Rubrankings.com
The Velvet Rooms
Top Escorts
Best Escorts

Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites

+ Add Report
Page 151 of 724 FirstFirst ... 51 101 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 201 251 651 ... LastLast
Results 2,251 to 2,265 of 10855
This blog is moderated by HollywoodGuy
  1. #8605
    Quote Originally Posted by WowU812  [View Original Post]
    I posted on this as well. I think SA is posting fake profiles and goes as far as having fake people text with you. Been confirmed Tinder and Bumble do this.
    I think SA is on its last legs. I just recently activated my account after 4 years away and the pond is filled with fake accounts. I believe SA girls moved to OF, showing your butthole for $3. 99 is easier than meeting people.

  2. #8604
    Quote Originally Posted by WowU812  [View Original Post]
    Anyone active on SA has encountered this. Message a girl on the site, get the phone number, discuss details but they don't follow through with meeting, always busy, etc etc, but keep texting every couple days saying lets meet.

    Years ago it was confirmed Tinder paid people to match, share a local phone number and stay engaged. Do you think SA does the same to keep guys paying?

    I have many, but 2 recent.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/8...1-f8895b7ad9f8

    https://members.seeking.com/member/b...7-8241cdb1e8dd
    Pornstar Felicity Feline.

    Escort Jayden Fox.

  3. #8603
    Quote Originally Posted by StudBucket  [View Original Post]
    I am also sorry to say guys that in my 5 years on Seeking, I have never came acroos so many fake profiles, scammers, catfishes. SA is becoming a cespool of the above. Just in the last couple of weeks, 3 out 5 girls I met could not do a Face Time video, take a call, so I ended up having to block them. So, always, always ask them to verify themselves via a video call to prove they are who they say they are or you can waste a lot of time. Remember, that there are many scammers out there who are dudes usually or girls looking for victims to send them money while posing as someone else, and SA does not have a verification policy.
    I posted on this as well. I think SA is posting fake profiles and goes as far as having fake people text with you. Been confirmed Tinder and Bumble do this.

  4. #8602
    Quote Originally Posted by Chupacabra  [View Original Post]
    Those are all solid reasons, alright. Looks like you're finding a TON of scammers, I wonder if SA is dying. Maybe most of the real babies are on Snapchat or Instagram now, or something.
    I am also sorry to say guys that in my 5 years on Seeking, I have never came acroos so many fake profiles, scammers, catfishes. SA is becoming a cespool of the above. Just in the last couple of weeks, 3 out 5 girls I met could not do a Face Time video, take a call, so I ended up having to block them. So, always, always ask them to verify themselves via a video call to prove they are who they say they are or you can waste a lot of time. Remember, that there are many scammers out there who are dudes usually or girls looking for victims to send them money while posing as someone else, and SA does not have a verification policy.

  5. #8601

    Not

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveTandberg  [View Original Post]
    Weren't the cracked cellphone lens photos a dead giveaway? &#129315
    Those were taken in a broken mirror I thought. Anyway, people often hide their eyes, it is key to facial rec. In many cases, eyes are also what make them attractive, in hers it was a definite negative.

    She is definitely a female, with a child, a nice little butt, and some decent boobs. Just a flake.

  6. #8600

    SB Reviews 02/04/2024

    Dolce Far Niente: A girl in her late 20's. Her private photos are fake. It's not her. Her profile states White but she looks Indian. She's an actress, tall and skinny. Her looks are a 6 and her body is a 7. Allowance negotiable.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/f...1-d4f9c94c159d

    Coolnewgirl: Latino girl in her late 20's from South America. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 8. She's tall and skinny and works out regularly. Allowance negotiable. She's condom only. Non-negotiable.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/d...d-74eaae6c015c

    Lolitalovesmoney: Tall white girl in her early 20's. She's asking for 1 k ppm. BB only with recent tests. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 7. She will only meet up if you're DTF.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...3-5ce6bd6591da

    GorgGirl: She's back again with a new profile. White girl in her mid or late 20's. She lives in WEHO. Her looks are a 6 and her body is a 6. Allowance negotiable.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...9-465de2b087f4

    Babygirl: Fake / Scammer. Asking you to send money before the meeting.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/5...7-0e45a3afa100

    Olga: Fake / Scammer.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...b-58f9e7a3eb91

    Shesthatgirl: Fake / Scammer.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...c-0bdd6a58ade6

  7. #8599

    Dead giveaway

    Quote Originally Posted by Alkalinedio  [View Original Post]
    That looks like a Tranny!

    Thanks for the warning.

    AD.
    Weren't the cracked cellphone lens photos a dead giveaway? &#129315

  8. #8598
    That looks like a Tranny!

    Thanks for the warning.

    AD.

  9. #8597
    Quote Originally Posted by UnknownSD  [View Original Post]
    One or more of the reasons below:

    1. They cannot meet in person.

    2. They are not looking for arrangements.

    3. Selling pics / videos.

    4. Scam you to join or sell other products or services.

    5. The recent location doesn't match their listed location.

    6. They are not willing to video chat or do a voice call.
    Those are all solid reasons, alright. Looks like you're finding a TON of scammers, I wonder if SA is dying. Maybe most of the real babies are on Snapchat or Instagram now, or something.

  10. #8596
    Quote Originally Posted by FarFarAway  [View Original Post]
    Jenny, 34 years old, Mission Viejo. I blocked her so can't give you the link.

    She is way older than 34, she has her eyes covered for a reason, something weird about them, bad lip plastic surgery, terrible comms, irresponsible on M&G.
    https://members.seeking.com/member/2...e-a73969c02409

  11. #8595

    Instagram

    I have mentioned a few POTs who turned out to be IG models. The most recent 3. I already described the Asian one, not for me but for some single guys at a very very good price point.

    I had given my GV# to another, but she hadn't texted. Trying to revive the conversation, I asked 'milk or dark chocolate', as her profile did say she loved flowers and chocolate. Her response was 'I love my chocolate in the form of Benjamins'. OK then.

    The last one was a score, so I have a batting average fine w / major league baseball. M&G, exactly the stunning model in her profile. We did talk by phone beforehand. Super nice, a quick coffee and talk in the car. She lives (not in LA) and is happy to host. I offered a fair 500 and away we went. Smoking!

    So, I would not be intimidated to see a profile from an IG model. And I am not any sort of a prize, no Brad Pitt. They might work out. But you can't be a jerk. IDK if you want to call that 'game', but it is certainly the opposite of the abundance of jerks on the site.

  12. #8594
    Quote Originally Posted by HoDough  [View Original Post]
    I'm curious what's your criteria for listing them as a "Fake / Scammer"?
    One or more of the reasons below:

    1. They cannot meet in person.

    2. They are not looking for arrangements.

    3. Selling pics / videos.

    4. Scam you to join or sell other products or services.

    5. The recent location doesn't match their listed location.

    6. They are not willing to video chat or do a voice call.

  13. #8593

    Stay away

    Jenny, 34 years old, Mission Viejo. I blocked her so can't give you the link.

    She is way older than 34, she has her eyes covered for a reason, something weird about them, bad lip plastic surgery, terrible comms, irresponsible on M&G.

  14. #8592
    I'm curious what's your criteria for listing them as a "Fake / Scammer"?

    Quote Originally Posted by UnknownSD  [View Original Post]
    A lot of fake profiles these past few days and not many new SBs as you can see from the list below.

    TINYDANCER: White blonde girl in her late 20's or early 30's. She's a stripper and works at Bare Elegance near LAX. She lives near the Melrose area. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 7. She's very short under 5'. She's asking for $800 ppm but it is negotiable if she likes you.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/c...c-acca4ea91a58

    SoCalGirl: White girl in her mid-20's. Lives in WLA. She's selective. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 7. Allowance is negotiable if you meet her cut first.

  15. #8591

    Rubi

    Rubi: I reviewed her previously in my SB Reviews and she's back again with a brand new profile with the same username. Some of the pics she used in this new profile are from the last profiles and with some new pics. I guess she didn't find anyone with her last profile which was only a few weeks ago. I'm not surprised since she's asking for a very very high allowance. I don't want to put the numbers here because some of you might be terrified. She's real if any of you want to give it a shot. She only does dinners for M&G at fine-dining restaurants in Beverly Hills or WEHO. No coffee meets. She's not afraid to order so be prepared for a large bill. Good luck!

    https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-f5b2d8cb4893

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions

Protected by Copyscape