Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 1,201 to 1,215 of 43030
-
05-25-25 20:53 #41830Senior Member

Posts: 438Fyi
Not into massages but came across this while looking around https://bunnyagent.com/us/massachuse...rotic-massages.
-
05-24-25 21:00 #41829Senior Member

Posts: 752Centre st n-ton
Stopped into good move foot spa down on the lower floor today the gal inside was a bit hesitant behind the door but let me in. Once inside straight across she said how long? I said is someone else here? Another lady came in, Coco. Looked better than the younger girl kinda so I said okay. Paid 40 for 1/2 weak rub really no effort in tease but w. E. I tapped my lips pointed down there meaning datty she said how much? I said 120 she agreed. Pulled her red Gucci top up pulled her leggings off tongued her boobs daty- kissed her before and after daty she didn't mind, than HJ. I've really been able to press up against girls at eastern in the tham 'young girls' so won't repeat here but I felt like going to tj-maxxx so I said why the heck not I'll check this place out. She doesn't have d breasts they are large c. And does look okay. I'm mongering much less now every few months wanted to see an escort but will do that next time. Brazilian jenny probably.
Damage again 160 total.
-
05-24-25 20:29 #41828Regular Member

Posts: 6Cherry Blossom Spa or Merry Spa. Very confusing name changes
Stopped By albion st in wakefield the other day. Girls aren't bad especially little Amy. Great tits and very playful and sexy. No FS but all else is up for grabs so to speak. Has anyone else had much luck there?
-
05-24-25 18:59 #41827Regular Member

Posts: 14Went to 452 B'tree. Always a decent trip, booked the hr, got a strong SWBJ and CFS. 60+200. Didn't catch the chicks name, but she was decent looking, moderately tall, and think in a good way. A few tattoos, but barely noticed.
-
05-24-25 18:56 #41826Regular Member

Posts: 14Anybody got any data on Zen 1002 Main st and 471 Bridge in Wey? I see some mention back in '19 for zen. SSW I saw something about new owner, just curious if it's the same number, and what the quality / age there is at both places? I'll TOFTT if nobodies got anything, just figured I would ask.
-
05-24-25 16:12 #41825Senior Member

Posts: 37New Face Mindful Watertown
Finished my Watertown accounts early and had some extra time to kill so I just took a chance at Mindful. Called and was told "Dora" was working. New to me, so I made the appointment. Arrived on time and was greeted by a very beautiful and well put together young girl. Maybe 30 if that? Seriously very attractive. I think she was the only one working. Took the hour and had a truly relaxing body work session. Her english was good and the conversation was great. The finish was standard and slow. Non rushed! Actually made me feel special. After the crappy week I had, this was the fix. Walked out feeling way better. She told me she was going to be around for a couple weeks. Told her I'd try and get back the next time I'm in the area. 65/90 and off I went.
-
05-24-25 15:08 #41824Senior Member

Posts: 31Chinatown for visitor
Hello Boston Mongers. Took a look at your board and hard to decipher locations for those of us visiting. Any recommendations on L3 places in Chinatown. Likewise, places to avoid. Feel free to PM. Appreciate any info you can provide.
-
05-24-25 11:14 #41823Senior Member

Posts: 53Nana 558
I saw Nana (not sure of her name) at 558 in w-ham. She seemed kinda hung over and smelled of cig smoke. The massage was okay, but it was weird she wore latex gloves for it. I have had ladies put gloves on when I asked them to work on my feet but never for the whole massage.
She is probably 50, kind of tall and thin with small tits. Nice face. She declined DATY and when I asked to kiss her ass instead she agreed. She kept her panties on and let me pull them down a bit. Man did she push down hard on my face! I thought she was going to break my nose. I think she was trying to keep me away from her holes. Standard price, would not repeat.
-
05-24-25 10:23 #41822Regular Member

Posts: 22I actually came here looking for reports on Lotus Danvers because I used to go there a lot when I worked in the area (2018 ish) and always had a great time (hour massage and HE only bur the table shower too was top notch).
Originally Posted by Johnson686
[View Original Post]
Glad I checked before wasting a trip there. I was so sure they'd be in the game still because I always had great success there. Times changin I guess.
Does anyone have a more recent experience good or bad (hopefully good)?
-
05-23-25 22:06 #41821Senior Member

Posts: 295Hoggin it at FuShen
Read a report on another site about Misha or Michelle, big girl with super huge tits. Its the place in Quincy, I love a fat ass with big tits was wondering if anyone here has seen her? Feel free to DM me if you don't want to be called out for hogging it, me I have no shame. Nobody can be as bad as Marley, that is one I wish I could erase.
-
05-23-25 17:18 #41820Senior Member

Posts: 70Fifi at BSky was always one of my favs when I was working in the area. It's been a long time since I've had contracts over there, so I've not been in maybe 9 months or so. As you said. She was always up for BBBJ, and a full body rub. But never CIM. She was quite clear in that regard. I've never heard that FS was on the menu. And my experiences there go back almost two years.
Originally Posted by DedaCam
[View Original Post]
-
05-23-25 15:21 #41819Senior Member

Posts: 242Thanks Corrado58
I appreciate the response.
Originally Posted by Corrado58
[View Original Post]
Yes. From long experience I understand well the importance of, and how to build relationships with providers. Not only does this reap added benefits service wise, it supports her livelihood.
I am 100 percent for that, and over the years have done it countless times, many cycles.
Thats not the issue here. Its about basics of reviews.
Based on his comment to me, just want to be sure that I understand JGC's particular theory of reviewing:
According to his logic and example several posts back, you should share a provider's location and identifiers, and also share freely all of the (relationship dependent) details of exactly what a provider did with you. Give people all of that info and those "shortcuts" in your review.
But whatever you do, do not share the much simpler physical description of what she looks like.
This doesn't make sense to me. If anything, seems like it should be the opposite.
Just for the record, I have no opportunity to see his provider, in case its a kind of defensive reaction.
I know we all have different styles, thats cool. Just trying to understand, not fight with anyone. I truly appreciate the contributions of everyone on this site.
Have a great Memorial Day weekend.
-
05-23-25 14:02 #41818Regular Member

Posts: 6BBBJ yes
Check out FiFi at B Sky, Danvers. Always BBBJ, she's a bit older, late 40's maybe, but still has a nice slim body. Likes to give you a nice full body titty rub but doesn't like you touching the titties. Kind of odd!.
Originally Posted by JackKerouac16
[View Original Post]
She's all in for 69 too, but no FS, Yet hahaha.
-
05-23-25 11:21 #41817Senior Member

Posts: 344Good rule
Agreed, absolutely. While we're hunting on here or STG, or wherever, the physical details can light us up and lead us to a decision. But in the end, I believe, it is our experience with that provider that matters. Some guys value the superficial traits: hotness, etc. But if you have a bad experience with a provider, you're not going to care, nor share anything else, likely. I think JGC is saying, and others, play the long game, the trust and rapport will reap bennies in time, getting you more of what you want, be it in service or time, availability for you. Spending is unavoidable in the long game, more so if you need constant change and pursue the latest, hot, shiny object. Depends on what you value.
Originally Posted by JohnGlobalCorp
[View Original Post]
-
05-23-25 03:17 #41816Senior Member

Posts: 242Hmm
Like many of us here, I've been at this for 20 plus years, spent 10's and 10's of thousands on providers, and have in fact shared a ton of valuable info (always a description of my provider included) on multiple boards and sites with my fellow mongers.
Originally Posted by JohnGlobalCorp
[View Original Post]
Not sure I get the logic of your comment, in terms of adding a mere physical description of the provider.
You gave a review about a particular provider at a specific place, a review which was explicit about exact services received and your action in the room. Thank you for posting and sharing those details, as we should. Most, including the site admin, would say its the raison d'etre of the site.
I responded to a DonBarzini post, a question to you, basically supporting his query: in effect to simply add a description of the girl you just reviewed.
Now your response is "spend money", "no shortcuts" and build a relationship with the provider. Odd that you'll share who and where she is, exactly what she does service-wise, but you suddenly draw the line-- at a mere description of her body/ looks?
Did you quote the wrong comment? Or is this something personal? Just curious.







Reply With Quote




