Agency Discussion and Reviews

[SSB69]

On GSG, I agree something definitely is going on. Ok both sites; there are either paid reviews, white knight shills, or straight up fake AI review activities. Business is down a lot and I imagine faking activity would draw attention to glowing reviews. I'll give you guys a positive one I had a while back.

Maple CP.

Cute kgirl, guessing late 20's. Met her on last visit and she seemed new to the US but somewhat of a pro. Face was a 7 ish and body was 5'5 ish bigger legs, flat ass, soft skin, natural B or C's. Amazing unlimited DFK and service. Very easy to talk to between rounds. She'd be an ATF if her body matched my preferences a bit more. The clock at CP is running 10 minutes ahead, so she had me out in 50 minutes which was a turn off.

Well, you're talking about Coco's reviews which is only 1 girl of the 10+ that have been reviewed there. But yeah, I see your point and also think there's something weird going on with the reviews.

I really have only looked into Mimi because I kept seeing her name pop up but her reviews are all over the place. Some say she's 40+, 5'8 with D's, some say she's late 20's 5'4 with B's. Some say she's 350/ hr, some say they paid 450? Some say it's 200/ hr. I checked her very first review on the other review site and it's Destello who I recognize. We've seen the same girls, rate them similarly, have similar experiences. Mimi's the only girl he ever gave a 6 to for looks, service was 8 though. Read the review and thought I'd rather not see Mimi. I'm thinking 2 or 3 girls share "Mimi"s profile and the booker just makes sure each person see's the same "Mimi" on rebooks. The difference in physical descriptions / experiences is way too far off for them to all be talking about the same girl.

From what I can see, there's like 3 websites that list the same girls plus ads scattered around random escort sites. Like this is an ad with a different number but the location is the old one? And they're using Coco's pics? My thought process is that a few bookers must've come together to masquerade as an agency with the idea to eventually become a legit one.

https://nova.bedpage.com/Escorts/her.../13209178.html

[Izumimuzi]

Looking for the reviewer histories and the recent reviews all 8-9's. That sounds incredible like the best service queen kgirls that are also young. So either these are all white knights who are a little generous or fake. With AI now, I'd imagine it's pretty easy to hire someone to create dozens of positive reviews across the agencies. We've already concluded that Chu kgirl had dozens and maybe hundreds of totally fake reviews. She had good service but when I met her she was literally in her 40's and looks like one of my younger aunts. It's easy for an agency to push fake or paid reviews.

Well, you're talking about Coco's reviews which is only 1 girl of the 10+ that have been reviewed there. But yeah, I see your point and also think there's something weird going on with the reviews.

I really have only looked into Mimi because I kept seeing her name pop up but her reviews are all over the place. Some say she's 40+, 5'8 with D's, some say she's late 20's 5'4 with B's. Some say she's 350/ hr, some say they paid 450? Some say it's 200/ hr. I checked her very first review on the other review site and it's Destello who I recognize. We've seen the same girls, rate them similarly, have similar experiences. Mimi's the only girl he ever gave a 6 to for looks, service was 8 though. Read the review and thought I'd rather not see Mimi. I'm thinking 2 or 3 girls share "Mimi"s profile and the booker just makes sure each person see's the same "Mimi" on rebooks. The difference in physical descriptions / experiences is way too far off for them to all be talking about the same girl.

From what I can see, there's like 3 websites that list the same girls plus ads scattered around random escort sites. Like this is an ad with a different number but the location is the old one? And they're using Coco's pics? My thought process is that a few bookers must've come together to masquerade as an agency with the idea to eventually become a legit one.

https://nova.bedpage.com/Escorts/her.../13209178.html

[Noworth]

Negative reviews can be more telling than the positive reviews.

I think the critical thing about reviewers is that they are consistent in their reviews. In others words, guys that get pissed off about something that occurs and then down play anything that was positive in the session (or could have been if they didn't fixate on some one disappointment) will have inconsistent reviews. Same for those that are overjoyed by some aspect of the session and then color everything else them might be average as really good. Neither will necessarily have a review about an escort that is that helpful for me because I will not know if the whole session, and everything that entrails, was as claimed or if one or two things in it colored the entire review.

A consistent reviewer, regardless of what grading scale they personally use is helpful to everyone because they can adjust the scoring, and text description, for their own use -- a lot like some use Celsius while others Fahrenheit, but it's simple to compare and get an accurate measure of temperature with either.

[EasyEmail786]

Texted and ask a out about Juri I was told by the booker she is beautiful and very good service. All was lies.

I went there door was open by some men and then I went inside she was in the room with blue dress she looked good at first. I went it no hug no kiss just how long you wanted I say 30 min and then asked about option. All paper taking care of went to shower was a quick wash. Dry up and was on bed soon as I get there together asked me to get to bed I did and started licking my nipple for 1 minute then she went to licking ball for 20 second was good and I was hard then she BBBJ me for 1 minute and asked me you ready and was like ok got the lube and went it missionary guess what? She blocks me in missionary well that is the first I was never blocked before in miss position well I guess there is a first for everyone LOL. She dry as hell I try to get lube and she said too much wasting what? I just paid for shitty service she looked away in miss position hand close like she was hugging her self so I can not get close to her in miss I am like I am not going to cum like this so I told her to get in Doggy position soon as I get the position and put it in and pump one of 2 times she puts me out and stiff her back so I can't put it in any more this was an ongoing struggle we wasted 10 min like that then I told her to get on the edge of bed for missionary took her so long to get to the edge of bed I think she was trying to kill time. I get some lube and she get up and give me napkin to wipe my hand off what the hell is going on here why are you wasting my time and want to wipe my hand with baby wipe while I am having s*x. She is insane she should not be doing this. Ripping people off and think you can get away with this. Terrible terrible. On top of all this she told me be gentle LOL gentle for what you won't even get close to me. Then alarm ring and she said time up!! I was like what the f**k did I do here probably the worse agency experience ever. YOU HAVE BEEN Warned.

[SweetDog]

Hey now! I'm coming to the dmv this weekend and was looking for something other than the usual PG county AMP's, I wanted to branch out. I was looking at the agencies and have always wanted to try that route. I saw several ladies that caught my eye but saw Shani was arriving today. I was reached out, was able to get verified and have an appt with her tomorrow. I'll give a good report shortly after. The ter reports seem to point to good looks but mediocre service. But, I can't wait to find out!

Shani was really good to me with no service issues. Posted more details in the K girl board. Best of luck. BTW get approved at Kstar if you can as I have yet to have a bad appt with them.

[SSB69]

Looking for the reviewer histories and the recent reviews all 8-9's. That sounds incredible like the best service queen kgirls that are also young. So either these are all white knights who are a little generous or fake. With AI now, I'd imagine it's pretty easy to hire someone to create dozens of positive reviews across the agencies. We've already concluded that Chu kgirl had dozens and maybe hundreds of totally fake reviews. She had good service but when I met her she was literally in her 40's and looks like one of my younger aunts. It's easy for an agency to push fake or paid reviews.

While gsgw seems shady, the only reason I'm not trying them out is because their website is abysmal. While the review activity is somewhat odd and I don't recognize any of the usernames, I don't think it's possible for any agency to fake that many reviews. Also, none of these girls are being rated all that highly IMO. When you click into all of them, the majority of reviews is 7's and 8's, few 9's, one or two 10's if that.

[OasisSecret]

Hey guys, it's been a while since I have been in DC. I dreamt about an asian from moon palace last time, do they still exist or is there something similar?

Thanks fellas.

[SfoDavid67]

AHG updated several new girls. They are crazy man. So many girls come and go quickly.

Amanda, Chinese girl, add 15 mins and 20 mins quick visit option. First time saw these options.

Yuria, Any info? Young? Skinny? Flat chest?

Umi, her pics look familiar, I think this is not her first time here, anyone remember her?

I have noticed that the agencies here do tend to turn the girls a lot faster. Just moved here and the orgs back (old) home the girls stay around a while even have been there a couple of years now. When they turn so fast its hard for them to build a reputation (good or bad). If a girl knows she will be in city XYZ just for a few weeks at most, the incentive for her to give good service and build a repeat return customers is low.

One org at my old location had a tiny blonde (died blonde) Korean. Incredible service, GFE / PSE to the max. Doubles with her roommate was also incredible.

So far my org experience here was 1. Just okay, 2. Waste of time and money, 3. Excellent!

Orgs here are double the price for BBFS CIP compared to my old stomping grounds and the service tended to be much better, yea I had some duds, we all do.

[PA Gonzo420]

Hey now! I'm coming to the dmv this weekend and was looking for something other than the usual PG county AMP's, I wanted to branch out. I was looking at the agencies and have always wanted to try that route. I saw several ladies that caught my eye but saw Shani was arriving today. I was reached out, was able to get verified and have an appt with her tomorrow. I'll give a good report shortly after. The ter reports seem to point to good looks but mediocre service. But, I can't wait to find out!

[Jacobs Patrick]

I usually only write TER reviews, typically two per month to maintain my membership status. Occasionally, I repost some content to this platform. I go out 5-6 times a month, and bad experiences definitely happen, but after I give feedback to the booker, those girls usually leave soon after. Writing reviews afterward becomes pointless since they're gone.

I don't know why you're so fixated on Mimi's 400/45 mins BBFS rate. I booked Mimi for an hour and rate 300, opting for standard service. I found her BBBJ and service to be well worth itthat's my genuine feeling after meeting her. At least I can guarantee my review was written after seeing her, with all booker records to back it up, even my Uber ride record since it was my first time going and I wasn't sure about parking. But you're quick to claim reviews are fake without even meeting the girls. Mimi currently has 51 TER reviewsthere's no way they're all fake, right? I once tried registering a TER alt account but got banned (can not post review, only can read) like 2 days after for using the same IP. TER is stricter than you think.

And looking at your post history, almost all are negative. If every girl you meet fails to satisfy you, have you considered that the issue might be with you? The girl across from you is a human, not a robot.

Negative reviews can be more telling than the positive reviews.

[Annie88]

If you make another fake account I will edit the posts so they say you use hidden cameras to extort your clients

A2

[FunctionK]

Anyone tried their new girl Cherry and Juri ？.

[McBababs1]

Haven't been to their MD location but made the drive to see this cutie. Glad I did, as she looks identical to pics with smaller bust (prob around Bs). Service was excellent and as she told me, she has great experience from her time working in 🧼 land.

[DMV Average Joe]

Please Check with Bookers for More Current and Accurate Option Info.

http://rentry.org/kgirls#dmv-dc-maryland-virginia

C-org / Asian Elf: Jgirl Risa (BB Video).

C-org / Asian Hot Girl / Asian Sensation: Jgirl Yuki (BB), Jgirl Amanda (no), Jgirl Aona (BB), Jgirl Miya (BB), Jgirl Umi (BB), Jgirl Urara (BB).

C-org / Joyful Bay: Jgirl Akayu (BB Greek), Jgirl Mei (BB), Jgirl Naho (BB), Jgirl Yuka (BB), Jgirl Kokoro (BB).

C-org / Firefox: Jgirl Airi (BB Video), Jgirl Miu (Video), Latin Zujhin (BB).

C-org / Asian Butterfly: Jgirl Cherry (BB Video), Jgirl Juri (BB Video), Jgirl Haruka (BB Video).

C-org / Sweet Baby: JAV Kosaka Aya (BB Video), Rin (BB Video).

C-org / GSGDWW123: Cgirl Tian (no), Cgirl Mimi (BB), Cgirl Wan (no), Cgirl Yike (no), Cgirl Coco (no).

K-org / Discreet Story: Angela (TBD), Heather (no).

K-org / Club Paradise: Maple (BB), Iris (BB), 7/18 Shani (BB).

K-org / Asian Top Model: 7/18 Baby Cindy (TBD), Kimmy (BB).

K-org / DMV Girls: Vgirl Scarlett (Video).

K-org / Asian Gem: Jgirl Mari (BB Video), White (no), Coco (no).

K-org / K-Star: Yeji K (BB).

[FunctionK]

AHG updated several new girls. They are crazy man. So many girls come and go quickly.

Amanda, Chinese girl, add 15 mins and 20 mins quick visit option. First time saw these options.

Yuria, Any info? Young? Skinny? Flat chest?

Umi, her pics look familiar, I think this is not her first time here, anyone remember her?