Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 1,546 to 1,560 of 5828
-
10-20-24 18:27 #4283Senior Member

Posts: 2104Hanako is half Japanese half Korean. You know how that is, exotic but not 'jgirl'. There have been 3 "Japanese" girls lately but it's marketing their looks, they are "Japanese" girls so no video. You are coming from East Coast where jgirl always means "actual girl flying in fresh from Japan" aka video for 200 normally.
Originally Posted by Monthehunt
[View Original Post]
If I can speak better Japanese than the jgirl, then to me they're basically kgirls with a different look. I would still see them, but I'm not going to be pulling out the camera and offering 200 right. Also, I have a very long line of kgirls waiting to see me, messaging me on Wechat and KKT. I can't keep up. "Japanese" girls are very cool but have to get in line like any other kgirl. Jgirls with video on the other hand get to skip to the front of the line. Same for you I know.
For those of us on the West Coast, flights next Spring to Japan are $550 if you go low season. Perfect weather in Spring. It can be done on a $2K budget, even better at $3K.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7072489
I have studied this issue very carefully. There is a huge overlap in girl quality for bb special versus bb upcharge. Meaning some of the best girls I've ever had were bb special for 320. Allie being the best example, she is a solid Tier 1 girl. Beautiful girl with great service, even a bit sassy. Bona and Jenny as well.
Originally Posted by OrangeGoku
[View Original Post]
Other people have had better experiences with upcharge girls. Two of my favorite girls right now are upcharge girls at 350 + 100. However, you cannot say that "If she has an upcharge, she is better" No way on that. There is just a small correlation on bb special or not, better instead to check reviews than assume based on pricing. Put another way, in my ranking there is a long list of upcharge girls that Allie is better than. But I only call out the good girls, so I won't name any. Just saying.
Lucky for you, 3 times last week I had to answer the same question of "I can't get into FA / SDAG". They are the strictest with screening, you need solid references. They ban rule breakers and protect the girls, and they host solid girls. If necessary, they get rid of girls who are not up to standard - they have often asked me and others for feedback on new girls. Check the website and you will see "open minded" (o) which means bb, it is ymmv the girl has the final say. Be respectful with a girl's boundaries and they will take care of you, true for every agency.
Originally Posted by Taws6
[View Original Post]
Right now in SD both (o) kgirls are top tier. Jira is even S-tier in my book. I mean she has ten TER reviews and her LOWEST review says "I would repeat with Jira". Let that sink in. Someone described her as a classy version of Petra. June is new but has the #1 most amazing tits, I will be giving her an award at the end of the year unless another queen shows up. We will try to keep them a few weeks but I'm sure you can have them back next month.
More about Jira and June:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7072375
-
10-20-24 17:45 #4282Senior Member

Posts: 182A vs A pus
Was scrolling on candygirl just looking what options are available.
I saw they have some girls at at a lower price point and offer it as BB special.
Is there a big difference if I get the who does BB for a little bit cheaper? I obviously know the girl with the higher rate will be more attractive but is the dropoff in looks that significant that I warrants to spend an extra 100 on a girl? Some of the tops girl who have been reviewed (like Peony or Baby Arin) are at a higher price point. But will I be unsatisfied if I get one of the girls ho are on the BB special list for a little bit cheaper?
Is it worth the extra 100?
-
10-20-24 14:07 #4281Senior Member

Posts: 450Insert the Homor Simpson DOH!
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
Thanks for spelling that out, I've seen them numerous times, never put two and two together with the notation.
-
10-20-24 11:55 #4280Senior Member

Posts: 582I have a few questions on hanako, if you're up for it. How would you rate her BBBJ? Is video on her menu and if so, does she allow more than 1 camera? Thanks.
Originally Posted by DateTime2
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 17:42 #4279Senior Member

Posts: 45How accurate is her ads photo?
Originally Posted by DateTime2
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 14:46 #4278Senior Member

Posts: 29Hanako
She wasn't offering BB when I first met her, but looks like it's available now. She's incredibly hot and accommodating with a very tight box. Highly recommended.
-
10-18-24 11:28 #4277Senior Member

Posts: 2104Thanks for mentioning this, I realized I listed the wrong duo. Stl Danish was Sophia / Mia. I was used to clicking on the ad page but the page changed recently, and I just copied the names, my bad. Jenny no longer does duos as well, as mentioned. Just want to mention this since she is still listed as duo friendly on cakd. Website info will often be out of date.
Originally Posted by GoofyPanda
[View Original Post]
Willa has showed up in OC. Two reviews of her. Both agree her face is an asset but it is up to your taste:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...la#post7034808
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7033269
I forgot to mention Amy. Model looks, tits and ass, more freestyle service than typical kgirl service (I consider this good, it's up to your preference). Good suction on bbbj. I think it really depends if you vibe well, most important is be respectful. We did vibe and I want to mention she is a bit more dominant in play. She made me her cock slave. I am usually looking for more submissive but she is quite the looker so cool.
Also, I noticed a new name Nari but it sounded so familiar. Now I realize there was a Nali before. Nali is Boner Certified but not Nari. Unless someone confirms otherwise we have to assume it's a different girl to be safe.
Lastly, Nadia has moved to LA. She will be missed.
-
10-18-24 11:13 #4276Senior Member

Posts: 60Booker say Mia no longer working. Bro you had one of the best times. Good Duo like that rarely come by.
Originally Posted by StlDanish
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-24 03:19 #4275Senior Member

Posts: 2104FirstAsians
FA is rotating in Eight, making the roster Eight (o), Lyly, Bian (o), Sandra, Bonnie. The last two being Latina. The schedule shows Saturday is last day for Sandra and Bian. (o) means 100 bb upcharge. Rate is 300 for 60 (260 for 45).
I mention Eight since she is coming in from SD. There were limited reviews but I recognize two of the reviewers as regulars, one on USAG:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7042905
She has large tits, some fillers, service queen with skills according to regulars. Sunday is sometimes a rotation day, maybe we will swap more girls. Hope this helps.
Between the Get9 / SKP / SAG group and CAKD groups there are a ton of top talent girls, both HYA and service queens. Too many to cover but if you like cute face and round tits and ass I always recommend Jenny. Ask her for eye contact during bbbj she has a cute baby face. Very thin waist for her proportions, limited English but no problem. Ada has been discussed several times already, her special point is bbbj. I've also mentioned Lizza elsewhere who is very cute, looks over service. Same with Baby Sugar, very cute looks over service.
Stl Danish has posted an excellent breakdown of the duo Sadie and Lydia. They have chemistry which you don't often get with duos and makes it a main attraction. Another regular confirmed the same experience, in his words "feels like a porno". I have posted elsewhere my own duo experience which was fun but not the same level of chemistry (glad I did but would not repeat). Hope this helps.
-
10-16-24 23:07 #4274Senior Member

Posts: 710Apink
FYI, Apink is Sori from LA.
-
10-16-24 13:53 #4273Senior Member

Posts: 101Sophia ATF
Great post! Sophia is YMMV. Had many visits with her, but freaked me out about being my new wife! Mia is awesome like she learned the ropes from Sophia. I might have to try out the 3 some.
Originally Posted by StlDanish
[View Original Post]
-
10-16-24 13:02 #4272Senior Member

Posts: 530Ada
Different!
Originally Posted by Man59
[View Original Post]
-
10-16-24 00:34 #4271Regular Member

Posts: 21Ada
Can anyone confirm this is the same Ada as Ace / Diva / Hope from prior stints?
-
10-15-24 20:32 #4270Senior Member

Posts: 211I saw Ada in SD (some of the same photos from that NY site). As Download X mentioned, she is not a HYA but I still found her attractive. She's curvy with great boobs and her blowjob skills are off the charts. It depends what you are looking for. If you are a more visual guy who wants to look down at a 10 giving you service, I would pick someone else. If you just really want a fantastic blowjob (she's not a bad fuck either) - Ada is great.
Originally Posted by JohnHada
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-24 18:40 #4269Senior Member

Posts: 2104TER numbers
I'll send a PM. Pretty expected reviews on TER for a service over looks girl, consistent with her multiple reviews on USAG. I will explain on PM since there was a lengthy discussion in the SD board.
Originally Posted by JohnHada
[View Original Post]
The person who liked her the least actually had a good time but was put off by the ad photo. This is why we can't expect too much from ad photos, some are accurate some are not. Ada is not a HYA, no one said Ada was stunning she is just good at BBBJ. I don't think 7.6 / 7.8 on TER is good or bad. In any case it hides the breakdown that reviews on USAG give. Every USAG reviewer good or bad clearly saw Ada, there's no contradiction. You can never say that about TER, the first review of every tour is 80% a shill.
Not specific to Ada, but TER numbers are really weird. I've been burned too often and completely ignore them now, especially the looks number. Too many reviewers rate ugly girls higher than beautiful young girls for reasons unrelated to looks. I've said elsewhere that by far the ugliest girl I've ever seen at an agency in 12 years got 8's for looks by many other guys. Her face was a 5 and she is overweight. But they were probably giving her an 8 because: a) She had huge natural boobs, b) She is in her 40's and guys are actually cutting her slack for that rather than the reverse c) She is clearly mentally challenged and a really sweet girl who takes care of you - I like her too but this has nothing to do with looks. Again, this girl is a 5 in looks for me in face not to mention overweight, but so many guys gave her an 8. Basically a ton of sympathy points, she has a noticeably low IQ which is probably the main reason.
As a final nail in that coffin, I know a girl who has two TER profiles depending on where she works. That's common. I'd say she's a solid 9 / 7. In one TER profile, she is a 9.3 / 7.3. In another, she is 7.5 / 6.0. Tons of reviews. It's the exact same girl!









Reply With Quote






