Agency Discussion

[Alejhenry]

If I’m honest, I’m a bit reluctant to post this review, because I’m fearful of her becoming too popular.

Cataleya is the next level triple threat now!

Cataleya is young, hot, and enthusiastic! She’s younger than most of the recent K-girls, closer to Jane’s age. If you've seen her before, you already know this.

But what you may not know is that while gorgeous Cataleya was on sabbatical, she was getting enhanced.

Personally, I was a big fan of Cataleya from the beginning - however, I know she was not everyone’s cup of tea. I was entranced with her service, it was an amazing connection (disclaimer - as always YMMV) previously I would have rated her service as 9-9.5/10. But with her new enhancements, she has a greater sense of self-confidence that seeps into her service - increasing her service to a 9.5-10/10.

New enhancements? As I mentioned before, she may not have been everyones cup of tea and YMMV. I really like curvy girls, and I would have previously rated her 8/10. Now?? 10/10!

She greeted me in this sexy black vinyl lingerie set with a garter belt. She was fun to unwrap, and when the bra came off - I was greeted with a perfect set of full D cups that defy gravity and are soft (and will apparently only become softer). They are so much fun to suck on, play with, gaze upon, and just an utter delight during the main event! She also got some liposuction done, which perfectly accents her curves now with a near perfect hourglass figure that must be approaching the golden ratio!

The bottoms came off, and the garter belt stayed on. BBBJ, cowgirl, doggy, and missionary. We completely and fully enjoyed each other! I was left speechless! We thrusted our bodies together in the universal mating process and found each other an exciting partner!

Bonus - she’s American and fun to talk with!

About the hair, did she look hot with the curly mop? - yes! Does she look hot with the straight hair? - also yes! Variety is the spice of life, best to embrace it and enjoy the most out of life. [disclaimer - unrelated story about different hair: one of my exs asked me my preference for grooming her pussy - I told her to change it up every few weeks. It was incredibly fun as she went from bare to stubble to landing strip to bare to large triangle to heart-shaped to v-shape to bare to stubble to full bush to landing strip to small triangle and on and on it went - I couldn’t get enough! I would get so intensely hard as I pulled down her panties to see what new sexual playground awaited me!]

If you're into young, hot, enthusiastic, and curvy girls - I would highly recommend her!

I have repeated with her when she was here last time. However, with Cataleya 2.0 I now seriously doubt my ability to wait until next week to repeat with her.

It’s pretty rare for me to want to repeat with the same provider in less time a week. Maybe its the post-session glow…but maybe it’s not.

I recommend you see her now, because I suspect she’s going to become very, very popular soon!

[Mikey6543]

Thank you for a very thorough and insightful answer.

According to the Globe there were 2800 "contacts" in the booker's phone. I'm guessing all of those have been saved into some database for later reference. The police have said that the 28 who were charged were those with the highest number of interactions with the booker. Unclear if this meant that they were actually the top customers, but roughly speaking they probably were among those who ended up using the service most frequently. I can't remember the figure but I think it was something like each of them had over 400 "interactions" over the course of the investigation period, which was several months long (not just a week). The 400 number was apparently just arbitrary, it seems they had a design to charge a large number of clients and so set the bar where they would generate a list of about 30 candidates to bring to trial. Some just happened to be high profile, others were "random johns".

They seem to have corroborated the identities of the clients through public and other records (they were using phones / numbers that could be easily traced to them), through video surveillance (for example, they apparently have time stamped images of Toner coming and going into the building). When they initially announced the bust, they showed images of paperwork / ledgers and applications for members that were obtained when they raided the booker's home. So it may be that they will also have applications and other documents that they will present in trial. We'll learn more about what they have when the trials begin.

[Nrlmus]

This is a very pretty young lady imo. She is Blasian, as in half black (Caribbean or Cape Verdian) -half Thai. Daughter of immigrants but American born. Very pretty face with a certain glam about her. The division between her black and her asian is that she's basically lighter skinned black, but her pretty face is more Asian. She just went through few body readjustments so there are few scars that are still visible that should soon disappear. It's not in your face so it didn't bother me one way or another. She straightened out her hair and shortened it a bit. Now she looks more Cleopatrish. Still cute as a button but I personally preferred it with her original curly mop.

Nice grasp on BBBJ and I do have a girth problem. I feel teeth with many if not most girls. This one was one of the few that did good. Deep throats, at least she did me. Black ass no doubt, which very much enjoys taking it from behind. We just went through standards with the rest. She sure is into it! Pretty darn good kisser too. She cupped it off with the nice very well learned body rub and then we caught up.

This is chick is fun. She's not simple. She can cover many topics. She's interested in what you do and can ask correct question to clarify what she didn't completely get. She's definitely been around well rounded men with whom she had to keep up and she has more than enough behind that forehead of hers to be able to do so.

Me like. Me like very much.

[KashkaiBoy]

According to the Globe there were 2800 "contacts" in the booker's phone. I'm guessing all of those have been saved into some database for later reference. The police have said that the 28 who were charged were those with the highest number of interactions with the booker. Unclear if this meant that they were actually the top customers, but roughly speaking they probably were among those who ended up using the service most frequently. I can't remember the figure but I think it was something like each of them had over 400 "interactions" over the course of the investigation period, which was several months long (not just a week). The 400 number was apparently just arbitrary, it seems they had a design to charge a large number of clients and so set the bar where they would generate a list of about 30 candidates to bring to trial. Some just happened to be high profile, others were "random johns".

They seem to have corroborated the identities of the clients through public and other records (they were using phones / numbers that could be easily traced to them), through video surveillance (for example, they apparently have time stamped images of Toner coming and going into the building). When they initially announced the bust, they showed images of paperwork / ledgers and applications for members that were obtained when they raided the booker's home. So it may be that they will also have applications and other documents that they will present in trial. We'll learn more about what they have when the trials begin.

Does anyone have any info on how these 28 men were selected? I would guess the agency has many more customers than 28. What did these guys do to get busted while the rest of the customers are not charged?

There are some posts here that say they might have used language or acronyms in their texts with the booker that were incriminating. Is that the whole thing?

Johns are using this as an argument against screening with personal info. But now this sounds like their names didn't come from the screening information? If not from there how were these johns even identified?

Or were they:

1) Caught in person?

2) Men who booked in the previous days before any messages were deleted so there were records?

3) Men who booked over texts rather than signal or telegram?

4) High profile occupations so it makes the bust sensational and they let the random johns go?

5) Men who spent enough money at the agency to say "This man spent over $10,000 on escorts".

I don't want to make the same mistakes as these guys.

[Nrlmus]

Anybody did Jin Sol at BI? PM if you'd rather.

[Nrlmus]

BostonGuy25, please clear your inbox. TY.

You got to clear your box yourself TheGreatOne22 LOL.

[BostonGuy25]

BostonGuy25, please clear your inbox. TY.

Sure will do.

[TheGreatOne22]

So gave her a try definitely older in the face great body and solid rimming love how she switches between rimming and blowing you when you are on all fours. Also pretty good BJ a little toothy at some points but no damage like some girls can leave from a toothy one. Also really great in missionary and doggy.

BostonGuy25, please clear your inbox. TY.

[LuvAznz]

She's around for another week or so.

I'd love to get a small GB together and video.

Anyone up for it?

BBC's would be awesome.

[Nrlmus]

Wasn't she suppose to come next week?

She's a freak, she just did a GB yet I saw it was only 3 dudes so I don't really consider it a GB. Cost was 90" $650 2 pops. I'm good, I have seen her and she is HOTTT AF.

Gaddamn, this woman can do everything! Saw her on Saturday! Flipped her every which way imaginable. For her it's like nothing to it. Anal, effing her mouth like mofo, screwing this way and that way: on the table, on the couch, on the floor: lazy dog, hazy dog, crazy dog: her energy is beyond believable. Maybe it's my girth but that pussy is tight man! Tighter than most Asian chicks I've been with, 100%, and I've been with plenty. Aiza sure doesn't need Kegel balls to tighten it up IMHO. The consequence of using them have already been factored in. Aiza is former bodybuilder so maybe that has something to do with it, and chances of you outlasting her are not high. But!

This is not my first time seeing her. It just was my first time trying to outOlympic her LOL. Did I succeed? You figure it out.

All other times I've been with her she was as gentle as woman in love. FWB, GF, mother-figure. Aiza is a true chameleon and really adjusts to your buttons. Her touch is amazing. She quickly figures out what you like to hear and feeds your ears with exact that. Your one and only? Sure. Do you want to hear how back in the day she took on 10 guys in some S&M club? No problem. Threesome, foursome, fivesome, twentysome whatever. Been there, done that.

What most surprising however is how with all that she could be so gentle and loving. Beautiful, dirty blonde, great kisser. Pretty face, nice body and truly great person. We all dream to have sister like that. No, stepsister LOL.

[BilboBaggins69]

I second that, all of it: from mish to rimming. Just saw her today for the first time. Rimming was never much of my cup of tea until today. Had it from Shu, Jamie, Aiza among others. Nothing was bad. It was just I could take it or leave it. Not with Sharon. Sharon definitely knows what she's doing when she has her tongue up your ass. Coupling and interchanging rimming with BBBJ doubles the high. I'd be interested to hear the take of those who felt similarly about rimming as I did before seeing Sharon, whether she actually made the light just a bit brighter for them in that regard as she did for me.

Other than that, Sharon is a good looking k-girl. No Jane but Jane is much younger too. Skills wise I wouldn't put Jane in the same category as Sharon though. Good body, natural tits, an ok face. Good kisser. My recommendation is to do kissing before rimming. Just IMHO you know.

See Sharon. If nothing else than for the experience of it. Some English is there, nice caring personality. Yea.

Will second or even 3rd that at this point, lovely woman. Wants to take care of you. But as far as rimming have had some girls do it to me before and never cared for it, Sharon makes a lot of eye contact whether its BBBJ or goin hard at the Rim, when she was down there she could see I wasn't really into and switched it back up.

[Nrlmus]

So gave her a try definitely older in the face great body and solid rimming love how she switches between rimming and blowing you when you are on all fours. Also pretty good BJ a little toothy at some points but no damage like some girls can leave from a toothy one. Also really great in missionary and doggy.

I second that, all of it: from mish to rimming. Just saw her today for the first time. Rimming was never much of my cup of tea until today. Had it from Shu, Jamie, Aiza among others. Nothing was bad. It was just I could take it or leave it. Not with Sharon. Sharon definitely knows what she's doing when she has her tongue up your ass. Coupling and interchanging rimming with BBBJ doubles the high. I'd be interested to hear the take of those who felt similarly about rimming as I did before seeing Sharon, whether she actually made the light just a bit brighter for them in that regard as she did for me.

Other than that, Sharon is a good looking k-girl. No Jane but Jane is much younger too. Skills wise I wouldn't put Jane in the same category as Sharon though. Good body, natural tits, an ok face. Good kisser. My recommendation is to do kissing before rimming. Just IMHO you know.

See Sharon. If nothing else than for the experience of it. Some English is there, nice caring personality. Yea.

[ThatGuy23]

How is screening for BI? Do they take references from other agencies?

[NHughty]

Does anyone have any info on how these 28 men were selected? I would guess the agency has many more customers than 28. What did these guys do to get busted while the rest of the customers are not charged?

There are some posts here that say they might have used language or acronyms in their texts with the booker that were incriminating. Is that the whole thing?

Johns are using this as an argument against screening with personal info. But now this sounds like their names didn't come from the screening information? If not from there how were these johns even identified?

Or were they:

1) Caught in person?

2) Men who booked in the previous days before any messages were deleted so there were records?

3) Men who booked over texts rather than signal or telegram?

4) High profile occupations so it makes the bust sensational and they let the random johns go?

5) Men who spent enough money at the agency to say "This man spent over $10,000 on escorts".

I don't want to make the same mistakes as these guys.

I believe #4 probably occurred because of #5?

One of the articles posted said something about them go after the ones who used the service the most. I seem to remember them mentioning they only went after the ones with 400+ texts.

It stands to reason that anyone who can afford to use the service that much is in the upper echelons of wealth and they tend to be higher profile.

[Mikey6543]

Does anyone have any info on how these 28 men were selected? I would guess the agency has many more customers than 28. What did these guys do to get busted while the rest of the customers are not charged?

There are some posts here that say they might have used language or acronyms in their texts with the booker that were incriminating. Is that the whole thing?

Johns are using this as an argument against screening with personal info. But now this sounds like their names didn't come from the screening information? If not from there how were these johns even identified?

Or were they:

1) Caught in person?

2) Men who booked in the previous days before any messages were deleted so there were records?

3) Men who booked over texts rather than signal or telegram?

4) High profile occupations so it makes the bust sensational and they let the random johns go?

5) Men who spent enough money at the agency to say "This man spent over $10,000 on escorts".

I don't want to make the same mistakes as these guys.

So far only one of them was stopped by LE when leaving the location. He was smart enough to tell them to fuck off, he doesn't have anything to say without a lawyer, and they had to let him go. The rest were accused based on text messages alone.

Last hearing, one attorney asked the detectives whether they have pics or info from the vetting (considering one press release mentioned how the agency was asking all this private stuff). The answer was that no, they didn't recover that, at least for the individual being accused.