Worth the tag price?
-
08-29-25 17:23 #5472Senior Member

Posts: 436Joanna TER
I haven't seen her but I did notice she has almost 400 TER reviews. She's pricey at 370 GFE.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
08-29-25 16:34 #5471Senior Member

Posts: 157I was thinking same thing. Her faceless pics remind me of Lime's.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
08-28-25 16:28 #5470Senior Member

Posts: 1258Joanna
Any info on Joanna? Getting rebrand vibes.
-
08-28-25 14:55 #5469Senior Member

Posts: 77FA verified me through another Korg.
Originally Posted by NomadPush
[View Original Post]
I told them I was cleared on booker grey & CAKDOLL.










Reply With Quote


