Korean Agency BB

**AsianAssEater** · 10-25-23 00:21

Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]

There are AMPs out there that do have decent lineups. Service aside, they can give most kgirls a good run for their money on looks.

Yep, there's a chain of AMP that run all along from Norcal to San Diego which has all the same girls just traveling throughout north and Socal. 150 for hot Chinese girls that all do BBBJ but no BBFS. I got tired of CfS so I did a little research and found Kgirls advertising their raw pussys and I've never looked back hahaha. Look up ocean spa in SD on RM if you interested in scoping it out. I recommend amber LOL.

**Bastard Chorum** · 10-24-23 23:53

Originally Posted by MiamiHeat2020 [View Original Post]

I always thought AMPs were old unattractive providers?

There are AMPs out there that do have decent lineups. Service aside, they can give most kgirls a good run for their money on looks.

**Bastard Chorum** · 10-24-23 23:50

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.

If all things are equal, then BB easily takes the cake. I would also argue that even if it's an upcharge, the BB girl will get slightly more business. BB has become so ubiquitous that it has forced some providers who were either GFE only or UTR BB into explicitly offering it to stay competitive and retain their average income stream from years prior. Only those that have superior looks, service, or a combination therefore have staved off going BB. The remaining girls dispersed to other areas where BB is less prevalent or hush hush. However, we're speculating where everything is equal so BB will either win outright or slightly lead. This is all based on my assumption that most guys will gravitate towards BB because it is unequivocally better than suiting up. Regardless of the platitudes warning of unprotected sex, a good portion of guys will still opt for it. Furthermore, this is supported by how active the BB threads are compared to the non-BB ones, the amount of reviews avalaible. Here and else where, and, most importantly, feedback from the girls and mongers themselves.

**MiamiHeat2020** · 10-24-23 23:05

Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]

Just look on TER the girls constantly getting reviews are BB. I never understand why you would pay same price for GFE as bb when you can just go to an AMP and smash with a rubber.

I always thought AMPs were old unattractive providers?

**BobLove** · 10-24-23 21:30

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.

BY Far BB girls are way more popular--especially BB no upcharge. GFE only girls generally struggle and end up touring whack cities.

**AsianAssEater** · 10-24-23 20:49

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.

Just look on TER the girls constantly getting reviews are BB. I never understand why you would pay same price for GFE as bb when you can just go to an AMP and smash with a rubber.

**Bince33** · 10-24-23 18:49

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

All bookers for all I know throughout the years said most of the time they never met the ladies and pictures are always provided to them.

So lets drop this what booker use real or fake, its not them, it's the girls, LOL.

Booker just doing the booking, all they know is the feedbacks from the customer said its really her or fake.

I remember seeing a K-girl once and she asked me to see what pics of her were being used on the website because she had no idea, so it's not always the girls.

What needs to be dropped are the complaints about fake pics. Most of the girls don't want to use their real photos for obvious privacy reasons. There's no way in this universe they can be forced to reveal their identities lolol.

**InternDavid** · 10-24-23 18:47

I wonder if she went back to BBFS with upcharge because she wasn't getting as much business as GFE only. I'm actually curious now, are BBFS girls more popular or GFE only girls more popular. Let's say if two girls were similar in looks / service.

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.

**InternDavid** · 10-24-23 18:40

Yes, for the most part. Of course, photosophed. She has a rounder face and not as pointy of chin. She is very cute.

Originally Posted by MiamiHeat2020 [View Original Post]

Ah I hadn't seen baby peach- are the pics what she looks like?

I also saw baby peach listed seperately: https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babypeach/

**InternDavid** · 10-24-23 18:38

Looks like it. I was debating whether to see her again when she went to GFE only. Now that she's back to BBFS, I'll be seeing her again.

The CG stats are more accurate. She is not 5'5. Probably 5'2. Breasts are likely Cs and not Ds.

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.

**MiamiHeat2020** · 10-24-23 15:55

Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]

Alba aka Baby Peach.

Ah I hadn't seen baby peach- are the pics what she looks like?

I also saw baby peach listed seperately: https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babypeach/

**SsStuntCock** · 10-24-23 15:51

Originally Posted by MiamiHeat2020 [View Original Post]

https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/albak/

Looks fairly cute with Ds and nice hips; supposedly real pics too.

Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]

Alba aka Baby Peach.

So she debuted as an upcharge girl, then had a very short stint as GFE only, now back to upcharge? Also, who has the more accurate advertisement for her stats?

GKS.

Body Size: 34 D-24-34; Weight: 103 lbs; Height: 5' 5".

CG.

Height:5'3"; Breast size:32 Breast cup: C-cup; Weight: 92 lbs.