Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 4,066 to 4,080 of 5443
-
12-08-08 05:40 #1378Senior Member

Posts: 862Sounds like a fake cop to me too
I suppose you never know for sure, but your caller does not sound like legitimate LE. I suppose if Michelle was arrested and she had your number there's a small possibility that a rogue vice cop with too much time on his hands might call you to bust your chops. But you mention he didn't have her number and wanted you to give it, so that theory doesn't make sense.
Originally Posted by Trashed201
Don't call Camden vice or get an attorney at this point. Just let it blow over which it probably will. The main point your story makes is how important it is that mongers be careful. Don't have personal information about yourself laying around your vehicle. Avoid giving info to SWs. If for some reason you give a number to a SW, make sure it's a pay-by-minute phone not traceable to you. As I've said before I also don't like sharing SW digits via PM, and rarely do it unless it's a senior member with a good history. Even then I often don't share. There's very little good that can come from it. Good luck.
-
12-07-08 23:08 #1377Senior Member

Posts: 199fake cop?
You can get someone's first and last name by going to whitepages .com and do a reverse lookup. Type in a phone number and the listed name pops up.
Also, when receiving a call from a 'cop' ask what precinct he's calling from. Then call him back at the listed number for that precinct.
Good Luck.
-
12-07-08 20:23 #1376Senior Member

Posts: 214Advice needed and another warning
This report is two fold. I got a call yest. From an 856 #. They said they were a cop who worked with the joint vice squad of Camden and Kensington. Supposedly they got my # and name thru whatever special computer skills LE posses. I can't imagine it could be anyone other than LE as I know no one who would call to haras and threaten me. While I didn't get an answer why I was being singled out I can only summize it's my advertising for Michelle and all the requests I filled for her #. Lesson here is don't make the mistake I did and push any #'s. While there may be another explanation as to whom this person is since I don't have any enemies I'm aware of LE is all I can come up with. If anyone has any thoughts contrary to mine I'd appreciate any feedback. The up shoot is I was told if I ever hit either stroll since they know my car and license plates I'd be pulled over, arrested, and the cops would make my life hell. He also told me I'd then get to met him. This is my punishment for not "cooperating" and giving him Michelle's # because Nobody should be calling me for any SW's #. I didn't believe he was acop till he told me my last name. If any senior members who are wiz's on the internet know how to get a name and other info from a phone # please PM me as I want to check this # out and see if it indeed is LE. I'm thinking of calling the Camden vice squad tomm. To see if an attorney should contact them as I was told to do by "John" the cop. Is this a bad or good idea to see if this guy is a cop? I don't want to spend the $ on an attorney if I can avoid it. At this point unless I; m convinced I'm not on the arrest list in Camden and the K it looks like my mongering days are sadly done. Hopefully some of you who are smarter than myself can give me some smart constructive advice. Any help is greatly appreciated. Every one else be super careful as it appears our hard earned $ is being well spent pursuing hardened evil criminals such as our selves.
-
12-07-08 07:12 #1375Senior Member

Posts: 869GM: Thanks for the citations?
I don't know about you, but I, like many who read this board, have collected images off the web for a long time. Over the years, how many might have been collected? Countless. Do we make careful note of where these came from? Absurd question. I have no idea where I found these images.
I guarantee that I did not "lift" these images from any pay site because I never have subscribed to a pay site. All images either came from pitch sites or from forums on which images are posted. Your snide implication that I "lifted" the images is off base. I did in fact note in my post that the images were from the web. One of the images had an embedded web address, which I obliterated, in line with the rules for this forum, which prohibit it. A rule which, I might add, you violated in your post.
l did not violate *your* citation rules on purpose, except to abide by forum rules.
Giani
P.S. It is interesting that you actually know the origin of the images. Do you have financial interest in either of these sites?
Originally Posted by G Malav
-
12-06-08 21:40 #1374Senior Member

Posts: 214Looking for Michelle and a heads up
Spare me the lectures, just want to know if anyone has seen Michelle{Pics from Cooky and myself recently}. If you've seen her since Thursday please PM me, it's important. Also anyone who I've given her # to if any new member requests her # or calls you if you've given Michelle your # and it was "found" by someone who saw her don't give out any info. Somehow my # was "found" by a member or someone who's been reading this site. They said Cooky Jar gave them my # and wanted Michelle's #. Cooky doesn't know the person, never had my # and neither do I so please use caution with this lying weasal!
-
12-06-08 20:35 #1373Senior Member

Posts: 855I am not sure if it heightens the sensations of sex. I have seen a while ago a curve showing the relation between drugs and sex performance, sex drive, sex appetite... I remember sex enhances at the begining then after continuous drug usage it declines. It even becomes worse than a natural. On the other hand, from few personal experiences it is not the case. I let the girls smoke since I thought the same thing.
Let me know if you or any other member have any scientific evidence.
Originally Posted by Giani
-
12-06-08 19:21 #1372Senior Member

Posts: 315Giani -better qualify your pics.
Jeez, the first picture is from Crack ***** Confessions and the second two are from Heather-Friends.com. Both sites that exploited drugged addicted women. Shouldn't you credit the sources where you lifted the pics?
-
12-06-08 16:56 #1371Senior Member

Posts: 869Anna: Poster child for butter as a weight loss program.
Dunno know about Philly, but in Cincy, butter (crack) is the most common reason for girls on the street. I've attached two pix from the web as an illustration. I've also attached a pic of one on the pipe for quite a while. A girl I once knew called it "panties down..." It considerably heightens the sensations of sex.
There is hardly a better appetite suppressant, and you can see with Anna:
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/at...chmentid=66006
The longer a girl is on it, the thinner she gets...
Knowing the ethical nature (or lack thereof) of the drug companies, I'm surprised they don't patent it and make billions. People truely WILL lose weight with the butter...
Giani.
-
12-06-08 09:03 #1370Senior Member

Posts: 5563Re: SW reality
It’s all a matter of taste. If you are after a young girl with a pretty face, and the body doesn’t matter, you might want someone like Anna. If you are more interested in a nice body, with a face that will not scare the crap outta you, you might prefer someone like Michelle. In both cases there is something nice to be said.
Originally Posted by Trashed201
Compare the two girls, which one would you rather lay next too? Which one would you rather sit next too (on a car date)? Everyone has there own preference.
Before you make you choice, know this, sometimes the camera’s flash will hoarsen a persons features. Michelle’s pictures were taken in a small dim lit room, where I couldn’t position myself for the best shots, using a small lamp and my flash for lighting,. Anna’s pictures were taken in a large darken room using sun light from the hole in the ceiling and my flash. Michelle is prettier in person and has a nice body. Anna is much prettier fully clothed.
CookyJar
-
12-05-08 14:40 #1369Senior Member

Posts: 214SW reality
While you are partially right she looks much better in person. As we all know drugs don't have a positive effect on one's looks. I don't know when the pics I posted were taken, however she was probably clean at the time. This is just the reality of there life. Regardless she's a terrific date and more than above average in SW looks. U can find a prettier one but if they are a terrible date what good id that?
Originally Posted by Menasha
-
12-04-08 20:29 #1368Senior Member

Posts: 5563Re: Michelle a better view (another better view)
Originally Posted by Trashed201
Originally Posted by Trashed201
Trashed has said it all, there’s no need for me to add anything more. I visited Michelle at her place. She was very accommodating. She did a fine BBBJCIM. Her place was clean and her male roommate was cool. The pictures don’t do her justice, I thought her much cuter in person. She has a nice body, soft in all the right places.
Originally Posted by Trashed201
I’d do her again. YMMV
CookyJar
-
12-03-08 10:09 #1367Senior Member

Posts: 65Thanks for enlarging them. She looks tasty. She reminds me of a girl I knew{with a few pounds put on} from the Philly scene a couple of years ago.
-
12-03-08 10:07 #1366Senior Member

Posts: 119Not much reporting on this stroll
Where on Westfield is the stroll? Marie sounds awesome?
Originally Posted by Tussel
-
12-03-08 05:00 #1365Senior Member

Posts: 214Michelle a better view
Excellent suggestion Texas! Here they are for your viewing pleasure!!
Originally Posted by TexasMonger
-
12-02-08 23:34 #1364Senior Member

Posts: 65No offence but there too small to see what she looks like.











Reply With Quote






