General Reports

**LuvNHookers** · 05-25-25 18:52

Originally Posted by RateGuy9 [View Original Post]

Got a text from a girl I'd like to see again that said she's a few weeks from release from her program. Any advice what to expect if I see her again? I assume she will be sober and make some better decisions less flaky etc. Will that hold or do alot of these girls go back to their old ways immediately? I also assume she's broke and won't have an incall and will also be more desperate / appreciative of help. Am I a sucker if I'm there with roses as soon as she gets out? And what about appearance surprises, could be good could be 20 bad pounds?

Depends on the girl. Substances may have made her flaky, but being sober could actually increase that. She may be lucid enough to think "WTF am I doing" after she agrees to a meeting and flake. One never knows. But she may be clean and clear headed and realize that if she gets and stays professional, she could stack huge bank. It depends on her mentality, desires, and overall circumstances.

As an aside, if deez heaux treated this like a real business, as the girls in the Nevada brothels do, everyone would cum out ahead. Lots of those girls stay in the biz a few years, until their portfolio reaches the number they want, then they retire; pockets fat, leaving many satisfied customers in their wake.

But right now you have the dice, sometimes you just have to roll dem janks. The standard caveats apply as they always will.

You can always ask her to send a fresh pic so you can see how much she has changed. If she looks good to you, you can schedule a meeting. If you get there and things are off, you can bounce. If everything feels good, by all means, enjoy your session and drop a review with all of the relevant information to help line her pockets.

You have to feel things out as far as if / how she may have changed. As has been discussed countless times, do not send a deposit because you never know. If she needs a room, maybe set up a car session so she can make money to get one. Perhaps make a deal on an extended outcall so you can offset the cost of your room with some added time or something (don't get a room in your name and let her use it, are you nvts?) Regardless, post a review with all the relevant information so the rest of us know about her.

If I may ask, who is this mystery girl?

**RateGuy9** · 05-25-25 17:19

Got a text from a girl I'd like to see again that said she's a few weeks from release from her program. Any advice what to expect if I see her again? I assume she will be sober and make some better decisions less flaky etc. Will that hold or do alot of these girls go back to their old ways immediately? I also assume she's broke and won't have an incall and will also be more desperate / appreciative of help. Am I a sucker if I'm there with roses as soon as she gets out? And what about appearance surprises, could be good could be 20 bad pounds?

**Ex Nihilo** · 04-15-25 09:44

Please make some room in your inbox.

**BodyCruisin22** · 02-26-25 10:19

What's up with this captcha shit on escort Alligator logging in trying to read reviews it's always says it's wrong.

**Mr Cookie** · 02-23-25 17:46

Originally Posted by ExNihilo [View Original Post]

Seems to be MIA. If anyone has had contact with her since this past Friday I'd appreciate hearing from you. Thanks.

Looks like she's back.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/norfo...-/276859391488

**AGuyInNorfolk** · 02-12-25 12:52

Originally Posted by LeeLow1965 [View Original Post]

Looks like you have the wrong lady per their Instagram. It is Lauren Philips coming to JB's.

https://www.instagram.com/jbsbattlefieldofficial/?hl=en

That's what I meant. I was reading Ex Nih post and that hijacked my brain. All though, Lauren Phillips in those American Apparel ads were fire.

**LeeLow1965** · 02-12-25 11:24

Originally Posted by AGuyInNorfolk [View Original Post]

I saw she's dancing at JB's on Battlefield this coming Friday night. I reached out to her to see if she was doing meet ups on tour and she doesn't while she's on tour. Countered with a FMTY. Bummer. Still looking forward to go see her dance. Anyone else headed out?

Looks like you have the wrong lady per their Instagram. It is Lauren Philips coming to JB's.

https://www.instagram.com/jbsbattlefieldofficial/?hl=en

**AGuyInNorfolk** · 02-12-25 07:29

I saw she's dancing at JB's on Battlefield this coming Friday night. I reached out to her to see if she was doing meet ups on tour and she doesn't while she's on tour. Countered with a FMTY. Bummer. Still looking forward to go see her dance. Anyone else headed out?

**Ex Nihilo** · 02-11-25 21:24

Seems to be MIA. If anyone has had contact with her since this past Friday I'd appreciate hearing from you. Thanks.

**Rydin** · 12-12-24 10:02

Originally Posted by Passport4 [View Original Post]

I am not an attorney. Virginia is a 1 party state, but there are exceptions and it was listed if you read the full link. I'm adding that part so you don't have to go back to find it in the link.

It is against the law to knowingly and intentionally create in any way, any videographic or still image of a nonconsenting person under circumstances which that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy if:

That person is in a state of full or partial nudity in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location for the purpose of exposing that person's intimate parts.

The imaging device is used to record under a person's clothing for the purpose of capturing that person's intimate parts or undergarments when such parts or undergarments are concealed from public view.

Yes, you are right that is a given, I didn't say anything about nudity, you have to be a dumbass if you think that would be legal, by the way most AMPs have cameras and most have audio recording, my point was these girls record us more than we ever would record them. Personally it's a not a good a idea, to have evidence on your own phone or recorder, glasses etc. Audio recordings are Legal, if only one party knows even if just you. Thanks for clarifying, as some of us know, the laws are made to keep the lawyers rich, and common people scratching their heads.

**Passport4** · 12-12-24 00:11

Originally Posted by Rydin [View Original Post]

It is legal if one party knows about it even if it's just you. But you can't record if you're not part of conversation, or video, but why would you want to have a recording of something that can come back to haunt you? That is the question I want to know. I know a local massage girl that would piss me off then record it on phone, for future leverage, and I also know she recorded a few of you unsuspecting pawns. Why? Because information is power, and power is control and money. To most of these girls, money is their only goal in life. So remember there is no trust in this game. I learned the hard way. But make no mistake I learned it well.

I am not an attorney. Virginia is a 1 party state, but there are exceptions and it was listed if you read the full link. I'm adding that part so you don't have to go back to find it in the link.

It is against the law to knowingly and intentionally create in any way, any videographic or still image of a nonconsenting person under circumstances which that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy if:

That person is in a state of full or partial nudity in a restroom, dressing room, locker room, hotel room, motel room, tanning bed, tanning booth, bedroom or other location for the purpose of exposing that person's intimate parts.

The imaging device is used to record under a person's clothing for the purpose of capturing that person's intimate parts or undergarments when such parts or undergarments are concealed from public view.

**SwordKnight** · 12-10-24 12:31

Originally Posted by Danyoyo75 [View Original Post]

Do any of you who wear glasses ever wear them during a massage or put the on after the flip to see the action?? I don't wear glasses so I am curious. I have never asked an MT to film, assuming a definite "no" would be the answer. However, if I had glasses on, there would be no reason to ask and memories could be taken home for safe keeping.

I'm nearsighted but not enough to need glasses that close. I know one girl who wears her glasses almost all the time, including sex and shower.

I've taken pics or film of quite a few girls, sometimes surreptitiously, usually after I'd seen them several times and built up some trust. I never ever post them anywhere.

I've heard that during the initial run of that type of videocam glasses, a few nerds found that going to certain bars while wearing the glasses was unwise.

**Rydin** · 12-09-24 13:26

Originally Posted by Passport4 [View Original Post]

https://recordinglaw.com/united-stat...ecording-laws/

It is legal if one party knows about it even if it's just you. But you can't record if you're not part of conversation, or video, but why would you want to have a recording of something that can come back to haunt you? That is the question I want to know. I know a local massage girl that would piss me off then record it on phone, for future leverage, and I also know she recorded a few of you unsuspecting pawns. Why? Because information is power, and power is control and money. To most of these girls, money is their only goal in life. So remember there is no trust in this game. I learned the hard way. But make no mistake I learned it well.

**Danyoyo75** · 12-09-24 12:20

Originally Posted by Passport4 [View Original Post]

https://recordinglaw.com/united-stat...ecording-laws/

Hypothetically, of course.

**Passport4** · 12-09-24 11:41

Originally Posted by Danyoyo75 [View Original Post]

Do any of you who wear glasses ever wear them during a massage or put the on after the flip to see the action?? I don't wear glasses so I am curious.

Ray-Ban has these glasses out with a video camera in them and am considering them for Monger purposes. I have never asked an MT to film, assuming a definite "no" would be the answer. However, if I had glasses on, there would be no reason to ask and memories could be taken home for safe keeping.

https://recordinglaw.com/united-stat...ecording-laws/