"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[Peter Pan]

Anyone met her before?

https://members.seeking.com/messages...4-45745aa91758

This is a link to messages not profile.

[JjayBoy]

Hello gents. Quick question? Do you guys verify on seeking? Is it worth verifying?

I've been on seeking for years. Hit tons of sbs. Recently I've taken a break from the game / site, and have only been dealing with my regulars sbs. I see they have added verified accounts? I guess that's cool to weed out the scammers. Is it worth it to verify on our side? I see some girls saying verified accounts only now. Should I ignore that, and just keep messaging without verification?

Sorry if this is a dumb question. I've been away from the site for a few months.

[BrownSugaTwo]

Has someone met her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...c-0fe0aabef8c6

[BrownSugaTwo]

Anyone met her before?

https://members.seeking.com/messages...4-45745aa91758

[Peter Pan]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...0-958016634d1b

Seems like a scammer?

[Ngasub20]

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...e-46b09f613027

I used to see her under a different name. She was a lovely time. I don't have her number anymore she used to be in mabelton. If anyone can DM me her contact OR if anyone just wants details. I would love to share.

Naturalcurlsandcurve.

I have her Snap still I think. She was a great time, would hang out all day for 4 oo, and absolutely break me in half. She got dumped by her BF recently so is apparently back in the prowl on SA.

[Ngasub20]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-e0ef346ab5c0

She's been around for YEARS. She's now demanding 1000 for "2 hours at the absolute most". Got her down to 400 within minutes and then I moved on because I didn't care for her attitude, especially as a used up 6 with a kid.

[Johnny Mapalo]

Anybody seen this chic. She messaged me on the Sugar daddy site wanting $300. I don't trust giving these chic's that kind of money. Anyone seen her? PM if you want.

[Berol Loz]

It can mean a lot of things, but if they are posting on SBs sites, I'd wager "Self employed / Entrepreneur" often means Stripper or Pro, or maybe "lifestyle coach" and as you mentioned, a wannabe "influencer".

That's pretty much EXACTLY what I think of when I see it LOL.

[Berol Loz]

Interesting, as well as their "Experience Hypergamy" campaign.

Yeah saw this a few months ago. I thought "Hypergamy" was a made-up marketing word, but no, it's an old one that used to mean "marrying up" .

I guess that's always what Seeking has tried to sell, but it sounds like they want to get away from the casual fun that Seeking and the other sugar sites seem to be about. This could well be a partly legal move to stay in the clear from accusations that it's facilitating paid hook-ups.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypergamy (from the 1800's).

[Peter Pan]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...f-e0ef346ab5c0

[Peter Johnson]

https://blog.seeking.com/leading-wit...ng-caro-bwback

Interesting, as well as their "Experience Hypergamy" campaign.

[Peter Johnson]

This really depends on what you are worried about. I would argue that if you are trying to keep your information safe from the likes of the NSA, and most other law enforcement, then that's fairly futile. Yes there are encrypted messaging apps, but plenty of women on there aren't going to want to use them. .

For me, it's not just about my "information" (my identity). It is about keeping the conversation private, and safe, from other parties, and of course encrypted messaging apps do this 10x better than SMS, especially using disappearing messages.

But yes there are quite a lot of women who get spooked, so you do lose some prospects. But I've got more DTF Seeking girls than I have the money or time to deal with, so that's ok. Plus it screens out some of the cunty ones if they won't use a more private messaging app, considering this sugar dating is a gray area of questionable legality. It also screen out some of the extra fearful and skiddish ones, as well as lower IQ (although that is the majority of these girls).

I really don't totally blame them for being concerned some guy could kidnap them, but whatever, and I like to speak freely on Signal, and knowing I'm having a genuinely private conversation, with no one else listening in to my business.

It's not perfect, it's not close to perfect, but it is 10x closer to perfect than SMS/GoogleVoice/Sudo is.

[2me4Looking2]

Need advise on getting a burner phone, that I do not have to use my real information.

Thanks.

This really depends on what you are worried about. I would argue that if you are trying to keep your information safe from the likes of the NSA, and most other law enforcement, then that's fairly futile. Yes there are encrypted messaging apps, but plenty of women on there aren't going to want to use them. For me personally, my primary goal is that a woman can't figure out who I am and for that, it doesn't really matter how I pay for the phone. It just can't be associated with my name online. I bought a cheap SIM on Amazon with a recurring monthly prepaid plan and put that in an old phone. I also mainly use Google Voice for messaging. The NSA and the FBI aren't policing sugar babies or prostitution unless you start trafficking women or dealing in other illegal activities way more serious than this.

[Peter Johnson]

Need advise on getting a burner phone, that I do not have to use my real information.

Thanks.

Use the Signal Messenger app if you want real privacy.

Google Voice is generally just regular SMS. Your messages can be vacuumed up by the NSA, cellular provider, and whoever else. But if you send the girls your pics, and you don't mind those being in the same conversation as ppm and everything else, that can be accessed and/or subpoenaed then by all means use it.

It doesn't matter what phone you buy. Pay with cash, buy refill cards with cash if you want to go that far.