The Raleigh area "Sugar Bowl" (SA, WYP, SD4 ME)

**NeedToSearch2** · 05-21-25 18:46

Jade - 24.

Talked for a bit, kept asking for money before meeting. I sent since she was legit on snap. Got that banned, but finally saw her. Don't recommend. High maintenance. Extended stay location. GPS. Covered everything. Pillow princess. Bad attitude.

More of a nightmare than a dream.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...7-56640f1fae9d

**3Putt** · 05-21-25 10:21

Originally Posted by SugarLifeNow [View Original Post]

Beautiful and fit, this is Liza, she's 28 and sweet.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/LizaB/

While they last, free 30 day membership, promo code: SLN1 FREE.

I can't get that promo code to work.

**SugarLifeNow** · 05-19-25 18:45

Beautiful and fit, this is Liza, she's 28 and sweet.

https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/LizaB/

While they last, free 30 day membership, promo code: SLN1 FREE.

**BeltWayGuy** · 05-19-25 15:07

Gaia.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...0-e062f1ef65bd

Wouldn't get into specifics over text and became hostile when I wouldn't commit to a date without them (link might now work because she blocked me). Talks about mostly dating women but into men.

Nicole.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...d-edb192122f72

Spotty coms but also into ANR, as noted in her profile. Pics are bit dated, definitely bigger now. Have FL profile if wanted.

Flirty and fun.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-1868b24d94ad

Ended up on her snap, seems to be a hard one to nail down, lots of sob stories, but ymv.

**MmceStep** · 05-19-25 14:10

Originally Posted by Swimback [View Original Post]

Body type filter removed? I'm not paying a subscription to have hambeasts pawned off to me against my will. Girls probably complained but seeking is too stupid to understand that's not the paying demographic, we are. Not renewing this month. I'm starting to get over seeking lately. Have had some luck just shooting my shot on Instagram.

I see they replaced it with the weight filter, but I don't think that's well thought out. I don't think they've ever made a woman that would answer that one honestly. Also, a 140 lb woman that's 5'1 and D-cups has a vastly different body than a woman that's the same height and weight with a flat chest. Like, you're likely only going to be attracted to one of those, depending on your preferences. I don't understand this move at all. It seems like they're just making random decisions over there.

**jobobtheclown** · 05-19-25 14:05

Originally Posted by Swimback [View Original Post]

Body type filter removed? I'm not paying a subscription to have hambeasts pawned off to me against my will. Girls probably complained but seeking is too stupid to understand that's not the paying demographic, we are. Not renewing this month. I'm starting to get over seeking lately. Have had some luck just shooting my shot on Instagram.

So I'm not imagining it, it's gone outright? What an idiotic choice. It asked me my weight in lbs but hid it by default, and presumably it did for all of them. But no girls will want to put the actual numerical value on their profiles.

**BeltWayGuy** · 05-19-25 13:24

Originally Posted by Swimback [View Original Post]

Body type filter removed? I'm not paying a subscription to have hambeasts pawned off to me against my will. Girls probably complained but seeking is too stupid to understand that's not the paying demographic, we are. Not renewing this month. I'm starting to get over seeking lately. Have had some luck just shooting my shot on Instagram.

Yeah kind of annoying, they added a weight listing but you can filter by it and the girls can elect to hide it. Definitely catering to the wrong side of the paid platform.

**Swimback** · 05-18-25 22:38

Body type filter removed? I'm not paying a subscription to have hambeasts pawned off to me against my will. Girls probably complained but seeking is too stupid to understand that's not the paying demographic, we are. Not renewing this month. I'm starting to get over seeking lately. Have had some luck just shooting my shot on Instagram.

**Ncsmm** · 05-11-25 15:11

I have question.

Selfie verification have to be matching the profile picture?

Last summer I closed down my account and now I can't opening back with Selfie. Or anyone have any recommendations for other sugar website not asking Selfie??

**Sanp420** · 05-09-25 18:07

Originally Posted by LostTribe [View Original Post]

Had coffee with this one. Pictures are accurate and I would say looks better in person. The conversation was easy and fun and I imagine she would be a very fun night on the town. Her financial expectations were very reasonable and below market. Only strange part was when the conversation turned to intimacy, the scope was very limited (YMMV). I will not peruse but I encourage anyone who finds her attractive to have a conversation. Why'all have fun out there.

How much below market?

**LostTribe** · 05-09-25 09:07

Originally Posted by LikesGirls [View Original Post]

There are multiple ladies with that name. Can you please post a link to the pertinent profile?

Apologies! Link is:

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...8-92fd580647a3

**LostTribe** · 05-09-25 01:57

Originally Posted by LikesGirls [View Original Post]

There are multiple ladies with that name. Can you please post a link to the pertinent profile?

Link for Anita below.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...8-92fd580647a3

**LikesGirls** · 05-08-25 20:47

Originally Posted by LostTribe [View Original Post]

Had coffee with this one. Pictures are accurate and I would say looks better in person. The conversation was easy and fun and I imagine she would be a very fun night on the town. Her financial expectations were very reasonable and below market. Only strange part was when the conversation turned to intimacy, the scope was very limited (YMMV). I will not peruse but I encourage anyone who finds her attractive to have a conversation. Why'all have fun out there.

There are multiple ladies with that name. Can you please post a link to the pertinent profile?

**LostTribe** · 05-08-25 09:06

Had coffee with this one. Pictures are accurate and I would say looks better in person. The conversation was easy and fun and I imagine she would be a very fun night on the town. Her financial expectations were very reasonable and below market. Only strange part was when the conversation turned to intimacy, the scope was very limited (YMMV). I will not peruse but I encourage anyone who finds her attractive to have a conversation. Why'all have fun out there.