Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 10,666 to 10,680 of 50161
-
12-31-23 14:49 #39496Senior Member

Posts: 126Baby Joo has massive tits. Natural it seemed too.
Originally Posted by Throwawayhok89
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-23 14:40 #39495Senior Member

Posts: 381Will the real Sophie please stand up
The MW Sophie. The one everyone gave good reviews. Not the sub par one in WLA.
F: 6. 5 - she cute, she has big teeth kinda? Good smile. Makes really great fuck faces.
B: 7. 5 - Shapely, Big C tits / Small D, a little stomach pouch, good ass, pretty tight body. Smallish 5'2 - 5'3.
A: 9 - Fun, willing to please almost however, great DFK, great cute attitude. Seemed super engaged and made me almost believe she was my girlfriend.
S: 9 - No FIV, FIA. Great DFK / LFK. TIght snatch. I lasted 8 minutes with her. Picked her up and she fucked me so hard. Nice view in doggy, mish was great with all the aural feedback. CG ride - 9. ALmost as good as Rie but she couldn't maintain it as much but fuck she is great.
E: Hardly any english.
Repeat: Absolutely. My new ATF.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-23 14:04 #39494Senior Member

Posts: 207In term of the LA's stale inventory, the hobby scene in LA is the product of behaviors of the hobbyists in general.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
I see the real problem in LA scene because a lot of mongers in LA are constantly warship these stale girls and the bookers in LA by constantly praising the bookers, the girls and buying and promoting the baby brands. So, why wouldn't the bookers and the bosses who always read this board will go to provide a better quality girls? They really don't need to because we are fu**ing anything that opens the door. As for me, I don't see any girl more than 3-4 times and move on but according to some that is being a SIMPS for being indifferent or being low profile.
So, as the saying goes "you made your bed, now lie in it". And as we continue praising these old hags and promoting the fake BABYS, don't expect that 2024 will be any better than 2023. It will be perhaps worse but I guess it is what it is.
Good luck to all and happy hunting.
-
12-31-23 13:22 #39493Senior Member

Posts: 448Top 10 Posters In This Thread For 2023
User Posts PumpNDump 366 Vulcan1009 320 SolarisMan 303 SsStuntCock 250 MiamiHeat2020 141 JoseMan 134 BonerAppetitty 134 Christophe1 114 Bastard Chorum 100 HiKeke 99
Thanks for keeping us informed in 2023.
- 2022 Results.
-
12-31-23 12:18 #39492Senior Member

Posts: 116To me it would be worth it just to hard XXX her small box and maybe wreck it, LOL.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-23 10:03 #39491Senior Member

Posts: 748It's slim pickings due to holidays, and some mongers need their fix, so they are willing to pay whatever. I will stick to tried and true and get value instead of participating in the rate inflation that has been rapidly growing the past few years, with a short-timer who thinks she should get a raise because she is here a just a certain time period. There are better experiences for less.
Originally Posted by AlexisDavis
[View Original Post]
-
12-31-23 01:18 #39490Senior Member

Posts: 518Don't be delusional and assume non existing scenario
I know you guys invested money in this hobby and want to show off your experiences with others by chit chat and posting a lot of stories. I know I know, you want to make your investment worth it since you love it or try to be cool.
But for simple people like me, I just want to book and see a lot of k girls and chill. My goal is to support my sexual desire and k girls. I want to have as much sex as possible in my lifetime.
If I feel like sharing, I will share. No pressures. Let's take it easy and book an appointment to support K Girls Economy system.
Don't put too much pressure on other people, worry about yourself, and stay in your lane.
Don't over complicate things and think too much about this pay for sex. It's not good for your mentality and you could develop into a stalker yourself LOL.
-
12-31-23 00:47 #39489Senior Member

Posts: 1834Gatekeeping
I wanted to touch on this topic as it's gotten a lot of traction recently. However, I think that my thoughts regarding this topic is the opposite of most here. Hear me out on this and decide for yourself. Therefore, I want to quash the notion of gatekeeping before it grows into a large and unwieldy abstract construct used to place blame on something that doesn't exist and not address the root of the problem.
Everything stems from the lack of active members who post reviews. There doesn't exist a person or group of people that have the time and wherewithal to see every kgirl that comes through LA / OC AND takes the time to write and post a review. Therefore, a community effort must form to fill that widening gap. However, it needs to consist of an amalgam of mongers with differing tastes and level of adventurousness shall we say. We need the TOFTT'ers, the MILF lovers, the HYA seekers, the adipohiliacs, the caboose chasers, etc. For every category absent, a piece of the total picture disappears and our grasp of the available talent softens. To be blunt, right now, we're a bunch of blind mice reliant on a few who can still see to lead us to cheese.
The natural consequence to this is a lack of information especially regarding new arrivals. As a result, it's misconstrued as gatekeeping when someone finally enlightens us on a gem that may have already been here for days or, god forbid, weeks. I've spoken a lot in the past about the lack of reviewers so I'm not going to beat on a dead horse. However, I do want to or at least try to correct a running theme that has been wrongly attributed to gatekeeping. I trust most of us who do post reviews understand that the pros of doing so outweighs the cons of not. Simply put more business means a longer stay. I'm positive that those who have been seeing kgirls for a good length will attest to having met one stating that they'll stay longer if business is good.
Ultimately, even if we don't get more reviewers, I don't want us pointing fingers and menacingly shaking our fists at imaginary opponents relying on ill-conceived and unnecessary justifications. We can use that energy and time for better things. Like fucking kgirls and reviewing them.
-
12-30-23 23:39 #39488Senior Member

Posts: 1387New WLA sophie vs semi new MW sophie
To your answer, those reviews were before WLA sophie3 showed up on the line up.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
Original big tit sophie started in WLA but shortly after moved to MW.
So I believe all reviews were for original sophie who started from WLA then moved to MW.
TBH, each to their own as YMMV but from years of experience, if the original Sophie1 from WLA were popular, she would not move to MW and would have lot more reviews like Ina or Hana or at least Maia, good or bad but review"S", not just two good one and one bad one.
I like big tits and many of them like Iris, Alice, Jun / June are all out there like Sophie but somehow none of them are popular like Ina / Hana / Maia. (IE service, weight, attitude etc).
So I believe that neither MW 1 or WLA Sophia3 are good or at least not enough intel because no one care to write about it. (was never interested in Sophia 3 now in WLA, smaller tits).
Gate keeping is one thing, but look at how Ina blown up? Someone is always going to show off their experience and that's what we are here for (I do my part, I do not gate keep, the busier they get, the longer they stay and more for me too, why gate keep?
Things are tight now so I rather wait and see more reviews but so far big tit Sophie1 at MW is a wait and see type of girl instead of charging ahead and gamble with luck.
-
12-30-23 20:32 #39487Senior Member

Posts: 672Thank you, KGA. I am relieved to hear this.
Originally Posted by KGirlAddict
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-23 18:53 #39486Senior Member

Posts: 214Boobies
I always appreciate your intel and inputs. Ahhh my expectations were blurred with the many conversation of titties with Asha and Ooyu. I will continue my search for the biggest. Never give up and got to catch them all.
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-23 17:30 #39485Senior Member

Posts: 193Candy with CGLA
I saw her as Candy last visit when in LA. If you like her pictures you won't be disappointed as those are her real photos but photo shopped younger and hotter (SOP for all advertising). She was great with me, no attitude and was actually very accommodating, seemed fine checking off all boxes but can't remember if she RIM because it was some time ago. BBFSCIP for sure and I found her attractive but beauty is in the eye of beholder. For example, Boner posted a pic of a girl's ass last time. Some mongers might say that ass was juicy perfect, others would say thic, but I'd probably say that same girl was fat and never even try to book her.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-23 16:50 #39484Senior Member

Posts: 107She's booked for like a week, more then 3 days like at least 5 LOL.
Originally Posted by AlexisDavis
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-23 16:41 #39483Senior Member

Posts: 801Asha / Larsa
Asha's tits are pretty f'ing great, IMO. Not D or DD or whatever the ad says. But definitely a full C, and they are beautifully done. Her surgeon is an artist of the highest order. Add her fun personality and high skill level into the mix, and I'd say she's solid ATF material for guys in their 40's, 50's, etc. If you prefer a true 20-something girl, then yeah, maybe you're looking elsewhere. But I'd say for most dudes who want a good combination of looks and skill, Asha is a killer k-girl. I always leave her place happy and exhausted!
Originally Posted by BastardChorum
[View Original Post]
-
12-30-23 15:29 #39482Senior Member

Posts: 1027Any idea if she only going to be booked with sag or if she will be on other booker? If not I'm going to have to get verified with sag!
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]











Reply With Quote








