rubmaps
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
Top Escorts

Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

+ Add Report
Page 90 of 1126 FirstFirst ... 40 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 140 190 590 1090 ... LastLast
Results 1,336 to 1,350 of 16882
This blog is moderated by Steak 404
  1. #15547

    Sinibee

    She's been around for a while. I think someone reviewed her before, but I can't find it.

    Anyone have updated thoughts?

    https://members.seeking.com/member/f...c-9f79d84f10ac
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 4c857b11-be17-4fc3-844b-27d72e3abe6d_2x.jpg‎  

  2. #15546
    Quote Originally Posted by Covnito  [View Original Post]
    New to this side of the hobby. What site do y'all usually have the best luck with or think is the best bang for your buck?
    Most people here are using Seeking (was called Seeking Arrangements a few years ago) and SugardaddyMeet (SDM). Seeking has the most members by far, but it costs the most and is pretty strict about any talk of money. SDM is smaller but cheaper, and doesn't care if you talk money with the girls. There's also Secret Benefits is ok too but be careful with the bot accounts. Get a free account on all of them and see which one you like best.

  3. #15545
    Quote Originally Posted by ElPerron  [View Original Post]
    I taking to some girls at sdm, looks like this site is more promising, Carmen looks very familiar she been in both sites, looks like she is a pro, any info on any of those?

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=72656928

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=73277773

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/message?userId=73551412

    Pm please.
    Fixed your last link: https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73551412&nsp=1 - .

    Haven't tried contacting them, but they all have the right kind of words ("mutually menificial", "regular meet-ups" etc.) and a bunch of Moments updates plus plenty of pictures, a lot of professional photos mixed in with a few regular photos. Carmen would me my pick too - she's got the look I like. I wouldn't be surprised if all of them are on Seeking, too. Included the pictures if someone recognizes them from Seeking.

    I'm thinking they're probably real, but if they put that money into photos, I'm guessing they're all not new to this? Youlovesky says right in her bio that she's an experienced sugar baby.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Capture.jpg‎   Capture-1.jpg‎   Capture-2.jpg‎  

  4. #15544

    Info

    I taking to some girls at sdm, looks like this site is more promising, Carmen looks very familiar she been in both sites, looks like she is a pro, any info on any of those?

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=72656928

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=73277773

    https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/message?userId=73551412

    Pm please.

  5. #15543
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnswer4  [View Original Post]
    Every woman sell sex, it's just how they package it. You think it's free to have sex with your girlfriend, fiance, or wife? LOL.
    Your point is mostly correct. Not every woman sells. I've had serious relationships with other professionals who chip in for half of everything we do.

  6. #15542
    A red flag would be referring to college as attending university. I know she may not be from here, but that's not how most typically say that. I'd be very cautious.

  7. #15541

  8. #15540
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnswer4  [View Original Post]
    Every woman sell sex, it's just how they package it. You think it's free to have sex with your girlfriend, fiance, or wife? LOL.
    True that. I would hate to calculate the 'ppm' for my marriages.

  9. #15539
    Quote Originally Posted by MrBlueSea  [View Original Post]
    Back on the road for a multi-day work trip with stops in several places. Have been doing some advanced recon to add to my Ass Tracker list, and I have some nice prospects lined up. My first stop was Atlanta where I met this lovely baby. Couldn't believe it when she walked in, stunning. As a whole I find black girls are quite beautiful, but this girl is a full on goddess. Real quiet, almost shy but no hesitation when I told her to undress. Wasn't into kissing all that much, and her head game was a bit passive for me, but her submissive nature made up for it and she obeyed whenever I gave her a command.

    This girl can take a pounding, and almost wore me out in doggy. I stopped long enough to work it into her ass from behind with no complaints at all. After a few minutes of of slowly getting her little brown eye relaxed, I turned her over onto her back, pushed her knees back and slid right back into her ass with the sexiest little whimper from her. She had brought her own vibrator and worked herself into a frenzy while I pounded her ass and blew my load deep in her. Oh, and yes, everything bare. I convinced her ahead of time that I was clean and tested but she never asked for proof. For now, she has the #1 spot on the list. Killer session. She says she might not be around for long as just visiting. Next stop, Knoxville.

    https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Sunshine23/
    Have you been successful on this site? Look for new opportunities.

  10. #15538
    Every woman sell sex, it's just how they package it. You think it's free to have sex with your girlfriend, fiancée, or wife? LOL.

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAnonymousName  [View Original Post]
    I agree with almost all of this except the last part. Sugar babies are pros. They aren't high volume full time hos. They don't like to think of themselves as hos. We don't call them hos because then they'd cut us off. But they are still hos. An allowance is payment for sex. Shopping sprees and spa days are payment for sex. If you sell sex, your a ho.

  11. #15537

    Give me a break

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo  [View Original Post]
    I smh every time I see one of you guys mentioning this. Dude, only a moron would have been sex and bare oral with a total stranger she just met off the internet. A real sugar baby would at least get to know a guy a bit first or have him paying for something like rent, car note, etc. Chic's who just meet random guys on the internet and agree to go to a hotel room for bare sex and oral are complete morons. These type of chic's are wreckless and just running down fast money. I respect a chic more who wants to start off with CBJ or condom sex first, because I know that they're not jumping in the saddle with any and every guy and bare sexing. I've had plenty of chic's start off with CBJ for the first couple of times and then bare head or bare everything afterwards. To me, that makes more logical sense and safer than just meeting random guys on the internet and agreeing to have bare sex with them in some hotel room downtown. All you know about him is his name is Bob the sugar daddy from Seeking. Smh.
    Mr Respectful over here, on this site. My experience has been very different, and from what you've regularly shared, so has yours.

  12. #15536

    Semantics.

    Quote Originally Posted by NewAnonymousName  [View Original Post]
    I agree with almost all of this except the last part. Sugar babies are pros. They aren't high volume full time hos. They don't like to think of themselves as hos. We don't call them hos because then they'd cut us off. But they are still hos. An allowance is payment for sex. Shopping sprees and spa days are payment for sex. If you sell sex, your a ho.
    Are we really arguing over a term? Personally, I agree with GFG 100%.

    Pro=Does this for her existence, whether that be food, drugs, other.

    SB=Does it because she like expensive crap she can't afford on her tips at Applebees.

    Are they both hos. Yes, technically. SB's do not like to be "thought" of that way typically and do not "advertise availability" even though they are putting themselves out there for purview.

    Like GFG, I have never had a CBJ from a NON Pro who has never been so much as a stripper. Got plenty of BBJNQNS from SB's for nothing more than lunch / dinner or a drink.

  13. #15535

    I agree

    I'm inclined to agree here. Out of all the girls I've hooked up with organically, not a single one has sucked rubber.

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneForGood97  [View Original Post]
    When I was younger and better looking, I found my fair share of fun. One night stands from bars, college parties, typical things. When Fetlife first came around that was a gold mine for hook ups, and later Tinder before it went to the shitter.

    Never once, not a single solitary time, did any girl I ever went home with or took home ever ask or expect a rubber on BJ. Not. A. Single. Time. A majority of them expected it during sex, but never, NEVER for a BJ. The ONLY time I've EVER had a girl suck on rubber is if...and ONLY if...they were an escort. Escorts / hookers / prostitutes are the only girls with high enough volume to ask. Even if they don't consider themselves one, if they think they need to suck on rubber, their volume is high enough that they are.

    The entire premise of a SB is it's closer to a GF or tinder hookup than an escort. Now, maybe the game has changed and every 1 night stand from Tinder requires a cover for a BJ (my easy hook up days are long behind me), but I find that doubtful.

    If the girls you're scoring with are wanting to suck on rubber, you're scoring a pro. And that's clearly not a problem, everyone here does. But an SB is not a pro, and if they are, then I'm blocking them and moving to the next option that isn't.

  14. #15534
    Quote Originally Posted by GoneForGood97  [View Original Post]
    When I was younger and better looking, I found my fair share of fun. One night stands from bars, college parties, typical things. When Fetlife first came around that was a gold mine for hook ups, and later Tinder before it went to the shitter.

    Never once, not a single solitary time, did any girl I ever went home with or took home ever ask or expect a rubber on BJ. Not. A. Single. Time. A majority of them expected it during sex, but never, NEVER for a BJ. The ONLY time I've EVER had a girl suck on rubber is if...and ONLY if...they were an escort. Escorts / hookers / prostitutes are the only girls with high enough volume to ask. Even if they don't consider themselves one, if they think they need to suck on rubber, their volume is high enough that they are.

    The entire premise of a SB is it's closer to a GF or tinder hookup than an escort. Now, maybe the game has changed and every 1 night stand from Tinder requires a cover for a BJ (my easy hook up days are long behind me), but I find that doubtful.

    If the girls you're scoring with are wanting to suck on rubber, you're scoring a pro. And that's clearly not a problem, everyone here does. But an SB is not a pro, and if they are, then I'm blocking them and moving to the next option that isn't.
    I agree with almost all of this except the last part. Sugar babies are pros. They aren't high volume full time hos. They don't like to think of themselves as hos. We don't call them hos because then they'd cut us off. But they are still hos. An allowance is payment for sex. Shopping sprees and spa days are payment for sex. If you sell sex, your a ho.

  15. #15533

    What if you're wrong?

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo  [View Original Post]
    I smh every time I see one of you guys mentioning this. Dude, only a moron would have been sex and bare oral with a total stranger she just met off the internet. A real sugar baby would at least get to know a guy a bit first or have him paying for something like rent, car note, etc. Chic's who just meet random guys on the internet and agree to go to a hotel room for bare sex and oral are complete morons. These type of chic's are wreckless and just running down fast money. I respect a chic more who wants to start off with CBJ or condom sex first, because I know that they're not jumping in the saddle with any and every guy and bare sexing. I've had plenty of chic's start off with CBJ for the first couple of times and then bare head or bare everything afterwards. To me, that makes more logical sense and safer than just meeting random guys on the internet and agreeing to have bare sex with them in some hotel room downtown. All you know about him is his name is Bob the sugar daddy from Seeking. Smh.
    When I was younger and better looking, I found my fair share of fun. One night stands from bars, college parties, typical things. When Fetlife first came around that was a gold mine for hook ups, and later Tinder before it went to the shitter.

    Never once, not a single solitary time, did any girl I ever went home with or took home ever ask or expect a rubber on BJ. Not. A. Single. Time. A majority of them expected it during sex, but never, NEVER for a BJ. The ONLY time I've EVER had a girl suck on rubber is if...and ONLY if...they were an escort. Escorts / hookers / prostitutes are the only girls with high enough volume to ask. Even if they don't consider themselves one, if they think they need to suck on rubber, their volume is high enough that they are.

    The entire premise of a SB is it's closer to a GF or tinder hookup than an escort. Now, maybe the game has changed and every 1 night stand from Tinder requires a cover for a BJ (my easy hook up days are long behind me), but I find that doubtful.

    If the girls you're scoring with are wanting to suck on rubber, you're scoring a pro. And that's clearly not a problem, everyone here does. But an SB is not a pro, and if they are, then I'm blocking them and moving to the next option that isn't.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The Velvet Rooms
Best Escorts
High Class Companions

Protected by Copyscape