Korean Agency BB

[GentleSun]

I just had a great session with Meghan at SAG. Good looking girl with a nice body. Petite with probably large B's, maybe late 20's early 30's. Usual blue toast with a nice BBBJ preview in the shower. I'm not sure why so many girls skip this part. They used to all do it, but now it's like 50/50. Anyways, it was nice. Moved to the bed and sat on the edge with her slurping on junior. Great view! She has a pretty face made prettier with my cock in her mouth. I pulled her up to the bed and laid her back with her legs spread and enjoyed some daty. Shaved and clean and she was responsive with body twitches and got really wet. Everything from here was pretty standard BBFS, multiple positions until I popped in doggy.

Right about then things got more interesting. I'd been rubbing her butthole with my thumb while giving her the long strokes in doggy and enjoying the great view. She asked if I want to put it there. And right about then I popped! Fuck! Just the prospect of Greek made me lose it, LOL. Afterwards, she told me she sometimes offers it, but only covered and for an upcharge. Her English isn't the best, but she made it clear it's an extra $80, so an all-in 1 hr session BBFS w / covered Greek is $400. She said she Sometimes offers it, so probably YMMV. I am mulling over a return visit and sampling the forbidden fruit. I honestly didn't think any of the younger Kgirls offered it. Maybe this is a sign of changing times?

[MisterDotD]

I saw a lot of positive reviews for her on the TER and LA forum, so I gave her a try. I was not disappointed.

Face and Body: She wears make-up, 7/10 (looks 95% accurate in pic), is cute, and tall around 5'-06". Big body frame, red hair as in pic, tits are MM, DD (feel very good to squeeze). Ass soft, decent. Slightly bit of tummy fat but not too much. Shave kitty. No abnormal odor. Age prob 32-35, very hot and cute MILF. Small tattoo around are foot.

English: decent 5/10. Can hold a conversation.

Attitude: Engaging, aiming to please, no rush, professional.

Service: All (BBFS). Here is what I got: DKF, BBBJ, deep throat, Rimming, FIV, DATY, 69, CG, RCG, Missionary, and Nuru. I came in and loved her engaging attitude. Clothes off and she immediately wipes and starts sucking, cute moans. Shower+preview. Off to bed, then process to all the above-mentioned services, and finally burst my nut in that hot creamy pussy. Massage and chit-chat at the end. It was fun. I left super happy.

Cost: $300/1 hr + 50 (BB special) with some tips.

Repeat: 100% if I craving for MILF. She will leave on 12/16 to Vegas. But plan to return to OC around Feb.

[HapaBoy86]

Tora at Topangels.

Not as young as pics show but still very pretty and enjoyed a nice bare pounding with the request of shoot outside.

Full GFE, I would return.

[TWill182]

It was! A couple bookers / agencies have taken down the ad for Diane and replaced with a Dana. I think those pics are of her (at least her face) but they definitely shopped them to make her look skinnier.

Seriously. I booked Dana thinking she was another girl. She wasn't the 5'2" as advertised. More like 5' 6". She was on her phone the entire time and didn't want to do any service at all. Complained to the booker and left early. Waste of time and money.

[Shonny Jins]

Sounds like a disaster!

It was! A couple bookers / agencies have taken down the ad for Diane and replaced with a Dana. I think those pics are of her (at least her face) but they definitely shopped them to make her look skinnier.

[SolarisMan]

This girl is using the same name and pictures, but definitely not the same Diane I saw in LA a few months ago. Fat, ugly, and with bad service. I saw think I saw a Diana being advertised on a site (can't remember which one) with different pictures, and this girl looked like those photos. Avoid at all cost!

Sounds like a disaster!

[Shonny Jins]

Saw Diane today through Topangels, she is also listed with other bookers and one of the website have listed ter as 377691. But the person I saw was nowhere close to the Diane in those ter reviews. Can anyone confirm if they saw the same Diane in OC? The one I saw was more like 180 lb. B cup tits and horrible service. This is a different person using Diane's pictures. Thought I would go for massage but all she did was apply pressure on a spot for 10-15 sec and move onto the next. I wonder if I got bait and switch? Booker did give me the choice to walk out if I did not like what I saw at the door. Should have walked out. Lesson learned.

This girl is using the same name and pictures, but definitely not the same Diane I saw in LA a few months ago. Fat, ugly, and with bad service. I saw think I saw a Diana being advertised on a site (can't remember which one) with different pictures, and this girl looked like those photos. Avoid at all cost!

[JackTms]

Saw Diane today through Topangels, she is also listed with other bookers and one of the website have listed ter as 377691. But the person I saw was nowhere close to the Diane in those ter reviews. Can anyone confirm if they saw the same Diane in OC? The one I saw was more like 180 lb. B cup tits and horrible service. This is a different person using Diane's pictures. Thought I would go for massage but all she did was apply pressure on a spot for 10-15 sec and move onto the next. I wonder if I got bait and switch? Booker did give me the choice to walk out if I did not like what I saw at the door. Should have walked out. Lesson learned.

The new Diane is not the same as the previously well reviewed Diane. That one is in New York right now.

[AssYan]

Saw Diane today through Topangels, she is also listed with other bookers and one of the website have listed ter as 377691. But the person I saw was nowhere close to the Diane in those ter reviews. Can anyone confirm if they saw the same Diane in OC? The one I saw was more like 180 lb. B cup tits and horrible service. This is a different person using Diane's pictures. Thought I would go for massage but all she did was apply pressure on a spot for 10-15 sec and move onto the next. I wonder if I got bait and switch? Booker did give me the choice to walk out if I did not like what I saw at the door. Should have walked out. Lesson learned.

Booked through orangecuties and was thinking the same.

[JohnBlas1991]

Saw Diane today through Topangels, she is also listed with other bookers and one of the website have listed ter as 377691. But the person I saw was nowhere close to the Diane in those ter reviews. Can anyone confirm if they saw the same Diane in OC? The one I saw was more like 180 lb. B cup tits and horrible service. This is a different person using Diane's pictures. Thought I would go for massage but all she did was apply pressure on a spot for 10-15 sec and move onto the next. I wonder if I got bait and switch? Booker did give me the choice to walk out if I did not like what I saw at the door. Should have walked out. Lesson learned.

[PePe44]

It's been a while since I've partaken and added a report, but this community is awesome and I hadn't seen a report yet for Gemma so decided to TOFTT.

P: not even close. If you're looking to book based on photos thinking there might be a close resemblance, look elsewhere.

L: Face 5 / 10 ; Body 5. 5 / 10 ; best view is in doggy and you'll read why.

I'd say C cups that were done nice if you're looking at them, but felt a bit hard. Age wise confidently state she's closer to upper 30's or low 40's but not fugly by any means.

She has a few torso tattoos around the belly button and abdomen, likely to cover a scar as her belly was definitely NOT tight. Either lost a shit ton of weight and had some excess skin, or had a baby and covered that c-section scar. Honestly I turned her to doggy the majority of times because her ass was just that right peach booty shape, and well. It hid the frontal abdomen.

Overall, Gemma is not thin, athletic, nor is she fat; but more slim thick.

E: non-existent.

A: this is where I would say she makes up for where she's lacking. Her attitude was bubbly and positive.

S: Gemma seems quite new to this, so the shower was awkward as it started with her pointing to the shower and motioning for me to enter alone. I motioned for her to join and without taking her dress off she hopped in and gave a mediocre soap down. No preview.

Dried off and in the room she sat me down on the bed and began to lick. I repeat lick my dick up and down. There was no sucking whatsoever even after I motioned for it, she continued to just lick.

A few minutes of that nonsense I turned her around and sat her on my dick to which surprisingly she was super wet. Had her ride me on the edge of the bed reverse so I could see her ass for a few minutes and even let me stick the tip of my thumb up her ass.

After that, things started to get boring as her CG consisted of her grinding with very minor bouncing. Even trying to take the lead and positioning her legs wasn't helping as she seemed to get tired quickly and always resorted back to the grinding. Flipped her over for some mish which wasn't too bad as she tried to spread her legs wide but clamped them when I started to go pound town which was a huge boner killer.

Think I started to get disenchanted with the session so I turned her over to doggy which was my favorite given I was in control over how far I spread her ass and could thumb fuck her asshole while I pounded her. Blew cip, showered, and bounced.

E: bb special.

Are: emphatically NO. Gemma is a nice girl, but with the others out there I cannot recommend.

Great report Nonsense! Thanks for TOFTT.

[Nonsense3099]

It's been a while since I've partaken and added a report, but this community is awesome and I hadn't seen a report yet for Gemma so decided to TOFTT.

P: not even close. If you're looking to book based on photos thinking there might be a close resemblance, look elsewhere.

L: Face 5 / 10 ; Body 5. 5 / 10 ; best view is in doggy and you'll read why.

I'd say C cups that were done nice if you're looking at them, but felt a bit hard. Age wise confidently state she's closer to upper 30's or low 40's but not fugly by any means.

She has a few torso tattoos around the belly button and abdomen, likely to cover a scar as her belly was definitely NOT tight. Either lost a shit ton of weight and had some excess skin, or had a baby and covered that c-section scar. Honestly I turned her to doggy the majority of times because her ass was just that right peach booty shape, and well. It hid the frontal abdomen.

Overall, Gemma is not thin, athletic, nor is she fat; but more slim thick.

E: non-existent.

A: this is where I would say she makes up for where she's lacking. Her attitude was bubbly and positive.

S: Gemma seems quite new to this, so the shower was awkward as it started with her pointing to the shower and motioning for me to enter alone. I motioned for her to join and without taking her dress off she hopped in and gave a mediocre soap down. No preview.

Dried off and in the room she sat me down on the bed and began to lick. I repeat lick my dick up and down. There was no sucking whatsoever even after I motioned for it, she continued to just lick.

A few minutes of that nonsense I turned her around and sat her on my dick to which surprisingly she was super wet. Had her ride me on the edge of the bed reverse so I could see her ass for a few minutes and even let me stick the tip of my thumb up her ass.

After that, things started to get boring as her CG consisted of her grinding with very minor bouncing. Even trying to take the lead and positioning her legs wasn't helping as she seemed to get tired quickly and always resorted back to the grinding. Flipped her over for some mish which wasn't too bad as she tried to spread her legs wide but clamped them when I started to go pound town which was a huge boner killer.

Think I started to get disenchanted with the session so I turned her over to doggy which was my favorite given I was in control over how far I spread her ass and could thumb fuck her asshole while I pounded her. Blew cip, showered, and bounced.

E: bb special.

Are: emphatically NO. Gemma is a nice girl, but with the others out there I cannot recommend.

[FreeWally]

I used to assume the same thing that another person was sleeping over in the living room. After talking to one of them with that setup, she told me she used the bedroom for work and the living room is where she sleep.

I remember seeing that setup before but for the last few years at the agencies I use it's 2 girls for 2 bedrooms. If the girl doesn't set up her room, it's because she doesn't care or is lazy. One girl spent her first 3 hours cleaning her room. She spent 5 weeks there so why not make it right. Another girl did the full decoration for her enjoyment, and it was like entering an Asian girl's room back in the day.

They definitely have the space to do 3 but I don't think it's practical for offering good service. The girls have hours to kill so it would suck not to be able to have lunch because the living room is occupied. Traffic can get tricky and being discreet is a factor anyways.

For the other question, in San Diego agencies (multiple ones I've tried) 60 minutes is barely more than 40 minutes (240 vs 280 for one of them). But if it's not busy anyways, it balances out and makes sure people who need 60 get it. I check the OC forums here because my favorites go to work there and I would totally drive down if they show up.

San Diego is not too busy so I guess it makes sense. They are not losing out on much business by giving an extra 20 minutes for almost nothing, they want return customers anyways. There aren't enough customers to need to rush on time. I notice other cities don't do this, probably because it's busier and 20 minutes means less customers. I'm shocked at how much East Coast charges, and the 60 minutes is way more than 30.

[KalvinHobbs]

Do they not live there? Is that why sometimes they have bedding in the common area? I just assumed more than 2 roommates lived there.

I used to assume the same thing that another person was sleeping over in the living room. After talking to one of them with that setup, she told me she used the bedroom for work and the living room is where she sleep.

[Member #6646]

One time it was their dog. I do like with the Kgirl agencies many of the girls make the room their own.

I used to worry about money but it's never happened to me over 50 visits. Doesn't mean it won't. But I do split my money between the upfront payment in one pocket and the rest for tip / contingency in a zipper pocket. Make sure you have your stuff before you leave, I've forgotten things before by my own fault.

But compared to all the other places in the world I've gone, why would I worry if some money goes missing one time. It could be my mistake or something else, not worth stressing about. Compared to TJ and some places where you worry about your safety instead (I will not go to TJ anymore for both my experiences and the experiences of others I knew). So to me it's no different than if I come back to my car and there's a new small bump. Compared to what I've been through before, it's nothing. And with no way of knowing, it could have been an honest mistake. So I'm moving on.

Even an average person will make millions in their lifetime. Your happiness and safety are more important than a hundred or two lost or blown away in the wind.

If you are sure something went wrong though, of course report it. But in all my visits everyone's been on the same page of let's get to business and get out, thank you. Their business is in volume.

Do they not live there? Is that why sometimes they have bedding in the common area? I just assumed more than 2 roommates lived there.

If you forget things can you not go back to retrieve them?

I don't know, stealing from a client rubs me the wrong way (assuming they really did and OP just didn't misplace it). Not cool. I would be afraid of my safety at that point and would have a serious talk with the booker.

As far as volume, I assumed a provider makes more for an hour visit than the HHR? I guess mathematically seeing 2 thirty minute appointments would bring in more than 1 one hour appointment for gross income.