Sugar Daddy Sites

**RanManCan** · 06-17-25 15:36

Emilyraexoxo experienced pro who arrived with a "driver", if that's your thing.

I declined upon learning about driver. . . Too hookerish for me, and probably a prepay request followed by a bunch of rules.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...ba49277a6676a3

That said, she does look as advertised.

**SugarLifeNow** · 06-15-25 23:40

SLN Girl, Eden 27.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Eden/

**FarFarAway** · 06-15-25 13:26

Originally Posted by FrenchLuvah [View Original Post]

Sharing is caring.

Yeah, no way, we took the vids on her phone, that is the easiest way to get a girl to agree to do this.

And yes, I saw her Friday, and we got some 'raw' footage, both her riding me and banging her doggee. Every now and then she sends me a screen shot, it isn't too availing.

**FrenchLuvah** · 06-15-25 01:30

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

This SB is 30, smoking hot body, blond, nice, sexy, skinny, personal trainer.

Sharing is caring.

**CuriousVaMan** · 06-13-25 00:48

I'm not sure it really matters. Recently I drove a luxury British coupe to a Tennessee college town I pass through a few times a year. Data Point 1 - SB#1 who I've seen several times gave me a driving tour of her campus in the car, and didn't say word one about the car. Saw her again 5 days later and again, no reference to the car. Data Point 2 - Had a meet and greet with SB#2 (SB#1's replacement) in the same TN college town. We conducted the meet & greet in my car. When discussing price, she agreed to the lower of the range I threw out. Driving an expensive car, I had thought she would have pressed for a higher PPM, but she didn't.

A fancy car is an outward symbol of your success. I'm not convinced it matters to an SB, unless, of course, she's a gold-digging *****.

Originally Posted by StubbornMule [View Original Post]

Q for you guys: do you think it is considered appealing to SBs to drive a flashy car like a Ferrari or McLaren? It seems to me that there are two potential downsides: 1) you might attract more pros instead of actual SBs and 2) SBs might expect more sugar since you have more money. What do you guys think?

**FarFarAway** · 06-12-25 01:11

This SB is 30, smoking hot body, blond, nice, sexy, skinny, personal trainer.

**SugarLifeNow** · 06-12-25 00:41

SLN Girl, Jenna 23.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/jennathedoll/

**HarryMcHardon** · 06-10-25 16:45

Originally Posted by HarryMcHardon [View Original Post]

Been out of the game for a couple years and looking to get back in. So being prudent, I'm RTFF'ing to catch up with the latest in the bowl and SA. Specifically opsec / scammers / facial recognition.

I've always had almost 0 internet presence, no FB, no Insta, nothing related to my job etc, etc. I do have a linked in but never have posted a photo. A couple hobby clubs I've been in show me in group photos that are taken somewhat far away to get 6-10 people in the pic. That is a total of maybe 4 pics on the internet, with limited detail. So I believe my risk of being I'd'd from a face photo is limited. (Feel free to dispute would like to hear if I'm whistling past the divorce courts LOL).

Today I ran a couple of my face pics through Facecheck for the first time and did not get any hits. Didn't surprise me. But I have a couple questions that I can't find by RTFF.

1.) Do you need the paid service to get all the possible matches? I had no hits on page one but there are many other pages that I would need to pay to see. . When you run your pic to make sure your face doesn't come up on these sites, do you all just view page 1, or do you pay for the more exhaustive list?

2.) I was thinking of implementing the practice of editing a big red bozo clown nose over my nose to send to POTs. Would that be enough to thwart the algorithms? It's stupid, but maybe getting a laugh from the POT would make up for not totally seeing my face. IDK, just reaching for answers because this Facial recognition thing is scary.

3.) Any other ideas of altering / editing a photo to thwart the face rec would be appreciated.

Still trying to modernize my Opsec procedures. And SA not accepting Blackhawk anymore is giving me more time to ponder this, because I still haven't figured out a way to pay LOL.

I was fairly confident my super low internet profile (No FB, Insta, Linked In with no pic, etc) would mean no issues with facial recignition but boy, was I wrong. I had checked a few of my photos on Facecheck with no hits, and wasn't surprised. However today I sent the same pics to Pimeyes – and from my one miniscule presence on the internet, one lousy club I help run, a few group pics on that site threw out a match. No personal info but anyone would know where to find me on certain times / dates when that club meets. I was pretty surprised to say the least.

So now got to figure out if I want to upload pics to Pimeyes to opt out. Knowing they'll probably use those pics at some point to help train their system on my face. It sucks, but I'm thinking opting out at the source is the likely best method to address this threat.

I tried a variety of ways to obscure the pics I would send to POTs, cloaked them 1 x, 2 x,3 x, reversed them, glasses on and off, and nothing worked except putting a big red clown nose over my nose. And even then, the nose had to be pretty damn big to thwart the system. And no guarantee they won't eventually perfect extrapolating around a big red clown nose.

Since I help run the club where my pics are posted, I got into their system and found the offending picture, downloaded it, and cloaked my face 2 x, plus slightly blurred it. And re-uploaded it back to the website where it presents now. Pimeyes is still finding the original version of the pic so I'm thinking it may take a little while for them to re-crawl that site and theoretically the cloaked / blurred pic would register a "no hit" result.

So long term, I have to decide if clown nose pics, monitoring and altering the source of my posted pics, or trusting the Pimeyes opt-out system is the safest answer.

Hope everyone out there who's married or otherwise has a reputation to protect is checking out this stuff. I mean, if I, Mr. Low internet profile, has to worry, then most guys probably have to worry.

**FarFarAway** · 06-10-25 14:09

Originally Posted by PantyPatrol1 [View Original Post]

No, the references to money I was referring to come from the 2025 decision to eliminate "net worth" and "income" sections of the profile, not any direct P4 P references. Seeking wants you to post photos of your ferrari and a selfie of you asking for Grey Poupon instead of bragging about your income / net worth with monetary figures.

While seeking removed those, their companion site, What's Your Price, still has them. IDK what that's about.

**SugarLifeNow** · 06-10-25 00:11

New SLN Girl, Shelley 40.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/shelleeylove001/

**Lexx1** · 06-09-25 14:10

Originally Posted by PantyPatrol1 [View Original Post]

No, the references to money I was referring to come from the 2025 decision to eliminate "net worth" and "income" sections of the profile, not any direct P4 P references. Seeking wants you to post photos of your ferrari and a selfie of you asking for Grey Poupon instead of bragging about your income / net worth with monetary figures.

Got it. That tied into their "luxury dating" rebrand. Guessing they're trying to make themselves seem even more like a regular dating site now. Grey Poupon LOL.

**PantyPatrol1** · 06-09-25 12:03

Originally Posted by Lexx1 [View Original Post]

They got rid of references to money back in 2018 when the FOSTA act was enacted. And rebranded to a luxury dating site and the name change. It's just to do "upgrades" as they see fit. The only site I know of that still uses terms such as PPM and allowance is Sugarbook. But they're not based in the US like Seeking is.

As far as overweight / obese women labeling themselves curvy. I've never seen them as that. Large, big and bbw are better labels. For me curvy has always been a woman that is within her healthy body weight vs height. But has big tits, hips / ass and the slender waist. So I welcome the change to providing actual weight. I've asked some women in the past what their height / weight was. When their pics weren't the best.

No, the references to money I was referring to come from the 2025 decision to eliminate "net worth" and "income" sections of the profile, not any direct P4 P references. Seeking wants you to post photos of your ferrari and a selfie of you asking for Grey Poupon instead of bragging about your income / net worth with monetary figures.

**Lexx1** · 06-08-25 15:28

Originally Posted by PantyPatrol1 [View Original Post]

Reply to an older post-I think they are again under regulatory scrutiny for the P4 P that goes on. So get rid of all references to money and allow obese women to not have to confess to being CURVY anymore. Just my opinion, there are new regulators in office now.

They got rid of references to money back in 2018 when the FOSTA act was enacted. And rebranded to a luxury dating site and the name change. It's just to do "upgrades" as they see fit. The only site I know of that still uses terms such as PPM and allowance is Sugarbook. But they're not based in the US like Seeking is.

As far as overweight / obese women labeling themselves curvy. I've never seen them as that. Large, big and bbw are better labels. For me curvy has always been a woman that is within her healthy body weight vs height. But has big tits, hips / ass and the slender waist. So I welcome the change to providing actual weight. I've asked some women in the past what their height / weight was. When their pics weren't the best.

**PantyPatrol1** · 06-08-25 13:15

Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy [View Original Post]

The problem with any major website is that if the web developers don't find something to "improve" they are out of a job.

Reply to an older post-I think they are again under regulatory scrutiny for the P4 P that goes on. So get rid of all references to money and allow obese women to not have to confess to being CURVY anymore. Just my opinion, there are new regulators in office now.