Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 7,396 to 7,410 of 50168
-
07-13-24 21:44 #42773Senior Member

Posts: 210Correct this is LSC Diya. Saw her once and will not repeat. Lack of effort and skills, zero chemistry, and nonexistent english made it hard to communicate. The only thing she had going for her "youthful" but in reality she was in her 30's. Business slowed down for her dramatically once LSC increased their rate hence why she went to SoCal and rebranded.
Originally Posted by EyceeRaw
[View Original Post]
-
07-13-24 18:56 #42772Senior Member

Posts: 181How do I get accepted to community?
Have been having a craving for young Asian CUT because I'm tired of the latinas and old Asian grannies.
How do I book with one of these chicks if I don't have any references.
Is there any chicks that will do it without a reference?
-
07-13-24 17:52 #42771Senior Member

Posts: 178Typically, you still pay the upcharge if you attempt the 2nd shot, even if you fail. The provider's economic justification is that she did the work that you paid for. She can't be held responsible for anything that prevents you from busting again.
Originally Posted by Bbaka10
[View Original Post]
But if you have a good relationship with her, she may let it slide.
-
07-13-24 17:16 #42770Senior Member

Posts: 210For those who have done MSOG upcharge
Do you only pay the upcharge if you finish the second time? Or do you still pay the upcharge if you attempt a 2nd time?
-
07-13-24 16:10
Senior Member
-
07-13-24 14:00 #42769Senior Member

Posts: 398Thanks bro. I totally missed that post.
Originally Posted by EyceeRaw
[View Original Post]
-
07-13-24 13:51 #42768Senior Member

Posts: 452FYI, Emily didn't retire; she just worked under a different name. She went back to Laos in March and will be back.
Originally Posted by FreeWally
[View Original Post]
-
07-13-24 12:18 #42767Senior Member

Posts: 2059Kbliss Saturday selection.
Ina Erika (upcharge) Elly.
Gangnam Dana Annie Jenny.
-
07-13-24 12:12 #42766Senior Member

Posts: 116
Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
SsStuntCock already came in clutch, as usual. Hani is LSC Diya. Attaching her previous pics.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
07-13-24 11:48 #42765Senior Member

Posts: 398Hani
So did you find you who it is? Those pics look so familiar to me too.
Originally Posted by JohnHada
[View Original Post]
-
07-12-24 15:41 #42764Senior Member

Posts: 302Who would've guessed being a decent human being and a chill dude would have led to a better time in any degree. Great read and really good etiquette for newer guys reading the board.
Originally Posted by JackHolly
[View Original Post]
-
07-12-24 15:13 #42763Senior Member

Posts: 801Back in the day
Yes, that is the one thing I like better about today's environment. Full transparency on BBFS is a good thing. But it's the only improvement, IMO.
Originally Posted by LARckr720
[View Original Post]
The other change I really dislike is the proliferation of bookers. It's all over the map and ridiculously confusing. Back in the day, if you were in good with the three top Korean bookers, you were golden. And, really, if you were cool with J, she was the only booker you really needed to know. She had nearly all the hottest ladies up and down the line. One call or text was all you ever had to make.
-
07-12-24 14:59 #42762Senior Member

Posts: 425I read that Hera is old and mix reviews on service.
Originally Posted by BigZhangMang
[View Original Post]
-
07-12-24 14:12 #42761Senior Member

Posts: 783Cv
Def those were the best years.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
Sunny and Michelle, they had so many top notch girls at that time.
-
07-12-24 13:18 #42760Senior Member

Posts: 209That was all pre-FOSTA. When advertising was out in the open and one pretty good central site to find girls. But BB service wasn't out in the open like it is now. So it's a trade off.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
-
07-12-24 12:47 #42759Senior Member

Posts: 2059Kbliss Friday fun.
Ina Erika elly.
Gangnam Dana Annie Jenny.









Reply With Quote










