Asian Providers

[Laf85]

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.

I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

[Miguel Honcho]

I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.

A lot of good info is gone. For the most part, you can read between the lines and tell what is exaggerated and what is actual review.

[PoonTangJohnny]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

"Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic. " < ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY! These types of blatant mandated censorship threats by sdag, is far more egregious IMO, than the shilling that cost 2 AMP's permanent banishment over in the AMP thread; the fact that these arrogant pricks feel emboldened and made no attempt at discretion in doing so. There's no doubt in my mind, that sdag and their shills, were 100% behind the constant attacks / sabotage / vandalism, which drove their main competition, VIP, out of business and ultimately out of San Diego.

I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.

But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?

This could have been prevented too.

If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.

If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.

What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?

This is 100% percent sdag own doing. Do you really expect TER to read every single fucking review written for sdag, then spend countless hundreds of man hours trying to figure out and determine, fact from shill? GMAFB!

TER made the right call, just like Admin would be here, banning this type of BS business model which basically mandates that every single member here to write a BS shill review for every single 1 of their ladies, regardless of whether they provide horrible service, or not. < Somebody here please explain to me why this fucking BS should be tolerated!?

Once again, SDAG policy mandate, quote:

"ASK THE EXPERT.

We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.

Some ladies you are going to love.

Some ladies you are going to like.

Some ladies are just ok.

Some ladies you aren't going to match with.

Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.

* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.

If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.

Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.

We will do our best to figure out who you are.

Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.

8 or higher.

If you don't then tell the assistant. ".

Could you imagine, had an AMP had the audacity to mandate this type of threatening mandate / policy against it's customers!? It's a direct order from the business, to shill. Period.

[SsStuntCock]

Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

[RocketManP]

I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.

But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?

This could have been prevented too.

If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.

If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.

What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?

[M4473]

So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?

[Sir Bishop]

Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.

Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.

And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.

The booker will wear this on his sleeve.

Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.

[RocketManP]

Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.

Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.

And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.

The booker will wear this on his sleeve.

[Jstwntlvn1]

TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.

I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.

[Sir Bishop]

I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.

TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.

[RolfTorren]

Always wait a few days before posting anything. Either positive or negative. I learnt the hard way.

I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.

[Jstwntlvn1]

I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.

[RocketManP]

Here it is, I saved it in archive:

https://archive.ph/VfFlw

[DRaj123]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.

[Laf85]

Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.

Just want to point out from a leverage standpoint that if a business is providing a product that customers consider to be subpar and the business claims it hurts revinues and that you need to stop sharing that their product is subpar otherwise your money is no longer good. Got to ask yourself if said business can really afford to say no to already paying customers? As paying customers don't forget that your spending power is worth.