Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,686 to 2,700 of 33117
-
01-23-25 15:10 #30432Senior Member

Posts: 752Sorry that happened. I haven't met her, I didn't know she was on tryst. This girl is 100 percent my type seeing all the other photos from just the few on stg makes me want to see her. This will be the next girl I contact. Steep 1/2 hour incall fee but that's what it is. If I see her most likely it will be next week I'll report back.
Originally Posted by Gabbos
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 13:24 #30431Senior Member

Posts: 1704Once Upon a time.
Once upon a time (25 yr +/- ago) there was a hobbyiest who posted on the "Big Doggie" website. He concocted a standard for applications to the sexiest women and their menus because there was no standard, and a lot of confusion as to what each hobbyiest meant by "GFE".
St. Bart was that old time monger. His standard was that GFE meant what your girlfriend would do, which included BBBJ, BBFS, DFK, DATY, at the very least, I believe.
Thus, was born the St. Bart's GFE standard of excellence. They all lived happily, and satisfied forever.
(This is my memory and I am sticking with it. Yours may vary from mine.)
-
01-23-25 13:00 #30430Senior Member

Posts: 35You took the words right out of my mouth.
Originally Posted by MassiveSquirt
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 12:41 #30429Senior Member

Posts: 178You really can't find anyone better than someone who looks like white trailer park trash wanting 550 an hour.
Originally Posted by Gabbos
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 12:23 #30428Senior Member

Posts: 98St. Barts standard? What does that mean? Thanks!
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 11:44 #30427Senior Member

Posts: 4429Look at her payment type. Even if someone seeing her, she will definitely scam one of us or steal our info if we dumb enough to pay her with credit card to an unknown girl.
Originally Posted by AceOfMatt
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 11:14 #30426Senior Member

Posts: 179I got vibes that Gianna one who wasted your time is a massive upseller.
Sorry that she wasted your time bro, but maybe it's for the better. I texted her a while back and she was a total wise ass to me. When I called her out for potentially being a upseller. She just kept "LOL" to me and was being defensive. And claiming she has all sorts of great reviews. She looks sexy AF though on those pics. It's too bad she's playing games, and or upsellin.
-
01-23-25 10:31 #30425Senior Member

Posts: 1704Angel Redux.
Finally saw this one. Very normal, full GFE, St Bart's standard. Nice lady. Doesn't always offer Incall. Good value.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
01-23-25 09:08 #30424Regular Member

Posts: 21Nelly in Q / BTree
Hey everyone, looking for a little help. Has anyone seen Nelly who's been advertising on listcrawler recently? I texted her and she seems really friendly and says she's new to the area. But I'm always hesitant with new people. Any on-site would be greatly appreciated. PM if preferred, thanks!
-
01-23-25 01:04 #30423Senior Member

Posts: 29Why do they do this?
Hi All,
So I was out for an event all dressed up and when it was over decided to quickly scan around and see who is available since I don't get to play much at night. Found this one:
https://tryst.link/escort/xxggbabyxx
I like the skank italian looking type.
Tells me to meet her at one of the airport hotels in Chelsea that she heading to and meet at 9:30 pm. I get there at 9:30 and she's running 20 min late. 10 pm I text her asking for eta no response. Since I was at the event and drinking water in the car I really had to use the restroom and went into the hotel. As I was coming out she was coming in. I wink and give her a nod. I texted her and said that was me. She told me to give her a few. This was 10:15 pm. 10:30 I texted back and said everything ok? Can I head up and not nothing. At 10:45 pm I said fuck it and left. Still no response after I told her thanks for fucking me over.
I don't get why these bitches do this?
Anyways FYI to use caution if you want to see this person.
Gab.
-
01-22-25 19:19 #30422Senior Member

Posts: 179Not sure if I posted the link correct, first time around? Here it is again.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/bosto...t/650559869252
Has anyone here on this Site, has anybody seen her? LOL, I bet the service sucked. Probably an upseller.
-
01-22-25 19:15 #30421Senior Member

Posts: 179Is this girl a scammer?
I feel like she must be bigger boned than her deceiving photos suggest, hmm 🤔. Always runs multiple ads together, different photos / brunette chick's. Seems very deceiving, and that she may be a scammer of sex or Service's, in general. I never see any reviews. Probably because most guys are scared away from the obvious deceivingness.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/bosto...t/650559869252
-
01-22-25 14:17 #30420Senior Member

Posts: 787Statistics
I have to agree with SalamanderFour on this one. The study was very limited in that it examined 500 couples who were presumably in a monogamous (or mostly monogamous) relationship. "Among 500 couples. . . With a maximum of 1. 2% (95% CI: 0. 2%2. 2%) of infections potentially attributable to sexual contact. " Since it was studying person-to-person sexual contact, the study was obviously looking at situations where one partner was infected (the goal was to assess the rate of infection from one partner to his or her partner).
Originally Posted by SalamanderFour
[View Original Post]
Granted, in most situations, female-to-male transmission is lower than male-to-female, but what about the provider with a drug problem who has an open cut in her mouth? Or who has seen several clients that day and whose vaginal tissues may be thin from repeated penetration? Or the provider whose teeth scratch your unit while performing oral? Or who's wearing a ring that cuts your unit while she's pumping it prior to penetration? Over several years the risk may be 1. 2% assuming occasional partner sex, whatever that means (six times a week if you're lucky, LOL). If conservatively the risk is 1% per encounter with a provider, that means a 99% chance of no infection. . . But after you've visited 20 providers, the odds that you haven't been infected is about 80%, which means that the odds of infection is 20%, or 1 out of 5. (Google the "birthday paradox" to understand the math.) That's a signficant risk, even if you can afford the $10 grand treatments.
-
01-22-25 09:18 #30419Senior Member

Posts: 338Statistics for the general population don't apply to this hobby. Too many of the providers use injectable drugs and share gear. Factors that increase the risk; anal, bareback, and numerous partners.
Originally Posted by HoHunter328
[View Original Post]
So the risk is not insignificant.
-
01-21-25 23:35 #30418Senior Member

Posts: 51I think HH was 4 last time I checked.
Originally Posted by ChiefTain
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote


