Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 691 to 705 of 10830
-
12-14-24 01:08 #10140Senior Member

Posts: 3246"video selfie to match your uploaded photos".
Originally Posted by Lexx1
[View Original Post]
Loser right off. My uploaded photos aren't me for real. I would never put my real photos on any dating site, in my case b / c I have a SO. I'd recommend anyone else also refuse to do it. Seeking needs to continually keep in mind that half its paying customers are married, and facilitate their being on the site (payments, requirements) .
I have two profiles, both a few years old. I am pretty observant of all the rules, I don't think I ought to get banned, yet I did get spanked a about a year ago, and had to watch their TOS video. I presume I am on probation, meaning any future transgression and I am instantly banned. We all know what a big deal it is to get banned. So, I don't think this is a great thing. It might be neutral. The same things that keep scammer 'girls' off will keep me off. And I pay, they don't.
-
12-13-24 23:14 #10139Regular Member

Posts: 21Google pay
Google pay worked for me. There was no need for verification. The only issue was I tried to use a fake public picture and it was flagged and I was required to picture by scanning the front and back of my driver's license. A few minutes later my profile was active with my real age. After my membership expired I created a different profile using Google pay (5 days ago) with no issues or verification.
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]
I'm still not sure how they have blacklisted me? I was denied creating a profile by using my name and CC but I was able to create a profile by using Google pay and I'd verification?
-
12-13-24 22:31 #10138Senior Member

Posts: 373Privacy is the biggest concern. Remember the Ashley Madison data breach?
Originally Posted by Stolper
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-24 20:41 #10137Senior Member

Posts: 910Until we know what the full process will be like. It sounds like it's only a quick video selfie to match your uploaded photos. And it says it's private. Meaning only for Seeking's temporary use and their eyes only. Not meant to show the selfie video on public profile. There's no mention of hard PII info such as SSN, Name, Address, etc. being gathered. So a bit early to get paranoid over it. And it may not be required of long established members. It said for new users/members.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
I think it's a great thing as well. Get rid of bots, catfishes, spammers, etc. It may not reduce it 100% but it's a good start. The only thing it won't work against is full on prostitutes signing up as a fresh sugarbaby. The pro will simply do the selfie video. Then again though there are career sugarbabies that keep returning. Which at that point I call them prostitutes as well. Side gig or main gig as a prostitute.
-
12-13-24 17:21 #10136Senior Member

Posts: 3246HG's point, though is that this may be required of guys, and those of us unwilling to give up personal info will be SOL.
Originally Posted by StudBucket
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-24 14:31 #10135Senior Member

Posts: 77We sure this is only targeted to SBs? The announcement made it seem like it would target all new users (SDs and SBs), which would be a huge privacy concern. I would personally quit SA if they made me do this.
Originally Posted by StudBucket
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-24 10:51 #10134Senior Member

Posts: 622You'll have to discuss that with her.
Originally Posted by AmgPhilly63
[View Original Post]
-
12-13-24 01:55 #10133Senior Member

Posts: 187This is great news and well overdue; wish they made all the girls verify their profiles. I spend hours weeding through fake profiles each month.
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-24 21:38 #10132Senior Member

Posts: 528She down for raw?
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-24 21:10 #10131Senior Member

Posts: 115Pretty sure they do, but good question, I will ask their support for you.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
12-12-24 17:12 #10130Senior Member

Posts: 622GoddessStorm
Here's a white girl for you guys. She lives near Hermosa Beach. Photos are accurate. She has bad complexion and bad teeth. Easy to M&G. Allowance negotiable.
https://members.seeking.com/member/3...f-e3d8660d612d
-
12-12-24 17:07 #10129Senior Member

Posts: 622Sky
Here's a blonde girl for you guys. She's been on SA for over 6 years, on and off. She's a model and actress but is now doing casting. She asks for a very high allowance and is very selective. You'll probably not meet her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...d-0e5cde59c2b2
-
12-12-24 17:03 #10128Senior Member

Posts: 622Katy
Here's a blonde girl for you guys. She's been on SA for many years now. She's looking for a monthly allowance upfront. She doesn't do ppm. Also, she asks for 300 for an M&G for dinner at an upscale restaurant. She doesn't meet for coffee. Unverified.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2...4-1e5300549ed8
-
12-12-24 16:59 #10127Senior Member

Posts: 622Laney
Here's a blonde girl for you guys. She lives near Hollywood. Photos are her but she's probably in her late 30's or 40's. She has wrinkles on her face. She's not new to sugar dating or SA. Allowance negotiable.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4...8-fd74f67fef2e
-
12-12-24 11:00 #10126Senior Member

Posts: 3246Yeah, I need to use a prepaid, I can't take any risk at all of that charge on my IRL card and the site having my actual name. The AM hack and all.
Originally Posted by MrBlueSea
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote



