Sugarbabies and Arrangements

[BuckENaked]

Anyone seen her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...8-448f996886d2

Is she legit?

Yeah, I've actually reported on her here and I've had a date. It was probably one of the worst experiences I've had with anyone and completely the opposite I expected given her looks. The pictures are true. She's tall skinny and draws a lot of attention but BCD was horrible. Just my experience there's been some chat from others that may have a different opinion.

[Kabbakabba]

Anyone seen her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...8-448f996886d2

Is she legit?

[Cleguy48]

I suspect that this one is a pro. Any thoughts?

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...9-8edaa0c979a7

[TheEndlessEdge]

Decided to do one more month of Seeking since I saw a few profiles that I was intrigued by. Some of the new "changes" are rolling out already. You can no longer say that you can give an "allowance. " The abbreviation "ppm" was already flagged, but now "allowance" is another word that is being flagged by their system. Just FYI.

Amy - https://members.seeking.com/member/9...6-11635ffea172 - Seemed to be cool and DTF, but she's picky about who she wants to be with. Sent a picture and I wasn't her type, but she cordially turned me down upfront and I appreciated that, wishing her the best of luck in return. YMMV.

Kate - https://members.seeking.com/member/8...3-e0fa502edad0 - If you like taller women, she's DTF. Didn't partake but may in the future. She seems cool.

Daisy - https://members.seeking.com/member/8...0-d961fb8cc94d - Messaged, no response yet.

Rose - https://members.seeking.com/member/9...c-06a13c4bc700 - Messaged, no response yet.

Casey - https://members.seeking.com/member/4...d-e700397d725a - Messaged, and she's DTF. But I don't think she wants to drive out to Cleveland. Still in talking stages.

Taylor - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...1-3935a885f6b0 - She's legit, but she was skeptical if I was real or not. Hit a bit of a stall. Might try to reengage soon.

Char - https://members.seeking.com/member/9...d-2a26397d06ea - She's very DTF. Usually don't go for black / mixed girls (just a personal preference), but may partake. She's pretty down to earth and cool to talk to.

Kaylee - https://members.seeking.com/member/1...1-de2b03b03802 - Seen her a few times before in the past. Thicker, but very DTF. Was open to a lot. BBBJ, DATY, CFS / BBFSCIP. Had a bit of a falling out with her because she wanted more commitment than I was willing to give, so YMMV.

Maddie - https://members.seeking.com/member/9...b-08c2aef3033d - Cool girl. DTF and wants to get together soon. Might plan something out with her down the line.

Alexis - https://members.seeking.com/member/a...1-45d2329bf93b - Good time, slim body. But wants 400-500. I had fun when I saw her at 300. BBBJ, DATY, CFS. She's friends with one other SB on the site, but not sure who.

Mariamarie - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...3-4ddeb737f304 - Posting her again because she's a good time. Very sweet girl too.

Amber - https://members.seeking.com/member/9...9-af263cc274f7 - Seems legit, just haven't gotten together yet with her.

[SR7D1]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...e-e708ae7b95cb

Possibly fake? Gave one number to text her on, then she texted back from a different 330 number. Looked up that number and it comes back as SPAM. Won't send pics via text, but wants to video chat. Anyone meet her? She is pretty new so doubt it.

[BestDjInOhio]

I do have phone numbers to exchange if anybody wants to.

Maisy 26 Akron.

Classic scammer wants a deposit and sends you her number to text. Then she blocks you after you have read the message.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...2-82650d210e94

E_L 33 westlake crazy chick.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...e-5bde4c13aef2

Maddie 23 cle.

Content seller nuff said.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...2-22e06b116a42

Sabrina 34 Akron.

Said she was into bbfscip and pleasing the guy then we met up and she expected 400 for a quickie. She was a mess looking rough and strung out. She is in NO WAY worth that much. 100 at best in her current look. Hard pass I sent her on her way.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...2-392d336c9491

Jessi 31 Akron.

Sent a few texts and things fizzled outs she has horrible comms. I moved on.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...1-9ff0a2e7d6f1

Cadence 20.

Bad comms don't even bother.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-cced92d31a23

Robin 26.

Also bad comms don't waste your time.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...2-330bd9b392a1

Samlam 34 Akron.

Homeless and not meeting people.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...f-2afd42cb03f2

DynamicSiren 33.

Bad comms.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...e-c11bbbc35050

Kelley.

More bad comms.

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...5-41826ef53a3b

Harley 36 Jackson twp.

Seems like a waste of time, works too much supposedly, is her excuse for not having time to meet.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-cea3b7658740

TemptingGirly 26 and Canton.

Keeps moving around city to city. She's homeless at the moment, comms are really bad.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...7-5e14831a532e

Jaden 25 Akron.

Looks kinky. Doesn't have sex for less than 1500 😂 claims she has no problem getting it either. Offered me head from her and her friend for 500 😂 I told her best of luck.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...5-9170d345219b

[Bernie76]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...2-eae87e4817e9

Anyone? I'm currently texting with her and hoping to see soon. PM if prefer.

[Bernie76]

Unfortunately because women today have near-infinite options, they can just get the rates they want eventually, especially if they're still in their prime or hot. I just move on to the next one as soon as I can and try to have a lot of options lined up.

Not to get all wonky here, but what the federal govt has done by printing Trillion $ since 2008 has directly led to inflation in this hobby and everything else. They REFUSE to allow anykind of a downturn (correction) in this economy.

[Ebauche]

I've given up on the USA entirely. Takes more planning, and the cost of airfare and hotels, but a buddy and I regularly go offshore to relax and have fun. In Thailand you can wife up for a week of round-the-clock pampering and fantastic sex for less than $ per day. Similar in the Philippines with better English language ability, but profoundly dumber girls.

It's bad. The gps is insane. Part of the problem is a few guys are paying.

Had one for $$ forthenight, everything. Then some other idiot gives her 8 $. Now I don't even get a response. She was at 6 at best.

The only way this gets fixed is to NOT pay them stupid $. Look at Tryst. Crazy.

Had one on SA ask for 2 k. LOL.

Fortunately I can travel so I survive the scene in Cleveland / Akron. PSA don't pay these crazy rates!

[TheEndlessEdge]

It's bad. The gps is insane. Part of the problem is a few guys are paying.

Had one for $$ forthenight, everything. Then some other idiot gives her 8 $. Now I don't even get a response. She was at 6 at best.

The only way this gets fixed is to NOT pay them stupid $. Look at Tryst. Crazy.

Had one on SA ask for 2 k. LOL.

Fortunately I can travel so I survive the scene in Cleveland / Akron. PSA don't pay these crazy rates!

Unfortunately because women today have near-infinite options, they can just get the rates they want eventually, especially if they're still in their prime or hot. I just move on to the next one as soon as I can and try to have a lot of options lined up.

[GolfBuddy]

It's bad. The gps is insane. Part of the problem is a few guys are paying.

Had one for $$ forthenight, everything. Then some other idiot gives her 8 $. Now I don't even get a response. She was at 6 at best.

The only way this gets fixed is to NOT pay them stupid $. Look at Tryst. Crazy.

Had one on SA ask for 2 k. LOL.

Fortunately I can travel so I survive the scene in Cleveland / Akron. PSA don't pay these crazy rates!

[TheEndlessEdge]

Miranda - https://members.seeking.com/member/2...3-9870f17a1aa3 - Was down to meet and then switched to saying she wants to sell content first before meeting.

Skylar - https://members.seeking.com/member/2...1-fcd0a411f117 - She's down to meet, haven't met yet though. Not really prioritizing her at the moment.

Jaden - https://members.seeking.com/member/5...5-9170d345219b - Seems interested and DTF, but she's GPS. Wants over 500. Bigger than what the pics show too.

Serina - https://members.seeking.com/member/0...7-bb5efa459010 - Wants to promote her online content. Says she'll meet for 500, anything more is $1 k and up.

Emhsirehc - https://members.seeking.com/member/2...8-84bb8cd3b3ef - She's been around before. Haven't seen her recently but she's legit. Pics are older. Not sure if she still has a BF or not to complicate things.

Tera - https://members.seeking.com/member/b...3-66d75f6c2587 - Messaging with her now, trying to work out a time to meet.

[Clion]

I'm sure most of us know that GPS has increased heavily over the years, but I encourage those of you who are on seeking to take a look at some of the latest blog posts the site uploaded that have popped up on the main page of the site, as it's a sign as to where we're headed with the current dynamic, as it seems like the women are being guided in a way that enhances a lot of bad habits and is encouraging the rise of the GPS era. The rise of social media has contributed heavily of course, but now it seems like the site itself has decided to triple down on the hard Ls we've been seeing them take these past few years, with the most recent thing being the removal of certain filters in the site's search engine. Not sure if those of you who don't have a current account can see these blog posts, but I'll link them here regardless so active members can see it (I can imagine that a lot of people spend time using their specific searches on the site rather than checking out the home page):

- Why "Too Much Is Exactly the Right Amount" - https://blog.seeking.com/why-too-muc...paign=too-much.

Everything is F* d up because of the "Online Content" .

Guys. Let's raise a toast to OF.

[PainWint]

I'm sure most of us know that GPS has increased heavily over the years, but I encourage those of you who are on seeking to take a look at some of the latest blog posts the site uploaded that have popped up on the main page of the site, as it's a sign as to where we're headed with the current dynamic, as it seems like the women are being guided in a way that enhances a lot of bad habits and is encouraging the rise of the GPS era. The rise of social media has contributed heavily of course, but now it seems like the site itself has decided to triple down on the hard Ls we've been seeing them take these past few years, with the most recent thing being the removal of certain filters in the site's search engine. Not sure if those of you who don't have a current account can see these blog posts, but I'll link them here regardless so active members can see it (I can imagine that a lot of people spend time using their specific searches on the site rather than checking out the home page):

- Why "Too Much Is Exactly the Right Amount" - https://blog.seeking.com/why-too-muc...paign=too-much.

I'll post a quote from the blog post: "Here's the shift: wanting more isn't a dealbreaker. It's a deal filter. Read that again. If someone thinks your standards are "too high," they're telling you everything you need to know. You may want to keep looking. You're not dating to impress everyoneyou're dating to connect with the one who gets it. ".

Looks like we are all observing some days of silence in respect to the death of an era.

Seeking WAS actually a more economical, hassle free and direct path to puss than standard dating. Now with the amount of work that needs to be put in and the insane expectations it is no longer worth it. If you can "date" publicly and have enough game to get girls in the real world that is probably a better option. Time to adapt or go the way of the dinosaurs.

[TheEndlessEdge]

I'm sure most of us know that GPS has increased heavily over the years, but I encourage those of you who are on seeking to take a look at some of the latest blog posts the site uploaded that have popped up on the main page of the site, as it's a sign as to where we're headed with the current dynamic, as it seems like the women are being guided in a way that enhances a lot of bad habits and is encouraging the rise of the GPS era. The rise of social media has contributed heavily of course, but now it seems like the site itself has decided to triple down on the hard Ls we've been seeing them take these past few years, with the most recent thing being the removal of certain filters in the site's search engine. Not sure if those of you who don't have a current account can see these blog posts, but I'll link them here regardless so active members can see it (I can imagine that a lot of people spend time using their specific searches on the site rather than checking out the home page):

- Why "Too Much Is Exactly the Right Amount" - https://blog.seeking.com/why-too-muc...paign=too-much.

I'll post a quote from the blog post: "Here's the shift: wanting more isn't a dealbreaker. It's a deal filter. Read that again. If someone thinks your standards are "too high," they're telling you everything you need to know. You may want to keep looking. You're not dating to impress everyone—you're dating to connect with the one who gets it. ".

- Why We Removed Net Worth and Income Fields and Introduced New Changes - https://blog.seeking.com/why-we-remo...ign=reasonswhy.

Regarding the removal of weight: "We replaced the "Body Type" field with "Weight" because body type is inherently subjective and can lead to misunderstandings or unrealistic expectations. Providing a specific measurement like weight allows members to have a clear, factual reference, minimizing ambiguity. Additionally, specifying weight encourages honesty and transparency in profiles, leading to more genuine connections based on true physical attributes rather than subjective interpretations. ".

While I can understand the removal of Net Worth and Income (because in the grand scheme of things, most men on the site are not going to reveal their true source of income or net worth, nor should they for privacy's sake), the body type filter being removed is a straight up bad idea, and bogs down our searches. The encouragement to be even more GPS has been a thing for years, but it seems like they're really wanting to push that further than ever, and it's making average women think they deserve more for being. Average.

It's going to be a rough ride for the average man, especially with things such as Tinder adding height filters for the women to use to filter out men they don't want to see. It seems like most of the power of choice is being handed unnecessarily to the women in this current era, so it's bound to cause a lot of issues.