Thread: NoVA SugarBabies
+
Add Report
Results 4,276 to 4,290 of 17603
-
03-24-24 09:57 #13328Senior Member

Posts: 3298Makes my blood run cold when I do a search on my real pics and a site has hits. It is really good that the sites permit you to exclude your results from a search, but of course this is something that you must maintain diligence about. Read the companion thread here on OPSEC. There was extensive discussion concerning facial rec there earlier.
Originally Posted by BDM1227
[View Original Post]
BTW, the person threatening you was most likely not a real sugarbaby, right? A guy w / w conniving mind like ours more likely.
There are ways to fight facial rec by modifying the real photos of you that are out there. It can prevent the software from forming the data needed to include you in their database. But everything that is really you out there needs to be pre-treated. Something to think about.
-
03-24-24 09:33 #13327Senior Member

Posts: 265She just happens to be my favorite performer at the moment. Going to try and lock this down. However, scam detection will be on high alert as any scammer can lift a popular porn stars pics.
Originally Posted by Dimples572
[View Original Post]
-
03-23-24 18:42 #13326Senior Member

Posts: 3298Yep, I get you, I thought he meant her private parts.
Originally Posted by Pathfinder04
[View Original Post]
-
03-23-24 13:45 #13325Senior Member

Posts: 1225Just searched on her name. Yep, she's a legitimate porn star.
Originally Posted by Dimples572
[View Original Post]
-
03-23-24 11:13 #13324Senior Member

Posts: 109Scammer hit me this week. Sends me aa text with all sorts of info threatening to out me. Told them to fuck off and eat my ass.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
Face check using my SA pics my linkedin came up came up using that.
-
03-23-24 11:10 #13323Senior Member

Posts: 109Private photos. Not good.
Originally Posted by Pathfinder04
[View Original Post]
-
03-23-24 09:50 #13322Senior Member

Posts: 284Privates not flattering? What does this mean?
Originally Posted by Emesdee
[View Original Post]
-
03-23-24 06:04 #13321Senior Member

Posts: 326Agree
Had an initial phone conversation. Heard the entire crazy life story and about several of her SD's. She was persistent about the fee for meeting, which I declined repeatedly. Never saw private photos, but it sounds like I'm not missing much.
Originally Posted by Emesdee
[View Original Post]
-
03-22-24 23:53 #13320Senior Member

Posts: 1021ThatStunnaGurl
Start chatting with this one, her name is Scarlett. Tells me she's in town (Fairfax) visiting for two weeks because her sister just had twins. We text and she sends me some ssssssmoking hot nudes. So I ask what's her ppm, that's when she mentions she's a pornstar, her screen name is Scarlett Alexis and she charges a deposit upfront fml. Says she can either host at the Airbnb she's renting or come to you. Once she mentioned the deposit I stopped with the conversation so idk what her actual ppm is but she's hot if you're willing to pay the deposit upfront.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f...d-0424c215a7f4
-
03-22-24 14:43 #13319Senior Member

Posts: 184Roxi
https://members.seeking.com/member/5...c-54a09d66369d
Conversation became business-like after initial few messages. Seems like she got jaded from the site pretty quick in the couple months she's been on. Asked for $1,000 PPM and I said good luck.
-
03-22-24 00:31 #13318Senior Member

Posts: 184Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.
Originally Posted by RudyWellz
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-24 18:25 #13317Senior Member

Posts: 974Look at her pics she's fat and old. She needs to pay me.
Originally Posted by JonFisher
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-24 12:42 #13316Senior Member

Posts: 445Summer
She is a waste of time and effort. Gives different responses to diff people at diff times. The last one I got was quote "It starts with an initial meeting where you are not allowed to touch me. That chance to woo me costs $300."
Originally Posted by RudyWellz
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-24 09:29 #13315Senior Member

Posts: 618She's certainly open about her life right? "I'm broke and lonely" after pissing away her life savings attempting to be a day trader. LOL Jeez!
Originally Posted by RudyWellz
[View Original Post]
In any case, I do recognize the pic of her holding the camera, but I don't remember seeing any specific reports on her.
-
03-20-24 20:01 #13314Senior Member

Posts: 130Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I did do the opt out on pimyes, not as a member, and didn't have to upload a picture. I recall just clicking on the hit that came up (linkedin) and they removed it from the search. Oddly, Facecheck didn't hit on that same picture buyt pimeyes did.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
I'll share a picture in the seeking chats if I trust the girl. But still one of those ridiculous mirror selfies hiding my face a bit (I'm too old for this shit, LOL). I fully believe sharing a real picture pays off with legit SBs, but it only takes one bad actor to level a world of regret on you.
Got to get some type of check going. While it is so painfully obvious to spot the 12 hour old hot chick profiles, the comfort gained by facecheck (when it was free) is sorely missed.









Reply With Quote



