Agency Discussion and Reviews

[Endogeny65]

Had a dream about her and it was a nightmare. Cannot recommend her. Bad attitude and does not perform as advertized. Cannot recommend. That is all. This has been a PSA. Giving back.

This is why I'm hesitant about this gsgdww place. So many mixed reviews here vs the other site. On the other site she has good reviews, but they seem kind of fake. Also all the pics seem fake as well. As others have noted the one girl Lin has a pornstar's pics posted.

[Jhaskin]

Cool. I might say fuck it and go see one of them and report back on my experience. Based on one of the recent reports I might avoid kil (she was one of my choices) just based off the attitude report. Latinas in my experience if the mood isn't set from the beginning the whole session will be a dud.

So far I've seen Michelle, Jane, Coco, Mimi, QQ. Michelle was most like her pics. Coco previous pics were accurate, current pics are way photoshopped / faceswapped. Mimi photos are her but using some sort of makeup filter, her face isn't that clean and slim in person. QQ and Jane were completely different people in person. Michelle, Coco, Mimi were the best out of the ones I've seen as far as service goes. I'm actually not that attracted to Coco or Mimi, but I have to admit they put in the effort to please you and ended up seeing both of them multiple times because of their service. Jane and QQ were both duds to me despite the positive reviews I read before going in. TBH it's the same YMMV gamble as with the other C orgs. I'm also not a fan of the upcharge for 2nd pop compared to the other agencies but at least I've had more positive experiences here than negative ones. I've tried making appointments with other girls here but the booker sometimes tells me, don't recommend, see this girl instead.

[Ansonl]

Had a dream about her and it was a nightmare. Cannot recommend her. Bad attitude and does not perform as advertized. Cannot recommend. That is all. This has been a PSA. Giving back.

[BazookaSteve]

Here it is:

http://gsgdww123.com/

I open the site and the first thing I see is a cgirl using stolen pics from one of the most popular Asian pornstars today LOL.

[Ansonl]

Is there a link to the new site first love club?

Here it is:

http://gsgdww123.com/

[Pkmnmewtwo]

(Please Check with Bookers for More Current and Accurate Option Info).

http://rentry.org/kgirls#dmv-dc-maryland-virginia

C-org / Asian Hot Girl / Asian Sensation: Latin Melanie (no), Jgirl Rika (BB), Jgirl Yuria (BB), Jgirl Urara (BB), Jgirl Amy (BB).

C-org / Joyful Bay: Jgirl Naho (BB), Jgirl Yuka (BB).

C-org / Firefox: Vgirl Pin (no), Latin Zujhin (BB).

C-org / Asian Butterfly Cgirl Tina (no), Jgirl Maho (BB Video), Jgirl Yume (BB Video Greek).

C-org / Sweet Baby: JAV Kosaka Aya (BB Video), Rin (BB Video).

C-org / First Love Club: Russian Lina (no), Cgirl Mimi (BB), Cgirl BingBing (no), Cgirl Yike (no), Cgirl Coco (no), Latin Kli (no), Cgirl Lin (Greek), Cgirl DouDou (BB Greek).

K-org / Discreet Story: Spring (no).

K-org / Club Paradise: Fiancee (no), Shani (BB).

K-org / Asian Top Model: 8/2 Lora Queen (BB), Kimmy (BB).

K-org / DMV Girls: Vgirl Scarlett (Video).

K-org / Asian Gem: Jgirl Babe Lilika (BB Video), Coco (no).

K-org / K-Star: Yeji K (BB).

Is there a link to the new site first love club?

[PhoKing77]

There like one or two girls on here that peak my interest but having read threw both mixed reviews on here I'm not sure if I should go or not. What makes me hesitate as well is one of the girls they have on the site has pictures of kazumi on her profile so I know that chick is hundred percent using fake pictures.

What actually ones that have actually used the service how positive is the gamble? Or should I pass on this one.

So far I've seen Michelle, Jane, Coco, Mimi, QQ. Michelle was most like her pics. Coco previous pics were accurate, current pics are way photoshopped / faceswapped. Mimi photos are her but using some sort of makeup filter, her face isn't that clean and slim in person. QQ and Jane were completely different people in person. Michelle, Coco, Mimi were the best out of the ones I've seen as far as service goes. I'm actually not that attracted to Coco or Mimi, but I have to admit they put in the effort to please you and ended up seeing both of them multiple times because of their service. Jane and QQ were both duds to me despite the positive reviews I read before going in. TBH it's the same YMMV gamble as with the other C orgs. I'm also not a fan of the upcharge for 2nd pop compared to the other agencies but at least I've had more positive experiences here than negative ones. I've tried making appointments with other girls here but the booker sometimes tells me, don't recommend, see this girl instead.

[Izumimuzi]

My bad I didn't get a chance to see on that Thursday. Some family shit came up and had to reschedule to that Friday but on Friday the booker cancelled my appointment and said she left town.

But earlier that week I did see Yuka and can confirm that her pictures are accurate. The mole on her face picture is accurate in person but she is 34 and not whatever young age they put her at. But she looks young surprisingly.

All good, I wouldn't have been able to make an appointment anyway since she left before the weekend came. Yuki was a great though.

[Ed Loves Head]

Just throwing in my 2 cents on Mimi and the gsgd agency.

I saw Mimi one day as a spur of the moment thing. I'm not an agency guy. I just texted a number in BP and set up a visit. I was quoted usual ACS rates.

I had a great time with Mimi. I think she's beautiful and she has an amazing talent that blew my mind. Totally my kind of girl. Liked her so much I saw her the next night to make sure it was real. The only downside for me is that I'm never in that area and I don't usually pay agency rates. So Mimi is a unicorn but she's way more than I usually pay.

Call me a shill, a white knight, an AI chatbot, whatever. These are all just dreams and fantasies, right?

Anyway, I'm reading a lot about her so I wanted to throw in my opinion.

I usually only write TER reviews, typically two per month to maintain my membership status. Occasionally, I repost some content to this platform. I go out 5-6 times a month, and bad experiences definitely happen, but after I give feedback to the booker, those girls usually leave soon after. Writing reviews afterward becomes pointless since they're gone.

I don't know why you're so fixated on Mimi's 400/45 mins BBFS rate. I booked Mimi for an hour and rate 300, opting for standard service. I found her BBBJ and service to be well worth itthat's my genuine feeling after meeting her. At least I can guarantee my review was written after seeing her, with all booker records to back it up, even my Uber ride record since it was my first time going and I wasn't sure about parking. But you're quick to claim reviews are fake without even meeting the girls. Mimi currently has 51 TER reviewsthere's no way they're all fake, right? I once tried registering a TER alt account but got banned (can not post review, only can read) like 2 days after for using the same IP. TER is stricter than you think.

And looking at your post history, almost all are negative. If every girl you meet fails to satisfy you, have you considered that the issue might be with you? The girl across from you is a human, not a robot.

[Jhaskin]

There like one or two girls on here that peak my interest but having read threw both mixed reviews on here I'm not sure if I should go or not. What makes me hesitate as well is one of the girls they have on the site has pictures of kazumi on her profile so I know that chick is hundred percent using fake pictures.

What actually ones that have actually used the service how positive is the gamble? Or should I pass on this one.

[Ansonl]

Hi all,

Has anybody seen Kli? I was curious but have not seen any reports. Thanks.

[Cooley]

Thanks for the great review. Sounds like p good DFK service.

On Rika, does anyone have any insight or know if she has reviews from NYC or otherwise? Pics look great from a thick booty perspective, but AHG has been pretty hit or miss recently.

One or two of those photos looks like Miyabi from PA:

https://pinkgfe.********.com/2024/07/Miyabi.html

She's reviewed on other sites, is pse, and appears to be open to greek if you're smaller.

[Annie88]

Easy booking. Pulled up and was able to go in early. Pin greeted me in a little sheer dress. We took our time undressing LFK. She sat on my lap while we set up music and joked around about what she likes. Blue toast and shower were basic. Her body is smoking hot, athletic and great boobs. She has a cute face as well. BBJ and eye contact to start. Slow cowgirl and tons of DFK. I finished pretty quickly. We cuddled and chatted about Vietnam. Didn't finish the convo as we just started kissing and starting round 2. Doggy was incredible. Overall enjoyed myself and would recommend.

[Cooley]

Haven't seen Yume in a while and was hesitant to book with the new, non-inclusive rates. She's lovely and all, but it's hard to beat free. Not sure what she's offering to all previous visitors or regulars, but she appears open to discounts. I thought she looked great before, but I guess she went through with her plans to get a procedure or two done. Those titties still looking amazing, but her ass isn't as plump. She still looks great, but I liked the more voluptuous Yume. Anyways, it was great to reconnect and get that sensual pse treatment. While she may have her routine and kind of goes through the motions, she's willing to take your lead and is open to all positions. She also seems more open to dfk now. I really missed the TS and her wet body slamming against mine, but the nuru on the bed was a nice substitute. First round ended with a lovely cip. Tried to get another cip through multiple positions with accompanying HJ and bbj, but couldn't get there. Regardless, I enjoyed my time with her and will try to see her when she's in NY.

[Hmapril]

Charlotte Bronte.

https://www.eros.com/washington_dc/f...6.htm?cat=1504

She's on eros.com for a while however I can't find any reviews of her.