Find Your New Baby
click for FREE hookups
Meet Sugar Babies
Top Escorts
click for FREE hookups
Top Tier Escorts

Thread: Asian Providers

+ Add Report
Page 172 of 569 FirstFirst ... 72 122 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 222 272 ... LastLast
Results 2,566 to 2,580 of 8524
This blog is moderated by Dog Rice
  1. #5959

    Gigisweetie

    Anybody got intel on this baddie on PD? Pricier than what's usually discussed here but I might pull the trigger if it means getting in the sheets with a solid 9/10 hottie.

    https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Calif...go/GigiSweetie

  2. #5958

    SDAG, TER, Sandra99 Lineup this week

    Here's the current line for us in San Diego with the K-Girls and Thai girls. I've seen a few of them but who would you select and why?

    In doing my research with various review platforms I have recently returned to the question, "Does she look hot in the pic". Since I was 10 and hiding Playboys under a mattress it's always been the visual. Nothing changes after 7 decades. It's the visual. Who would you select?

    Ash aka Yogi, 4'11" 34 C - 2 visits both BBFS, 2 pops.

    Zia, 5'4", 32 C, 22 yrs. Nice ass, points for the option and youth.

    Swan, 5'4" 32 C, 22 yrs. Longer hair, better possible CG rider.

    Giyo, 5'4" 32 C, - nicer black hair, has (o) and (a) option.

    Kathy, 5'4" 32 C, Thai and JPN!! - is option there.

    Olive 5'6" 34 D. Looks like basic k-girl.

    Ellie, Thai. Nice visit CFs, little to no lfk.

    Chi Chi aka Kira, Thai. Looks older, no info.

  3. #5957

    Serina

    Pics are somewhat accurate just add 10 years to her face. She's small, but in no way spinner skinny.

    Service was good, lots of DFK, decent BJ and seems to enjoy herself at all times. Would repeat if no one else was available, but I prefer dreamy skinny girls.

    Quote Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute  [View Original Post]
    Was going to make an appointment with her as well for tomorrow, but got busy. Please share experience.

  4. #5956
    Agree and feel that the appearances reported on TER are increasingly not matching my imagination based on the descriptions. Often, it's the same few specific and familiar users who first define the attractive parameters that pass through my HYA filter. However, they frequently turn out to be less aligned with my expectations. Perhaps I am simply setting my expectations too high or not sharing the same standard with those users.

    Quote Originally Posted by FreeWally  [View Original Post]
    I had a TER subscription and it did not help me at all in rating a girl. I think it's because I have different tastes, half the reviews for some girls are shills (some more than half, some less). The most obvious shill is when it doesn't even match the girl or her menu.

    For example, I prefer young and friendly, but many reviewers love old and nasty. So a girl I'd easily give an 8 or 9 to someone else will give a 5 to 7. I've looked up about 15 girls I've personally been with, and the review ratings did not correlate in any way at all. My method was to rank my experiences first, then see if there was any positive correlation. There was zero correlation (a girl high on my list is no more likely to have a higher rating, a girl low on my list is no more likely to have a low rating).

    What I did enjoy was reminiscing when a review accurately described a girl's quirks and routine, gave me insight on a girl I liked, and helped me remember some girls from the past. I was amazed to see a girl like Bunny from around 2013 having worked years and years but I never saw her again after the first time (probably because I switched to FEC for 90% of the time until recently). And a girl with years / pages of reviews is typically more skilled than a girl with just a handful of reviews. So it doesn't surprise me when I meet a girl from the Thai booker who is young, beautiful, but totally amateur and unskilled. I see she literally just started. Again, the ratings were worthless (for many girls, most if not every review was a shill, but the timestamp on the review was ironically useful for figuring out how long a girl worked since the shill consistently reviewed from her starting date).

    I've let my subscription lapse and don't care about it anymore. Reviews here have been very useful, in contrast. I'm sure there are a few shills but most were accurate to at least where the person clearly visited the girl. And gave me a useful heads up.

  5. #5955
    Quote Originally Posted by TrayParker68  [View Original Post]
    Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.
    Haven't myself. But fwiw, her TER is 353118.

  6. #5954
    Quote Originally Posted by TrayParker68  [View Original Post]
    Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.
    Was going to make an appointment with her as well for tomorrow, but got busy. Please share experience.

  7. #5953

    Serena at Lollygirls?

    Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.

  8. #5952
    Quote Originally Posted by SirBishop  [View Original Post]
    TER actually has reviews we can read? LOL. I stopped believing those things.
    I had a TER subscription and it did not help me at all in rating a girl. I think it's because I have different tastes, half the reviews for some girls are shills (some more than half, some less). The most obvious shill is when it doesn't even match the girl or her menu.

    For example, I prefer young and friendly, but many reviewers love old and nasty. So a girl I'd easily give an 8 or 9 to someone else will give a 5 to 7. I've looked up about 15 girls I've personally been with, and the review ratings did not correlate in any way at all. My method was to rank my experiences first, then see if there was any positive correlation. There was zero correlation (a girl high on my list is no more likely to have a higher rating, a girl low on my list is no more likely to have a low rating).

    What I did enjoy was reminiscing when a review accurately described a girl's quirks and routine, gave me insight on a girl I liked, and helped me remember some girls from the past. I was amazed to see a girl like Bunny from around 2013 having worked years and years but I never saw her again after the first time (probably because I switched to FEC for 90% of the time until recently). And a girl with years / pages of reviews is typically more skilled than a girl with just a handful of reviews. So it doesn't surprise me when I meet a girl from the Thai booker who is young, beautiful, but totally amateur and unskilled. I see she literally just started. Again, the ratings were worthless (for many girls, most if not every review was a shill, but the timestamp on the review was ironically useful for figuring out how long a girl worked since the shill consistently reviewed from her starting date).

    I've let my subscription lapse and don't care about it anymore. Reviews here have been very useful, in contrast. I'm sure there are a few shills but most were accurate to at least where the person clearly visited the girl. And gave me a useful heads up.

  9. #5951
    Quote Originally Posted by DRaj123  [View Original Post]
    Ter reviews of Swan and seminars are not that great.

    I'd pass.
    TER actually has reviews we can read? LOL. I stopped believing those things.

  10. #5950
    Quote Originally Posted by Clclcl  [View Original Post]
    Guess she was sick yesterday. Than she left and the repleced her with Serina.

    From SF and sophie will come soon.

    Need a HYA blog.

    Is swan, beam, olive or kathy k HYA?
    People can leave for many reasons. It's flu season and a lot of people I know have caught the cold. I'm surprised more girls aren't catching it because among family members I can see it hop from person to person on a daily basis.

    Swan is young as far as SDAG goes, as someone else mentioned she has a typical Korean face, her photos are close enough after P.S. Normal proportions, small natural tits, girl next door type, very friendly, would try again. But it's always hard to recommend since every guy is looking for something different.

  11. #5949
    Quote Originally Posted by Clclcl  [View Original Post]
    Guess she was sick yesterday. Than she left and the repleced her with Serina.

    From SF and sophie will come soon.

    Need a HYA blog.

    Is swan, beam, olive or kathy k HYA?
    Ter reviews of Swan and seminars are not that great.

    I'd pass.

  12. #5948
    Quote Originally Posted by BrainLara  [View Original Post]
    Both Kamela and Essie gone in 5 days. Too bad the boss decided to tinker with the only thing that made them stand out from the competition. Oh well, it was good while it lasted LOL.
    Guess she was sick yesterday. Than she left and the repleced her with Serina.

    From SF and sophie will come soon.

    Need a HYA blog.

    Is swan, beam, olive or kathy k HYA?

  13. #5947
    Both Kamela and Essie gone in 5 days. Too bad the boss decided to tinker with the only thing that made them stand out from the competition. Oh well, it was good while it lasted LOL.

    Quote Originally Posted by MisterO  [View Original Post]
    Dang looks like Kamela left already after like 4 days. Was hoping to see her.

  14. #5946

    Higher rates

    Oooof, looks like yourlollygirls when up to 340 an hour.

  15. #5945

    Kamela

    Quote Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute  [View Original Post]
    Here you go.

    Yourlollygirls.
    Dang looks like Kamela left already after like 4 days. Was hoping to see her.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
High Class Companions
Ava Escorts
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Mix and Match Combo Pack Viagra 100mg Generic Cialis (Vidalista 20 mg) USA to USA Only Mvitra 20 mg (Generic Levitra or vardenafil 20 mg pills)

Protected by Copyscape