Cuddle Comfort

[Meddic80]

Tried talking to this one despite the warnings LOL at least with me she's pretty firm on no extras at all, no grinding or groping at all. Mentioned tipping but didn't get much further really. So I dunno. If we do meet up it's not for awhile so maybe things will change. Will update as needed.

I'm surprised that she's not down at all. I guess some people do change. I will consider myself lucky because I was able to see her a year ago via SA.

[Cog99]

No extras for me with this one: ladyofshaIott.

I got to take off my shirt and get some under-the-shirt and upper thigh touching but, that's it.

[Hooker Upper]

Why is that funny? BTW, no extras for me from sunnygirl808.

Oh, because the profile for Camila is a photo of Taylor Swift with no description. I thought is was a joke, but maybe it's a different spelling.

[KiwiEater48]

Haha. Funny.

Why is that funny? BTW, no extras for me from sunnygirl808.

[Hooker Upper]

Has anyone tried Camila? PM is fine. I can trade info.

Haha. Funny.

[TheRave5]

Has anyone tried Camila? PM is fine. I can trade info.

[AvgWhiteGuy]

I got this message from some random guy.

Cat fish alert: ńğ289;316;Ħvě324; 88 in stream wood.

Says she's 32 but she's 38. Criminally transmitted Hpv to her previous partners too. Don't get caught up in it bruv.

I messaged her yesterday asking if she was on SA, knowing full well she was. She told me I had the wrong person and blocked me. I vividly remember her wanting $700 for an outcall, everything covered. Streamwood isn't necessarily a hotbed for action, she's not fooling anyone.

[Member #6849]

Also, for anyone looking for something that seems like a sure thing: I traded messages with SnuggleHaven88 around the start of the year and didn't end up seeing her, but got two unsolicited messages a few weeks apart on the site from a random user who shares that she offers extras / has a menu. Not sure if she is the one planting the messages, or if it's someone who just wants to share with the masses, but passing the info along. https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/SnuggleHaven88.

I got this message from some random guy.

Cat fish alert: Šńüğ289;316;èĦàvě324; 88 in stream wood.

Says she's 32 but she's 38. Criminally transmitted Hpv to her previous partners too. Don't get caught up in it bruv.

[Platonico]

And. Just like that, Vanessa is paused. I don't know if this post contributed to this, but I do know that CC is watching this forum closely as exhibited by the inability to click on CC links directly from here.

In most cases, a pause is due to an issue with charging the payment method CC has on file for the house fee. Could be as simple as an expired card or a gift card that ran out of $$. For investigating suspicions activities, you would see her Timed Out rather than Paused.

[DaveSanto2]

Also, for anyone looking for something that seems like a sure thing: I traded messages with SnuggleHaven88 around the start of the year and didn't end up seeing her, but got two unsolicited messages a few weeks apart on the site from a random user who shares that she offers extras / has a menu. Not sure if she is the one planting the messages, or if it's someone who just wants to share with the masses, but passing the info along. https://www.cuddlecomfort.com/SnuggleHaven88.

[DaveSanto2]

A game for sure, and not much different from an actual date but with a much different context.

Pretty much spot on.

[SpaGuy21]

...you're...essentially paying to attempt to seduce a woman in some cases. A game for sure, and not much different from an actual date but with a much different context.

This pretty much sums it up right here, regardless of the "cuddler", just varying degrees of probability.

[Soulandis]

And. Just like that, Vanessa is paused. I don't know if this post contributed to this, but I do know that CC is watching this forum closely as exhibited by the inability to click on CC links directly from here.

Crazy timing. Probably did bring attention to her account. But the pinned post by Admin2 pretty much says it all.

[MeNU469]

I would bet that Vanessa is in category 3. Only because there's a report of her being on seeking arrangements and the one guy who did get lucky with her. However, most reviewers, including me, have not gotten lucky. From my POV during the experience she gave signs (I didn't go into great detail in my review) that she was comfortable and enjoyed / liked me but not enough to begin anything sexual. Additionally, if no one had brought her up on here then I wouldn't have reached out due to all the karma she has.

However, I agree with your assessment and appreciate your response. After my experience, I fully realized that this area of the hobby doesn't appeal to everyone (especially me) since you're intentionally trying to find sex workers / girls open to sex on a site that is publicly against those actions and houses plenty of women who are also against it. And you're also essentially paying to attempt to seduce a woman in some cases. A game for sure, and not much different from an actual date but with a much different context.

And I know beauty is subjective but I just don't think there's a lot of eye candy on this site in Chicago. So it's slim pickings for me to find someone attractive, not expensive, recently active, and a guarantee for fun.

I may have one more swing at this but I think escorts and AMPs are more of my speed. Though I am actively trying to cut down on this hobby's spending this year cause things are looking spooky in the world right now; I didn't even buy eggs the last time I went to the grocery store.

And. Just like that, Vanessa is paused. I don't know if this post contributed to this, but I do know that CC is watching this forum closely as exhibited by the inability to click on CC links directly from here.

[Soulandis]

No offense, but all this report seems to indicate is that she is not one of the prostitutes-in-disguise on the site who start to recite their menu once you simply paw at their tits or pussy to silently indicate what you want.

There are basically three categories of pros on CC, IMO:

1. On one end of the spectrum, legit platonic-only cuddlers, usually who believe in its legitimacy as a therapy tool (they're probably right in many cases). The giveaway for these is usually a profile laden with hippie shit, or they are active participants in the CC community, like the forums. A profile that says "platonic only!" is NOT an immediate indication that they fall into this category.

2. On the other end, prostitutes who are just using the site as another place to book and find mongers.

3. The fat middle (like half of the site or more). Some combination of semi-active or aspirational SBs (e. G. On Seeking), women who just need money, women who like cuddling (and want to get paid), women who are lonely (and want to get paid), or some or all of the above.

The fun of the site for many is Category 3. These women are willing to get into a bed with you for hours and get about as intimate as you can with a stranger without sex, and maybe even more so. All of the ingredients are there for fun if you play your cards right. They are human too. The keys are basically the same as getting lucky in real life: be respectful (and charming / funny), try to follow their lead, and hopefully have some game and understand the art of escalation.

Sample routine in a two hour session: first 30-45 minutes, at least, is just chatting while cuddling. Small talk, ask them questions, make them laugh. Get them to drop any guard they have and get more comfortable with you. All the while, gradually touch them more in G-rated places. Rub their back, trace your fingers on the nape of their neck or their arms, etc. Ask if it's okay at each step along the way. Keep escalating ever so slightly. By the time hour two starts there's likely starting to be some serious sexual tension. Don't hide your arousal or interest at all, and send subtle signals, but let her eventually be the one to act on it if you can. At a certain point, it's going to be very clear on both sides where it's going (think of the quote "if you think you can kiss her, you probably could have ten minutes ago" Then it's game on from there. (Some may charge more at this point, but many will not).

You're going to end up in some cases discovering that you actually ended up with a Category 1 Non-Platonic cuddler, but that's part of the fun in my opinion. (EDIT: it could very well be that Vanessa is now just Category 1. I've never seen her, just saying that this report isn't necessary proof that she is).

This is a very different game than traditional mongering, but it can be super hot if done right.

I would bet that Vanessa is in category 3. Only because there's a report of her being on seeking arrangements and the one guy who did get lucky with her. However, most reviewers, including me, have not gotten lucky. From my POV during the experience she gave signs (I didn't go into great detail in my review) that she was comfortable and enjoyed / liked me but not enough to begin anything sexual. Additionally, if no one had brought her up on here then I wouldn't have reached out due to all the karma she has.

However, I agree with your assessment and appreciate your response. After my experience, I fully realized that this area of the hobby doesn't appeal to everyone (especially me) since you're intentionally trying to find sex workers / girls open to sex on a site that is publicly against those actions and houses plenty of women who are also against it. And you're also essentially paying to attempt to seduce a woman in some cases. A game for sure, and not much different from an actual date but with a much different context.

And I know beauty is subjective but I just don't think there's a lot of eye candy on this site in Chicago. So it's slim pickings for me to find someone attractive, not expensive, recently active, and a guarantee for fun.

I may have one more swing at this but I think escorts and AMPs are more of my speed. Though I am actively trying to cut down on this hobby's spending this year cause things are looking spooky in the world right now; I didn't even buy eggs the last time I went to the grocery store.