Escort Reports

[PeckerPete13]

Does anyone know who this is in the picture? When I used to see her name was Natalia, but that was years ago. I found the picture and I'm trying to locate her.

[Lips1963]

(disclaimer. I am not a lawyer).

The 4th amendment protects you against unlawful search and seizure, which extends to your identification. So, depending on the state, you do not have to provide ID unless you are either a) already under arrest; or b) the police have reasonable, articulable suspicion that you have committed, are committing, or about to commit a crime. If they specify that they will arrest you unless you provide ID, it's generally better to comply and sue later. And please, if you are in this situation, start video recording immediately. That is your 1st amendment right, established in case law by the Supreme Court.

Oh, man, it looks like I opened a can of worms here! I think you may be right that it is dependent on the state, as to whether you have to provide I'd if on foot. But I think its universal, if stopped in a vehicle? Licence and registration, in ALL states, and insurance in some? I THINK?! But EVERY lawyer website I looked a says that you should NEVER voluntarily provide info to police except for ID and the required vehicle documents. They can TRY to get info, but you are not required by law to answer, BUT, they do NOT have to warn you of Miranda rights UNLESS and UNTIL arrested? And they CAN use whatever you say, voluntarily, before an arrest. But am I correct? Is there a lawyer in the house?

[LustyB]

(disclaimer. I am not a lawyer).

. So, depending on the state, you do not have to provide I'd unless you are either a) already under arrest; or b) the police have reasonable, articulable suspicion that you have committed, are committing, or about to commit a crime..

The above is the case in Rhode Island and New Hampshire. Cops can ask for I'd if you're on foot for "b" above. But you still do t have to say anything or help with their "investigation". And do t let then pull the old "I'll chart her you with obstruction". Obstruction only can be charge as a secondary offense to a primary crime. Asserting your 5th amendment rights isn't obstruction.

In Massachusetts, there is no I'd requirement if you're on foot. You don't have to show them shit.

[DJrunner]

I don't, refresh my memory.

Two days early LOL. Anyone remember Tammi Lynn? Boy was she hot, when she wasn't dressed like a boy (which was most of the time).

[KatSuno1492]

Exactly. As far as I understand it, the law says you have to provide identification if on foot, car registration, license etc if in a vehicle. The 5th amendment says you don't have to answer questions. So if you provide the required documents and decline to answer questions, what could they do? What could they possibly arrest you for? Being a monger? Where's the evidence of money exchange for sex? Me? I'm much more scared of the thug handlers than the police. I'll stick with the Hamptons and the Sonestas any day, and skip the Hilltops and Alpines.

(disclaimer. I am not a lawyer).

The 4th amendment protects you against unlawful search and seizure, which extends to your identification. So, depending on the state, you do not have to provide I'd unless you are either a) already under arrest; or b) the police have reasonable, articulable suspicion that you have committed, are committing, or about to commit a crime. If they specify that they will arrest you unless you provide I'd, it's generally better to comply and sue later. And please, if you are in this situation, start video recording immediately. That is your 1st amendment right, established in case law by the Supreme Court.

[DarkClouds]

Two days early LOL. Anyone remember Tammi Lynn? Boy was she hot, when she wasn't dressed like a boy (which was most of the time).

[Lips1963]

I don't answer questions.

Then leave.

Exactly. As far as I understand it, the law says you have to provide identification if on foot, car registration, license etc if in a vehicle. The 5th amendment says you don't have to answer questions. So if you provide the required documents and decline to answer questions, what could they do? What could they possibly arrest you for? Being a monger? Where's the evidence of money exchange for sex? Me? I'm much more scared of the thug handlers than the police. I'll stick with the Hamptons and the Sonestas any day, and skip the Hilltops and Alpines.

[LustyB]

You've been around long enough to know that LE can hang around in the parking lot and harass visitors if they know what's going on inside.

I don't answer questions.

Then leave.

[DarkClouds]

You've been around long enough to know that LE can hang around in the parking lot and harass visitors if they know what's going on inside.

So, if they are "being watched" on cameras, etc, watching entries and exits from their room, then just exactly what danger is this to a monger? Has anyone ever heard of police busting into the room of a provider, UNLESS she herself is LEO or else working with police? In other words, a sting. But I've never heard of police busting into a provider's room, based soley on evidence that there are frequent room visitors. In most hotels, there are no rules against visitors in rooms, at least not during daylight hours. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that there is an "expectation of privacy" and such evidence as comings and goings from rooms could not possbly justify a warrant. . . Or could it? Also would police needlessly risk significant danger to themselves by busting into a room that had not been carefully engineeered beforehand to conduct a sting? So, just exactly what is the danger to the MONGER in such situations, where the provider is "being watched"? The hotel could certainly just kick the provider out if they wanted to, yes? But how could that, in any way, impact the monger?

[DJrunner]

Let's be honest, she not for 99.9% of us. I saw her and was disgusted. You do you, but please don't pump up the tires for Debbie. That does a disservice to most here.

Had a good time with her last week Attleboro MA area. Maybe not for everyone, but I thought she was a great mature lady. https://lovelyladyforyou.wixsite.com/mysite.

[AndesThins21]

Had a good time with her last week Attleboro MA area. Maybe not for everyone, but I thought she was a great mature lady. https://lovelyladyforyou.wixsite.com/mysite.

[Lips1963]

Keep in mind these high end hotels have cameras which I am sure are or could be monitored. I will only meet a provider in a hotel that has been verified either by many reviews or a recomendation from somene I talked through my mail box on this site. I do not meet any new providers cause I am just getting back into game and honestly most are just scams or ripping us off. If a single woman checks into a hotel who is to say they are not being watched by these cameras to see if there is traffic coming into their room? Also I do not walk by the front desk I prefer to go into a back door but as most of us know they are usually locked so you got to wait for someone to walk in that door which is a time waster. Just my two cents. Be safe.

So, if they are "being watched" on cameras, etc, watching entries and exits from their room, then just exactly what danger is this to a monger? Has anyone ever heard of police busting into the room of a provider, UNLESS she herself is LEO or else working with police? In other words, a sting. But I've never heard of police busting into a provider's room, based soley on evidence that there are frequent room visitors. In most hotels, there are no rules against visitors in rooms, at least not during daylight hours. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that there is an "expectation of privacy" and such evidence as comings and goings from rooms could not possbly justify a warrant. . . Or could it? Also would police needlessly risk significant danger to themselves by busting into a room that had not been carefully engineeered beforehand to conduct a sting? So, just exactly what is the danger to the MONGER in such situations, where the provider is "being watched"? The hotel could certainly just kick the provider out if they wanted to, yes? But how could that, in any way, impact the monger?

[DarkClouds]

It's very odd, because the reviews on the other site are all positive and they seem to be talking about her. And yet the number I use for her is not on any of her profiles because I got it on Seeking. I messaged her to see what's up.

Here's another profile with many positive reviews using one of the same numbers from the other site.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/jasmine-...vidence-650850

Where did you get her number, the ad on TER is not her. She is spectacular. And you must have the wrong number. She is perhaps the best provider here.

[AcknowledgeMe]

I texted Jasmine and made an appt for an hour later. She asked for a $20 deposit. Normally I wouldn't, but since she's in such high standing I did it. I took a shower and when I got out, I checked my phone. She's texting me asking for my address. I said I thought it was an incall. She said ok and then gave an address of 600 New York Ave NE and said she's staying at the Red Carpet Inn. I'm like what the. And looked it up. It's in Wash DC. I said you're in Washington I said I'm in RI. She then replies "I drunk a lot baby" and then starts texting me saying she's coming to me. I thought, screw this. Then blocked her. Everything I've read I've never seen anything like this. I wonder if it's even worth it to try again.

If you try again (which I wouldn't) can you please for the love of Christ do not send this scammer a deposit. Thank you.

[JackBeQuick1]

I texted Jasmine and made an appt for an hour later. She asked for a $20 deposit. Normally I wouldn't, but since she's in such high standing I did it. I took a shower and when I got out, I checked my phone. She's texting me asking for my address. I said I thought it was an incall. She said ok and then gave an address of 600 New York Ave NE and said she's staying at the Red Carpet Inn. I'm like what the. And looked it up. It's in Wash DC. I said you're in Washington I said I'm in RI. She then replies "I drunk a lot baby" and then starts texting me saying she's coming to me. I thought, screw this. Then blocked her. Everything I've read I've never seen anything like this. I wonder if it's even worth it to try again.

Where did you get her number, the ad on TER is not her. She is spectacular. And you must have the wrong number. She is perhaps the best provider here.