NoVA SugarBabies

[FrankCastle6]

Please explain "breadcrumbers."

"breadcrumbing" is a term for when they dole out just enough attention to keep you interested, but aren't really serious.

These girls are answering with a couple of sentences every couple of days. I'm pretty sure they're real, just some combination of entitled, used to not putting in any effort for attention, and lazy.

[FarFarAway]

Against my better judgement, I paid for a month. Of the 100+ accounts messaging me, maybe 20 were attractive real humans. After filtering heavily for fakes, I've had a $5 k / month ask, one escort's digits, several ghosts, and three breadcrumbers. Maybe I'm dumb, but I'm hoping one of the latter three ends up with a meet.

I was seeing a stripper otc now and then to take care of things, but she was aggravating and flipped out recently, perhaps permanently blocking me.

It's way easier to get pussy in just about any other city in the country. My theory is that the high number of rich, powerful male politicians coming to the area blows up the market.

Please explain "breadcrumbers."

[BuckNaked84]

Definitely the absolute worst in my 5 years.

I guess the question is, is Sugar a declining thing generally, or are SBs migrating to other platforms? Honestly don't know the answer.

I have posted about this a few weeks ago. Now wasting 300 for 90 day membership again. Its hopeless for me at this time. I rejoined recently after 2 years after losing one of my SBs and seeking is a shell of its former self. I am going to list a few scammers below but I would love to hear from people who have tried any other competitors to SA like SDM, SB or even WYP recently. Are they any better? It astonishing to me that I am not even close to finding a replacement despite my experience and resources. It will probably be pure luck or fluke if it happens. I am searching in 40 miles radius DC and baltimore area.

Here are a few profiles you don't need to waste your time on. That will also give you idea of my type. Any help or ideas are most welcome.

Amber: E-meets only.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...b-1d4adfc2c345

Elizabeth: selling pics.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...9-2f6d58aee143

Lauren: $100 in advance, 400 ppm.

[FrankCastle6]

...

Against my better judgement, I paid for a month. Of the 100+ accounts messaging me, maybe 20 were attractive real humans. After filtering heavily for fakes, I've had a $5 k / month ask, one escort's digits, several ghosts, and three breadcrumbers. Maybe I'm dumb, but I'm hoping one of the latter three ends up with a meet.

I was seeing a stripper otc now and then to take care of things, but she was aggravating and flipped out recently, perhaps permanently blocking me.

It's way easier to get pussy in just about any other city in the country. My theory is that the high number of rich, powerful male politicians coming to the area blows up the market.

[HornyTwist]

I have posted about this a few weeks ago. Now wasting 300 for 90 day membership again. Its hopeless for me at this time. I rejoined recently after 2 years after losing one of my SBs and seeking is a shell of its former self. I am going to list a few scammers below but I would love to hear from people who have tried any other competitors to SA like SDM, SB or even WYP recently. Are they any better? It astonishing to me that I am not even close to finding a replacement despite my experience and resources. It will probably be pure luck or fluke if it happens. I am searching in 40 miles radius DC and baltimore area.

Here are a few profiles you don't need to waste your time on. That will also give you idea of my type. Any help or ideas are most welcome.

Amber: E-meets only.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...b-1d4adfc2c345

Elizabeth: selling pics.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...9-2f6d58aee143

Lauren: $100 in advance, 400 ppm.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...4-e2e4dd1e8d74

Sarah: Stopped responding after told about no advance money transfer.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...d-43cc83be1b55

Cynthia: digits on first message. Gas money scam.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...a-bd49e0f73cdf

June: now in florida selling pics.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...0-d56d25ce6b23

Dimples: I have seen her multiple profiles before. Selling pics.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...d-83ff6a353e08

[The Curve]

Any info on this one? Pursuing me out of the blue from miami and beverly hills?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-298a2f4a278a

Arianna expects 1 k. LOL.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...8-cba03aad2cbc

[NovaNova]

Sort of a similar experience with me. I got her number and we did text, but a couple messages in, she stopped responding. Interesting thing is the photo on the profile is of one girl, but the number she gave me doesn't seem to be a fake number and is registered to another girl who happens to be friends or an acquaintance of the girl in the photos. I don't really know what to make of it. I wonder if she is using her friend's photos on the site for discretion.

I saw this profile before first reported but concluded in was probobly fake IMO. There are a bunch of red flags that I saw and if anyone else sees different then feel free to weigh in. 1. Profile is new 2. Pictures appear to be different people. First picture, cute little asian spinner with light hair which appears to be taken in Asia based upon the building in the background; second picture thicker but not fat asian and a taller asian spinner which appears to be in a western nation. Obviously the spinner is not the thicker girl so taller girl is supposed to be the girl in the first picture. Although I do not think the spinner in the first picture is the same spinner in the second photo, what caught my attention was the height. She lists her height at 5'-2". The thicker girl is considerably shorter in the second pic which would put the thicker girl somwhere in the range of 4'-8" to 4'-10" or so which is noticbly short even for an asian or hispanic chick. Also consider the railings in the background. Railings in the US are generally 42" in height. Looking at the thick girl compared to the railing, she appears taller than 56" to 58". 3. The second picture appears to be a dated, but well kept up neighborhood, of which I cannot think of any around DC. Could be Baltimore or some other city but at least in DC not a lot of vinyl siding row houses next to garage row houses sporting 1980's awning that I can think of. 4. Third picture is useless and skin tone appears much more yellow but this could be due to lighting. Why would she share pictures of herself in #1, her friend and herself in #2, and then pick some useless eyeball pic for #3. 4. A picture of two people without the face blocked out. Although I have found some real ones with a second person in the photo, the second person's face is always hidden. No reasonable girl is going to share her friend's face on her SA profile.

I have seen one that used photos of another girl when I actually did met her but she was still very hot and admitted she only did that so no one would find out she was on SA. Maybe I am over analizing but this one just seems to throw up too many flags for me to believe it is real. Just an opinion so if anyone has any other thoughts would love to hear so we can help eachother spot the fakes.

[ShortMan22]

Any details on this one? I messaged her but have not heard anything yet.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...7-159b6e88a4ed

[ShortMan22]

Picture seller.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...3-5e94bfc4ffa9

[CharmCityBro]

Any intel on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-8a7a1a7fa46d

She's real. DTF, a little heavier than her pics, but still attractive and seemed willing to please. Had a M&G, but never pulled the trigger. I think she wanted 400.

[FreeWally]

Dude clean out your inbox.

USAG allows 200 message inbox + sent combined. This is a common problem we will run into. Here's how to delete some quickly:

Click Notifications and hit Inbox. Your messages will display and you scroll towards the bottom. A message says "Inbox contains XX messages. You have XX messages stored, of a total 200 allowed. " This means once you have a total of 200 in / sent messages you can't send or receive more messages. To delete some old messages, look right above and see the "Date Filter". I set the range from 2014 to Jan 1 2024. Then hit "Apply filter". This will show those old messages. Then click the 1 checkbox near the upper right and you'll see every message auto-selected. Scroll down and click on the tab "Selected Messages" and hit the action "Delete" then click "Proceed". Done.

If this is a recurring problem, you can download to CSV and then delete everything. Go to the last page of your inbox / sent (this is required to skip a bug). Click on the upper right button to select all. You will see in 'Selected Messages' all of the messages are selected (multiple pages), so you then export it to. Csv or whatever. CSV can then import into whichever spreadsheet program you use Libre, Excel, etc.

While I am here, here is an iphone / data security guide for those who take pictures and videos:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...91#post6978391

This saved me 2 weeks ago when I took a jgirl on a date and the first thing she did when I turned on my GPS was browse through my phone and see if I was a pervert. I was declared innocent (I am guilty). She even checked my Youtube history before she started her music playlist for the drive.

[ShortMan22]

Any intel on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-8a7a1a7fa46d

Dude clean out your inbox.

[CuriousVaMan]

Any intel on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-8a7a1a7fa46d

[Shier]

Are you using an App Number (eg. TextFree, TextMe)? I think some phones or texting apps identify app numbers as such and many women associate these with flakes and scams. I use an app number and sometimes I think getting a "real" burner phone may result in better responses.

It could be number harvesting, or scammers / blackmailers who, when they see no google results for your number, simply move on.

I've noticed a lot of the really good on site communication and then ghosting once phone number exchanged. Maybe some new scam for guys that actually give a real number. Anyone else experience an uptick in this?

I've had good site communication with at least 5 girls over the past month. Got the phone number, texted, then never heard back. Not sure what is going on. But all 5 haven't been active in weeks since initial communication.

[TomFordModel]

Alice.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...0-eb0bcc443b81

Honduras woman, 28. Little chubby. Wanted 500 ppm.

Mimi.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...6-fe0da45e7f8b

Asked for my phone number and then ghosted me.

Sara.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...0-4752f50701d4

Wanted to meet for drinks and then go shopping before discussing allowance. I was not interested.

Anastasia...

Sarah.

She's not 26. I met her several years ago for m&g. A waste of time. You should be able to find her insta. She's either going to ask for high $$$ but not worth it. What a shame she's a Harvard grad and still hoing for $$.

Abby. BBFS, etc has a funk thou. She's been around.