Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 3,271 to 3,285 of 8822
-
09-28-23 10:21 #5552Senior Member

Posts: 732Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
09-27-23 23:43 #5551Senior Member

Posts: 2547Gisella LG / CG / Kdolls in Irvine
She may not tour SD like so many other missed opportunties. Worth the drive IMO at 320 bb + 40 msog in thru LG; CG has her at 340 all in. If you like that pic, she's your girl. Take my review below with a grain of salt, as that was over a year ago. And it's well documented that her headgame has improved since then.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
09-27-23 22:06 #5550Banned Member

Posts: 770Without traffic it should take you around 45 minutes to get to north San Jose from San Ramon. That's the closest and best place for Kgirls in the bay area.
Originally Posted by SuchaDilf
[View Original Post]
There's an aggregation site which tries to keep up with Korean agencies in the US.
Rentry. Co / Kgirls.
-
09-27-23 15:28 #5549Senior Member

Posts: 50Not Adam sdag
I'm visiting east bay and was hoping for an agency similar to sdag.
-
09-27-23 14:12 #5548Banned Member

Posts: 770Oh boo hoo their biz depends on the reviews. Well duh. They're gaining tons of biz from positive reviews too. Funny how they want to use reviews to only benefit them, but if they are detrimental they can't take it.
Originally Posted by BigCoomer
[View Original Post]
Guess what, freedom of expression your biz. Mongers have a right to evaluate a product publicly with bookers / girls taking a bad review like they can take a dick.
Imagine if instead of removing expired product from shelves, a store would implement a policy that you can't shop there anymore if you point out the said expired product.
This is a scumbag technique and it's not new for this shop. They included it in their introductory email back when they were called differently and for their OC branch too.
-
09-27-23 13:31 #5547Senior Member

Posts: 489I also had the opportunity to see Stella this week and she is a sweetheart. Super pretty all natural type of girl. She's got a sexy devilish smile and her lips feel great when kissing.
Originally Posted by MCHammerHang
[View Original Post]
I think I can say I've tried all the Latinas that have come through SDAG in the last year. I still have Cuban Ginger and Betty as my top best experience and service. I'd probably have Max at the bottom. And between Stella and Kitten it's a tough one for me. I had an amazing experience with Kitten. When it comes to looks and body I think Kitten has them beat. For service and experience I can see why some might be let down especially since she don't offer bare and BBJ was so so. Low key I got to fuck her bare. But that was only because when she was first advertised she had the (O). She was taken by surprised when I gave her the tip for bare and said she didn't do that. I was surprised too but said no worries b / c she was hot AF and because of that I would still enjoy it covered. But after she rode me for a little bit covered she said fuck it and said she'd let me in raw but only because she was really attracted to me. Felt so good to hit it without the cover. Probably the hottest chick I've ever got to fuck raw!
-
09-27-23 13:26 #5546Senior Member

Posts: 50Is there an agency similar to Adam in east bay
I'm visiting east bay near San Ramon next week and I was hoping for any agency recommendations similar to sdag.
Thank you.
-
09-27-23 00:52 #5545Senior Member

Posts: 127Unfortunate. I read on the OC boards a while back that she previously did CIP.
Originally Posted by BigCoomer
[View Original Post]
-
09-27-23 00:39 #5544Senior Member

Posts: 115100% agree with this. I miss the Thai agencies of old.
Originally Posted by TacoManVa
[View Original Post]
-
09-27-23 00:38 #5543Senior Member

Posts: 240I concur
Just saw her today and she's a 9 in my book in looks, GND type of girl and body which is banging. She speaks fluent English and her mains are a turn on. See while you can, she leaves on the 29th which I most likely will.
Originally Posted by Magnum44
[View Original Post]
-
09-26-23 23:33 #5542Senior Member

Posts: 64Stella was stellar
Saw Stella today and I wholeheartedly agree with Magnum's review. My experience with Kitten was a letdown, so this renewed my experience. Will be seeing her when she returns. Highly recommend seeing her before she leaves on Thursday!
Originally Posted by Magnum44
[View Original Post]
-
09-26-23 23:19 #5541Senior Member

Posts: 135SDAG reviews
I agree with everybody it is a pretty stupid statement from SDAG regarding their review policy, but isn't that the very purpose of this forum to be able to provide reviews without giving a score? Scores are so hard to interpret since its subjective, but actual written reviews / reports on forums give so much more light on what kind of look & service a girl provides.
Scoring on TER is never really a good indicator. A girl I thought was average at best in looks would sometimes get a mid 8's on TER, which is pretty good for k-orgs. For example, I thought SDAG Dallas, though exotic and unique, was not exceptionally pretty. But TER has her at 8. 3, which is on the higher end of k-org looks. And same could be said other way around.
-
09-26-23 20:27 #5540Senior Member

Posts: 146This doesn't seem like it would work. It would likely just destroy business for their girls who have little to no reviews? Either people will just assume anyone not rated an 8 or better is a 1, and that anyone without reviews becomes an even bigger risk to TOFTT.
Originally Posted by SDPewPew
[View Original Post]
-
09-26-23 18:57 #5539Banned Member

Posts: 518Thai vs K agencies
Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.
Originally Posted by FreeWally
[View Original Post]
But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.
-
09-26-23 16:20 #5538Senior Member

Posts: 75Heard rumblings of this
A while back another member had alerted me of being careful what I post for this exact reason. Its a bit unfortunate, but I guess it kind of makes sense with how review based this hobby is. Its just like restaurants with Yelp. A restaurant's business is definitely make or break based on reviews, and yelp runs a racket based on that. We luckily have the free speech and have no fear of removal / fake metrics, so it makes sense that the bookers themselves would probably purge who they feel is disadvantageous to their business.
Originally Posted by SDPewPew
[View Original Post]
Not sure what the right solution is, but I suppose its just the unfortunate reality. I'm usually willing to TOFTT with girls with little to no reviews, but have definitely been burned before by that, so I understand the reluctance from other mongers to see a girl with little / no reviews.







Reply With Quote




