Hot Young Asian Girls

[Chef Boyardee]

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.

Everyone is getting "the cold shoulder" right now from sessang because they are on vacation and have been for a couple weeks now. They finally updated their website to reflect their vacation.

[DefCooked]

No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.

I didn't know the girls or their bookers were allowed to converse with us here. Sup LOL.

[RockItAllNite]

Nothing you listed is the problem.

It's simple. Anything nonconsensual or would hurt the girl and cancel appointments. If a girl can't work for a day or two after your visit, you're doing it wrong. I try not to ask but in some cases I can't help but know. In 12 years I've seen my fair share. People don't get banned for consensual play. They get banned because they shouldn't be seeing girls.

Also, robbery. One agency had to ban a certain race not for any roughness, but because in one city they would not stop robbing the girls. After that ban, it magically stopped. It was discussed on TER. I'm not defending the logic, just saying this is what happened. Some people just like to fuck it up for everyone. This is not about spanking a girl.

A girl can't work for a day or two? How are you supposed to know this? Yes, I can see people getting banned for robbery. LOL. I have read from your reviews that you believe 20 minutes. Is sufficient for PIV.

So I guess if someone goes beyond 20 minutes PIV without consent they should be banned and those that shoot faster should be allowed repeat visits.

[Download X]

Interesting argument. Please define "too rough". Some girls like things like choking, spanking, long hard banging. Others do not.

Nothing you listed is the problem.

It's simple. Anything nonconsensual or would hurt the girl and cancel appointments. If a girl can't work for a day or two after your visit, you're doing it wrong. I try not to ask but in some cases I can't help but know. In 12 years I've seen my fair share. People don't get banned for consensual play. They get banned because they shouldn't be seeing girls.

Also, robbery. One agency had to ban a certain race not for any roughness, but because in one city they would not stop robbing the girls. After that ban, it magically stopped. It was discussed on TER. I'm not defending the logic, just saying this is what happened. Some people just like to fuck it up for everyone. This is not about spanking a girl.

[RockItAllNite]

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

Agencies like SDAG are quick to ban and do not do "customer service" like 90% of other bookers. But I noticed something over many years. SDAG protects their girls and keeps them safe at another level. If a guy is too rough they are banned not just from that girl, but all girls. For life. They banned my own friends for life, who by my friend's own admission was banned for being too rough. That same friend was even banned by another booker, but just for that one girl. However he could see other girls. I can see both sides, but what SSG and SDAG is doing is keeping only the best customers. That's my chief complaint about the multi-booker system, it's nice enough for the customer but sucks for the girl and makes some top tier girls quit. I've seen it enough but won't name them. It's also bad for customers that get cancelled because another customer fucks up or is too rough again. Seen it enough times.

Just want to give both sides of it. There are times bookers are so nice and polite to me and they shouldn't be. It would be nice if they enforced common sense rules and boundaries more strictly. Banning is just one example but I can't discuss the others since it just makes things less safe to say it.

Interesting argument. Please define "too rough". Some girls like things like choking, spanking, long hard banging. Others do not.

[KGirlSavant]

No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.

Which ORG do you PO for? Please bring back Baby Arin and Baby Peach!

[Chuminh]

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

I'd like to add my. 02 experience w / SSG. 2 months ago.

They initially asked for full name, age & race.

I told them I was verified through, BG, CGLA & CAKD.

Then they requested (3) booker phone numbers I've used.

I sent (3 booker #'s) then booker said, they didn't accept the last # (It was OC #. Booker wanted LA #.

Then booker said all bookers must know my name & have them match otherwise booker will require photo I'd.

I said, I will pass this screening.

[Resilient John]

I agree, she is overhyped and not worth 600. Thus, she is now being booked by SBC and CG. I texted bookers and she is not busy at all. I think she is satisfied with higher rates and low volume since she is a student here. Any thoughts.

It should be easy enough. Just see girls who you think are worth seeing. People value different things so there will always be guys who will see the Celines and Freesias of the world regardless. The old adage "One man's trash. " applies here in a cynical polar opposites kinda way. Both girls started out at normal rates, albeit at the high end of the spectrum, but still manageable. They know they can demand at least that much with good bookings. So the next logical step is to go for a cash grab with a boss that is like minded. People can call it whatever they want: greed, capitalism, market segmentation, etc. In short, they are maximizing their profits versus how much they can be railed.

In my viewpoint, girls worth seeing are those that meet my metrics. Three in particular: looks, service, and personal satisfaction. From a value standpoint, is Celine 67% (roughly how much she is charging more than normal rates) better in all three categories than any of my ATFs. The answer is no, she may surpass a couple in looks but comes no where close to the latter two metrics. Never saw Freesia so can't make a comparison but the underlying logic still applies. Clearly define what you are looking for or want in a provider. It's incredibly important to be honest and list your deal breakers and must haves (examples include but are not limited to: young or at least looks young, natural tits only, needs to RIM, GFE only, magnum friendly, etc.) as that will lay the foundation of what you value and what girl will give you the best "bang for the buck".

Some may argue quality over quantity. I say, look at your own metrics cause that will give you a good idea of what is included in your definition of quality. My metrics are roughly equality weighted so a girl needs to be rather well rounded for me to consider her worth seeing. Another person might have looks overly represented in their metrics. This is fine too. I'm not one to judge what others find attractive and enjoys. Therefore, the quality versus quantity argument doesn't really apply to me. How superior a girl may looks can only go so far if her service falls flat. The reverse of that is also true. I have no need of bells and whistles when they are just decorations that serve no purpose to me.

At the end of the day, you can't change how other people are going to act. Regardless of whether either girl's schedule is jammed packed or barren as a ghost town, it matters not to you unless you make it so. We all need to make peace with external hype and FOMO.

[Download X]

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.

I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.

SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.

Agencies like SDAG are quick to ban and do not do "customer service" like 90% of other bookers. But I noticed something over many years. SDAG protects their girls and keeps them safe at another level. If a guy is too rough they are banned not just from that girl, but all girls. For life. They banned my own friends for life, who by my friend's own admission was banned for being too rough. That same friend was even banned by another booker, but just for that one girl. However he could see other girls. I can see both sides, but what SSG and SDAG is doing is keeping only the best customers. That's my chief complaint about the multi-booker system, it's nice enough for the customer but sucks for the girl and makes some top tier girls quit. I've seen it enough but won't name them. It's also bad for customers that get cancelled because another customer fucks up or is too rough again. Seen it enough times.

Just want to give both sides of it. There are times bookers are so nice and polite to me and they shouldn't be. It would be nice if they enforced common sense rules and boundaries more strictly. Banning is just one example but I can't discuss the others since it just makes things less safe to say it.

[JohnHada]

I agree, she is overhyped and not worth 600. Thus, she is now being booked by SBC and CG. I texted bookers and she is not busy at all. I think she is satisfied with higher rates and low volume since she is a student here. Any thoughts.

Now CGLA has a post for DD cup Daisy starting tomorrow (11/14) charging SIX bills an hour.

[Resilient John]

Sesangirls booker is the worst of all agency bookers. Really rude and unethical practices. No other bookers treat customers so badly. My advice. Use other agencies and eventually her private providers (Nali) will too.

My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.

[Resilient John]

Now CGLA has a post for DD cup Daisy starting tomorrow (11/14) charging SIX bills an hour.

It's feels like deja vu all over again with SBC. Exclusivity gets thrown out the window when they know they can't fully book her with their own client pool. Especially at their inflated rates. Just FYI and even CGLA lists her under her old profile name. Daisy is Celine K, now new and improved at the low low rate of $600/ hr. She pushed for more money in the past, forgot the actual number but it went nowhere. Now she's going bigger than before. GPS to the max baby.

My brief synopsis of my time with Celine K last year:

Pretty face, ABG vibe, natural D's pillowy but with some sag to it, slender frame, good English, tan skin complexion, painfully fake theatrics. I saw her once and did not feel the desire to see her again. She's definitely looks over service. She was booked solid at $360 but I don't think she'll repeat the same feat at this price point. At least for me, she's definitely not worth seeing at $600.

It's worth noting that after things simmered down and her proponents' voice faded away, some users did start posting that she was overhyped. By all means, see her if you want. Far be it for me to tell a man what he should do with his hard earned money. But I hope history doesn't repeat itself.

[GhtTwentyK]

Now CGLA has a post for DD cup Daisy starting tomorrow (11/14) charging SIX bills an hour.

Looks like she vanished today. So strange. Makes me wonder if this is just bookers putting a feeler out to see what the demand is for a $$ girl.

[Download X]

No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.

Yeah that's called getting kicked out. There are other ways too. I've seen it all.

[Bbaka10]

Looks like there's a girl Mia3 on CG at 500 1 hr GFE.

I wonder if rebrand or a new Celine / Freesia tier.

Looks like she vanished today. So strange. Makes me wonder if this is just bookers putting a feeler out to see what the demand is for a $$ girl.