Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,191 to 2,205 of 26373
-
09-19-24 23:55 #24183Senior Member

Posts: 1160LOL, so true. NOT.
Originally Posted by Bkmsw
[View Original Post]
-
09-19-24 18:47 #24182Banned Member

Posts: 64Disregard this guy. She looks like a man. Takes the concept of tomboy to an entirely new level.
Originally Posted by OnaniKing
[View Original Post]
-
09-19-24 18:26 #24181Senior Member

Posts: 62It was supposed to be at 9:30 at night.
Originally Posted by BldFatLvr
[View Original Post]
-
09-19-24 02:52 #24180Senior Member

Posts: 63I saw her
I just saw this delightful little woman. She's very sweet and very open. And she just moved to a pretty nice hotel. I recommend that if you treat her right she's very reciprocating.
Originally Posted by LogansRun
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-24 23:57 #24179Senior Member

Posts: 366No problem. Yeah it definitely makes you skeptical. Seeing they are or were together at one time.
Originally Posted by BldFatLvr
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-24 23:28 #24178Senior Member

Posts: 110Was it daytime or night?
Originally Posted by LogansRun
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-24 21:47 #24177Senior Member

Posts: 156Cheap QV Girls
Does anyone have experience with these two?
Brooke.
https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...915/2602050069
Cute and young snow bunny with one review. I reached out and she's unsure how long she'll be in Chicago. $150 QV. Def interested, just skeptical about the one review is all. Also originally from Indiana. Not sure what part though.
Colombian.
https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...367/2243891040
May have work done on her body but don't really care. Boobs sit nice and has a good core it looks like. Looks really hot. $120 QV. Always been skeptical of the Latina posters but def want to pull the trigger on her. Also one review but several comments.
-
09-18-24 17:36 #24176Senior Member

Posts: 62Well I tried
So I set up a time to meet with her and drove an hour only for her to go radio silent when I showed up. Next morning I get a text from her saying she fell asleep. Only thing I wasted was gas and time. I doubt I'll try again. Maybe if she was closer.
Originally Posted by DivingDeep70
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-24 15:16 #24175Banned Member

Posts: 443AC Telegram
Anyone know their telegram info??
-
09-18-24 12:00 #24174Senior Member

Posts: 110Thanks for the 411. Makes me wonder then if she is working with LEO as well. I will be in that area tomorrow and was debating on trying but, now I'm a little skeptical.
Originally Posted by PopWorker
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-24 10:56 #24173Senior Member

Posts: 366[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting reports claiming that another person is or was collaborating with Law Enforcement officials, largely because many of these reports are less than genuine.
The fact I'll just come out and say it: From my long history running this forum, the vast majority of these accusations are authored by ex-boyfriends, ex-clients, competitors, and other individuals with a grudge who post the accusations solely to disparage their "target".
But nevertheless, let's follow the logic:
1. How exactly do you know that the individual is cooperating with LE? From my perspective, the only way I can imagine that you would know this would be if you were "in the room" at the time, which makes you either LE or an imformant yourself.
2. From experience, many of these accusations are substantiated solely by the author having witnessed the individual talking to cops on the street, which is not in and of itself sufficient evidence of anything. If you're claiming that as the source of your accusation, then every person who has been given a traffic ticket is also cooperating with LE. It just doesn't wash.
3. Nevertheless, let's assume that the individual you mentioned is in fact "working with LE". OK, so what? What exactly are they going to tell them? That they fucked some guy for money? I've never heard of any individual being prosecuted for engaging in commercial sex based on the testimony of a street prostitute. It just doesn't make any sense. Can you imagine the scene in the courtroom where a jury is listening to some street prostitute on a witness stand pointing at some average Joe and claiming "He paid me for sex!". It's just laughable.
Like I said, so what?
The bottom line: Don't waste my time posting this sort of stupidity in my forum.
Thanks!
-
09-17-24 19:35 #24172Senior Member

Posts: 1255A well known provider in the south suburbs I haven't seen in months told be last week that alot of girls have been avoiding LC lately due to police activity. On the Illinois side it may be be due to the DNC but also Dart in general.
Originally Posted by BldFatLvr
[View Original Post]
-
09-17-24 19:32 #24171Senior Member

Posts: 1255She recently changed in her ad that she will no longer service men that are 7 inches plus just FYI. I was going to see her until that recent change.
Originally Posted by LogansRun
[View Original Post]
-
09-17-24 19:31 #24170Senior Member

Posts: 1255I don't trust them. I would verify through Snapchat. I really don't like video verifying because it can be used as blackmail or even to set you up for robbery. Once they know what you look like before you arrive, they know who to look for as well. If you do video verify, don't say or or solicit anything as there will be video evidence of it. I've heard some providers use it as a way to discriminate against men they don't want to see. Also keep in mind the girl you video verify might be in some other state or country. She may send you a location, you travel there and she wants a deposit to let you in. Video verification doesn't prove as much as most think.
Originally Posted by MarkWrx
[View Original Post]
-
09-17-24 17:36 #24169Senior Member

Posts: 110If you look on the NWI section, you can see a possibility why they don't get a lot posted. A pimp got busted and named LC as where he was advertising. It is from last month. Nothing really posted in that section after.
Originally Posted by DivingDeep70
[View Original Post]







Reply With Quote




