Hot Young Asian Girls

[BonerAppetitty]

Yes it seems to be that Amy.

Is this the same Amy that was in KT and roommate was Lily (very skinny one)?

[BonerAppetitty]

Sexy Shannon told me 20 minutes boning is ideal. That does not include foreplay. Personally I believe in rocking it all night except I have zero control over my boner. 5 minutes pre-shower, 5 minutes BBBJ, 5 minutes DATY, 20 minutes first shot, 20 minutes second shot, 5 minutes post-shower. That math works.

..20 minutes. Is sufficient for PIV...

[JoseMan]

This is truly laughable at $600/ hour https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/celine-k.

She will fetch $80 in Columbia!

[Download X]

A girl can't work for a day or two? How are you supposed to know this? Yes, I can see people getting banned for robbery. LOL. I have read from your reviews that you believe 20 minutes. Is sufficient for PIV.

So I guess if someone goes beyond 20 minutes PIV without consent they should be banned and those that shoot faster should be allowed repeat visits.

You can hurt a girl the first minute of PIV. Has nothing to do with how long. If a guy fucks too hard too fast, then he'll hurt the girl. Doesn't matter if she can take a magnum or much bigger guy. It's basic biology, it takes time for a woman's vagina to get aroused and it can extend twice as deep. No different than a dick being flaccid or erect after arousal. Switching to doggy is another time this can happen too. There are girls with 10 years experience and thousands of cocks that still have to be careful on the switch to doggy. But guys are learning sex from porn.

I've had girls let me go 80 minutes PIV where I had to extend it where she didn't want me to stop fucking, don't know what you're talking about. No two girls are the same. If you don't think a girl did you right, complain to the booker instead of taking it out on her. If other guys give that feedback, they'll get rid of her. 20 minutes is just what I do on average. With most girls, that's all I want. There's bbbj and other play. I never said it should be another's standard. Many guys are much less, some guys much more. You do you on that part.

A good example of no two girls being the same is, some girls do anal. You can't say one girl let you do anal, so another now has to. You force that and you get banned right? Even the top tier service queens don't necessarily do anal. The more unusual your demands, the more you want to find that right girl. The one who likes being choked, for example.

If a girl likes being choked, then great go ahead. If she doesn't, don't. That's what consent means. A clearer example is Indian guys keep getting banned because they stick their thumb up a girl's asshole suddenly without any warning. But if a girl let's you, probably because you didn't suddenly ramp it up to max, cool. One can hurt a girl, the other probably won't. This is the mildest example, I don't want to ruin appetites by listing what guys do.

You must have read or personally seen girls who were hurt. It's obvious when you've seen a girl on repeat and she can't do what she did for you last time. Some guy ruined it for the rest of us. Since it takes just one guy to ruin a dozen appointments, you are much more likely to be affected than to be the one doing it. Just how that works. I've had appointments cancelled where I know the girl, and other situations where I can't go into details but saw the aftermath. Including girls quitting their tour early.

Guys that are getting banned for hurting girls know and generally don't care.

[Chef Boyardee]

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.

Everyone is getting "the cold shoulder" right now from sessang because they are on vacation and have been for a couple weeks now. They finally updated their website to reflect their vacation.

[DefCooked]

No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.

I didn't know the girls or their bookers were allowed to converse with us here. Sup LOL.

[RockItAllNite]

Nothing you listed is the problem.

It's simple. Anything nonconsensual or would hurt the girl and cancel appointments. If a girl can't work for a day or two after your visit, you're doing it wrong. I try not to ask but in some cases I can't help but know. In 12 years I've seen my fair share. People don't get banned for consensual play. They get banned because they shouldn't be seeing girls.

Also, robbery. One agency had to ban a certain race not for any roughness, but because in one city they would not stop robbing the girls. After that ban, it magically stopped. It was discussed on TER. I'm not defending the logic, just saying this is what happened. Some people just like to fuck it up for everyone. This is not about spanking a girl.

A girl can't work for a day or two? How are you supposed to know this? Yes, I can see people getting banned for robbery. LOL. I have read from your reviews that you believe 20 minutes. Is sufficient for PIV.

So I guess if someone goes beyond 20 minutes PIV without consent they should be banned and those that shoot faster should be allowed repeat visits.

[Download X]

Interesting argument. Please define "too rough". Some girls like things like choking, spanking, long hard banging. Others do not.

Nothing you listed is the problem.

It's simple. Anything nonconsensual or would hurt the girl and cancel appointments. If a girl can't work for a day or two after your visit, you're doing it wrong. I try not to ask but in some cases I can't help but know. In 12 years I've seen my fair share. People don't get banned for consensual play. They get banned because they shouldn't be seeing girls.

Also, robbery. One agency had to ban a certain race not for any roughness, but because in one city they would not stop robbing the girls. After that ban, it magically stopped. It was discussed on TER. I'm not defending the logic, just saying this is what happened. Some people just like to fuck it up for everyone. This is not about spanking a girl.

[RockItAllNite]

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

Agencies like SDAG are quick to ban and do not do "customer service" like 90% of other bookers. But I noticed something over many years. SDAG protects their girls and keeps them safe at another level. If a guy is too rough they are banned not just from that girl, but all girls. For life. They banned my own friends for life, who by my friend's own admission was banned for being too rough. That same friend was even banned by another booker, but just for that one girl. However he could see other girls. I can see both sides, but what SSG and SDAG is doing is keeping only the best customers. That's my chief complaint about the multi-booker system, it's nice enough for the customer but sucks for the girl and makes some top tier girls quit. I've seen it enough but won't name them. It's also bad for customers that get cancelled because another customer fucks up or is too rough again. Seen it enough times.

Just want to give both sides of it. There are times bookers are so nice and polite to me and they shouldn't be. It would be nice if they enforced common sense rules and boundaries more strictly. Banning is just one example but I can't discuss the others since it just makes things less safe to say it.

Interesting argument. Please define "too rough". Some girls like things like choking, spanking, long hard banging. Others do not.

[KGirlSavant]

No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.

Which ORG do you PO for? Please bring back Baby Arin and Baby Peach!

[Chuminh]

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

I'd like to add my. 02 experience w / SSG. 2 months ago.

They initially asked for full name, age & race.

I told them I was verified through, BG, CGLA & CAKD.

Then they requested (3) booker phone numbers I've used.

I sent (3 booker #'s) then booker said, they didn't accept the last # (It was OC #. Booker wanted LA #.

Then booker said all bookers must know my name & have them match otherwise booker will require photo I'd.

I said, I will pass this screening.

[Resilient John]

I agree, she is overhyped and not worth 600. Thus, she is now being booked by SBC and CG. I texted bookers and she is not busy at all. I think she is satisfied with higher rates and low volume since she is a student here. Any thoughts.

It should be easy enough. Just see girls who you think are worth seeing. People value different things so there will always be guys who will see the Celines and Freesias of the world regardless. The old adage "One man's trash. " applies here in a cynical polar opposites kinda way. Both girls started out at normal rates, albeit at the high end of the spectrum, but still manageable. They know they can demand at least that much with good bookings. So the next logical step is to go for a cash grab with a boss that is like minded. People can call it whatever they want: greed, capitalism, market segmentation, etc. In short, they are maximizing their profits versus how much they can be railed.

In my viewpoint, girls worth seeing are those that meet my metrics. Three in particular: looks, service, and personal satisfaction. From a value standpoint, is Celine 67% (roughly how much she is charging more than normal rates) better in all three categories than any of my ATFs. The answer is no, she may surpass a couple in looks but comes no where close to the latter two metrics. Never saw Freesia so can't make a comparison but the underlying logic still applies. Clearly define what you are looking for or want in a provider. It's incredibly important to be honest and list your deal breakers and must haves (examples include but are not limited to: young or at least looks young, natural tits only, needs to RIM, GFE only, magnum friendly, etc.) as that will lay the foundation of what you value and what girl will give you the best "bang for the buck".

Some may argue quality over quantity. I say, look at your own metrics cause that will give you a good idea of what is included in your definition of quality. My metrics are roughly equality weighted so a girl needs to be rather well rounded for me to consider her worth seeing. Another person might have looks overly represented in their metrics. This is fine too. I'm not one to judge what others find attractive and enjoys. Therefore, the quality versus quantity argument doesn't really apply to me. How superior a girl may looks can only go so far if her service falls flat. The reverse of that is also true. I have no need of bells and whistles when they are just decorations that serve no purpose to me.

At the end of the day, you can't change how other people are going to act. Regardless of whether either girl's schedule is jammed packed or barren as a ghost town, it matters not to you unless you make it so. We all need to make peace with external hype and FOMO.

[Download X]

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

Agencies like SDAG are quick to ban and do not do "customer service" like 90% of other bookers. But I noticed something over many years. SDAG protects their girls and keeps them safe at another level. If a guy is too rough they are banned not just from that girl, but all girls. For life. They banned my own friends for life, who by my friend's own admission was banned for being too rough. That same friend was even banned by another booker, but just for that one girl. However he could see other girls. I can see both sides, but what SSG and SDAG is doing is keeping only the best customers. That's my chief complaint about the multi-booker system, it's nice enough for the customer but sucks for the girl and makes some top tier girls quit. I've seen it enough but won't name them. It's also bad for customers that get cancelled because another customer fucks up or is too rough again. Seen it enough times.

Just want to give both sides of it. There are times bookers are so nice and polite to me and they shouldn't be. It would be nice if they enforced common sense rules and boundaries more strictly. Banning is just one example but I can't discuss the others since it just makes things less safe to say it.

[JohnHada]

I agree, she is overhyped and not worth 600. Thus, she is now being booked by SBC and CG. I texted bookers and she is not busy at all. I think she is satisfied with higher rates and low volume since she is a student here. Any thoughts.

Now CGLA has a post for DD cup Daisy starting tomorrow (11/14) charging SIX bills an hour.

[Resilient John]

Sesangirls booker is the worst of all agency bookers. Really rude and unethical practices. No other bookers treat customers so badly. My advice. Use other agencies and eventually her private providers (Nali) will too.

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.