Rubrankings.com
The hottest girls are here
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Top Escorts

Thread: Safe Sex Information and Advice

+ Add Report
Page 12 of 127 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 62 112 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 1900
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #1735

    Lulu

    Quote Originally Posted by SnarkDog54  [View Original Post]
    He's talking about LuLu, who now goes by Lucille Ball.

    https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...nati/176739568
    Holy shit. She has sores on her lips, needle marks on her arms and pictures of rapid HIV tests in her ad. Not even with my worst enemy's dick.

  2. #1734

    Tested positive for chlamydia as well

    Quote Originally Posted by Bawall69  [View Original Post]
    I'm posting this in here because we apparently frequent the same girls.

    Tested positive for Chlamydia. I get tested for everything every few months. Even if it weren't against the rules, I still wouldn't try to speculate on who gave it to me because I have seen a few since my last test.

    Only posting this as a reminder to please get tested periodically. I have no symptoms. It's curable, but only if you know about it.
    Not going to speculate as well but once I started feeling burning urination I decided to put myself on the bench and get tested. Best to suit up boys.

  3. #1733
    JoeyNuts is right on. I have a SO, and I don't go down on working girls and I don't even do BBBJ because it is too much risk and too much to lose for me. When getting older, rubbers suck and I am getting to the point that I have hard time getting hard with rubber. CBJ is not doing much for me. Already using 003 condom. Anyway, it sucks but that's life especially for non-single dude.

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyNuts  [View Original Post]
    If you're eating out sex worker puss it's only a mater of time, you will definitely catch an STD. What if the odds were 5% on doing it just once? If you were jumping out of a plane and they told you the parachute works 95% of the time would you jump? I wouldn't but maybe you would. The more you do it, the more likely you're going to go splat. It's just math.

    And remember, it's not just your behavior it's that of every pervert who has come inside her holes before you and all of the other hoes they've done that with ... the multiplier is crazy ... and most of these girls are HIGH VOLUME PROSTITUTES who engage in very risky behavior EVERY DAY. They're not the brightest, I've had some tell me they aren't worried about STDs because they take a shower every day - really. That volume and casual attitude about hygiene ups the ante significantly. In the past when I was younger and dumber, I have caught chlamydia despite using condoms - it happens a lot more than you think. And good luck when your wife/gf goes to her gynecologist and they tell her she has chlamydia. And that's just one STD, which has exploded recently in terms of the number of people who get it ... there are others as mentioned to be wary of.

    Hey, if you're a single dude with no GF, fewer consequences, less to lose and maybe you don't care (you should); I don't know your situation and of course that factors in with risk-aversion or not. If you are married, have a GF, have shit to lose .. I would advise not doing going down on sex workers and when you fuck them ALWAYS use rubbers and even then you aren't 100% shielded from STDs. But if you do that vs bareback, oral on prostitutes etc .. you're lowering your risk significantly. Again, math.

  4. #1732
    What a great thread. Question about DATY. Can anyone recommend an antibiotic that can cure most bacterial issues that might originate from DATY bare? Thanks for any thoughts.

  5. #1731

    It's about the odds

    Quote Originally Posted by Ts123  [View Original Post]
    Yeah, I hear what you are saying, I guess I just thought that if DATY / DATO was causing problems that we would hear more about it forums like this. Maybe people are and I just have a false sense of security. I would love to hear of people (or who know of people) who were practicing safe FS that ran into trouble doing other things.
    If you're eating out sex worker puss it's only a mater of time, you will definitely catch an STD. What if the odds were 5% on doing it just once? If you were jumping out of a plane and they told you the parachute works 95% of the time would you jump? I wouldn't but maybe you would. The more you do it, the more likely you're going to go splat. It's just math.

    And remember, it's not just your behavior it's that of every pervert who has come inside her holes before you and all of the other hoes they've done that with ... the multiplier is crazy ... and most of these girls are HIGH VOLUME PROSTITUTES who engage in very risky behavior EVERY DAY. They're not the brightest, I've had some tell me they aren't worried about STDs because they take a shower every day - really. That volume and casual attitude about hygiene ups the ante significantly. In the past when I was younger and dumber, I have caught chlamydia despite using condoms - it happens a lot more than you think. And good luck when your wife/gf goes to her gynecologist and they tell her she has chlamydia. And that's just one STD, which has exploded recently in terms of the number of people who get it ... there are others as mentioned to be wary of.

    Hey, if you're a single dude with no GF, fewer consequences, less to lose and maybe you don't care (you should); I don't know your situation and of course that factors in with risk-aversion or not. If you are married, have a GF, have shit to lose .. I would advise not doing going down on sex workers and when you fuck them ALWAYS use rubbers and even then you aren't 100% shielded from STDs. But if you do that vs bareback, oral on prostitutes etc .. you're lowering your risk significantly. Again, math.

  6. #1730
    Regular Member


    Posts: 11

    Hmmm.

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyNuts  [View Original Post]
    B / C many STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, can be spread through oral sex. And with sex workers, like AMP girls who may be taking 10 loads from mongers per day, multiply the risks significantly. A lot of them get / have STDs. If you are married or have a SO and even if you don't. Not worth the risk. Have your fun but be smart.
    Yeah, I hear what you are saying, I guess I just thought that if DATY / DATO was causing problems that we would hear more about it forums like this. Maybe people are and I just have a false sense of security. I would love to hear of people (or who know of people) who were practicing safe FS that ran into trouble doing other things.

  7. #1729

    No worries

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyNuts  [View Original Post]
    B / C many STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, can be spread through oral sex. And with sex workers, like AMP girls who may be taking 10 loads from mongers per day, multiply the risks significantly. A lot of them get / have STDs. If you are married or have a SO and even if you don't. Not worth the risk. Have your fun but be smart.
    Those STI's are really nothing to worry about, because they are all easily treated with antibiotics. Get a Hep B vaccination in advance so that you are completely protected from that, and you are golden. Even the other stuff, like Hep C, AIDS, and Herpes are quite easily managed with medications these days.

  8. #1728
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparkish  [View Original Post]
    The way I'm reading that sheet is that word Reactive there is a label for that data point and NON-REACTIVE in all caps is the value, thus this is a negative for Syphilis. Why would she post it otherwise? But as another poster pointed out, there's an even better reason to avoid this one. She ugly.
    Right? This hag is getting way too much attention, even though it's mostly negative. I would seriously not let her anywhere near my schwanz if someone paid me. Please go away!

  9. #1727

    Really?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ts123  [View Original Post]
    Why not eat out? I am pretty new to this game and read about BBFS and think that is insane, but always thought eating out seemed way less risky? DATY and DATO are the things I look forward to the most. I mean I can bang my wife missionary any ol Tuesday. I am seriously asking bc not partaking in this would be a major disappointment as I grow with the hobby.
    B / C many STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, can be spread through oral sex. And with sex workers, like AMP girls who may be taking 10 loads from mongers per day, multiply the risks significantly. A lot of them get / have STDs. If you are married or have a SO and even if you don't. Not worth the risk. Have your fun but be smart.

  10. #1726

    It's reactive

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparkish  [View Original Post]
    The way I'm reading that sheet is that word Reactive there is a label for that data point and NON-REACTIVE in all caps is the value, thus this is a negative for Syphilis. Why would she post it otherwise? But as another poster pointed out, there's an even better reason to avoid this one. She ugly.
    The first box is the result of the test and the second box is what it should be. First box is reactive so it's a positive rpr. It's odd they don't put a titer on the sheet but it's positive.

  11. #1725
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparkish  [View Original Post]
    The way I'm reading that sheet is that word Reactive there is a label for that data point and NON-REACTIVE in all caps is the value, thus this is a negative for Syphilis. Why would she post it otherwise? But as another poster pointed out, there's an even better reason to avoid this one. She ugly.
    You're reading her results incorrectly. All testing has some kind of range or default. Anything that should not be in your body should have a negative or zero value. For instance, if you went to a doctor and they tested you for alcohol, then the default is zero because alcohol should NOT be in your body. If you look at the other tests that she had performed, chlamydia and gonorrhea, the default or acceptable value is NEGATIVE and her results are "negative". For the RPR, the default result or normal result is "non-reactive" which is correct, that result should be non-reactive since the normal state for mankind / womankind is non-reactive or negative for that test. Therefore, her result should be considered positive although a confirmation test is necessary to be sure that the result is truly positive. I read the Labcorp and Healthline web sites last night for more information and a lot of things can cause an RPR test to have a result of Reactive including IV drug use, which she appears to be a member among that group (according to her records on coreduvalclerk.com). A recent COVID vaccination also appears to potentially cause falsely positive RPR test. She posted her own name so I'm not saying anything that isn't readily available online. Hopefully, it's just a false positive. If someone on this board is friends with her, you might encourage her to post any confirmatory results that she may have and which should have been ordered as a result of the "reactive" result for the original RPR. That might alleviate any fears that may have arisen to her earlier post. Just my two cents.

    Shaggy.

  12. #1724

    I think it's Non-reactive

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan1978  [View Original Post]
    Reactive to rpr means syphillis. It's hard to read but looks like reactive is highlighted. Dummy told on herself 😂.
    The way I'm reading that sheet is that word Reactive there is a label for that data point and NON-REACTIVE in all caps is the value, thus this is a negative for Syphilis. Why would she post it otherwise? But as another poster pointed out, there's an even better reason to avoid this one. She ugly.

  13. #1723
    Quote Originally Posted by LobsterClit  [View Original Post]
    Isn't reactive on the last one a bad thing?

    https://skipthegames.com/posts/jacks...e/904951620436
    Reactive to rpr means syphillis. It's hard to read but looks like reactive is highlighted. Dummy told on herself 😂.

  14. #1722

    Fun size

    Isn't reactive on the last one a bad thing?

    https://skipthegames.com/posts/jacks...e/904951620436

  15. #1721

    False positive

    I got tested at a walk in clinic last December just to be safe and everything came back clean but HSV-2. Never had any symptoms and never did it raw. It felt like the world was ending until I learned that blood test for hsv2 could yield false positives when the igg test is used and you're in a low positive range. I got retested at another place where they used a more sensitive test instead of a walk in clinic and came back as a false positive. Never been more relieved in my life, however I haven't been in the hobby since because of it. I only ever go to AMPs and always wrap it up, never even got a BBBJ, but I'm still worried about actually catching HSV-2. Is there a way to avoid getting it entirely or is it just vigilance?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Ferrant Lax Mexico City
Meet Sugar Babies
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Live Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Live Escorts

Protected by Copyscape